|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#141
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Dec 24, 7:42*pm, Nightcrawler wrote:
On 12/24/2009 8:32 PM, BradGuth wrote: At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not conditional. Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this case? Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper belt and scads of Oort zone Items hanging around? It is a bit queer how you keep claiming things that I never stated or intimated. Have you always invented crap to explain away your short comings? Your parents must have had a grand time with the mouse from Venus eating the last of the cookies argument, and then when you were chastised for blowing smoke up their ass you retorted with some gibberish about how they didn't believe in conception or live child birth and practiced reverse C-sections on the solstices. Are we having another bad ZNR day? Why can't you and others of your ZNR kind honestly deal with this topic? ~ BG |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Dec 21, 8:20*pm, "Yubiwan" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Dec 20, 11:04 pm, "Yubiwan" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message .... On Dec 20, 4:39 am, "Lomriy" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Dec 18, 8:38 pm, "Lomriy" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Dec 18, 7:23 am, "Lomriy" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Nov 13, 11:59 am, "Nightcrawler" wrote: "Double-A" wrote in ... Bradnever explains how the Alpha Centauri system, Barnard's Star, Wolf 359, and Lalande 21185, all closer to us than Sirius, fit into this supposedly gravitationally linked up system. It's called goofy fixation. Is this newsgroup actually alt.duh? Everything is in orbit around something, including the most rogue of stars trekking at 0.5c. *However, the original 12.5 Ms worth of the nearby Sirius star/solar system had all the right stuff, and especially when you consider what horrific mass its molecular cloud had to offer. ~ BG Y O U * W E R E * T H E R E ! tee hee -- **** Lomie Be well and come... be welcome You are the fifth star! Your 'sean' book of puns is noted. Can I speak with your supervisor? ~ BG That would be Aaross, my trainer. I don't even know where she is right now, so, sorry. Would you like me to get Kiyo? She's human, and she commands this system while Mom's sur une mission. -- **** Lomie Be well and come... be welcome You are the fifth star! Sure thing, why the hell not. *Put Kiyo on the line. ~ BG Uhm, Kiyo's a little busy right now. She IS commanding the Solar system right now, after all. I'm not sure what she meant when she told me, "I'll give him all the time he's worth." Hah! These ornamental oriental humans, they're such kidders, aren't they.. Well, HOPEFULLY SOMETIME before Christmas. 2187? Zat too sooon? tee hee -- **** Lomie Be well and come... be welcome You are the fifth star! Your usual Sean Rothschild policy of toying with us and otherwise jerking off is noted. So, getting back as pertaining to this topic of "Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable". *What part of those Newtonian laws of gravity and thus elliptical orbital mechanics don't you agree with? btw; *your satanic use of the 5th star is also noted. ~ BG You truly are special, aren't you? And you're doing all this just to chide us into giving you a ride in an extraterrestrial's rocket ship? -- Yubiwan PS. Lomie wishes you all well and asked me to say her goodbyes. She had to rush back to her training site. Get real. *You know that I'm already a devout believer in ETs, intelligent design and directed panspermia, as well as believing that some of these ETs having mastered extended space travels. *However, seans as ETs are not likely among those with actual space travel expertise, which doesn't mean that you weren't intentionally deployed on Earth as a caste of ET minions, spies, moles and brown-nosed clowns whenever needed. Your supposed trainers may in fact be such interplanetary and possibly even interstellar capable ETs, of which I'd very much like to interact with them as soon as possible. ~ BG But I thought you previously stated that you must not only take the word of others, but that word must be supported by the best evidence thoroughly reviewed and tested by the best available science. Did you not state that? And now you say that you are a "devout believer" in extraterrestrials? Frankly, I've seen no good, hard evidence that would support the existence of ETs. And there MOST CERTAINLY has been no evidence of ETs that has been successful at passing the rigorous tests of science. I know that we seans have always been careful enough. But yet, you are a "devout believer". It truly tickles me to hear what you think of seans. At any rate, you will have as much interaction as you like with us, our trainers, the humans of Earth's past that we rescued, anyone you like. Wait for it. -- Yubiwan Be well and come... be welcome! Perhaps there’s enough magnetic repulsion to resist our future elliptical encounter with Sirius, that which Sirius should by rights have an even stronger diamagnetospheric molecular cloud of its very own. