A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

what if (on colliding galaxies)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old August 4th 08, 11:56 PM posted to alt.astronomy
GOD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default what if (on colliding galaxies)

"BradGuth" wrote in message
...
On Aug 2, 2:12 am, "GOD" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...



On Aug 1, 2:53 pm, "Painius" wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote...


in ...


What if colliding galaxies need much more thinking? This What if
came
out of Cactus Saul posting his answer that stars of a colliding
galaxy
just pass each other by without even a hello. Not so fast Saul Im
looking as I type at the Cartwheel galaxy This galaxy has been hit
face on by another galaxy. It created great SHOCKWAVES that spread
out
like ripples on a lake.to form a glowing ring of stars at the galaxy
edge. Now we must think what gravity is doing when twogalaxies
collide. Gravity pulls from each galaxy sheets of gas and stars
creating
great interaction This is shown to us in these two galaXIES NGC
4038
AND NGC 4039 nEXT TO THE BREATH TAKING PICTURE OF THE cARTWHEEL
GALAXY is galaxy NGC 2207 It is an unbelievable picture. So
best
you all see it for yourselves Especially Cactus Saul Bert


And here they all are...


NGC 4038 & 4039
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060630.html


NGC 2207 & 2163
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080420.html


It's hard to say anything about the directions of spin in the
first two, but the second two are easy. On the left, 2207 is
going clockwise, and on the right, 2163 is going the opposite,
counter-clockwise.


Like two mysterious, almost sinister eyes peering back at us.


happy days and...
starry starry nights!


--
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth


P.S.: Thank YOU for reading!


P.P.S.: http://painellsworth.net


There's lots of colliding galaxies to work with. Several having
collided multiple times is what makes for good eye-candy, though
likely trillions upon trillions of mostly innocent lives having been
lost per galactic collision.


If there's a cosmic God, it's a god of vast evil and torture.


* Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth


D o n' t m a k e m e c o m e d o w n t h e r e !

--
Unohoo


And you're going to do something as horrific or worse off than
colliding galaxies?

Is GOD being a species racist kind of guy or gal, or just typically
bipolar and sadistic as per usual?

* Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth



Galaxies collide all the time. It's not my fault. You make your own choices.
That's what "free will" is all about. I did not invent, nor do I maintain
racism, bipolarism or sadism. Those are all human choices. Would you rather
be a puppet on a string? I can arrange it.

--
Free Will Hunting


  #42  
Old August 5th 08, 12:03 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Saul Levy Saul Levy is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by SpaceBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 21,291
Default what if (on colliding galaxies)

Oh God, I'm soooooooooooooo religious! lmao!

NOT!

At my age I just don't give a DAMN! lmao!

Oh, my father's 95th birthday party is this Friday. I may just have a
LONG TIME LEFT!

Saul Levy


On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 22:52:01 GMT, "GOD" wrote:

It's not enough to know that you are doomed? You must also know precisely
when? I would tell you, but you wouldn't believe me because you give no
fornication. Blessed be the obscene, for they shall inherit the media.

BTW, what part of "Thou Shalt Not . . ." didn't you understand?

  #43  
Old August 5th 08, 01:20 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Timberwoof[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 799
Default what if (on colliding galaxies)

In article ,
Saul Levy wrote:

On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 05:21:12 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
wrote:

On Aug 2, 4:27 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Brad You brought into the pot an interesting point. The shock wave
created by galaxies colliding could wipe out planets that have
intelligent life. Here on Earth we have the same worry on being hit by
an asteroid. Well universe with galaxies with intelligent life has to
come under the uncertainty principle,and life is a gamble Bert


A relatively little asteroid encounter could seriously terminate most
of all life on Earth.


But a "lithobraking encounter" "suckerpunch" by the moon ... well,
that's different. That would only end all the ice ages forever.

Only the robust and obviously intelligent likes
of Moe would survive.

~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth


You wouldn't survive, BradBoi! lmfjao!

So what does that say about your intelligence?

DUMBER THAN A COCKROACH!

Saul Levy



--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot com http://www.timberwoof.com
Official naysayer of the DARPA kind, who knows only of what¹s accepted by
the Old Testament of the Zionist/Nazi New World Order
which refuses to accept or allow deductive reasoning.
  #44  
Old August 5th 08, 01:21 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Timberwoof[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 799
Default what if (on colliding galaxies)

In article ,
(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

Timberhead I use shockwaves here as a good energy force. Its my post
and you can tell me shockwaves are only used by our imperial thinkers
but again I use it in colliding galaxies and I say it fits Bert



Oh... I should have realized that it was *your* post and that you're
privileged. Sorry. Carry on.

