A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

God Proven to Exist According to Mainstream Physics



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 17th 12, 03:09 PM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics.electromag,sci.math,sci.philosophy.meta
James Redford
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 44
Default God Proven to Exist According to Mainstream Physics

God has been proven to exist based upon the most reserved view of the
known laws of physics. For much more on that, see my below article,
which details physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's
Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum
gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE) correctly describing
and unifying all the forces in physics. The Omega Point cosmology
demonstrates that the known laws of physics (viz., the Second Law of
Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics) require
that the universe end in the Omega Point (the final cosmological
singularity and state of infinite informational capacity having all
the properties traditionally claimed for God, and of which is a
different aspect of the Big Bang initial singularity, i.e., the first
cause):

James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of
Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), August 6, 2012
(orig. pub. December 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708;
PDF, 1740849 bytes, MD5: 20b5fffb10038ab679cd7be4825176a1.
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708 ,
http://archive.org/details/ThePhysic...OfEveryth ing
, http://theophysics.host56.com/Redfor...ics-of-God.pdf ,
http://webcitation.org/69kSvuziV ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/1foosl5woi2rgy2 ,
http://rapidshare.com/files/65731518...ics-of-God.pdf ,
http://depositfiles.com/files/4amwmei82 ,
http://ziddu.com/download/20072034/R...f-God.pdf.html

Below is the abstract to my above article:

""
ABSTRACT: Analysis is given of the Omega Point cosmology, an
extensively peer-reviewed proof (i.e., mathematical theorem) published
in leading physics journals by professor of physics and mathematics
Frank J. Tipler, which demonstrates that in order for the known laws
of physics to be mutually consistent, the universe must diverge to
infinite computational power as it collapses into a final cosmological
singularity, termed the Omega Point. The theorem is an intrinsic
component of the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard
Model Theory of Everything (TOE) describing and unifying all the
forces in physics, of which itself is also required by the known
physical laws. With infinite computational resources, the dead can be
resurrected--never to die again--via perfect computer emulation of the
multiverse from its start at the Big Bang. Miracles are also
physically allowed via electroweak quantum tunneling controlled by the
Omega Point cosmological singularity. The Omega Point is a different
aspect of the Big Bang cosmological singularity--the first cause--and
the Omega Point has all the haecceities claimed for God in the
traditional religions.

From this analysis, conclusions are drawn regarding the social,
ethical, economic and political implications of the Omega Point
cosmology.
""

Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology has been peer-reviewed
and published in a number of the world's leading physics and science
journals.[1] Even NASA itself has peer-reviewed his Omega Point
Theorem and found it correct according to the known laws of physics
(see below). No refutation of it exists within the peer-reviewed
scientific literature, or anywhere else for that matter.

Below are some of the peer-reviewed papers in physics and science
journals and proceedings wherein Prof. Tipler has published his Omega
Point cosmology:

* Frank J. Tipler, "Cosmological Limits on Computation", International
Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 25, No. 6 (June 1986), pp.
617-661, doi:10.1007/BF00670475, bibcode: 1986IJTP...25..617T. (First
paper on the Omega Point cosmology.) http://webcitation.org/64KHgOccs
,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/kfxn99...omputation.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Sensorium of God: Newton and Absolute Space",
bibcode: 1988nnds.conf..215T, in G[eorge]. V. Coyne, M[ichal]. Heller
and J[ozef]. Zycinski (Eds.), "Message" by Franciszek Macharski,
Newton and the New Direction in Science: Proceedings of the Cracow
Conference, 25 to 28 May 1987 (Vatican City: Specola Vaticana, 1988),
pp. 215-228, LCCN 88162460, bibcode: 1988nnds.conf.....C.
http://webcitation.org/69Vb0JF1W ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/0xicxa...ium-of-God.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Omega Point Theory: A Model of an Evolving
God", in Robert J. Russell, William R. Stoeger and George V. Coyne
(Eds.), message by John Paul II, Physics, Philosophy, and Theology: A
Common Quest for Understanding (Vatican City: Vatican Observatory, 2nd
ed., 2005; orig. pub. 1988), pp. 313-331, ISBN 0268015775, LCCN
89203331, bibcode: 1988pptc.book.....R.
http://webcitation.org/69VaKG2nd ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/0kwtgp...int-Theory.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Anthropic Principle: A Primer for
Philosophers", in Arthur Fine and Jarrett Leplin (Eds.), PSA 1988:
Proceedings of the 1988 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science
Association, Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers (East Lansing,
Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association, 1989), pp. 27-48, ISBN
091758628X. http://webcitation.org/69VarCM3I ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/1uim5b...-Principle.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Omega Point as Eschaton: Answers to
Pannenberg's Questions for Scientists", Zygon: Journal of Religion &
Science, Vol. 24, No. 2 (June 1989), pp. 217-253,
doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.1989.tb01112.x. Republished as Chapter 7: "The
Omega Point as Eschaton: Answers to Pannenberg's Questions to
Scientists" in Carol Rausch Albright and Joel Haugen (editors),
Beginning with the End: God, Science, and Wolfhart Pannenberg
(Chicago, Ill.: Open Court Publishing Company, 1997), pp. 156-194,
ISBN 0812693256, LCCN 97000114. http://webcitation.org/5nY0aytpz ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/wschm7...s-eschaton.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The ultimate fate of life in universes which
undergo inflation", Physics Letters B, Vol. 286, Nos. 1-2 (July 23,
1992), pp. 36-43, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90155-W, bibcode:
1992PhLB..286...36T. http://webcitation.org/64Uskd785 ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/zfu3hb...-inflation.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "A New Condition Implying the Existence of a
Constant Mean Curvature Foliation", bibcode: 1993dgr2.conf..306T, in
B. L. Hu and T. A. Jacobson (editors), Directions in General
Relativity: Proceedings of the 1993 International Symposium, Maryland,
Volume 2: Papers in Honor of Dieter Brill (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1993), pp. 306-315, ISBN 0521452678, bibcode:
1993dgr2.conf.....H. http://webcitation.org/5qbXJZiX5 ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/tb8kpb...-foliation.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "Ultrarelativistic Rockets and the Ultimate Future
of the Universe", NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Workshop
Proceedings, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, January
1999, pp. 111-119; an invited paper in the proceedings of a conference
held at and sponsored by NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio,
August 12-14, 1997; doi:2060/19990023204. Document ID: 19990023204.
Report Number: E-11429; NAS 1.55:208694; NASA/CP-1999-208694.
http://webcitation.org/5zPq69I0O Full proceedings volume:
http://webcitation.org/69zAxm0sT