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...bed69ef?hl=en# “Voyagers discover that Solar System is passing through a magnetized gas cloud” "Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*," says Opher. "This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure required to resist destruction."" http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ec_voyager.htm So, where's all the warm and fuzzy Usenet/newsgroup expertise on this one? ~ BG |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Dec 24, 6:58*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 24, 11:35*am, Nightcrawler wrote: On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote: Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is noted. Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept reality is noted. At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not conditional, politically correct nor faith-based approved. Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this case? Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper belt and TNO asteroids, plus scads of Oort zone Items hanging around (including Sedna and at least a few thousand others)? Tell us how we're supposedly not the least bit tidal associated with Sirius. Do you have some new and improved formula for gravity? Perhaps there’s enough magnetic repulsion to resist our future elliptical encounter with Sirius, that which Sirius should by rights have an even stronger diamagnetospheric molecular cloud of its very own. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...bed69ef?hl=en# “Voyagers discover that Solar System is passing through a magnetized gas cloud” "Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*," says Opher. "This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure required to resist destruction."" http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ec_voyager.htm So, where's all the warm and fuzzy Usenet/newsgroup expertise on this one? ~ BG |
#144
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
The magnetic cloud is what is leftover from the noxious cloud we dispersed
some time back. The cloud was rendered harmless to this system, however its magnetic field along with other harmless content were allowed to remain. -- S e m m a Be well and come... be welcome! "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Dec 21, 8:20 pm, "Yubiwan" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Dec 20, 11:04 pm, "Yubiwan" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Dec 20, 4:39 am, "Lomriy" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Dec 18, 8:38 pm, "Lomriy" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Dec 18, 7:23 am, "Lomriy" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Nov 13, 11:59 am, "Nightcrawler" wrote: "Double-A" wrote in ... Bradnever explains how the Alpha Centauri system, Barnard's Star, Wolf 359, and Lalande 21185, all closer to us than Sirius, fit into this supposedly gravitationally linked up system. It's called goofy fixation. Is this newsgroup actually alt.duh? Everything is in orbit around something, including the most rogue of stars trekking at 0.5c. However, the original 12.5 Ms worth of the nearby Sirius star/solar system had all the right stuff, and especially when you consider what horrific mass its molecular cloud had to offer. ~ BG Y O U W E R E T H E R E ! tee hee -- **** Lomie Be well and come... be welcome You are the fifth star! Your 'sean' book of puns is noted. Can I speak with your supervisor? ~ BG That would be Aaross, my trainer. I don't even know where she is right now, so, sorry. Would you like me to get Kiyo? She's human, and she commands this system while Mom's sur une mission. -- **** Lomie Be well and come... be welcome You are the fifth star! Sure thing, why the hell not. Put Kiyo on the line. ~ BG Uhm, Kiyo's a little busy right now. She IS commanding the Solar system right now, after all. I'm not sure what she meant when she told me, "I'll give him all the time he's worth." Hah! These ornamental oriental humans, they're such kidders, aren't they. Well, HOPEFULLY SOMETIME before Christmas. 2187? Zat too sooon? tee hee -- **** Lomie Be well and come... be welcome You are the fifth star! Your usual Sean Rothschild policy of toying with us and otherwise jerking off is noted. So, getting back as pertaining to this topic of "Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable". What part of those Newtonian laws of gravity and thus elliptical orbital mechanics don't you agree with? btw; your satanic use of the 5th star is also noted. ~ BG You truly are special, aren't you? And you're doing all this just to chide us into giving you a ride in an extraterrestrial's rocket ship? -- Yubiwan PS. Lomie wishes you all well and asked me to say her goodbyes. She had to rush back to her training site. Get real. You know that I'm already a devout believer in ETs, intelligent design and directed panspermia, as well as believing that some of these ETs having mastered extended space travels. However, seans as ETs are not likely among those with actual space travel expertise, which doesn't mean that you weren't intentionally deployed on Earth as a caste of ET minions, spies, moles and brown-nosed clowns whenever needed. Your supposed trainers may in fact be such interplanetary and possibly even interstellar capable ETs, of which I'd very much like to interact with them as soon as possible. ~ BG But I thought you previously stated that you must not only take the word of others, but