A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » UK Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #141  
Old December 25th 09, 04:12 PM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.space.policy,alt.journalism,alt.news-media,uk.sci.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth

On Dec 24, 7:42*pm, Nightcrawler wrote:
On 12/24/2009 8:32 PM, BradGuth wrote:

At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not
conditional.


Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this
case?


Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper
belt and scads of Oort zone Items hanging around?


It is a bit queer how you keep claiming things that I never stated or
intimated.

Have you always invented crap to explain away your short comings?
Your parents must have had a grand time with the mouse from Venus
eating the last of the cookies argument, and then when you were
chastised for blowing smoke up their ass you retorted with some
gibberish about how they didn't believe in conception or live
child birth and practiced reverse C-sections on the solstices.


Are we having another bad ZNR day?

Why can't you and others of your ZNR kind honestly deal with this
topic?

~ BG
  #142  
Old December 27th 09, 04:01 AM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.space.policy,alt.journalism,alt.news-media,uk.sci.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth

On Dec 21, 8:20*pm, "Yubiwan" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...



On Dec 20, 11:04 pm, "Yubiwan" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message


....


On Dec 20, 4:39 am, "Lomriy" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message


...


On Dec 18, 8:38 pm, "Lomriy" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message


...


On Dec 18, 7:23 am, "Lomriy" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message


...


On Nov 13, 11:59 am, "Nightcrawler"
wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in
...
Bradnever explains how the Alpha Centauri system, Barnard's
Star,
Wolf 359, and Lalande 21185, all closer to us than Sirius,
fit
into
this supposedly gravitationally linked up system.


It's called goofy fixation.


Is this newsgroup actually alt.duh?


Everything is in orbit around something, including the most
rogue
of
stars trekking at 0.5c. *However, the original 12.5 Ms worth
of
the
nearby Sirius star/solar system had all the right stuff, and
especially when you consider what horrific mass its molecular
cloud
had to offer.


~ BG


Y O U * W E R E * T H E R E ! tee hee


--
**** Lomie
Be well and come... be welcome
You are the fifth star!


Your 'sean' book of puns is noted.


Can I speak with your supervisor?


~ BG


That would be Aaross, my trainer.
I don't even know where she is right now, so, sorry.


Would you like me to get Kiyo?
She's human, and she commands this system while Mom's sur une
mission.


--
**** Lomie
Be well and come... be welcome
You are the fifth star!


Sure thing, why the hell not. *Put Kiyo on the line.


~ BG


Uhm, Kiyo's a little busy right now.
She IS commanding the Solar system right now, after all.
I'm not sure what she meant when she told me, "I'll give him all the
time
he's worth."
Hah!
These ornamental oriental humans, they're such kidders, aren't they..


Well, HOPEFULLY SOMETIME before Christmas.


2187?


Zat too sooon? tee hee


--
**** Lomie
Be well and come... be welcome
You are the fifth star!


Your usual Sean Rothschild policy of toying with us and otherwise
jerking off is noted.


So, getting back as pertaining to this topic of "Sirius and us,
Newtonian inseparable". *What part of those Newtonian laws of gravity
and thus elliptical orbital mechanics don't you agree with?


btw; *your satanic use of the 5th star is also noted.


~ BG


You truly are special, aren't you?
And you're doing all this just to chide us into giving you a ride in an
extraterrestrial's rocket ship?


--
Yubiwan
PS. Lomie wishes you all well and asked
me to say her goodbyes. She had to rush
back to her training site.


Get real. *You know that I'm already a devout believer in ETs,
intelligent design and directed panspermia, as well as believing that
some of these ETs having mastered extended space travels. *However,
seans as ETs are not likely among those with actual space travel
expertise, which doesn't mean that you weren't intentionally deployed
on Earth as a caste of ET minions, spies, moles and brown-nosed clowns
whenever needed.


Your supposed trainers may in fact be such interplanetary and possibly
even interstellar capable ETs, of which I'd very much like to interact
with them as soon as possible.