* Frank J. Tipler, "There Are No Limits To The Open Society", Critical
Rationalist, Vol. 3, No. 2 (September 23, 1998).
http://webcitation.org/5sFYkHgSS ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/h7lkzd...en-Society.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, Jessica Graber, Matthew McGinley, Joshua
Nichols-Barrer and Christopher Staecker, "Closed Universes With Black
Holes But No Event Horizons As a Solution to the Black Hole
Information Problem", arXiv:gr-qc/0003082, March 20, 2000.
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0003082 Published in Monthly Notices of the
Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 379, No. 2 (August 2007), pp.
629-640, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11895.x, bibcode:
2007MNRAS.379..629T. http://webcitation.org/5vQ3M8uxB ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/mhaali...t-horizons.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Ultimate Future of the Universe, Black Hole
Event Horizon Topologies, Holography, and the Value of the
Cosmological Constant", arXiv:astro-ph/0104011, April 1, 2001.
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0104011 Published in J. Craig Wheeler
and Hugo Martel (editors), Relativistic Astrophysics: 20th Texas
Symposium, Austin, TX, 10-15 December 2000 (Melville, N.Y.: American
Institute of Physics, 2001), pp. 769-772, ISBN 0735400261, LCCN
2001094694, which is AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 586 (October 15,
2001), doi:10.1063/1.1419654, bibcode: 2001AIPC..586.....W.

* Frank J. Tipler, "Intelligent life in cosmology", International
Journal of Astrobiology, Vol. 2, No. 2 (April 2003), pp. 141-148,
doi:10.1017/S1473550403001526, bibcode: 2003IJAsB...2..141T.
http://webcitation.org/5o9QHKGuW Also at arXiv:0704.0058, March 31,
2007. http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0058

* F. J. Tipler, "The structure of the world from pure numbers",
Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 68, No. 4 (April 2005), pp.
897-964, doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/4/R04, bibcode: 2005RPPh...68..897T.
http://math.tulane.edu/~tipler/theoryofeverything.pdf Also released as
"Feynman-Weinberg Quantum Gravity and the Extended Standard Model as a
Theory of Everything", arXiv:0704.3276, April 24, 2007.
http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.3276

* Frank J. Tipler, "Inevitable Existence and Inevitable Goodness of
the Singularity", Journal of Consciousness Studies, Vol. 19, Nos. 1-2
(2012), pp. 183-93. http://webcitation.org/69JEi5wHp ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/09x8nr...ingularity.pdf

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, in which the above
August 2007 paper was published, is one of the world's leading
peer-reviewed astrophysics journals.

Prof. Tipler's paper "Ultrarelativistic Rockets and the Ultimate
Future of the Universe" was an invited paper for a conference held at
and sponsored by NASA Lewis Research Center, so NASA itself has
peer-reviewed Tipler's Omega Point Theorem (peer-review is a standard
process for published proceedings papers; and again, Tipler's said
paper was an *invited* paper by NASA, as opposed to what are called
"poster papers").

Zygon is the world's leading peer-reviewed academic journal on science
and religion.

Out of 50 articles, Prof. Tipler's 2005 Reports on Progress in Physics
paper--which presents the Omega Point/Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum
gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE)--was selected as one
of 12 for the "Highlights of 2005" accolade as "the very best articles
published in Reports on Progress in Physics in 2005 [Vol. 68].
Articles were selected by the Editorial Board for their outstanding
reviews of the field. They all received the highest praise from our
international referees and a high number of downloads from the journal
Website." (See Richard Palmer, Publisher, "Highlights of 2005",
Reports on Progress in Physics. http://webcitation.org/5o9VkK3eE )

Reports on Progress in Physics is the leading journal of the Institute
of Physics, Britain's main professional body for physicists. Further,
Reports on Progress in Physics has a higher impact factor (according
to Journal Citation Reports) than Physical Review Letters, which is
the most prestigious American physics journal (one, incidently, which
Prof. Tipler has been published in more than once). A journal's impact
factor reflects the importance the science community places in that
journal in the sense of actually citing its papers in their own
papers.

For much more on these matters, see my above-cited article "The
Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything" in
addition to my below website:

Theophysics: God Is the Ultimate Physicist
http://theophysics.host56.com , http://theophysics.ifastnet.com ,
http://theophysics.freevar.com

The only way to avoid the Omega Point cosmology is to reject the known
laws of physics (i.e., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General
Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics), and hence to reject empirical
science: as these physical laws have been confirmed by every
experiment to date. That is, there exists no rational reason for
thinking that the Omega Point cosmology is incorrect, and indeed, one
must engage in extreme irrationality in order to argue against the
Omega Point cosmology.

Additionally, we now have the quantum gravity Theory of Everything
(TOE) required by the known laws of physics and that correctly
describes and unifies all the forces in physics: of which inherently
produces the Omega Point cosmology. So here we have an additional high
degree of assurance that the Omega Point cosmology is correct.

-----

Note:

1. While there is a lot that gets published in physics journals that
is anti-reality and non-physical (such as String Theory, which
violates the known laws of physics and has no experimental support
whatsoever), the reason such things are allowed to pass the
peer-review process is because the paradigm of assumptions which such
papers are speaking to has been made known, and within their operating
paradigm none of the referees could find anything crucially wrong with
said papers. That is, the paradigm itself may have nothing to do with
reality, but the peer-reviewers could find nothing fundamentally wrong
with such papers within the operating assumptions of that paradigm.
Whereas, e.g., the operating paradigm of Prof. Tipler's 2005 Reports
on Progress in Physics paper and his other papers on the Omega Point
Theorem is the known laws of physics, i.e., our actual physical
reality which has been repeatedly confirmed by every experiment
conducted to date. So the professional physicists charged with
refereeing these papers could find nothing fundamentally wrong with
them within their operating paradigm, i.e., the known laws of physics.

----------------------------------------

James Redford, author of "Jesus Is an Anarchist", Social Science
Research Network (SSRN), December 4, 2011 (orig. pub. December 19,
2001), doi:10.2139/ssrn.1337761, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337761 ,
http://theophysics.host56.com/anarchist-jesus.pdf ,
http://webcitation.org/66AIz2rJw

Theophysics: God Is the Ultimate Physicist (a website with information
on Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point Theorem and the quantum gravity
Theory of Everything [TOE]) http://theophysics.host56.com ,
http://theophysics.ifastnet.com
  #2  
Old August 17th 12, 04:40 PM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics.electromag,sci.math,sci.philosophy.meta
Jens Stuckelberger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default God Proven to Exist According to Mainstream Physics

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:09:33 -0400, James Redford wrote:

[Mostly drivel]


I am so relieved to have proof that Odin is for real. Or is it
Baal?

