Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth

On 12/24/2009 10:01 AM, BradGuth wrote:

Our tidal association with the Sirius star system is still much
greater than necessary, and we're closing in on Sirius. Of those
which have sufficient supercomputers and orbital proper motion
simulators, are simply avoiding this one.

Closing in on Sirius? Are you starting this false babble again?

On Dec 24, 9:22*am, Nightcrawler wrote:
On 12/24/2009 10:01 AM, BradGuth wrote:

Our tidal association with the Sirius star system is still much
greater than necessary, and we're closing in on Sirius. *Of those
which have sufficient supercomputers and orbital proper motion
simulators, are simply avoiding this one.

Closing in on Sirius? *Are you starting this false babble again?

Never stopped. (why should I?)

Is there another interpretation for the -7.6 km/sec that's only
increasing in velocity?

Of course, it could be those magnetic interstellar clouds of
sufficient diamagnetic hydrogen and helium as providing a repulsion
flux that'll always keep our sun from getting too close to Sirius
(abc).

"Solar System Passing Through Interstellar Cloud"
http://www.redorbit.com/news/space/1...stellar_cloud/

Otherwise there's way more than sufficient Newtonian binding force
that's associated with these two stars having a mutual elliptical
tidal radii with one another, as well as a common barycenter in
between.

~ BG

On 12/24/2009 12:38 PM, BradGuth wrote:

Never stopped. (why should I?)

Is there another interpretation for the -7.6 km/sec that's only
increasing in velocity?

Why stop? Because it is stupid and inaccurate.

As for -7.6 km/sec, that shows what? Nothing. It's not a
heading, or did you not learn what radial velocity was the
last go round?

On Dec 24, 10:48*am, Nightcrawler wrote:
On 12/24/2009 12:38 PM, BradGuth wrote:

Never stopped. (why should I?)

Is there another interpretation for the -7.6 km/sec that's only
increasing in velocity?

Why stop? *Because it is stupid and inaccurate.

As for -7.6 km/sec, that shows what? *Nothing. *It's not a
heading, or did you not learn what radial velocity was the
last go round?

Are you now suggesting that the Newtonian laws of physics and whatever
orbital mechanics do not apply?

~ BG

On 12/24/2009 1:10 PM, BradGuth wrote:

Are you now suggesting that the Newtonian laws of physics and whatever
orbital mechanics do not apply?

Are you pulling another Guthdrival out of your ass?

If yes, then no.

If no, then no.

If else, then put the pipe down.

On Dec 24, 11:16*am, Nightcrawler wrote:
On 12/24/2009 1:10 PM, BradGuth wrote:

Are you now suggesting that the Newtonian laws of physics and whatever
orbital mechanics do not apply?

Are you pulling another Guthdrival out of your ass?

If yes, then no.

If no, then no.

If else, then put the pipe down.

Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is noted.

~ BG

On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote:

Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is noted.

Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept
reality is noted.

On Dec 24, 11:35*am, Nightcrawler wrote:
On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote:

Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is noted.

Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept
reality is noted.

At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not
conditional.

Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this
case?

Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper
belt and scads of Oort zone Items hanging around?

~ BG

On Dec 24, 11:35*am, Nightcrawler wrote:
On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote:

Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is noted.

Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept
reality is noted.

At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not
conditional, politically correct nor faith-based approved.

Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this
case?

Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper
belt and TNO asteroids, plus scads of Oort zone Items hanging around
(including Sedna and at least a few thousand others)?

Tell us how we're supposedly not the least bit tidal associated with
Sirius.

Do you have some new and improved formula for gravity?

~ BG

On 12/24/2009 8:32 PM, BradGuth wrote:

At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not
conditional.

Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this
case?

Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper
belt and scads of Oort zone Items hanging around?

It is a bit queer how you keep claiming things that I never stated or
intimated.

Have you always invented crap to explain away your short comings?
Your parents must have had a grand time with the mouse from Venus
eating the last of the cookies argument, and then when you were
chastised for blowing smoke up their ass you retorted with some
gibberish about how they didn't believe in conception or live
child birth and practiced reverse C-sections on the solstices.