~ BG


But I thought you previously stated that you must not only take the word of
others, but that word must be supported by the best evidence thoroughly
reviewed and tested by the best available science.
Did you not state that?

And now you say that you are a "devout believer" in extraterrestrials?
Frankly, I've seen no good, hard evidence that would support the existence
of ETs.
And there MOST CERTAINLY has been no evidence of ETs that has been
successful at passing the rigorous tests of science.
I know that we seans have always been careful enough.
But yet, you are a "devout believer".

It truly tickles me to hear what you think of seans.
At any rate, you will have as much interaction as you like with us, our
trainers, the humans of Earth's past that we rescued, anyone you like.
Wait for it.

--
Yubiwan
Be well and come... be welcome!


Perhaps there’s enough magnetic repulsion to resist our future
elliptical encounter with Sirius, that which Sirius should by rights
have an even stronger diamagnetospheric molecular cloud of its very
own.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...bed69ef?hl=en#
“Voyagers discover that Solar System is passing through a magnetized
gas cloud”

"Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized
than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*,"
says Opher. "This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure
required to resist destruction.""
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ec_voyager.htm

So, where's all the warm and fuzzy Usenet/newsgroup expertise on this
one?

~ BG
  #143  
Old December 27th 09, 04:02 AM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.space.policy,alt.journalism,alt.news-media,uk.sci.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth

On Dec 24, 6:58*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 24, 11:35*am, Nightcrawler wrote:

On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote:


Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is noted.


Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept
reality is noted.


At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not
conditional, politically correct nor faith-based approved.

Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this
case?

Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper
belt and TNO asteroids, plus scads of Oort zone Items hanging around
(including Sedna and at least a few thousand others)?

Tell us how we're supposedly not the least bit tidal associated with
Sirius.

Do you have some new and improved formula for gravity?


Perhaps there’s enough magnetic repulsion to resist our future
elliptical encounter with Sirius, that which Sirius should by rights
have an even stronger diamagnetospheric molecular cloud of its very
own.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...bed69ef?hl=en#
“Voyagers discover that Solar System is passing through a magnetized
gas cloud”

"Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized
than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*,"
says Opher. "This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure
required to resist destruction.""
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ec_voyager.htm

So, where's all the warm and fuzzy Usenet/newsgroup expertise on this
one?

~ BG
  #144  
Old December 27th 09, 08:50 AM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.space.policy,alt.journalism,alt.news-media,uk.sci.astronomy
Semmalon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 92
Default Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth

The magnetic cloud is what is leftover from the noxious cloud we dispersed
some time back.
The cloud was rendered harmless to this system, however its magnetic field
along with other harmless content were allowed to remain.

--
S e m m a
Be well and come... be welcome!

"BradGuth" wrote in message
...
On Dec 21, 8:20 pm, "Yubiwan" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...



On Dec 20, 11:04 pm, "Yubiwan" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message


...


On Dec 20, 4:39 am, "Lomriy" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message


...


On Dec 18, 8:38 pm, "Lomriy" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message


...


On Dec 18, 7:23 am, "Lomriy" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message


...


On Nov 13, 11:59 am, "Nightcrawler"

wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in
...
Bradnever explains how the Alpha Centauri system,
Barnard's
Star,
Wolf 359, and Lalande 21185, all closer to us than
Sirius,
fit
into
this supposedly gravitationally linked up system.


It's called goofy fixation.


Is this newsgroup actually alt.duh?


Everything is in orbit around something, including the most
rogue
of
stars trekking at 0.5c. However, the original 12.5 Ms
worth
of
the
nearby Sirius star/solar system had all the right stuff,
and
especially when you consider what horrific mass its
molecular
cloud
had to offer.


~ BG


Y O U W E R E T H E R E ! tee hee


--
**** Lomie
Be well and come... be welcome
You are the fifth star!


Your 'sean' book of puns is noted.


Can I speak with your supervisor?


~ BG


That would be Aaross, my trainer.
I don't even know where she is right now, so, sorry.


Would you like me to get Kiyo?
She's human, and she commands this system while Mom's sur une
mission.