  #3  
Old August 17th 12, 05:01 PM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics.electromag,sci.math,sci.philosophy.meta
James Redford
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 44
Default God Proven to Exist According to Mainstream Physics

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:40:41 +0000 (UTC), Jens Stuckelberger
wrote:

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:09:33 -0400, James Redford wrote:

[Mostly drivel]


I am so relieved to have proof that Odin is for real. Or is it
Baal?


You display your irrationalism. How unfortunate for you.

Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology has been peer-reviewed
and published in a number of the world's leading physics and science
journals.[1] Even NASA itself has peer-reviewed his Omega Point
Theorem and found it correct according to the known laws of physics
(see below). No refutation of it exists within the peer-reviewed
scientific literature, or anywhere else for that matter.

Below are some of the peer-reviewed papers in physics and science
journals and proceedings wherein Prof. Tipler has published his Omega
Point cosmology:

* Frank J. Tipler, "Cosmological Limits on Computation", International
Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 25, No. 6 (June 1986), pp.
617-661, doi:10.1007/BF00670475, bibcode: 1986IJTP...25..617T. (First
paper on the Omega Point cosmology.) http://webcitation.org/64KHgOccs
,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/kfxn99...omputation.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Sensorium of God: Newton and Absolute Space",
bibcode: 1988nnds.conf..215T, in G[eorge]. V. Coyne, M[ichal]. Heller
and J[ozef]. Zycinski (Eds.), "Message" by Franciszek Macharski,
Newton and the New Direction in Science: Proceedings of the Cracow
Conference, 25 to 28 May 1987 (Vatican City: Specola Vaticana, 1988),
pp. 215-228, LCCN 88162460, bibcode: 1988nnds.conf.....C.
http://webcitation.org/69Vb0JF1W ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/0xicxa...ium-of-God.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Omega Point Theory: A Model of an Evolving
God", in Robert J. Russell, William R. Stoeger and George V. Coyne
(Eds.), message by John Paul II, Physics, Philosophy, and Theology: A
Common Quest for Understanding (Vatican City: Vatican Observatory, 2nd
ed., 2005; orig. pub. 1988), pp. 313-331, ISBN 0268015775, LCCN
89203331, bibcode: 1988pptc.book.....R.
http://webcitation.org/69VaKG2nd ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/0kwtgp...int-Theory.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Anthropic Principle: A Primer for
Philosophers", in Arthur Fine and Jarrett Leplin (Eds.), PSA 1988:
Proceedings of the 1988 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science
Association, Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers (East Lansing,
Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association, 1989), pp. 27-48, ISBN
091758628X. http://webcitation.org/69VarCM3I ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/1uim5b...-Principle.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Omega Point as Eschaton: Answers to
Pannenberg's Questions for Scientists", Zygon: Journal of Religion &
Science, Vol. 24, No. 2 (June 1989), pp. 217-253,
doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.1989.tb01112.x. Republished as Chapter 7: "The
Omega Point as Eschaton: Answers to Pannenberg's Questions to
Scientists" in Carol Rausch Albright and Joel Haugen (editors),
Beginning with the End: God, Science, and Wolfhart Pannenberg
(Chicago, Ill.: Open Court Publishing Company, 1997), pp. 156-194,
ISBN 0812693256, LCCN 97000114. http://webcitation.org/5nY0aytpz ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/wschm7...s-eschaton.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The ultimate fate of life in universes which
undergo inflation", Physics Letters B, Vol. 286, Nos. 1-2 (July 23,
1992), pp. 36-43, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90155-W, bibcode:
1992PhLB..286...36T. http://webcitation.org/64Uskd785 ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/zfu3hb...-inflation.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "A New Condition Implying the Existence of a
Constant Mean Curvature Foliation", bibcode: 1993dgr2.conf..306T, in
B. L. Hu and T. A. Jacobson (editors), Directions in General
Relativity: Proceedings of the 1993 International Symposium, Maryland,
Volume 2: Papers in Honor of Dieter Brill (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1993), pp. 306-315, ISBN 0521452678, bibcode:
1993dgr2.conf.....H. http://webcitation.org/5qbXJZiX5 ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/tb8kpb...-foliation.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "Ultrarelativistic Rockets and the Ultimate Future
of the Universe", NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Workshop
Proceedings, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, January
1999, pp. 111-119; an invited paper in the proceedings of a conference
held at and sponsored by NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio,
August 12-14, 1997; doi:2060/19990023204. Document ID: 19990023204.
Report Number: E-11429; NAS 1.55:208694; NASA/CP-1999-208694.
http://webcitation.org/5zPq69I0O Full proceedings volume:
http://webcitation.org/69zAxm0sT

* Frank J. Tipler, "There Are No Limits To The Open Society", Critical
Rationalist, Vol. 3, No. 2 (September 23, 1998).
http://webcitation.org/5sFYkHgSS ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/h7lkzd...en-Society.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, Jessica Graber, Matthew McGinley, Joshua
Nichols-Barrer and Christopher Staecker, "Closed Universes With Black
Holes But No Event Horizons As a Solution to the Black Hole
Information Problem", arXiv:gr-qc/0003082, March 20, 2000.
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0003082 Published in Monthly Notices of the
Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 379, No. 2 (August 2007), pp.
629-640, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11895.x, bibcode:
2007MNRAS.379..629T. http://webcitation.org/5vQ3M8uxB ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/mhaali...t-horizons.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Ultimate Future of the Universe, Black Hole
Event Horizon Topologies, Holography, and the Value of the
Cosmological Constant", arXiv:astro-ph/0104011, April 1, 2001.
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0104011 Published in J. Craig Wheeler
and Hugo Martel (editors), Relativistic Astrophysics: 20th Texas
Symposium, Austin, TX, 10-15 December 2000 (Melville, N.Y.: American
Institute of Physics, 2001), pp. 769-772, ISBN 0735400261, LCCN
2001094694, which is AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 586 (October 15,
2001), doi:10.1063/1.1419654, bibcode: 2001AIPC..586.....W.

