#1
|
|||
|
|||
"What is that?"
My boyfriend and I wanted to watch the meteor shower this past weekend and I was determined to get somewhere nice and dark so we could see as much as possible. We went out on Sunday the 12th to an area of New Jersey that's mostly just farms so there was minimal light pollution.
Dan had noticed what we initially thought were just two very dim stars. They were light enough that there would have been no way we would have noticed them if there was any light pollution where we were. But after looking at them for a few seconds we noticed that they were moving. They were far enough apart that they were obviously two separate items, but they were moving in perfect unison. We were able to watch them move across the sky for a minute or so, so I imagine they must have been moving pretty fast, judging by how far away I assumed they were. The entire time we watched them, they stayed the exact same distance apart, and in the same formation (one was just slightly higher than the other, but they were mostly one behind the other.) I am not a hobbyist, nor do I pretend to know anything about this. The extent of my expertise is that I could lay on the beach and stare at the stars for hours! But my immediate thought was maybe they were satellites? I was under the impression that, under the right circumstances, you could sometimes see them with the naked eye. I posted about it on facebook and was immediately shot down by a friend who told me that you could not, so now I'm really curious about what this could have been. I'm pretty convinced that they were not airplanes. They didn't look like any planes I've ever seen, moved too slowly to be planes, and I find it very hard to believe that planes would keep in such PERFECT formation to each other. Please don't think I expect any exact answers ("it was satellite such and such run by such and such..."), I'm just really curious and looking for some possibilities of what it COULD maybe be. Thanks in advance for any help, and sorry if this isn't where this belongs!!! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"What is that?"
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:36:59 +0000, Sweet Chaos
wrote: Please don't think I expect any exact answers ("it was satellite such and such run by such and such..."), I'm just really curious and looking for some possibilities of what it COULD maybe be. Thanks in advance for any help, and sorry if this isn't where this belongs!!! There are lots of satellites that are visible with the naked eye. See http://www.satobs.org/ for more information. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"What is that?"
On 17/08/2012 01:36, Sweet Chaos wrote:
Please don't think I expect any exact answers ("it was satellite such and such run by such and such..."), I'm just really curious and looking for some possibilities of what it COULD maybe be. It is quite possible your expectations can be exceeded. Very accurate programmes are online to predict satellite positions see below. sci.astro.amateur might get you more observers though. This group is full of nutters who have NEW THEORIES OF THE UNIVERSE and have not yet learnt where the shift key is on their keyboard. .amateur was split off to deal with observational hobby astronomy and avoid the kooks. BTW You appear to be using some parasitic front end banter website to post to Usenet and probably seeing lots of adverts as a result. Thanks in advance for any help, and sorry if this isn't where this belongs!!! If you know your location, date and time when you saw them and direction of travel there is a very good chance of identifying them. Try: http://www.heavens-above.com/ Set your location from the map or database (database gets the time zone right for you) and select daily predictions for all satellites brighter than 4.5 (dimmest) and you should be in business. When it isn't doing anything else BMEWS exercises by tracking satellites and space junk and these programmes use that data to allow you to identify satellites at more or less any date. Also check out their predictions of Iridium flares for the coming week - they really are quite something to see! Regards, Martin Brown |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"What is that?"
