|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Cosmos Article: Was Einstein a Fake?
Koobee Wublee set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time
continuum: For example, the self-styled physicists have bragged about the GPS being a hotbed of verification for GR. Well, in reality, it is far from the case. The clock, the frequency accumulating the calendar time, will certainly drift over time, temperature, stress, radiation, reflection, refraction, and other engineering concerns, and it is crucial to understand what exactly have to be synchronized. shrug The scientists who set up GPS have allowed for known _and_unknown_ effects which may cause the on-board clocks to run at different rates. GR is a known effect and needs to be allowed for, but in case GR isn't the full story and actually needs refinement (and I'm happy with such refinements being found to be necessary), they allow for unknown factors that affect the synchronism between them. In theoretical discussions of GR we consider ideal clocks, where all other known effects (temperature variations, component aging, etc.) are allowed for, and compare what would happen between such ideal clocks in Euclidean space-time and such ideal clocks in reality. [snip the satellite / Major Tom dialogue, details not relevant to the next paragraph ] What all this discussion specifies is a good practical way of synchronising the satellite clocks to allow for all sorts of unknown factors. Doesn't shake the theoretical basis of GR though. (Ask yourself: WHY is synchronisation necessary at all?) -- ξ: ) Proud to be curly Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Cosmos Article: Was Einstein a Fake?
On Feb 9, 12:23 pm, Curlytop wrote:
Koobee Wublee set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time continuum: Koobee Wublee does not believe in the nonsense of spacetime. So, eddies spirallying through spacetime is a mere figure of imagination on Curly’s part. shrug For example, the self-styled physicists have bragged about the GPS being a hotbed of verification for GR. Well, in reality, it is far from the case. The clock, the frequency accumulating the calendar time, will certainly drift over time, temperature, stress, radiation, reflection, refraction, and other engineering concerns, and it is crucial to understand what exactly have to be synchronized. shrug The scientists who set up GPS have allowed for known _and_unknown_ effects which may cause the on-board clocks to run at different rates. The GPS was set up by engineers with scientists as consultants --- very incompetent consultants in fact. shrug GR is a known effect and needs to be allowed for, GR effects are also predicted by many non-GR hypotheses. So, the discussion really is not GR-centric. shrug but in case GR isn't the full story and actually needs refinement (and I'm happy with such refinements being found to be necessary), they allow for unknown factors that affect the synchronism between them. You need to identify why these refinements are necessary in implementations. So far, the accused refinements identified by self- styled physicists are not necessary as Koobee Wublee and many others have argued before. shrug In theoretical discussions of GR we consider ideal clocks, where all other known effects (temperature variations, component aging, etc.) are allowed for, and compare what would happen between such ideal clocks in Euclidean space-time and such ideal clocks in reality. In any realistic scenarios, one will find other non-GR effects to be ever so dominating. shrug [snip the satellite / Major Tom dialogue, details not relevant to the next paragraph ] Snipping that, you will remain in mysticism. shrug What all this discussion specifies is a good practical way of synchronising the satellite clocks to allow for all sorts of unknown factors. Synchronization is an issue challenged by algorithm engineers. There is no need to apply GR effect even if realistic. Thus, it is absolutely a lie to say GR effects are taken into accounts in GPS development. shrug Doesn't shake the theoretical basis of GR though. (Ask yourself: WHY is synchronisation necessary at all?) GPS synchronization of chronological time (not necessarily clock) is necessary among the satellites (not with the ground stations). The underlining reason has nothing to do with GR. shrug ξ: ) Proud to be curly Whatever makes you happy. Be happy as an Einstein Dingleberry. shrug Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply What do you mean? Do you expect to receive a private email complementing how smart you are? As a zealous believer in GR, you are so predictable. Curly is another fine example where the following Orwellian traits apply to self-styled physicists. shrug ** FAITH IS LOGIC ** LYING IS TEACHING ** DECEIT IS VALIDATION ** NITWIT IS GENIUS ** OCCULT IS SCIENCE ** FICTION IS THEORY ** FUDGING IS DERIVATION ** PARADOX IS KOSHER ** WORSHIP IS STUDY ** BULL**** IS TRUTH ** ARROGANCE IS SAGE ** BELIEVING IS LEARNING ** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE ** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM ** SCRIPTURE IS AXIOM ** CONJECTURE IS REALITY ** HANDWAVING IS REASONING ** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY ** PRIESTHOOD IS TENURE ** FRAUDULENCE IS FACT ** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS ** INCONSISTENCY IS CONSISTENCY ** INTERPRETATION IS VERIFICATION shrug |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Cosmos Article: Was Einstein a Fake?
