A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cosmos Article: Was Einstein a Fake?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 9th 13, 08:23 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
Curlytop
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default Cosmos Article: Was Einstein a Fake?

Koobee Wublee set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time
continuum:

For example, the self-styled physicists have bragged about the GPS
being a hotbed of verification for GR. Well, in reality, it is far
from the case. The clock, the frequency accumulating the calendar
time, will certainly drift over time, temperature, stress, radiation,
reflection, refraction, and other engineering concerns, and it is
crucial to understand what exactly have to be synchronized. shrug


The scientists who set up GPS have allowed for known _and_unknown_ effects
which may cause the on-board clocks to run at different rates. GR is a
known effect and needs to be allowed for, but in case GR isn't the full
story and actually needs refinement (and I'm happy with such refinements
being found to be necessary), they allow for unknown factors that affect
the synchronism between them.

In theoretical discussions of GR we consider ideal clocks, where all other
known effects (temperature variations, component aging, etc.) are allowed
for, and compare what would happen between such ideal clocks in Euclidean
space-time and such ideal clocks in reality.

[snip the satellite / Major Tom dialogue, details not relevant to the
next paragraph ]


What all this discussion specifies is a good practical way of synchronising
the satellite clocks to allow for all sorts of unknown factors. Doesn't
shake the theoretical basis of GR though. (Ask yourself: WHY is
synchronisation necessary at all?)
--
ξ: ) Proud to be curly

Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply
  #2  
Old February 10th 13, 09:10 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro,sci.physics
Koobee Wublee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 815
Default Cosmos Article: Was Einstein a Fake?

On Feb 9, 12:23 pm, Curlytop wrote:

Koobee Wublee set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time
continuum:


Koobee Wublee does not believe in the nonsense of spacetime. So,
eddies spirallying through spacetime is a mere figure of imagination
on Curly’s part. shrug

For example, the self-styled physicists have bragged about the GPS
being a hotbed of verification for GR. Well, in reality, it is far
from the case. The clock, the frequency accumulating the calendar
time, will certainly drift over time, temperature, stress, radiation,
reflection, refraction, and other engineering concerns, and it is
crucial to understand what exactly have to be synchronized. shrug


The scientists who set up GPS have allowed for known _and_unknown_ effects
which may cause the on-board clocks to run at different rates.


The GPS was set up by engineers with scientists as consultants ---
very incompetent consultants in fact. shrug

GR is a known effect and needs to be allowed for,


GR effects are also predicted by many non-GR hypotheses. So, the
discussion really is not GR-centric. shrug

but in case GR isn't the full
story and actually needs refinement (and I'm happy with such refinements
being found to be necessary), they allow for unknown factors that affect
the synchronism between them.


You need to identify why these refinements are necessary in
implementations. So far, the accused refinements identified by self-
styled physicists are not necessary as Koobee Wublee and many others
have argued before. shrug

In theoretical discussions of GR we consider ideal clocks, where all other
known effects (temperature variations, component aging, etc.) are allowed
for, and compare what would happen between such ideal clocks in Euclidean
space-time and such ideal clocks in reality.


In any realistic scenarios, one will find other non-GR effects to be
ever so dominating. shrug

[snip the satellite / Major Tom dialogue, details not relevant to the
next paragraph ]


Snipping that, you will remain in mysticism. shrug

What all this discussion specifies is a good practical way of synchronising
the satellite clocks to allow for all sorts of unknown factors.


Synchronization is an issue challenged by algorithm engineers. There
is no need to apply GR effect even if realistic. Thus, it is
absolutely a lie to say GR effects are taken into accounts in GPS
development. shrug

Doesn't
shake the theoretical basis of GR though. (Ask yourself: WHY is
synchronisation necessary at all?)


GPS synchronization of chronological time (not necessarily clock) is
necessary among the satellites (not with the ground stations). The
underlining reason has nothing to do with GR. shrug

ξ: ) Proud to be curly


Whatever makes you happy. Be happy as an Einstein Dingleberry.
shrug

Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply


What do you mean? Do you expect to receive a private email
complementing how smart you are? As a zealous believer in GR, you are
so predictable. Curly is another fine example where the following
Orwellian traits apply to self-styled physicists. shrug

** FAITH IS LOGIC
** LYING IS TEACHING
** DECEIT IS VALIDATION
** NITWIT IS GENIUS
** OCCULT IS SCIENCE
** FICTION IS THEORY
** FUDGING IS DERIVATION
** PARADOX IS KOSHER
** WORSHIP IS STUDY
** BULL**** IS TRUTH
** ARROGANCE IS SAGE
** BELIEVING IS LEARNING
** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE
** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM
** SCRIPTURE IS AXIOM
** CONJECTURE IS REALITY
** HANDWAVING IS REASONING
** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY
** PRIESTHOOD IS TENURE
** FRAUDULENCE IS FACT
** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS
** INCONSISTENCY IS CONSISTENCY
** INTERPRETATION IS VERIFICATION

shrug
  #3  
Old February 10th 13, 06:20 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro,sci.physics
Curlytop
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default Cosmos Article: Was Einstein a Fake?