* Frank J. Tipler, "Intelligent life in cosmology", International
Journal of Astrobiology, Vol. 2, No. 2 (April 2003), pp. 141-148,
doi:10.1017/S1473550403001526, bibcode: 2003IJAsB...2..141T.
http://webcitation.org/5o9QHKGuW Also at arXiv:0704.0058, March 31,
2007. http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0058

* F. J. Tipler, "The structure of the world from pure numbers",
Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 68, No. 4 (April 2005), pp.
897-964, doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/4/R04, bibcode: 2005RPPh...68..897T.
http://math.tulane.edu/~tipler/theoryofeverything.pdf Also released as
"Feynman-Weinberg Quantum Gravity and the Extended Standard Model as a
Theory of Everything", arXiv:0704.3276, April 24, 2007.
http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.3276

* Frank J. Tipler, "Inevitable Existence and Inevitable Goodness of
the Singularity", Journal of Consciousness Studies, Vol. 19, Nos. 1-2
(2012), pp. 183-93. http://webcitation.org/69JEi5wHp ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/09x8nr...ingularity.pdf

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, in which the above
August 2007 paper was published, is one of the world's leading
peer-reviewed astrophysics journals.

Prof. Tipler's paper "Ultrarelativistic Rockets and the Ultimate
Future of the Universe" was an invited paper for a conference held at
and sponsored by NASA Lewis Research Center, so NASA itself has
peer-reviewed Tipler's Omega Point Theorem (peer-review is a standard
process for published proceedings papers; and again, Tipler's said
paper was an *invited* paper by NASA, as opposed to what are called
"poster papers").

Zygon is the world's leading peer-reviewed academic journal on science
and religion.

Out of 50 articles, Prof. Tipler's 2005 Reports on Progress in Physics
paper--which presents the Omega Point/Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum
gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE)--was selected as one
of 12 for the "Highlights of 2005" accolade as "the very best articles
published in Reports on Progress in Physics in 2005 [Vol. 68].
Articles were selected by the Editorial Board for their outstanding
reviews of the field. They all received the highest praise from our
international referees and a high number of downloads from the journal
Website." (See Richard Palmer, Publisher, "Highlights of 2005",
Reports on Progress in Physics. http://webcitation.org/5o9VkK3eE )

Reports on Progress in Physics is the leading journal of the Institute
of Physics, Britain's main professional body for physicists. Further,
Reports on Progress in Physics has a higher impact factor (according
to Journal Citation Reports) than Physical Review Letters, which is
the most prestigious American physics journal (one, incidently, which
Prof. Tipler has been published in more than once). A journal's impact
factor reflects the importance the science community places in that
journal in the sense of actually citing its papers in their own
papers.

For much more on these matters, see my following article in addition
to my below website:

James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of
Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), August 6, 2012
(orig. pub. December 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708;
PDF, 1740849 bytes, MD5: 20b5fffb10038ab679cd7be4825176a1.
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708 ,
http://archive.org/details/ThePhysic...OfEveryth ing
, http://theophysics.host56.com/Redfor...ics-of-God.pdf ,
http://webcitation.org/69kSvuziV ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/1foosl5woi2rgy2

Theophysics: God Is the Ultimate Physicist
http://theophysics.host56.com , http://theophysics.ifastnet.com ,
http://theophysics.freevar.com

The only way to avoid the Omega Point cosmology is to reject the known
laws of physics (i.e., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General
Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics), and hence to reject empirical
science: as these physical laws have been confirmed by every
experiment to date. That is, there exists no rational reason for
thinking that the Omega Point cosmology is incorrect, and indeed, one
must engage in extreme irrationality in order to argue against the
Omega Point cosmology.

Additionally, we now have the quantum gravity Theory of Everything
(TOE) required by the known laws of physics and that correctly
describes and unifies all the forces in physics: of which inherently
produces the Omega Point cosmology. So here we have an additional high
degree of assurance that the Omega Point cosmology is correct.

-----

Note:

1. While there is a lot that gets published in physics journals that
is anti-reality and non-physical (such as String Theory, which
violates the known laws of physics and has no experimental support
whatsoever), the reason such things are allowed to pass the
peer-review process is because the paradigm of assumptions which such
papers are speaking to has been made known, and within their operating
paradigm none of the referees could find anything crucially wrong with
said papers. That is, the paradigm itself may have nothing to do with
reality, but the peer-reviewers could find nothing fundamentally wrong
with such papers within the operating assumptions of that paradigm.
Whereas, e.g., the operating paradigm of Prof. Tipler's 2005 Reports
on Progress in Physics paper and his other papers on the Omega Point
Theorem is the known laws of physics, i.e., our actual physical
reality which has been repeatedly confirmed by every experiment
conducted to date. So the professional physicists charged with
refereeing these papers could find nothing fundamentally wrong with
them within their operating paradigm, i.e., the known laws of physics.

----------------------------------------

James Redford, author of "Jesus Is an Anarchist", Social Science
Research Network (SSRN), December 4, 2011 (orig. pub. December 19,
2001), doi:10.2139/ssrn.1337761, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337761 ,
http://theophysics.host56.com/anarchist-jesus.pdf ,
http://webcitation.org/66AIz2rJw

Theophysics: God Is the Ultimate Physicist (a website with information
on Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point Theorem and the quantum gravity
Theory of Everything [TOE]) http://theophysics.host56.com ,
http://theophysics.ifastnet.com
  #4  
Old August 17th 12, 08:32 PM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics.electromag,sci.math,sci.philosophy.meta
Jens Stuckelberger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default God Proven to Exist According to Mainstream Physics

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:01:35 -0400, James Redford wrote:

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:40:41 +0000 (UTC), Jens Stuckelberger
wrote:

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:09:33 -0400, James Redford wrote:

[Mostly drivel]


I am so relieved to have proof that Odin is for real. Or is it
Baal?


You display your irrationalism. How unfortunate for you.


Maybe so, but you haven't answered my question.
  #5  
Old August 17th 12, 08:53 PM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math
Dirk Van de moortel[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 26
Default God Proven to Exist According to Mainstream Physics

"Jens Stuckelberger" wrote in message

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:01:35 -0400, James Redford wrote:

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:40:41 +0000 (UTC), Jens Stuckelberger
wrote:

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:09:33 -0400, James Redford wrote:

[Mostly drivel]

I am so relieved to have proof that Odin is for real. Or is it
Baal?


You display your irrationalism. How unfortunate for you.


Maybe so, but you haven't answered my question.


People like that don't understand a question like that, as
it requires a sense of humour and some mildly abstract
thinking.
It is clear that your question (as is Tonico's) is a killer
argument. The only possible answer is of course
"Touché, sorry.", but having invested all that time putting
his junk together, he's got no way out, and in stead of
quietly crawling back under his rock, he'll just regurgitate
his junk until everyone gets tired of it. A classic :-)

Dirk Vdm

  #6  
Old August 17th 12, 09:45 PM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics.electromag,sci.philosophy.meta
Virgil[_8_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default No God Proven to Exist According to Mainstream Physics

In article ,
James Redford wrote:

God has been proven to exist based upon the most reserved view of the
known laws of physics.