Koobee Wublee set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time
continuum: [ Snip the drivel because there's no arguing with antirelativists.] shrug ξ: ) Proud to be curly Whatever makes you happy. Be happy as an Einstein Dingleberry. shrug Since I have plenty of curl I cannot be the divergence of a scalar field. shrug Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply What do you mean? Do you expect to receive a private email complementing how smart you are? I have had many such, from appropriate posters here. I don't think I could really expect one from you. shrug -- ξ: ) Proud to be curly Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Cosmos Article: Was Einstein a Fake?
ahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ROTFLMAO
--[[[ KW 1 -:- Curly 0, zero , null, nil, nada ]]]-- Passionately devout Einstein Dingleberry "Curlytop" who knows nothing but to worship Albert's sphinter cranked herself as being.... Einstein Dingleberry Townsend who wrote: Koobee Wublee set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time continuum: [ Snip the drivel because there's no arguing with antirelativists.] Proud to be curly KW wrote: Whatever makes you happy. Be happy as an Einstein Dingleberry. shrug E-Dingleberry-Townsend wrote: Since I have plenty of curl I cannot be the divergence of a scalar field. shrug hanson wrote: Hey you Schmuck, listen: "Div & Curl" won't really help you to proselytize effectively for your Einstein worship of Albert's Sphincter. But you can "Dive" into Albert's asshole, "Curl" up in there & be ecstatically happy, despite the fact that already more than 60 years ago __ Einstein himself became a RELATIVITY DENIER __ http://tinyurl.com/Einstein-denied-his-SR-and-GR..... Thanks for the laughs, you Dreidel.... ahahahaha.... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Cosmos Article: Was Einstein a Fake?
ahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ROTFLMAO --[[[ KW 1 -:- Curly 0, zero , null, nil, nada ]]]-- Passionately devout Einstein Dingleberry "Curlytop" who knows nothing but to worship Albert's sphinter cranked herself and being an.... Einstein Dingleberry Townsend wrote: Koobee Wublee set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time continuum: [ Snip the drivel because there's no arguing with antirelativists.] Proud to be curly KW wrote: Whatever makes you happy. Be happy as an Einstein Dingleberry. shrug E-Dingleberry-Townsend wrote: Since I have plenty of curl I cannot be the divergence of a scalar field. shrug hanson wrote: Hey you Schmuck, listen: "Div & Curl" won't really help you to proselytize effectively for your worship of Einstein's Sphincter. But you can "Dive" into Albert's asshole, "Curl" up in there & be ecstatically happy, despite the fact that already more than 60 years ago __ Einstein himself became a RELATIVITY DENIER __ http://tinyurl.com/Einstein-denied-his-SR-and-GR..... Thanks for the laughs, you Dreidel.... ahahahaha.... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Cosmos Article: Was Einstein a Fake?
ahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ROTFLMAO --[[[ KW 1 -:- Curly 0, zero , null, nil, nada ]]]-- Passionately devout Einstein Dingleberry "Curlytop" aka "Prai Jei" knows nothing but to worship Albert's sphinter. He cranked himself and being an.... Einstein Dingleberry Townsend wrote: Koobee Wublee set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time continuum: [ Snip the drivel because there's no arguing with antirelativists.] Proud to be curly KW wrote: Whatever makes you happy. Be happy as an Einstein Dingleberry. shrug E-Dingleberry-Townsend wrote: Since I have plenty of curl I cannot be the divergence of a scalar field. shrug hanson wrote: Hey you Schmuck, listen: "Div & Curl" won't really help you to proselytize effectively for your worship of Einstein's Sphincter. But you can "Dive" into Albert's colon, "Curl" up in there & be ecstatically happy, despite the fact that already more than 60 years ago __ Einstein himself became a RELATIVITY DENIER __ http://tinyurl.com/Einstein-denied-his-SR-and-GR..... Thanks for the laughs, you Dreidel.... ahahahaha.... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Cosmos Article: Was Einstein a Fake?