--
**** Lomie
Be well and come... be welcome
You are the fifth star!


Sure thing, why the hell not. Put Kiyo on the line.


~ BG


Uhm, Kiyo's a little busy right now.
She IS commanding the Solar system right now, after all.
I'm not sure what she meant when she told me, "I'll give him all
the
time
he's worth."
Hah!
These ornamental oriental humans, they're such kidders, aren't
they.


Well, HOPEFULLY SOMETIME before Christmas.


2187?


Zat too sooon? tee hee


--
**** Lomie
Be well and come... be welcome
You are the fifth star!


Your usual Sean Rothschild policy of toying with us and otherwise
jerking off is noted.


So, getting back as pertaining to this topic of "Sirius and us,
Newtonian inseparable". What part of those Newtonian laws of
gravity
and thus elliptical orbital mechanics don't you agree with?


btw; your satanic use of the 5th star is also noted.


~ BG


You truly are special, aren't you?
And you're doing all this just to chide us into giving you a ride in
an
extraterrestrial's rocket ship?


--
Yubiwan
PS. Lomie wishes you all well and asked
me to say her goodbyes. She had to rush
back to her training site.


Get real. You know that I'm already a devout believer in ETs,
intelligent design and directed panspermia, as well as believing that
some of these ETs having mastered extended space travels. However,
seans as ETs are not likely among those with actual space travel
expertise, which doesn't mean that you weren't intentionally deployed
on Earth as a caste of ET minions, spies, moles and brown-nosed clowns
whenever needed.


Your supposed trainers may in fact be such interplanetary and possibly
even interstellar capable ETs, of which I'd very much like to interact
with them as soon as possible.


~ BG


But I thought you previously stated that you must not only take the word
of
others, but that word must be supported by the best evidence thoroughly
reviewed and tested by the best available science.
Did you not state that?

And now you say that you are a "devout believer" in extraterrestrials?
Frankly, I've seen no good, hard evidence that would support the
existence
of ETs.
And there MOST CERTAINLY has been no evidence of ETs that has been
successful at passing the rigorous tests of science.
I know that we seans have always been careful enough.
But yet, you are a "devout believer".

It truly tickles me to hear what you think of seans.
At any rate, you will have as much interaction as you like with us, our
trainers, the humans of Earth's past that we rescued, anyone you like.
Wait for it.

--
Yubiwan
Be well and come... be welcome!


Perhaps there’s enough magnetic repulsion to resist our future
elliptical encounter with Sirius, that which Sirius should by rights
have an even stronger diamagnetospheric molecular cloud of its very
own.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...bed69ef?hl=en#
“Voyagers discover that Solar System is passing through a magnetized
gas cloud”

"Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized
than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*,"
says Opher. "This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure
required to resist destruction.""
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ec_voyager.htm

So, where's all the warm and fuzzy Usenet/newsgroup expertise on this
one?

~ BG



  #145  
Old December 27th 09, 10:39 PM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.space.policy,alt.journalism,alt.news-media,uk.sci.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth

On Dec 27, 12:56*pm, Double-A wrote:
On Dec 27, 12:30*pm, BradGuth wrote:


(out to lunch?)


Yes, you are!

Double-A


Good grief, you’ve become another one of the ZNR bad guys.

With that original molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms which produced the
vibrant Sirius star/solar system so nearby, besides its tidal radii
taking the dominate role, perhaps it's a wonder that our solar system
ever managed to survived without a scratch, much less shortly after
Sirius(B) went nova.

On Sep 22, 9:04 am, Sam Wormley wrote:
Magnetized Gas Points to New Physics
By Adrian Cho
ScienceNOW Daily News
18 September 2009
“It would be tough to stick it to your refrigerator, but an ultra-
cold gas magnetizes
itself just as do metals such as iron or nickel, a team of atomic
physicists reports. That
cool trick shows that the messy physics within solids can be modeled
with pristine gases,
the researchers say. But others are skeptical that the team has
actually seen what they claim.”