that word must be supported by the best evidence thoroughly reviewed and tested by the best available science. Did you not state that? And now you say that you are a "devout believer" in extraterrestrials? Frankly, I've seen no good, hard evidence that would support the existence of ETs. And there MOST CERTAINLY has been no evidence of ETs that has been successful at passing the rigorous tests of science. I know that we seans have always been careful enough. But yet, you are a "devout believer". It truly tickles me to hear what you think of seans. At any rate, you will have as much interaction as you like with us, our trainers, the humans of Earth's past that we rescued, anyone you like. Wait for it. -- Yubiwan Be well and come... be welcome! Perhaps there’s enough magnetic repulsion to resist our future elliptical encounter with Sirius, that which Sirius should by rights have an even stronger diamagnetospheric molecular cloud of its very own. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...bed69ef?hl=en# “Voyagers discover that Solar System is passing through a magnetized gas cloud” "Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*," says Opher. "This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure required to resist destruction."" http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ec_voyager.htm So, where's all the warm and fuzzy Usenet/newsgroup expertise on this one? ~ BG |
#145
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Dec 27, 12:56*pm, Double-A wrote:
On Dec 27, 12:30*pm, BradGuth wrote: (out to lunch?) Yes, you are! Double-A Good grief, you’ve become another one of the ZNR bad guys. With that original molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms which produced the vibrant Sirius star/solar system so nearby, besides its tidal radii taking the dominate role, perhaps it's a wonder that our solar system ever managed to survived without a scratch, much less shortly after Sirius(B) went nova. On Sep 22, 9:04 am, Sam Wormley wrote: Magnetized Gas Points to New Physics By Adrian Cho ScienceNOW Daily News 18 September 2009 “It would be tough to stick it to your refrigerator, but an ultra- cold gas magnetizes itself just as do metals such as iron or nickel, a team of atomic physicists reports. That cool trick shows that the messy physics within solids can be modeled with pristine gases, the researchers say. But others are skeptical that the team has actually seen what they claim.” Perhaps there’s enough stellar magnetic repulsion to resist our future elliptical encounter with Sirius, that which Sirius should by rights have an even stronger diamagnetospheric molecular cloud or “Local Fluff” of its very own. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...bed69ef?hl=en# “Voyagers discover that Solar System is passing through a magnetized gas cloud” "Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*," says Opher. "This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure required to resist destruction."" http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ec_voyager.htm ““Astronomers call the cloud we're running into now the Local Interstellar Cloud or "Local Fluff" for short. It's about 30 light years wide and contains a wispy mixture of hydrogen and helium atoms at a temperature of 6000 C.”” So, where's all the warm and fuzzy Usenet/newsgroup expertise (including our sean and Darla feedback) on this one? (out to lunch?) ~ BG |
#146
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Dec 24, 6:58*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 24, 11:35*am, Nightcrawler wrote: On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote: Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is noted. Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept reality is noted. At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not conditional, politically correct nor faith-based approved. Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this case? Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper belt and TNO asteroids, plus scads of Oort zone Items hanging around (including Sedna and at least a few thousand others)? Tell us how we're supposedly not the least bit tidal associated with Sirius. Do you have some new and improved formula for gravity? With that original molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms which arrived (possibly from a galactic merger) and produced the vibrant Sirius star/ solar system so nearby, besides its extended tidal radii taking the dominant role, it's a wonder or perhaps a true miracle that our passive little solar system ever managed to survive without a scratch, much less shortly after Sirius(B) went nova (or was it initially Sirius C and then B?). On Sep 22, 9:04 am, Sam Wormley wrote: Magnetized Gas Points to New Physics By Adrian Cho ScienceNOW Daily News / 18 September 2009 “It would be tough to stick it to your refrigerator, but an ultra- cold gas magnetizes itself just as do metals such as iron or nickel, a team of atomic physicists reports. That cool trick shows that the messy physics within solids can be modeled with pristine gases, the researchers say. But others are skeptical that the team has actually seen what they claim.” Perhaps there’s enough stellar magnetic repulsion to resist our future elliptical encounter with Sirius, that which Sirius should by rights have an even stronger diamagnetospheric molecular cloud or “Local Fluff” of its very own. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...bed69ef?hl=en# “Voyagers discover that Solar System is passing through a magnetized gas cloud” "Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*," says Opher. "This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure required to resist destruction."" http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ec_voyager.htm ““Astronomers call the cloud we're running into now the Local Interstellar Cloud or "Local Fluff" for short. It's about 30 light years wide and contains a wispy mixture of hydrogen and helium atoms at a temperature of 6000 C.”” “The discovery has implications for the future when the solar system will eventually bump into other, similar clouds in our arm of the Milky Way galaxy.” So, where's all the warm and fuzzy Usenet/newsgroup expertise (including our “sean” and Darla feedback) on this one? (out to lunch?) ~ BG |
#147
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Dec 27, 6:50*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 24, 6:58*pm, BradGuth wrote: On Dec 24, 11:35*am, Nightcrawler wrote: On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote: Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is noted.. Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept reality is noted. At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not conditional, politically correct nor faith-based approved. Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this case? Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper belt and TNO asteroids, plus scads of Oort zone Items hanging around (including Sedna and at least a few thousand others)? Tell us how we're supposedly not the least bit tidal associated with Sirius. Do you have some new and improved formula for gravity? With that original molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms which arrived (possibly from a galactic merger) and produced the vibrant Sirius star/ solar system so nearby, besides its extended tidal radii taking the dominant role, it's a wonder or perhaps a true miracle that our passive little solar system ever managed to survive without a scratch, much less shortly after Sirius(B) went nova (or was it initially Sirius C and then B?). On Sep 22, 9:04 am, Sam Wormley wrote: *Magnetized Gas Points to New Physics By Adrian Cho ScienceNOW Daily News / 18 September 2009 *“It would be tough to stick it to your refrigerator, but an ultra- cold gas magnetizes itself just as do metals such as iron or nickel, a team of atomic physicists reports. That cool trick shows that the messy physics within solids can be modeled with pristine gases, the researchers say. But others are skeptical that the team has actually seen what they claim.” Perhaps there’s enough stellar magnetic repulsion to resist our future elliptical encounter with Sirius, that which Sirius should by rights have an even stronger diamagnetospheric molecular cloud or “Local Fluff” of its very own. *http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...ead/171d72880b.... *“Voyagers discover that Solar System is passing through a magnetized gas cloud” *"Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*," says Opher. "This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure required to resist destruction."" *http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ec_voyager.htm *““Astronomers call the cloud we're running into now the Local Interstellar Cloud or "Local Fluff" for short. It's about 30 light years wide and contains a wispy mixture of hydrogen and helium atoms at a temperature of 6000 C.”” “The discovery has implications for the future when the solar system will eventually bump into other, similar clouds in our arm of the Milky Way galaxy.” So, where's all the warm and fuzzy Usenet/newsgroup expertise (including our “sean” and Darla feedback) on this one? (out to lunch?) ~ BG |
#148
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Dec 27, 6:50 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Dec 24, 6:58 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Dec 24, 11:35 am, Nightcrawler wrote: On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote: Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is noted. Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept reality is noted. At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not conditional, politically correct nor faith-based approved. Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this case? Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper belt and TNO asteroids, plus scads of Oort zone Items hanging around (including Sedna and at least a few thousand others)? Tell us how we're supposedly not the least bit tidal associated with Sirius. Do you have some new and improved formula for gravity? With that original molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms which arrived (possibly from a galactic merger) and produced the vibrant Sirius star/ solar system so nearby, besides its extended tidal radii taking the dominant role, it's a wonder or perhaps a true miracle that our passive little solar system ever managed to survive without a scratch, much less shortly after Sirius(B) went nova (or was it initially Sirius C and then B?). On Sep 22, 9:04 am, Sam Wormley wrote: Magnetized Gas Points to New Physics By Adrian Cho ScienceNOW Daily News / 18 September 2009 “It would be tough to stick it to your refrigerator, but an ultra- cold gas magnetizes itself just as do metals such as iron or nickel, a team of atomic physicists reports. That cool trick shows that the messy physics within solids can be modeled with pristine gases, the researchers say. But others are skeptical that the team has actually seen what they claim.” Perhaps there’s enough stellar magnetic repulsion to resist our future elliptical encounter with Sirius, that which Sirius should by rights have an even stronger diamagnetospheric molecular cloud or “Local Fluff” of its very own. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...ead/171d72880b... “Voyagers discover that Solar System is passing through a magnetized gas cloud” "Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*," says Opher. "This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure required to resist destruction."" http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ec_voyager.htm ““Astronomers call the cloud we're running into now the Local Interstellar Cloud or "Local Fluff" for short. It's about 30 light years wide and contains a wispy mixture of hydrogen and helium atoms at a temperature of 6000 C.”” “The discovery has implications for the future when the solar system will eventually bump into other, similar clouds in our arm of the Milky Way galaxy.” So, where's all the warm and fuzzy Usenet/newsgroup expertise (including our “sean” and Darla feedback) on this one? (out to lunch?) ~ BG Yeah, well, lunch is important, isn't it. -- S e m m a Be well and come... be welcome! |
#149
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Dec 29, 4:32*am, "Semmalon" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Dec 27, 6:50 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Dec 24, 6:58 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Dec 24, 11:35 am, Nightcrawler wrote: On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote: Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is noted. Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept reality is noted. At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not conditional, politically correct nor faith-based approved. Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this case? Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper belt and TNO asteroids, plus scads of Oort zone Items hanging around (including Sedna and at least a few thousand others)? Tell us how we're supposedly not the least bit tidal associated with Sirius. Do you have some new and improved formula for gravity? With that original molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms which arrived (possibly from a galactic merger) and produced the vibrant Sirius star/ solar system so nearby, besides its extended tidal radii taking the dominant role, it's a wonder or perhaps a true miracle that our passive little solar system ever managed to survive without a scratch, much less shortly after Sirius(B) went nova (or was it initially Sirius C and then B?). On Sep 22, 9:04 am, Sam Wormley wrote: *Magnetized Gas Points to New Physics By Adrian Cho ScienceNOW Daily News / 18 September 2009 *“It would be tough to stick it to your refrigerator, but an ultra- cold gas magnetizes itself just as do metals such as iron or nickel, a team of atomic physicists reports. That cool trick shows that the messy physics within solids can be modeled with pristine gases, the researchers say. But others are skeptical that the team has actually seen what they claim.” Perhaps there’s enough stellar magnetic repulsion to resist our future elliptical encounter with Sirius, that which Sirius should by rights have an even stronger diamagnetospheric molecular cloud or “Local Fluff” of its very own. *http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...ead/171d72880b... *“Voyagers discover that Solar System is passing through a magnetized gas cloud” *"Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*," says Opher. "This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure required to resist destruction."" *http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ec_voyager.htm *““Astronomers call the cloud we're running into now the Local Interstellar Cloud or "Local Fluff" for short. It's about 30 light years wide and contains a wispy mixture of hydrogen and helium atoms at a temperature of 6000 C.”” “The discovery has implications for the future when the solar system will eventually bump into other, similar clouds in our arm of the Milky Way galaxy.” So, where's all the warm and fuzzy Usenet/newsgroup expertise (including our “sean” and Darla feedback) on this one? (out to lunch?) ~ BG Yeah, well, lunch is important, isn't it. -- S e m m a Be well and come... be welcome! Your systematic obfuscation on behalf of anything which might for the greater good revise history or alter the future is noted. Tell us again why those of your aloof kind are not allowed to use or share any form of observationology (aka photographs, digital imaging or any form of deductive image and scientific interpreting that involves photons). You do realize that all of your text in these Usenet/newsgroups is purely digital graphic (not analogue). Besides your selectively ignoring the Newtonian laws of gravity that has our solar system associated with the Sirius star/solar system, do seans also not believe in radar or in any other kinds of secondary/ recoil imaging? Why is this diamagnetic cosmic fluff (protective interstellar diamagnetosphere) so taboo/nondisclosure rated with those of your kind? ~ BG |
