A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Station
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 1st 06, 11:03 AM posted to alt.music.rush,sci.space.station,sci.space.shuttle,alt.fan.art-bell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kx2Gf...NASA%20planets

This is from a major news network, and this guy is saying there are
bases on the moon, and possibly extraterrestrial.

The video isn't legible for me, and that's one of the common negative
things about YouTube. They have no video controls for people to tune
the video to their hardware & so on.

But please watch this.

  #2  
Old April 1st 06, 10:58 PM posted to alt.music.rush,sci.space.station,sci.space.shuttle,alt.fan.art-bell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review

On 1 Apr 2006 02:03:49 -0800, "LIBERATOR"
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in message
.com:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kx2Gf...NASA%20planets

This is from a major news network, and this guy is saying there are
bases on the moon, and possibly extraterrestrial.


OH, MY GHOD! WE'RE DOOOOOMMMEEED!!! RUN FOR THE HILLS!!!

The video isn't legible for me, and that's one of the common negative


A more appropriate word would have been, "credible".

things about YouTube. They have no video controls for people to tune
the video to their hardware & so on.

But please watch this.


Don't have to. I've know about the alien bases on the moon for
decades. Back when I worked for Haliburton, we subcontracted to help
them build the bases. We even built the platforms for the plasma
cannons, but we wouldn't help the ALIENS install them. You gotta draw
the line somewhere, you know?
--
V.G.

"i would blame them it they went on a holy jhiad and killed off all the infidels, would you?"
- AssLexa's "200+" alien-implanted IQ jumps the rails and crashes into a grade school, killing all inside.

Change pobox dot alaska to gci.

Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield.
  #3  
Old April 1st 06, 10:59 PM posted to alt.music.rush,sci.space.station,sci.space.shuttle,alt.fan.art-bell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review

On 1 Apr 2006 09:15:39 -0800, "Brad Guth"
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in message
.com:

-
Brad Guth


GOBBLE ON, GUTHBALL! WOOT!
--
V.G.

"i would blame them it they went on a holy jhiad and killed off all the infidels, would you?"
- AssLexa's "200+" alien-implanted IQ jumps the rails and crashes into a grade school, killing all inside.

Change pobox dot alaska to gci.

Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield.
  #4  
Old April 3rd 06, 12:07 AM posted to alt.music.rush,sci.space.station,sci.space.shuttle,alt.fan.art-bell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review


LIBERATOR wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kx2Gf...NASA%20planets

This is from a major news network, and this guy is saying there are
bases on the moon, and possibly extraterrestrial.

The video isn't legible for me, and that's one of the common negative
things about YouTube. They have no video controls for people to tune
the video to their hardware & so on.

But please watch this.



Thank-you for telling us about this.

Years ago, in a college classroom, an astronomer told us about the
"bridge over a crater on the Moon." Recently, I observed an
International Space Station photograph of the Moon, that when greatly
enlarged, showed rectangles on the surface. I am guessing that it may
mean strip mining -- probably gathering titanium, aluminum, and He-3.

Mars also has life, humanoid life.

See: http://stardot.blogspot.com/



tomcat

  #5  
Old April 4th 06, 06:21 AM posted to sci.space.station,sci.space.shuttle,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review

Quite frankly, I do not respect posters that sign off as "Official
Agent of Deception" or list themselves as "Skepticult® Member#
581-00504-208" because I regard that as immaturity. I invite rational
criticism. I actually enjoy rational disagreement that can be resolved
in such a way that it educates everyone.

These 'name calling posts' clutter up the Usenet, making real discourse
difficult.

And, for the record, my posts are as accurate as I know how to make
them and, if asked, will support specific statements made. My
http://stardot.blogspot.com/ Blog is accurate as far as it goes.
It makes no claims other than "see for yourself".


tomcat

  #6  
Old April 4th 06, 06:28 AM posted to sci.space.station,sci.space.shuttle,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review

tomcat , the dowdy delinquent and sedentary
culero who likes indelicate one gun salutes with parakeets, and whose
partner is a whoopee-fluff with a nasty meat tunnel, wrote in
.com:

I invite rational criticism.


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!



Respond to that.



--
http://xp-crack.kadaitcha.cx
  #7  
Old April 4th 06, 06:38 AM posted to sci.space.station,sci.space.shuttle,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review

"tomcat" wrote:

Quite frankly, I do not respect posters that sign off as
"Official Agent of Deception" or list themselves as
"Skepticult® Member# 581-00504-208" because I regard that as
immaturity. I invite rational criticism. I actually enjoy
rational disagreement that can be resolved in such a way that
it educates everyone.

These 'name calling posts' clutter up the Usenet, making real
discourse difficult.