--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot com
http://www.timberwoof.com
Official naysayer of the DARPA kind, who knows only of what¹s accepted by
the Old Testament of the Zionist/Nazi New World Order
which refuses to accept or allow deductive reasoning.
  #45  
Old August 5th 08, 01:33 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Timberwoof[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 799
Default what if (on colliding galaxies)

In article
,
"Painius" wrote:

"Timberwoof" wrote...
in message
...

. . .
How far apart are stars on the average? Several light-years? The 100 AU
number is out of your ass, like most things you say.


1 AU = distance of Earth from Sun

100 AU = .00158128588 light years

100 AU = 9,295,588,762 miles

100 AU = 14,959,800,000 kilometers


Thank you, Pain. That was informative, but you missed the point. "100 AU
= .00158128588 light years" was the most important part of your highly
accurate reply. (But we really don't need that much accuracy for this
back-of-the-envelope calculation.) If 100 AU ~ .001 LY, then 1000 AU ~
..01 LY, 10,000 AU = .1 LY, and 100,000 AU = 1 LY. The nearest star is 4
LY away, so 10 LY is the right order of magnitude for typical star
distances. That's roughly a million AU between stars.
How big is a grain of sand? A tenth of a millimeter? That makes it 10^-4
m. So the nearest grain of sand would be ~ 10^2 m or a hundred meters
away.

Let's say you had a football field with golf balls spread in a grid
roughly a hundred meters apart. That would let you put, oh, one golf
ball in the football field. (And that golf ball isn't even to scale; I
just want you to be able to see it!) Now you get to drop, oh, one golf
ball from anywhere in the ceiling overhead ... It's not very likely that
the golf ball is going to hit the other one, or even come close.

I suppose one could calculate the likelihood of a hundred stars
colliding out of the hundreds of millions in as typical galaxy. Yeah,
I'd bet my life on it. That is, yeah, if the only planet I could find
that supported my kind of life was in a galaxy that was undergoing
collision with another one, I'd move there anyway.

Now... the question of whether stars got close enough to one another to
seriously mess up their orbits is something else entirely. That's quite
likely to happen! And that's what makes galactic collisions so
interesting to watch.

--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot com http://www.timberwoof.com
Official naysayer of the DARPA kind, who knows only of what¹s accepted by
the Old Testament of the Zionist/Nazi New World Order
which refuses to accept or allow deductive reasoning.
  #46  
Old August 5th 08, 01:34 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Timberwoof[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 799
Default what if (on colliding galaxies)

In article
,
BradGuth wrote:

Why are you so afraid of gravity and the tidal radius of consequences
when things get near enough to matter?


Well, you are a never-ending fount of undefined terms and phrases! What,
pray tell, is a "tidal radius of consequences"?

--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot com http://www.timberwoof.com
Official naysayer of the DARPA kind, who knows only of what¹s accepted by
the Old Testament of the Zionist/Nazi New World Order
which refuses to accept or allow deductive reasoning.
  #47  
Old August 5th 08, 02:39 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Warren G. Harding[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default what if (on colliding galaxies)

Timberwoof wrote:

In article
,
BradGuth wrote:

Why are you so afraid of gravity and the tidal radius of consequences
when things get near enough to matter?


Well, you are a never-ending fount of undefined terms and phrases! What,
pray tell, is a "tidal radius of consequences"?


As usual, Brad needs you to define his random techno-phrases for him.
He can't do it.

If I was forced to guess, in this example, the tidal radius of
consequences would have to be approximately 42 Tesla. With gravity
factored in, the elliptical tidal radius would expand to 53 ****ts.
  #48  
Old August 5th 08, 05:17 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Timberwoof[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 799
Default what if (on colliding galaxies)

In article ,
"Warren G. Harding" wrote:

Timberwoof wrote:

In article
,
BradGuth wrote:

Why are you so afraid of gravity and the tidal radius of consequences
when things get near enough to matter?


Well, you are a never-ending fount of undefined terms and phrases! What,
pray tell, is a "tidal radius of consequences"?


As usual, Brad needs you to define his random techno-phrases for him.
He can't do it.