#150
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Dec 29, 4:32 am, "Semmalon" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Dec 27, 6:50 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Dec 24, 6:58 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Dec 24, 11:35 am, Nightcrawler wrote: On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote: Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is noted. Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept reality is noted. At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not conditional, politically correct nor faith-based approved. Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this case? Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper belt and TNO asteroids, plus scads of Oort zone Items hanging around (including Sedna and at least a few thousand others)? Tell us how we're supposedly not the least bit tidal associated with Sirius. Do you have some new and improved formula for gravity? With that original molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms which arrived (possibly from a galactic merger) and produced the vibrant Sirius star/ solar system so nearby, besides its extended tidal radii taking the dominant role, it's a wonder or perhaps a true miracle that our passive little solar system ever managed to survive without a scratch, much less shortly after Sirius(B) went nova (or was it initially Sirius C and then B?). On Sep 22, 9:04 am, Sam Wormley wrote: Magnetized Gas Points to New Physics By Adrian Cho ScienceNOW Daily News / 18 September 2009 “It would be tough to stick it to your refrigerator, but an ultra- cold gas magnetizes itself just as do metals such as iron or nickel, a team of atomic physicists reports. That cool trick shows that the messy physics within solids can be modeled with pristine gases, the researchers say. But others are skeptical that the team has actually seen what they claim.” Perhaps there’s enough stellar magnetic repulsion to resist our future elliptical encounter with Sirius, that which Sirius should by rights have an even stronger diamagnetospheric molecular cloud or “Local Fluff” of its very own. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...ead/171d72880b... “Voyagers discover that Solar System is passing through a magnetized gas cloud” "Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*," says Opher. "This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure required to resist destruction."" http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ec_voyager.htm ““Astronomers call the cloud we're running into now the Local Interstellar Cloud or "Local Fluff" for short. It's about 30 light years wide and contains a wispy mixture of hydrogen and helium atoms at a temperature of 6000 C.”” “The discovery has implications for the future when the solar system will eventually bump into other, similar clouds in our arm of the Milky Way galaxy.” So, where's all the warm and fuzzy Usenet/newsgroup expertise (including our “sean” and Darla feedback) on this one? (out to lunch?) ~ BG Yeah, well, lunch is important, isn't it. -- S e m m a Be well and come... be welcome! Your systematic obfuscation on behalf of anything which might for the greater good revise history or alter the future is noted. You're velcome! Tell us again why those of your aloof kind are not allowed to use or share any form of observationology (aka photographs, digital imaging or any form of deductive image and scientific interpreting that involves photons). Aloof? Yeah, that's me, all right. I'm so aloof, you'll usually find me in the basement shelling peas. So, you want to hear again why if we give you any kind of evidence of our presence it will mean official contact? Okay, Jinglebells, there it is. Unlike you, we're not used to having to repeat ourselves all the time. So I hope it sinks in this time. Did it sink in? You do realize that all of your text in these Usenet/newsgroups is purely digital graphic (not analogue). Digital, schmigital. You got any analogs of your girlfriend in nothing but Victoria Secret? No? You want to buy some? Besides your selectively ignoring the Newtonian laws of gravity that has our solar system associated with the Sirius star/solar system, do seans also not believe in radar or in any other kinds of secondary/ recoil imaging? Hate to have to remind you, but Newton's been fired. Einstein's the top banana these days. Try to keep up. Why is this diamagnetic cosmic fluff (protective interstellar diamagnetosphere) so taboo/nondisclosure rated with those of your kind? ~ BG Maybe because it gives me hives? In places I don't want to talk about. Let's not go there, okay? Sheez, I'd rather ride down a razor-sharp banister and land on my ass in hot coals than talk about dia... dia..., vhat the hell is dat, anyvay? So, what do you want to know? Don't be shy. Shoot. -- S e m m a Be well and come... be welcome! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Brad Guth is...... | OM | History | 0 | December 27th 03 12:34 AM |