Koobee Wublee set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time
continuum:

[ Snip the drivel because there's no arguing with antirelativists.]

shrug

ξ: ) Proud to be curly


Whatever makes you happy. Be happy as an Einstein Dingleberry.
shrug


Since I have plenty of curl I cannot be the divergence of a scalar field.
shrug

Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply


What do you mean? Do you expect to receive a private email
complementing how smart you are?


I have had many such, from appropriate posters here. I don't think I could
really expect one from you. shrug
--
ξ: ) Proud to be curly

Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply
  #4  
Old February 10th 13, 08:00 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
hanson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,934
Default Cosmos Article: Was Einstein a Fake?

ahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ROTFLMAO

--[[[ KW 1 -:- Curly 0, zero , null, nil, nada ]]]--

Passionately devout Einstein Dingleberry "Curlytop"
who knows
nothing but to worship Albert's sphinter cranked herself
as being....

Einstein Dingleberry Townsend who wrote:
Koobee Wublee set the following eddies spiralling through
the space-time continuum:
[ Snip the drivel because there's no arguing with antirelativists.]
Proud to be curly

KW wrote:
Whatever makes you happy. Be happy as an Einstein Dingleberry.
shrug

E-Dingleberry-Townsend wrote:
Since I have plenty of curl I cannot be the divergence of a scalar field.
shrug

hanson wrote:
Hey you Schmuck, listen: "Div & Curl" won't really help you to
proselytize effectively for your Einstein worship of Albert's
Sphincter.
But you can "Dive" into Albert's asshole, "Curl" up in there &
be ecstatically happy, despite the fact that already more than
60 years ago
__ Einstein himself became a RELATIVITY DENIER __
http://tinyurl.com/Einstein-denied-his-SR-and-GR.....

Thanks for the laughs, you Dreidel.... ahahahaha....



  #5  
Old February 11th 13, 08:18 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
hanson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,934
Default Cosmos Article: Was Einstein a Fake?


ahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ROTFLMAO

--[[[ KW 1 -:- Curly 0, zero , null, nil, nada ]]]--

Passionately devout Einstein Dingleberry "Curlytop"
who knows
nothing but to worship Albert's sphinter cranked herself
and being an....

Einstein Dingleberry Townsend wrote:
Koobee Wublee set the following eddies spiralling through
the space-time continuum:
[ Snip the drivel because there's no arguing with antirelativists.]
Proud to be curly

KW wrote:
Whatever makes you happy. Be happy as an Einstein Dingleberry.
shrug

E-Dingleberry-Townsend wrote:
Since I have plenty of curl I cannot be the divergence of a scalar field.
shrug

hanson wrote:
Hey you Schmuck, listen: "Div & Curl" won't really help you to
proselytize effectively for your worship of Einstein's Sphincter.
But you can "Dive" into Albert's asshole, "Curl" up in there &
be ecstatically happy, despite the fact that already more than
60 years ago
__ Einstein himself became a RELATIVITY DENIER __
http://tinyurl.com/Einstein-denied-his-SR-and-GR.....

Thanks for the laughs, you Dreidel.... ahahahaha....



  #6  
Old February 11th 13, 05:24 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
hanson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,934
Default Cosmos Article: Was Einstein a Fake?


ahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ROTFLMAO

--[[[ KW 1 -:- Curly 0, zero , null, nil, nada ]]]--


Passionately devout Einstein Dingleberry "Curlytop"
aka "Prai Jei"
knows nothing but to worship Albert's sphinter. He
cranked himself and being an....

Einstein Dingleberry Townsend wrote:
Koobee Wublee set the following eddies spiralling through
the space-time continuum:
[ Snip the drivel because there's no arguing with antirelativists.]
Proud to be curly

KW wrote:
Whatever makes you happy. Be happy as an Einstein Dingleberry.
shrug

E-Dingleberry-Townsend wrote:
Since I have plenty of curl I cannot be the divergence of a scalar field.
shrug

hanson wrote:
Hey you Schmuck, listen: "Div & Curl" won't really help you to
proselytize effectively for your worship of Einstein's Sphincter.
But you can "Dive" into Albert's colon, "Curl" up in there &
be ecstatically happy, despite the fact that already more than
60 years ago
__ Einstein himself became a RELATIVITY DENIER __
http://tinyurl.com/Einstein-denied-his-SR-and-GR.....