If I was forced to guess, in this example, the tidal radius of
consequences would have to be approximately 42 Tesla. With gravity
factored in, the elliptical tidal radius would expand to 53 ****ts.


mode="spock"Highly illogical./mode

}: )

--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot com http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ‹Chris L.
  #49  
Old August 5th 08, 10:42 AM posted to alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default what if (on colliding galaxies)

On Aug 4, 3:56 pm, "GOD" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...



On Aug 2, 2:12 am, "GOD" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message


...


On Aug 1, 2:53 pm, "Painius" wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote...


in ...


What if colliding galaxies need much more thinking? This What if
came
out of Cactus Saul posting his answer that stars of a colliding
galaxy
just pass each other by without even a hello. Not so fast Saul Im
looking as I type at the Cartwheel galaxy This galaxy has been hit
face on by another galaxy. It created great SHOCKWAVES that spread
out
like ripples on a lake.to form a glowing ring of stars at the galaxy
edge. Now we must think what gravity is doing when twogalaxies
collide. Gravity pulls from each galaxy sheets of gas and stars
creating
great interaction This is shown to us in these two galaXIES NGC
4038
AND NGC 4039 nEXT TO THE BREATH TAKING PICTURE OF THE cARTWHEEL
GALAXY is galaxy NGC 2207 It is an unbelievable picture. So
best
you all see it for yourselves Especially Cactus Saul Bert


And here they all are...


NGC 4038 & 4039
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060630.html


NGC 2207 & 2163
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080420.html


It's hard to say anything about the directions of spin in the
first two, but the second two are easy. On the left, 2207 is
going clockwise, and on the right, 2163 is going the opposite,
counter-clockwise.


Like two mysterious, almost sinister eyes peering back at us.


happy days and...
starry starry nights!


--
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth


P.S.: Thank YOU for reading!


P.P.S.: http://painellsworth.net


There's lots of colliding galaxies to work with. Several having
collided multiple times is what makes for good eye-candy, though
likely trillions upon trillions of mostly innocent lives having been
lost per galactic collision.


If there's a cosmic God, it's a god of vast evil and torture.


* Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth


D o n' t m a k e m e c o m e d o w n t h e r e !


--
Unohoo


And you're going to do something as horrific or worse off than
colliding galaxies?


Is GOD being a species racist kind of guy or gal, or just typically
bipolar and sadistic as per usual?


* Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth


Galaxies collide all the time. It's not my fault. You make your own choices.
That's what "free will" is all about. I did not invent, nor do I maintain
racism, bipolarism or sadism. Those are all human choices. Would you rather
be a puppet on a string? I can arrange it.

--
Free Will Hunting


You get a real kick out of intentionally tormenting and traumatizing
trillions upon trillions of mostly innocent souls, don't you. You
must be another DARPA Zionist/Nazi, cloaked as a born-again
Republican.

~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth
  #50  
Old August 5th 08, 10:48 AM posted to alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default what if (on colliding galaxies)

On Aug 4, 5:20 pm, Timberwoof
wrote:
In article ,
Saul Levy wrote:

On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 05:21:12 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
wrote:


On Aug 2, 4:27 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Brad You brought into the pot an interesting point. The shock wave
created by galaxies colliding could wipe out planets that have
intelligent life. Here on Earth we have the same worry on being hit by
an asteroid. Well universe with galaxies with intelligent life has to
come under the uncertainty principle,and life is a gamble Bert


A relatively little asteroid encounter could seriously terminate most
of all life on Earth.


But a "lithobraking encounter" "suckerpunch" by the moon ... well,
that's different. That would only end all the ice ages forever.


Only if our Selene/moon stuck around. w/o moon, Earth would once
again become relatively cooler and icier, not to mention that of
likely having a nearly monoseason environment (aka less seasonal
tilt).

~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What if? (on colliding Photons) G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] Misc 0 January 10th 08 02:14 PM
Colliding planetary discs Carsten Nielsen Amateur Astronomy 7 June 20th 05 06:38 AM
Colliding Galaxies gp.skinner UK Astronomy 2 April 29th 04 10:07 AM
Magnesium and silicon in a pair of colliding galaxies Sam Wormley Amateur Astronomy 16 January 19th 04 02:40 AM
Colliding Gasses of Galaxies G=EMC^2 Glazier Misc 2 December 21st 03 02:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.