Nonsense!
--


  #7  
Old August 17th 12, 09:46 PM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics.electromag,sci.math,sci.philosophy.meta
James Redford
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 44
Default God Proven to Exist According to Mainstream Physics

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:32:06 +0000 (UTC), Jens Stuckelberger
wrote:

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:01:35 -0400, James Redford wrote:

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:40:41 +0000 (UTC), Jens Stuckelberger
wrote:

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:09:33 -0400, James Redford wrote:

[Mostly drivel]

I am so relieved to have proof that Odin is for real. Or is it
Baal?


You display your irrationalism. How unfortunate for you.


Maybe so, but you haven't answered my question.


I did answer your question. In fact, I wrote an article in order to
anwser that question. That is called prolepsis--a word you are
obviously not familiar with.

For details on this issue, see my following article:

James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of
Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), August 6, 2012
(orig. pub. December 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708;
PDF, 1740849 bytes, MD5: 20b5fffb10038ab679cd7be4825176a1.
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708 ,
http://archive.org/details/ThePhysic...OfEveryth ing
, http://theophysics.host56.com/Redfor...ics-of-God.pdf ,
http://webcitation.org/69kSvuziV ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/1foosl5woi2rgy2

Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology has been peer-reviewed
and published in a number of the world's leading physics and science
journals.[1] Even NASA itself has peer-reviewed his Omega Point
Theorem and found it correct according to the known laws of physics
(see below). No refutation of it exists within the peer-reviewed
scientific literature, or anywhere else for that matter.

Below are some of the peer-reviewed papers in physics and science
journals and proceedings wherein Prof. Tipler has published his Omega
Point cosmology:

* Frank J. Tipler, "Cosmological Limits on Computation", International
Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 25, No. 6 (June 1986), pp.
617-661, doi:10.1007/BF00670475, bibcode: 1986IJTP...25..617T. (First
paper on the Omega Point cosmology.) http://webcitation.org/64KHgOccs
,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/kfxn99...omputation.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Sensorium of God: Newton and Absolute Space",
bibcode: 1988nnds.conf..215T, in G[eorge]. V. Coyne, M[ichal]. Heller
and J[ozef]. Zycinski (Eds.), "Message" by Franciszek Macharski,
Newton and the New Direction in Science: Proceedings of the Cracow
Conference, 25 to 28 May 1987 (Vatican City: Specola Vaticana, 1988),
pp. 215-228, LCCN 88162460, bibcode: 1988nnds.conf.....C.
http://webcitation.org/69Vb0JF1W ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/0xicxa...ium-of-God.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Omega Point Theory: A Model of an Evolving
God", in Robert J. Russell, William R. Stoeger and George V. Coyne
(Eds.), message by John Paul II, Physics, Philosophy, and Theology: A
Common Quest for Understanding (Vatican City: Vatican Observatory, 2nd
ed., 2005; orig. pub. 1988), pp. 313-331, ISBN 0268015775, LCCN
89203331, bibcode: 1988pptc.book.....R.
http://webcitation.org/69VaKG2nd ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/0kwtgp...int-Theory.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Anthropic Principle: A Primer for
Philosophers", in Arthur Fine and Jarrett Leplin (Eds.), PSA 1988:
Proceedings of the 1988 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science
Association, Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers (East Lansing,
Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association, 1989), pp. 27-48, ISBN
091758628X. http://webcitation.org/69VarCM3I ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/1uim5b...-Principle.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Omega Point as Eschaton: Answers to
Pannenberg's Questions for Scientists", Zygon: Journal of Religion &
Science, Vol. 24, No. 2 (June 1989), pp. 217-253,
doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.1989.tb01112.x. Republished as Chapter 7: "The
Omega Point as Eschaton: Answers to Pannenberg's Questions to
Scientists" in Carol Rausch Albright and Joel Haugen (editors),
Beginning with the End: God, Science, and Wolfhart Pannenberg
(Chicago, Ill.: Open Court Publishing Company, 1997), pp. 156-194,
ISBN 0812693256, LCCN 97000114. http://webcitation.org/5nY0aytpz ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/wschm7...s-eschaton.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The ultimate fate of life in universes which
undergo inflation", Physics Letters B, Vol. 286, Nos. 1-2 (July 23,
1992), pp. 36-43, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90155-W, bibcode:
1992PhLB..286...36T. http://webcitation.org/64Uskd785 ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/zfu3hb...-inflation.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "A New Condition Implying the Existence of a
Constant Mean Curvature Foliation", bibcode: 1993dgr2.conf..306T, in
B. L. Hu and T. A. Jacobson (editors), Directions in General
Relativity: Proceedings of the 1993 International Symposium, Maryland,
Volume 2: Papers in Honor of Dieter Brill (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1993), pp. 306-315, ISBN 0521452678, bibcode:
1993dgr2.conf.....H. http://webcitation.org/5qbXJZiX5 ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/tb8kpb...-foliation.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "Ultrarelativistic Rockets and the Ultimate Future
of the Universe", NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Workshop
Proceedings, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, January
1999, pp. 111-119; an invited paper in the proceedings of a conference
held at and sponsored by NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio,
August 12-14, 1997; doi:2060/19990023204. Document ID: 19990023204.
Report Number: E-11429; NAS 1.55:208694; NASA/CP-1999-208694.
http://webcitation.org/5zPq69I0O Full proceedings volume:
http://webcitation.org/69zAxm0sT

* Frank J. Tipler, "There Are No Limits To The Open Society", Critical
Rationalist, Vol. 3, No. 2 (September 23, 1998).
http://webcitation.org/5sFYkHgSS ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/h7lkzd...en-Society.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, Jessica Graber, Matthew McGinley, Joshua
Nichols-Barrer and Christopher Staecker, "Closed Universes With Black
Holes But No Event Horizons As a Solution to the Black Hole
Information Problem", arXiv:gr-qc/0003082, March 20, 2000.
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0003082 Published in Monthly Notices of the
Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 379, No. 2 (August 2007), pp.
629-640, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11895.x, bibcode:
2007MNRAS.379..629T. http://webcitation.org/5vQ3M8uxB ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/mhaali...t-horizons.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Ultimate Future of the Universe, Black Hole
Event Horizon Topologies, Holography, and the Value of the
Cosmological Constant", arXiv:astro-ph/0104011, April 1, 2001.
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0104011 Published in J. Craig Wheeler
and Hugo Martel (editors), Relativistic Astrophysics: 20th Texas
Symposium, Austin, TX, 10-15 December 2000 (Melville, N.Y.: American
Institute of Physics, 2001), pp. 769-772, ISBN 0735400261, LCCN
2001094694, which is AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 586 (October 15,
2001), doi:10.1063/1.1419654, bibcode: 2001AIPC..586.....W.