Perhaps there’s enough stellar magnetic repulsion to resist our future
elliptical encounter with Sirius, that which Sirius should by rights
have an even stronger diamagnetospheric molecular cloud or “Local
Fluff” of its very own.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...bed69ef?hl=en#
“Voyagers discover that Solar System is passing through a magnetized
gas cloud”

"Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized
than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*,"
says Opher. "This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure
required to resist destruction.""
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ec_voyager.htm
““Astronomers call the cloud we're running into now the Local
Interstellar Cloud or "Local Fluff" for short. It's about 30 light
years wide and contains a wispy mixture of hydrogen and helium atoms
at a temperature of 6000 C.””

So, where's all the warm and fuzzy Usenet/newsgroup expertise
(including our sean and Darla feedback) on this one? (out to lunch?)

~ BG
  #146  
Old December 28th 09, 03:50 AM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.space.policy,alt.journalism,alt.news-media,uk.sci.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth

On Dec 24, 6:58*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 24, 11:35*am, Nightcrawler wrote:

On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote:


Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is noted.


Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept
reality is noted.


At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not
conditional, politically correct nor faith-based approved.

Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this
case?

Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper
belt and TNO asteroids, plus scads of Oort zone Items hanging around
(including Sedna and at least a few thousand others)?

Tell us how we're supposedly not the least bit tidal associated with
Sirius.

Do you have some new and improved formula for gravity?


With that original molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms which arrived
(possibly from a galactic merger) and produced the vibrant Sirius star/
solar system so nearby, besides its extended tidal radii taking the
dominant role, it's a wonder or perhaps a true miracle that our
passive little solar system ever managed to survive without a scratch,
much less shortly after Sirius(B) went nova (or was it initially
Sirius C and then B?).

On Sep 22, 9:04 am, Sam Wormley wrote:
Magnetized Gas Points to New Physics
By Adrian Cho
ScienceNOW Daily News / 18 September 2009
“It would be tough to stick it to your refrigerator, but an ultra-
cold gas magnetizes
itself just as do metals such as iron or nickel, a team of atomic
physicists reports. That
cool trick shows that the messy physics within solids can be modeled
with pristine gases,
the researchers say. But others are skeptical that the team has
actually seen what they claim.”

Perhaps there’s enough stellar magnetic repulsion to resist our future
elliptical encounter with Sirius, that which Sirius should by rights
have an even stronger diamagnetospheric molecular cloud or “Local
Fluff” of its very own.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...bed69ef?hl=en#
“Voyagers discover that Solar System is passing through a magnetized
gas cloud”

"Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized
than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*,"
says Opher. "This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure
required to resist destruction.""
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ec_voyager.htm
““Astronomers call the cloud we're running into now the Local
Interstellar Cloud or "Local Fluff" for short. It's about 30 light
years wide and contains a wispy mixture of hydrogen and helium atoms
at a temperature of 6000 C.””

“The discovery has implications for the future when the solar system
will eventually bump into other, similar clouds in our arm of the
Milky Way galaxy.”

So, where's all the warm and fuzzy Usenet/newsgroup expertise
(including our “sean” and Darla feedback) on this one? (out to lunch?)

~ BG
  #147  
Old December 29th 09, 03:11 AM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.space.policy,alt.journalism,alt.news-media,uk.sci.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth

On Dec 27, 6:50*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 24, 6:58*pm, BradGuth wrote:


On Dec 24, 11:35*am, Nightcrawler wrote:


On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote:


Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is noted..


Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept
reality is noted.


At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not
conditional, politically correct nor faith-based approved.


Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this
case?


Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper
belt and TNO asteroids, plus scads of Oort zone Items hanging around
(including Sedna and at least a few thousand others)?


Tell us how we're supposedly not the least bit tidal associated with
Sirius.


Do you have some new and improved formula for gravity?


With that original molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms which arrived
(possibly from a galactic merger) and produced the vibrant Sirius star/
solar system so nearby, besides its extended tidal radii taking the
dominant role, it's a wonder or perhaps a true miracle that our
passive little solar system ever managed to survive without a scratch,
much less shortly after Sirius(B) went nova (or was it initially
Sirius C and then B?).