eOn Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:10:06 -0800 (PST), Koobee Wublee
wrote: On Feb 9, 12:23 pm, Curlytop wrote: Koobee Wublee set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time continuum: Koobee Wublee does not believe in the nonsense of spacetime. So, eddies spirallying through spacetime is a mere figure of imagination on Curly’s part. shrug For example, the self-styled physicists have bragged about the GPS being a hotbed of verification for GR. Well, in reality, it is far from the case. The clock, the frequency accumulating the calendar time, will certainly drift over time, temperature, stress, radiation, reflection, refraction, and other engineering concerns, and it is crucial to understand what exactly have to be synchronized. shrug The scientists who set up GPS have allowed for known _and_unknown_ effects which may cause the on-board clocks to run at different rates. The GPS was set up by engineers with scientists as consultants --- very incompetent consultants in fact. shrug GR is a known effect and needs to be allowed for, GR effects are also predicted by many non-GR hypotheses. So, the discussion really is not GR-centric. shrug but in case GR isn't the full story and actually needs refinement (and I'm happy with such refinements being found to be necessary), they allow for unknown factors that affect the synchronism between them. You need to identify why these refinements are necessary in implementations. So far, the accused refinements identified by self- styled physicists are not necessary as Koobee Wublee and many others have argued before. shrug In theoretical discussions of GR we consider ideal clocks, where all other known effects (temperature variations, component aging, etc.) are allowed for, and compare what would happen between such ideal clocks in Euclidean space-time and such ideal clocks in reality. In any realistic scenarios, one will find other non-GR effects to be ever so dominating. shrug [snip the satellite / Major Tom dialogue, details not relevant to the next paragraph ] Snipping that, you will remain in mysticism. shrug What all this discussion specifies is a good practical way of synchronising the satellite clocks to allow for all sorts of unknown factors. Synchronization is an issue challenged by algorithm engineers. There is no need to apply GR effect even if realistic. Thus, it is absolutely a lie to say GR effects are taken into accounts in GPS development. shrug Doesn't shake the theoretical basis of GR though. (Ask yourself: WHY is synchronisation necessary at all?) GPS synchronization of chronological time (not necessarily clock) is necessary among the satellites (not with the ground stations). The underlining reason has nothing to do with GR. shrug ?: ) Proud to be curly Whatever makes you happy. Be happy as an Einstein Dingleberry. shrug Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply What do you mean? Do you expect to receive a private email complementing how smart you are? As a zealous believer in GR, you are so predictable. Curly is another fine example where the following Orwellian traits apply to self-styled physicists. shrug ** FAITH IS LOGIC ** LYING IS TEACHING ** DECEIT IS VALIDATION ** NITWIT IS GENIUS ** OCCULT IS SCIENCE ** FICTION IS THEORY ** FUDGING IS DERIVATION ** PARADOX IS KOSHER ** WORSHIP IS STUDY ** BULL**** IS TRUTH ** ARROGANCE IS SAGE ** BELIEVING IS LEARNING ** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE ** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM ** SCRIPTURE IS AXIOM ** CONJECTURE IS REALITY ** HANDWAVING IS REASONING ** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY ** PRIESTHOOD IS TENURE ** FRAUDULENCE IS FACT ** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS ** INCONSISTENCY IS CONSISTENCY ** INTERPRETATION IS VERIFICATION shrug |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WAS EINSTEIN A FAKE? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 6 | July 28th 11 09:23 PM |
WAS EINSTEIN A FAKE AFTER ALL? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 29 | October 21st 08 06:54 AM |
Was Einstein a fake? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 12 | April 29th 08 09:35 PM |
Article - Combing the Cosmos at High Speed: The Allen Telescope Array | Jason H. | SETI | 1 | October 16th 06 06:26 AM |
Article Examines a Disputed Einstein Paper (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 1 | December 5th 05 12:17 AM |