* Frank J. Tipler, "Intelligent life in cosmology", International
Journal of Astrobiology, Vol. 2, No. 2 (April 2003), pp. 141-148,
doi:10.1017/S1473550403001526, bibcode: 2003IJAsB...2..141T.
http://webcitation.org/5o9QHKGuW Also at arXiv:0704.0058, March 31,
2007. http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0058

* F. J. Tipler, "The structure of the world from pure numbers",
Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 68, No. 4 (April 2005), pp.
897-964, doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/4/R04, bibcode: 2005RPPh...68..897T.
http://math.tulane.edu/~tipler/theoryofeverything.pdf Also released as
"Feynman-Weinberg Quantum Gravity and the Extended Standard Model as a
Theory of Everything", arXiv:0704.3276, April 24, 2007.
http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.3276

* Frank J. Tipler, "Inevitable Existence and Inevitable Goodness of
the Singularity", Journal of Consciousness Studies, Vol. 19, Nos. 1-2
(2012), pp. 183-93. http://webcitation.org/69JEi5wHp ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/09x8nr...ingularity.pdf

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, in which the above
August 2007 paper was published, is one of the world's leading
peer-reviewed astrophysics journals.

Prof. Tipler's paper "Ultrarelativistic Rockets and the Ultimate
Future of the Universe" was an invited paper for a conference held at
and sponsored by NASA Lewis Research Center, so NASA itself has
peer-reviewed Tipler's Omega Point Theorem (peer-review is a standard
process for published proceedings papers; and again, Tipler's said
paper was an *invited* paper by NASA, as opposed to what are called
"poster papers").

Zygon is the world's leading peer-reviewed academic journal on science
and religion.

Out of 50 articles, Prof. Tipler's 2005 Reports on Progress in Physics
paper--which presents the Omega Point/Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum
gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE)--was selected as one
of 12 for the "Highlights of 2005" accolade as "the very best articles
published in Reports on Progress in Physics in 2005 [Vol. 68].
Articles were selected by the Editorial Board for their outstanding
reviews of the field. They all received the highest praise from our
international referees and a high number of downloads from the journal
Website." (See Richard Palmer, Publisher, "Highlights of 2005",
Reports on Progress in Physics. http://webcitation.org/5o9VkK3eE )

Reports on Progress in Physics is the leading journal of the Institute
of Physics, Britain's main professional body for physicists. Further,
Reports on Progress in Physics has a higher impact factor (according
to Journal Citation Reports) than Physical Review Letters, which is
the most prestigious American physics journal (one, incidently, which
Prof. Tipler has been published in more than once). A journal's impact
factor reflects the importance the science community places in that
journal in the sense of actually citing its papers in their own
papers.

For much more on these matters, see my above-cited article "The
Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything" in
addition to my below website:

Theophysics: God Is the Ultimate Physicist
http://theophysics.host56.com , http://theophysics.ifastnet.com ,
http://theophysics.freevar.com

The only way to avoid the Omega Point cosmology is to reject the known
laws of physics (i.e., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General
Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics), and hence to reject empirical
science: as these physical laws have been confirmed by every
experiment to date. That is, there exists no rational reason for
thinking that the Omega Point cosmology is incorrect, and indeed, one
must engage in extreme irrationality in order to argue against the
Omega Point cosmology.

Additionally, we now have the quantum gravity Theory of Everything
(TOE) required by the known laws of physics and that correctly
describes and unifies all the forces in physics: of which inherently
produces the Omega Point cosmology. So here we have an additional high
degree of assurance that the Omega Point cosmology is correct.

-----

Note:

1. While there is a lot that gets published in physics journals that
is anti-reality and non-physical (such as String Theory, which
violates the known laws of physics and has no experimental support
whatsoever), the reason such things are allowed to pass the
peer-review process is because the paradigm of assumptions which such
papers are speaking to has been made known, and within their operating
paradigm none of the referees could find anything crucially wrong with
said papers. That is, the paradigm itself may have nothing to do with
reality, but the peer-reviewers could find nothing fundamentally wrong
with such papers within the operating assumptions of that paradigm.
Whereas, e.g., the operating paradigm of Prof. Tipler's 2005 Reports
on Progress in Physics paper and his other papers on the Omega Point
Theorem is the known laws of physics, i.e., our actual physical
reality which has been repeatedly confirmed by every experiment
conducted to date. So the professional physicists charged with
refereeing these papers could find nothing fundamentally wrong with
them within their operating paradigm, i.e., the known laws of physics.

----------------------------------------

James Redford, author of "Jesus Is an Anarchist", Social Science
Research Network (SSRN), December 4, 2011 (orig. pub. December 19,
2001), doi:10.2139/ssrn.1337761, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337761 ,
http://theophysics.host56.com/anarchist-jesus.pdf ,
http://webcitation.org/66AIz2rJw

Theophysics: God Is the Ultimate Physicist (a website with information
on Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point Theorem and the quantum gravity
Theory of Everything [TOE]) http://theophysics.host56.com ,
http://theophysics.ifastnet.com
  #8  
Old August 17th 12, 09:51 PM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math
James Redford
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 44
Default God Proven to Exist According to Mainstream Physics

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 21:53:18 +0200, "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote:

"Jens Stuckelberger" wrote in message

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:01:35 -0400, James Redford wrote:

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:40:41 +0000 (UTC), Jens Stuckelberger
wrote:

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:09:33 -0400, James Redford wrote:

[Mostly drivel]

I am so relieved to have proof that Odin is for real. Or is it
Baal?

You display your irrationalism. How unfortunate for you.


Maybe so, but you haven't answered my question.


People like that don't understand a question like that, as
it requires a sense of humour and some mildly abstract
thinking.
It is clear that your question (as is Tonico's) is a killer
argument. The only possible answer is of course
"Touché, sorry.", but having invested all that time putting
his junk together, he's got no way out, and in stead of
quietly crawling back under his rock, he'll just regurgitate
his junk until everyone gets tired of it. A classic :-)

Dirk Vdm


I actually answered the question well before Jens Stuckelberger asked
it. In fact, I wrote an article in order to answer that question. You
obviously are not familiar with the concept of prolepsis.