And, for the record, my posts are as accurate as I know how to
make them and, if asked, will support specific statements
made. My http://stardot.blogspot.com/ Blog is accurate as
far as it goes. It makes no claims other than "see for
yourself".


tomcat


Your apology for your personal style is accepted. We rarely see
that sort of thing, mostly because damn near everyone has the
idea that his style is as valid as anyone's. As for your web
site, nothing you've posted here has motivated me to go looking
for more. Is that page those rock pictures I've heard about?
I'll just walk outside if I want to see rocks.




  #8  
Old April 4th 06, 04:04 PM posted to sci.space.station,sci.space.shuttle,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review

I am not an "Official". I have no "Skepticult" number. I am just
'tomcat', the guy that discovered life, and humanoids, on Mars.


tomcat

  #9  
Old April 4th 06, 09:15 PM posted to alt.music.rush,sci.space.station,sci.space.shuttle,alt.fan.art-bell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review


Brad Guth wrote:
Perhaps once upon a time aliens may have utilized our once-upon-a-time
icy proto-moon for a nifty pitstop, or perhaps that of an interstellar
lifeboat as they migrated and/or accommodated their expeditions to/from
their nearby Sirius star system, that which our solar system is
essentially being pulled along in a very elliptical (100,000 some odd
years) orbit by the massive gravity influence of what the combined
Sirius star system amounts to as roughly 3.5 sol. At least there's no
known laws of astrophysics or of any other physics that's keeping us
apart.


So you say that the Sirius star system is where the advanced
civilization of extraterrestrials is?

The "UPN Moon UFO mystery" may be suggesting to us of there being
sufficient reason for our having another good look-see, that which
those items as having been pointed out by this "UPN Moon UFO mystery"
can be quite nicely outdone by our KECK team, that which the KECK
methods have already been more than capable of accomplishing this task
with better than sufficient resolution.


I agree. The continued use (ploy) of using bad photos, faint, non
clear, is obvious that we're being doped on disinformation. The
technology available has long surpassed the inability of providing
lousy photos. Yet they're still providing us lousy photos, thus
clearly, it's a disinformation ploy.

At this point in the grand ruse/sting of the century, our NASA is
willing to do whatever it takes in order to convince even the UFO cults
that we've been there and done that. Unfortunately, other than having
obtained those absolutely terrific telephoto images from such a nearby
orbit (which has long been proven by our NASA as per having the
capability of such images being robotically obtained) is about as good
as it gets.


Here here.

If you'd like a run-through of the following archive, as to what's
perfectly believable and of what isn't, just ask and I'll deliver the
goods.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/


Deliver deliver deliver !!! You always are a good counter source to
show that NASA is lying scum.

BTW; if ETs wanted a sufficiently nearby base of operations, as such
there's absolutely no question that Venus has by far been offering the
better alternative for an absolute ET butt-load of perfectly good
reasons, which may in fact be of what's depicted in the image(s) that
I've identified as such. Unlike the supposed alien moon bases that we
have obtained such extremely poor quality if hardly any worthy images
to go by, whereas my observationology as a deductive interpreted image
of what's quite easily extracted and as replicated to your heart's
content from the official Magellan archives, of especially that taken
from one specific image file that's absolutely chuck full of what's
easily identified as a significant community of large scale structures
and of a highly rational infrastructure, are offering us 10+ fold
better image quality and 100 fold better complexity of artificial
looking content than of the supposed moon bases that are wussy by
comparison. Would you like to see?


Oh yes, definitely, please show!!! Sorry so late on responding.

Brad Guth


  #10  
Old April 5th 06, 04:32 AM posted to sci.space.station,sci.space.shuttle,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review

tomcat wrote:

Quite frankly, I do not respect posters that sign off as "Official
Agent of Deception" or list themselves as "Skepticult® Member#
581-00504-208" because I regard that as immaturity. I invite rational
criticism. I actually enjoy rational disagreement that can be resolved
in such a way that it educates everyone.


You call running away "rational disagreement"?

These 'name calling posts' clutter up the Usenet, making real discourse
difficult.

And, for the record, my posts are as accurate as I know how to make
them and, if asked, will support specific statements made. My
http://stardot.blogspot.com/ Blog is accurate as far as it goes.
It makes no claims other than "see for yourself".


Nice rocks.

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Official Agent of Deception
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005

"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is the Moon Hollow? Sleuths? Imperishable Stars Misc 46 October 8th 04 04:08 PM
Apollo Buzz alDredge Astronomy Misc 5 July 28th 04 10:05 AM
Apollo Buzz alDredge UK Astronomy 5 July 28th 04 10:05 AM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ darla Misc 10 July 25th 04 02:57 PM
The Apollo Moon Hoax FAQ v4.1 November 2003 Nathan Jones Misc 20 November 11th 03 08:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.