Thanks for the laughs, you Dreidel.... ahahahaha....



  #7  
Old March 12th 13, 05:58 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro,sci.physics
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default Cosmos Article: Was Einstein a Fake?

eOn Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:10:06 -0800 (PST), Koobee Wublee
wrote:

On Feb 9, 12:23 pm, Curlytop wrote:

Koobee Wublee set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time
continuum:


Koobee Wublee does not believe in the nonsense of spacetime. So,
eddies spirallying through spacetime is a mere figure of imagination
on Curly’s part. shrug

For example, the self-styled physicists have bragged about the GPS
being a hotbed of verification for GR. Well, in reality, it is far
from the case. The clock, the frequency accumulating the calendar
time, will certainly drift over time, temperature, stress, radiation,
reflection, refraction, and other engineering concerns, and it is
crucial to understand what exactly have to be synchronized. shrug


The scientists who set up GPS have allowed for known _and_unknown_ effects
which may cause the on-board clocks to run at different rates.


The GPS was set up by engineers with scientists as consultants ---
very incompetent consultants in fact. shrug

GR is a known effect and needs to be allowed for,


GR effects are also predicted by many non-GR hypotheses. So, the
discussion really is not GR-centric. shrug

but in case GR isn't the full
story and actually needs refinement (and I'm happy with such refinements
being found to be necessary), they allow for unknown factors that affect
the synchronism between them.


You need to identify why these refinements are necessary in
implementations. So far, the accused refinements identified by self-
styled physicists are not necessary as Koobee Wublee and many others
have argued before. shrug

In theoretical discussions of GR we consider ideal clocks, where all other
known effects (temperature variations, component aging, etc.) are allowed
for, and compare what would happen between such ideal clocks in Euclidean
space-time and such ideal clocks in reality.


In any realistic scenarios, one will find other non-GR effects to be
ever so dominating. shrug

[snip the satellite / Major Tom dialogue, details not relevant to the
next paragraph ]


Snipping that, you will remain in mysticism. shrug

What all this discussion specifies is a good practical way of synchronising
the satellite clocks to allow for all sorts of unknown factors.


Synchronization is an issue challenged by algorithm engineers. There
is no need to apply GR effect even if realistic. Thus, it is
absolutely a lie to say GR effects are taken into accounts in GPS
development. shrug

Doesn't
shake the theoretical basis of GR though. (Ask yourself: WHY is
synchronisation necessary at all?)


GPS synchronization of chronological time (not necessarily clock) is
necessary among the satellites (not with the ground stations). The
underlining reason has nothing to do with GR. shrug

?: ) Proud to be curly


Whatever makes you happy. Be happy as an Einstein Dingleberry.
shrug

Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply


What do you mean? Do you expect to receive a private email
complementing how smart you are? As a zealous believer in GR, you are
so predictable. Curly is another fine example where the following
Orwellian traits apply to self-styled physicists. shrug

** FAITH IS LOGIC
** LYING IS TEACHING
** DECEIT IS VALIDATION
** NITWIT IS GENIUS
** OCCULT IS SCIENCE
** FICTION IS THEORY
** FUDGING IS DERIVATION
** PARADOX IS KOSHER
** WORSHIP IS STUDY
** BULL**** IS TRUTH
** ARROGANCE IS SAGE
** BELIEVING IS LEARNING
** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE
** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM
** SCRIPTURE IS AXIOM
** CONJECTURE IS REALITY
** HANDWAVING IS REASONING
** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY
** PRIESTHOOD IS TENURE
** FRAUDULENCE IS FACT
** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS
** INCONSISTENCY IS CONSISTENCY
** INTERPRETATION IS VERIFICATION

shrug

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WAS EINSTEIN A FAKE? Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 6 July 28th 11 09:23 PM
WAS EINSTEIN A FAKE AFTER ALL? Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 29 October 21st 08 06:54 AM
Was Einstein a fake? Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 12 April 29th 08 09:35 PM
Article - Combing the Cosmos at High Speed: The Allen Telescope Array Jason H. SETI 1 October 16th 06 06:26 AM
Article Examines a Disputed Einstein Paper (Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 1 December 5th 05 12:17 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.