For details on this issue, see my following article:

James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of
Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), August 6, 2012
(orig. pub. December 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708;
PDF, 1740849 bytes, MD5: 20b5fffb10038ab679cd7be4825176a1.
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708 ,
http://archive.org/details/ThePhysic...OfEveryth ing
, http://theophysics.host56.com/Redfor...ics-of-God.pdf ,
http://webcitation.org/69kSvuziV ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/1foosl5woi2rgy2

Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology has been peer-reviewed
and published in a number of the world's leading physics and science
journals.[1] Even NASA itself has peer-reviewed his Omega Point
Theorem and found it correct according to the known laws of physics
(see below). No refutation of it exists within the peer-reviewed
scientific literature, or anywhere else for that matter.

Below are some of the peer-reviewed papers in physics and science
journals and proceedings wherein Prof. Tipler has published his Omega
Point cosmology:

* Frank J. Tipler, "Cosmological Limits on Computation", International
Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 25, No. 6 (June 1986), pp.
617-661, doi:10.1007/BF00670475, bibcode: 1986IJTP...25..617T. (First
paper on the Omega Point cosmology.) http://webcitation.org/64KHgOccs
,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/kfxn99...omputation.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Sensorium of God: Newton and Absolute Space",
bibcode: 1988nnds.conf..215T, in G[eorge]. V. Coyne, M[ichal]. Heller
and J[ozef]. Zycinski (Eds.), "Message" by Franciszek Macharski,
Newton and the New Direction in Science: Proceedings of the Cracow
Conference, 25 to 28 May 1987 (Vatican City: Specola Vaticana, 1988),
pp. 215-228, LCCN 88162460, bibcode: 1988nnds.conf.....C.
http://webcitation.org/69Vb0JF1W ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/0xicxa...ium-of-God.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Omega Point Theory: A Model of an Evolving
God", in Robert J. Russell, William R. Stoeger and George V. Coyne
(Eds.), message by John Paul II, Physics, Philosophy, and Theology: A
Common Quest for Understanding (Vatican City: Vatican Observatory, 2nd
ed., 2005; orig. pub. 1988), pp. 313-331, ISBN 0268015775, LCCN
89203331, bibcode: 1988pptc.book.....R.
http://webcitation.org/69VaKG2nd ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/0kwtgp...int-Theory.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Anthropic Principle: A Primer for
Philosophers", in Arthur Fine and Jarrett Leplin (Eds.), PSA 1988:
Proceedings of the 1988 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science
Association, Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers (East Lansing,
Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association, 1989), pp. 27-48, ISBN
091758628X. http://webcitation.org/69VarCM3I ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/1uim5b...-Principle.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Omega Point as Eschaton: Answers to
Pannenberg's Questions for Scientists", Zygon: Journal of Religion &
Science, Vol. 24, No. 2 (June 1989), pp. 217-253,
doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.1989.tb01112.x. Republished as Chapter 7: "The
Omega Point as Eschaton: Answers to Pannenberg's Questions to
Scientists" in Carol Rausch Albright and Joel Haugen (editors),
Beginning with the End: God, Science, and Wolfhart Pannenberg
(Chicago, Ill.: Open Court Publishing Company, 1997), pp. 156-194,
ISBN 0812693256, LCCN 97000114. http://webcitation.org/5nY0aytpz ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/wschm7...s-eschaton.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The ultimate fate of life in universes which
undergo inflation", Physics Letters B, Vol. 286, Nos. 1-2 (July 23,
1992), pp. 36-43, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90155-W, bibcode:
1992PhLB..286...36T. http://webcitation.org/64Uskd785 ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/zfu3hb...-inflation.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "A New Condition Implying the Existence of a
Constant Mean Curvature Foliation", bibcode: 1993dgr2.conf..306T, in
B. L. Hu and T. A. Jacobson (editors), Directions in General
Relativity: Proceedings of the 1993 International Symposium, Maryland,
Volume 2: Papers in Honor of Dieter Brill (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1993), pp. 306-315, ISBN 0521452678, bibcode:
1993dgr2.conf.....H. http://webcitation.org/5qbXJZiX5 ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/tb8kpb...-foliation.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "Ultrarelativistic Rockets and the Ultimate Future
of the Universe", NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Workshop
Proceedings, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, January
1999, pp. 111-119; an invited paper in the proceedings of a conference
held at and sponsored by NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio,
August 12-14, 1997; doi:2060/19990023204. Document ID: 19990023204.
Report Number: E-11429; NAS 1.55:208694; NASA/CP-1999-208694.
http://webcitation.org/5zPq69I0O Full proceedings volume:
http://webcitation.org/69zAxm0sT

* Frank J. Tipler, "There Are No Limits To The Open Society", Critical
Rationalist, Vol. 3, No. 2 (September 23, 1998).
http://webcitation.org/5sFYkHgSS ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/h7lkzd...en-Society.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, Jessica Graber, Matthew McGinley, Joshua
Nichols-Barrer and Christopher Staecker, "Closed Universes With Black
Holes But No Event Horizons As a Solution to the Black Hole
Information Problem", arXiv:gr-qc/0003082, March 20, 2000.
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0003082 Published in Monthly Notices of the
Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 379, No. 2 (August 2007), pp.
629-640, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11895.x, bibcode:
2007MNRAS.379..629T. http://webcitation.org/5vQ3M8uxB ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/mhaali...t-horizons.pdf

* Frank J. Tipler, "The Ultimate Future of the Universe, Black Hole
Event Horizon Topologies, Holography, and the Value of the
Cosmological Constant", arXiv:astro-ph/0104011, April 1, 2001.
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0104011 Published in J. Craig Wheeler
and Hugo Martel (editors), Relativistic Astrophysics: 20th Texas
Symposium, Austin, TX, 10-15 December 2000 (Melville, N.Y.: American
Institute of Physics, 2001), pp. 769-772, ISBN 0735400261, LCCN
2001094694, which is AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 586 (October 15,
2001), doi:10.1063/1.1419654, bibcode: 2001AIPC..586.....W.