On Sep 22, 9:04 am, Sam Wormley wrote:
*Magnetized Gas Points to New Physics
By Adrian Cho
ScienceNOW Daily News / 18 September 2009
*“It would be tough to stick it to your refrigerator, but an ultra-
cold gas magnetizes
itself just as do metals such as iron or nickel, a team of atomic
physicists reports. That
cool trick shows that the messy physics within solids can be modeled
with pristine gases,
the researchers say. But others are skeptical that the team has
actually seen what they claim.”

Perhaps there’s enough stellar magnetic repulsion to resist our future
elliptical encounter with Sirius, that which Sirius should by rights
have an even stronger diamagnetospheric molecular cloud or “Local
Fluff” of its very own.
*http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...ead/171d72880b....
*“Voyagers discover that Solar System is passing through a magnetized
gas cloud”

*"Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized
than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*,"
says Opher. "This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure
required to resist destruction.""
*http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ec_voyager.htm
*““Astronomers call the cloud we're running into now the Local
Interstellar Cloud or "Local Fluff" for short. It's about 30 light
years wide and contains a wispy mixture of hydrogen and helium atoms
at a temperature of 6000 C.””

“The discovery has implications for the future when the solar system
will eventually bump into other, similar clouds in our arm of the
Milky Way galaxy.”


So, where's all the warm and fuzzy Usenet/newsgroup expertise
(including our “sean” and Darla feedback) on this one? (out to lunch?)

~ BG
  #148  
Old December 29th 09, 01:32 PM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.space.policy,alt.journalism,alt.news-media,uk.sci.astronomy
Semmalon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 92
Default Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth


"BradGuth" wrote in message
...
On Dec 27, 6:50 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 24, 6:58 pm, BradGuth wrote:


On Dec 24, 11:35 am, Nightcrawler wrote:


On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote:


Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is
noted.


Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept
reality is noted.


At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not
conditional, politically correct nor faith-based approved.


Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this
case?


Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper
belt and TNO asteroids, plus scads of Oort zone Items hanging around
(including Sedna and at least a few thousand others)?


Tell us how we're supposedly not the least bit tidal associated with
Sirius.


Do you have some new and improved formula for gravity?


With that original molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms which arrived
(possibly from a galactic merger) and produced the vibrant Sirius star/
solar system so nearby, besides its extended tidal radii taking the
dominant role, it's a wonder or perhaps a true miracle that our
passive little solar system ever managed to survive without a scratch,
much less shortly after Sirius(B) went nova (or was it initially
Sirius C and then B?).

On Sep 22, 9:04 am, Sam Wormley wrote:
Magnetized Gas Points to New Physics
By Adrian Cho
ScienceNOW Daily News / 18 September 2009
“It would be tough to stick it to your refrigerator, but an ultra-
cold gas magnetizes
itself just as do metals such as iron or nickel, a team of atomic
physicists reports. That
cool trick shows that the messy physics within solids can be modeled
with pristine gases,
the researchers say. But others are skeptical that the team has
actually seen what they claim.”

Perhaps there’s enough stellar magnetic repulsion to resist our future
elliptical encounter with Sirius, that which Sirius should by rights
have an even stronger diamagnetospheric molecular cloud or “Local
Fluff” of its very own.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...ead/171d72880b...
“Voyagers discover that Solar System is passing through a magnetized
gas cloud”

"Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized
than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*,"
says Opher. "This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure
required to resist destruction.""
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ec_voyager.htm
““Astronomers call the cloud we're running into now the Local
Interstellar Cloud or "Local Fluff" for short. It's about 30 light
years wide and contains a wispy mixture of hydrogen and helium atoms
at a temperature of 6000 C.””

“The discovery has implications for the future when the solar system
will eventually bump into other, similar clouds in our arm of the
Milky Way galaxy.”


So, where's all the warm and fuzzy Usenet/newsgroup expertise
(including our “sean” and Darla feedback) on this one? (out to lunch?)