* Frank J. Tipler, "Intelligent life in cosmology", International
Journal of Astrobiology, Vol. 2, No. 2 (April 2003), pp. 141-148,
doi:10.1017/S1473550403001526, bibcode: 2003IJAsB...2..141T.
http://webcitation.org/5o9QHKGuW Also at arXiv:0704.0058, March 31,
2007. http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0058

* F. J. Tipler, "The structure of the world from pure numbers",
Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 68, No. 4 (April 2005), pp.
897-964, doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/4/R04, bibcode: 2005RPPh...68..897T.
http://math.tulane.edu/~tipler/theoryofeverything.pdf Also released as
"Feynman-Weinberg Quantum Gravity and the Extended Standard Model as a
Theory of Everything", arXiv:0704.3276, April 24, 2007.
http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.3276

* Frank J. Tipler, "Inevitable Existence and Inevitable Goodness of
the Singularity", Journal of Consciousness Studies, Vol. 19, Nos. 1-2
(2012), pp. 183-93. http://webcitation.org/69JEi5wHp ,
http://flashmirrors.com/files/09x8nr...ingularity.pdf

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, in which the above
August 2007 paper was published, is one of the world's leading
peer-reviewed astrophysics journals.

Prof. Tipler's paper "Ultrarelativistic Rockets and the Ultimate
Future of the Universe" was an invited paper for a conference held at
and sponsored by NASA Lewis Research Center, so NASA itself has
peer-reviewed Tipler's Omega Point Theorem (peer-review is a standard
process for published proceedings papers; and again, Tipler's said
paper was an *invited* paper by NASA, as opposed to what are called
"poster papers").

Zygon is the world's leading peer-reviewed academic journal on science
and religion.

Out of 50 articles, Prof. Tipler's 2005 Reports on Progress in Physics
paper--which presents the Omega Point/Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum
gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE)--was selected as one
of 12 for the "Highlights of 2005" accolade as "the very best articles
published in Reports on Progress in Physics in 2005 [Vol. 68].
Articles were selected by the Editorial Board for their outstanding
reviews of the field. They all received the highest praise from our
international referees and a high number of downloads from the journal
Website." (See Richard Palmer, Publisher, "Highlights of 2005",
Reports on Progress in Physics. http://webcitation.org/5o9VkK3eE )

Reports on Progress in Physics is the leading journal of the Institute
of Physics, Britain's main professional body for physicists. Further,
Reports on Progress in Physics has a higher impact factor (according
to Journal Citation Reports) than Physical Review Letters, which is
the most prestigious American physics journal (one, incidently, which
Prof. Tipler has been published in more than once). A journal's impact
factor reflects the importance the science community places in that
journal in the sense of actually citing its papers in their own
papers.

For much more on these matters, see my above-cited article "The
Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything" in
addition to my below website:

Theophysics: God Is the Ultimate Physicist
http://theophysics.host56.com , http://theophysics.ifastnet.com ,
http://theophysics.freevar.com

The only way to avoid the Omega Point cosmology is to reject the known
laws of physics (i.e., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General
Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics), and hence to reject empirical
science: as these physical laws have been confirmed by every
experiment to date. That is, there exists no rational reason for
thinking that the Omega Point cosmology is incorrect, and indeed, one
must engage in extreme irrationality in order to argue against the
Omega Point cosmology.

Additionally, we now have the quantum gravity Theory of Everything
(TOE) required by the known laws of physics and that correctly
describes and unifies all the forces in physics: of which inherently
produces the Omega Point cosmology. So here we have an additional high
degree of assurance that the Omega Point cosmology is correct.

-----

Note:

1. While there is a lot that gets published in physics journals that
is anti-reality and non-physical (such as String Theory, which
violates the known laws of physics and has no experimental support
whatsoever), the reason such things are allowed to pass the
peer-review process is because the paradigm of assumptions which such
papers are speaking to has been made known, and within their operating
paradigm none of the referees could find anything crucially wrong with
said papers. That is, the paradigm itself may have nothing to do with
reality, but the peer-reviewers could find nothing fundamentally wrong
with such papers within the operating assumptions of that paradigm.
Whereas, e.g., the operating paradigm of Prof. Tipler's 2005 Reports
on Progress in Physics paper and his other papers on the Omega Point
Theorem is the known laws of physics, i.e., our actual physical
reality which has been repeatedly confirmed by every experiment
conducted to date. So the professional physicists charged with
refereeing these papers could find nothing fundamentally wrong with
them within their operating paradigm, i.e., the known laws of physics.

----------------------------------------

James Redford, author of "Jesus Is an Anarchist", Social Science
Research Network (SSRN), December 4, 2011 (orig. pub. December 19,
2001), doi:10.2139/ssrn.1337761, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337761 ,
http://theophysics.host56.com/anarchist-jesus.pdf ,
http://webcitation.org/66AIz2rJw

Theophysics: God Is the Ultimate Physicist (a website with information
on Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point Theorem and the quantum gravity
Theory of Everything [TOE]) http://theophysics.host56.com ,
http://theophysics.ifastnet.com
  #9  
Old August 17th 12, 09:59 PM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics.electromag,sci.math,sci.philosophy.meta
William Hughes[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default God Proven to Exist According to Mainstream Physics

On Aug 17, 1:01*pm, James Redford wrote:

typical crank stuff

The fact that the Omega theorem holds does not mean
a particular God exists.

Of course the Omega theorem is true, look
at this ...
  #10  
Old August 17th 12, 10:57 PM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math
Dirk Van de moortel[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 26
Default God Proven to Exist According to Mainstream Physics

"James Redford" wrote in message

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 21:53:18 +0200, "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote:

"Jens Stuckelberger" wrote in
message
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:01:35 -0400, James Redford wrote:

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:40:41 +0000 (UTC), Jens Stuckelberger
wrote:

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:09:33 -0400, James Redford wrote:

[Mostly drivel]

I am so relieved to have proof that Odin is for real. Or is it
Baal?

You display your irrationalism. How unfortunate for you.

Maybe so, but you haven't answered my question.


People like that don't understand a question like that, as
it requires a sense of humour and some mildly abstract
thinking.
It is clear that your question (as is Tonico's) is a killer
argument. The only possible answer is of course
"Touché, sorry.", but having invested all that time putting
his junk together, he's got no way out, and in stead of
quietly crawling back under his rock, he'll just regurgitate
his junk until everyone gets tired of it. A classic :-)

Dirk Vdm


I actually answered the question well before Jens Stuckelberger asked
it. In fact, I wrote an article in order to answer that question. You
obviously are not familiar with the concept of prolepsis.

For details on this issue, see my following article:


A classic it is.

Dirk Vdm

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics Kalkidas Astronomy Misc 5 October 11th 09 06:45 PM
God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics Abu Husein Astronomy Misc 0 September 12th 09 10:48 AM
God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics James Redford Astronomy Misc 9 October 21st 08 05:23 AM
God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics James Redford Astronomy Misc 10 August 27th 08 02:01 AM
God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics James Redford Astronomy Misc 13 June 19th 08 01:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.