~ BG


Yeah, well, lunch is important, isn't it.

--
S e m m a
Be well and come... be welcome!


  #149  
Old December 29th 09, 07:12 PM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.space.policy,alt.journalism,alt.news-media,uk.sci.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth

On Dec 29, 4:32*am, "Semmalon" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...



On Dec 27, 6:50 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 24, 6:58 pm, BradGuth wrote:


On Dec 24, 11:35 am, Nightcrawler wrote:


On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote:


Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is
noted.


Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept
reality is noted.


At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not
conditional, politically correct nor faith-based approved.


Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this
case?


Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper
belt and TNO asteroids, plus scads of Oort zone Items hanging around
(including Sedna and at least a few thousand others)?


Tell us how we're supposedly not the least bit tidal associated with
Sirius.


Do you have some new and improved formula for gravity?


With that original molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms which arrived
(possibly from a galactic merger) and produced the vibrant Sirius star/
solar system so nearby, besides its extended tidal radii taking the
dominant role, it's a wonder or perhaps a true miracle that our
passive little solar system ever managed to survive without a scratch,
much less shortly after Sirius(B) went nova (or was it initially
Sirius C and then B?).


On Sep 22, 9:04 am, Sam Wormley wrote:
*Magnetized Gas Points to New Physics
By Adrian Cho
ScienceNOW Daily News / 18 September 2009
*“It would be tough to stick it to your refrigerator, but an ultra-
cold gas magnetizes
itself just as do metals such as iron or nickel, a team of atomic
physicists reports. That
cool trick shows that the messy physics within solids can be modeled
with pristine gases,
the researchers say. But others are skeptical that the team has
actually seen what they claim.”


Perhaps there’s enough stellar magnetic repulsion to resist our future
elliptical encounter with Sirius, that which Sirius should by rights
have an even stronger diamagnetospheric molecular cloud or “Local
Fluff” of its very own.
*http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...ead/171d72880b...
*“Voyagers discover that Solar System is passing through a magnetized
gas cloud”


*"Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized
than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*,"
says Opher. "This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure
required to resist destruction.""
*http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ec_voyager.htm
*““Astronomers call the cloud we're running into now the Local
Interstellar Cloud or "Local Fluff" for short. It's about 30 light
years wide and contains a wispy mixture of hydrogen and helium atoms
at a temperature of 6000 C.””


“The discovery has implications for the future when the solar system
will eventually bump into other, similar clouds in our arm of the
Milky Way galaxy.”


So, where's all the warm and fuzzy Usenet/newsgroup expertise
(including our “sean” and Darla feedback) on this one? (out to lunch?)


~ BG


Yeah, well, lunch is important, isn't it.

--
S e m m a
Be well and come... be welcome!


Your systematic obfuscation on behalf of anything which might for the
greater good revise history or alter the future is noted.

Tell us again why those of your aloof kind are not allowed to use or
share any form of observationology (aka photographs, digital imaging
or any form of deductive image and scientific interpreting that
involves photons).

You do realize that all of your text in these Usenet/newsgroups is
purely digital graphic (not analogue).

Besides your selectively ignoring the Newtonian laws of gravity that
has our solar system associated with the Sirius star/solar system, do
seans also not believe in radar or in any other kinds of secondary/
recoil imaging?

Why is this diamagnetic cosmic fluff (protective interstellar
diamagnetosphere) so taboo/nondisclosure rated with those of your
kind?

~ BG
  #150  
Old December 29th 09, 07:41 PM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.space.policy,alt.journalism,alt.news-media,uk.sci.astronomy
Semmalon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 92
Default Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth


"BradGuth" wrote in message
...
On Dec 29, 4:32 am, "Semmalon" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...



On Dec 27, 6:50 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 24, 6:58 pm, BradGuth wrote:


On Dec 24, 11:35 am, Nightcrawler wrote:


On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote:


Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is
noted.


Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept
reality is noted.


At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not
conditional, politically correct nor faith-based approved.


Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in
this
case?


Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those
Kuiper
belt and TNO asteroids, plus scads of Oort zone Items hanging around
(including Sedna and at least a few thousand others)?


Tell us how we're supposedly not the least bit tidal associated with
Sirius.


Do you have some new and improved formula for gravity?


With that original molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms which arrived
(possibly from a galactic merger) and produced the vibrant Sirius
star/
solar system so nearby, besides its extended tidal radii taking the
dominant role, it's a wonder or perhaps a true miracle that our
passive little solar system ever managed to survive without a scratch,
much less shortly after Sirius(B) went nova (or was it initially
Sirius C and then B?).


On Sep 22, 9:04 am, Sam Wormley wrote:
Magnetized Gas Points to New Physics
By Adrian Cho
ScienceNOW Daily News / 18 September 2009
“It would be tough to stick it to your refrigerator, but an ultra-
cold gas magnetizes
itself just as do metals such as iron or nickel, a team of atomic
physicists reports. That
cool trick shows that the messy physics within solids can be modeled
with pristine gases,
the researchers say. But others are skeptical that the team has
actually seen what they claim.”


Perhaps there’s enough stellar magnetic repulsion to resist our future
elliptical encounter with Sirius, that which Sirius should by rights
have an even stronger diamagnetospheric molecular cloud or “Local
Fluff” of its very own.

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.a...ead/171d72880b...
“Voyagers discover that Solar System is passing through a magnetized
gas cloud”


"Voyager data show that the Fluff is much more strongly magnetized
than anyone had previously suspected—between 4 and 5 microgauss*,"
says Opher. "This magnetic field can provide the extra pressure
required to resist destruction.""
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ec_voyager.htm
““Astronomers call the cloud we're running into now the Local
Interstellar Cloud or "Local Fluff" for short. It's about 30 light
years wide and contains a wispy mixture of hydrogen and helium atoms
at a temperature of 6000 C.””


“The discovery has implications for the future when the solar system
will eventually bump into other, similar clouds in our arm of the
Milky Way galaxy.”


So, where's all the warm and fuzzy Usenet/newsgroup expertise
(including our “sean” and Darla feedback) on this one? (out to lunch?)


~ BG


Yeah, well, lunch is important, isn't it.

--
S e m m a
Be well and come... be welcome!


Your systematic obfuscation on behalf of anything which might for the
greater good revise history or alter the future is noted.


You're velcome!

Tell us again why those of your aloof kind are not allowed to use or
share any form of observationology (aka photographs, digital imaging
or any form of deductive image and scientific interpreting that
involves photons).


Aloof?
Yeah, that's me, all right.
I'm so aloof, you'll usually find me in the basement shelling peas.

So, you want to hear again why if we give you any kind of evidence of our
presence it will mean official contact?
Okay, Jinglebells, there it is.
Unlike you, we're not used to having to repeat ourselves all the time.
So I hope it sinks in this time.
Did it sink in?

You do realize that all of your text in these Usenet/newsgroups is
purely digital graphic (not analogue).


Digital, schmigital.
You got any analogs of your girlfriend in nothing but Victoria Secret?
No?
You want to buy some?

Besides your selectively ignoring the Newtonian laws of gravity that
has our solar system associated with the Sirius star/solar system, do
seans also not believe in radar or in any other kinds of secondary/
recoil imaging?


Hate to have to remind you, but Newton's been fired.
Einstein's the top banana these days.
Try to keep up.

Why is this diamagnetic cosmic fluff (protective interstellar
diamagnetosphere) so taboo/nondisclosure rated with those of your
kind?

~ BG


Maybe because it gives me hives?
In places I don't want to talk about.
Let's not go there, okay?
Sheez, I'd rather ride down a razor-sharp banister and land on my ass in hot
coals than talk about dia... dia..., vhat the hell is dat, anyvay?

So, what do you want to know?
Don't be shy.
Shoot.

--
S e m m a
Be well and come... be welcome!


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brad Guth is...... OM History 0 December 27th 03 12:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.