Sweet Chaos wrote:
My boyfriend and I wanted to watch the meteor shower this past weekend and I was determined to get somewhere nice and dark so we could see as much as possible. We went out on Sunday the 12th to an area of New Jersey that's mostly just farms so there was minimal light pollution. Dan had noticed what we initially thought were just two very dim stars. They were light enough that there would have been no way we would have noticed them if there was any light pollution where we were. But after looking at them for a few seconds we noticed that they were moving. They were far enough apart that they were obviously two separate items, but they were moving in perfect unison. We were able to watch them move across the sky for a minute or so, so I imagine they must have been moving pretty fast, judging by how far away I assumed they were. The entire time we watched them, they stayed the exact same distance apart, and in the same formation (one was just slightly higher than the other, but they were mostly one behind the other.) I am not a hobbyist, nor do I pretend to know anything about this. The extent of my expertise is that I could lay on the beach and stare at the stars for hours! But my immediate thought was maybe they were satellites? I was under the impression that, under the right circumstances, you could sometimes see them with the naked eye. I posted about it on facebook and was immediately shot down by a friend who told me that you could not, so now I'm really curious about what this could have been. I'm pretty convinced that they were not airplanes. They didn't look like any planes I've ever seen, moved too slowly to be planes, and I find it very hard to believe that planes would keep in such PERFECT formation to each other. Please don't think I expect any exact answers ("it was satellite such and such run by such and such..."), I'm just really curious and looking for some possibilities of what it COULD maybe be. Thanks in advance for any help, and sorry if this isn't where this belongs!!! Satellites seems to be a likely identification. Could be either a satellite in orbit with its final stage booster in a similar orbit, or a space experiment that uses two satellites, or - less likely - military aircraft in formation at high altitude*, without the usual strobe lights and flashing lights. Whether this ever happens over land I do not know. *e.g., mid-air refueling exercise. -- Mike Dworetsky (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply) |
#5
|
||||||
|
||||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks again to everyone who took the time to respond. I appreciate your input! =) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"What is that?"
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 5:36:59 PM UTC-7, Sweet Chaos wrote:
My boyfriend and I wanted to watch the meteor shower this past weekend and I was determined to get somewhere nice and dark so we could see as much as possible. We went out on Sunday the 12th to an area of New Jersey that's mostly just farms so there was minimal light pollution. Dan had noticed what we initially thought were just two very dim stars. They were light enough that there would have been no way we would have noticed them if there was any light pollution where we were. But after looking at them for a few seconds we noticed that they were moving. They were far enough apart that they were obviously two separate items, but they were moving in perfect unison. We were able to watch them move across the sky for a minute or so, so I imagine they must have been moving pretty fast, judging by how far away I assumed they were. The entire time we watched them, they stayed the exact same distance apart, and in the same formation (one was just slightly higher than the other, but they were mostly one behind the other.) I am not a hobbyist, nor do I pretend to know anything about this. The extent of my expertise is that I could lay on the beach and stare at the stars for hours! But my immediate thought was maybe they were satellites? I was under the impression that, under the right circumstances, you could sometimes see them with the naked eye. I posted about it on facebook and was immediately shot down by a friend who told me that you could not, so now I'm really curious about what this could have been. I'm pretty convinced that they were not airplanes. They didn't look like any planes I've ever seen, moved too slowly to be planes, and I find it very hard to believe that planes would keep in such PERFECT formation to each other. Please don't think I expect any exact answers ("it was satellite such and such run by such and such..."), I'm just really curious and looking for some possibilities of what it COULD maybe be. Thanks in advance for any help, and sorry if this isn't where this belongs!!! -- Sweet Chaos What you saw is very likely one of these guys... http://www.satobs.org/noss.html .... I've seen them many, many times, and they look just as you have described \Paul A |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"What is that?"
On 18/08/2012 00:22, Sweet Chaos wrote:
Mark Sieving;1221007 Wrote: There are lots of satellites that are visible with the naked eye. See http://www.satobs.org/ for more information. Thank you! Mark Sieving;1221007 Wrote: It is quite possible your expectations can be exceeded. Very accurate programmes are online to predict satellite positions see below. That's awesome! Martin Brown;1221008 Wrote: BTW You appear to be using some parasitic front end banter website to post to Usenet and probably seeing lots of adverts as a result. Huh? I'm confused. spacebanter.com? Yes. That is a parasitic website that takes conversations occurring on the ancient *free* Usenet text newsgroups (in this case sci.astro) and repackages them with adverts for commercial gain. The posts you make on that site are reflected onto Usenet where experts hang out. You can see the entirety of Usenet by going to Google groups although I suggest you get a real newsreader and subscribe to free AOIE newsfeed or Teranews (one time sub $5 for text only). There is a newsgroup to cover almost every interest although these days some are low traffic. https://groups.google.com/forum/?fro...orum/sci.astro https://groups.google.com/forum/?fro....astro.amateur The "new" Google groups is inferior to the old service at https://groups.google.com/?hl=en-GB&noredirect=true You can also search these archives for old posts and subjects which can be invaluable as they go back to about 1990. Google broke the indexes though so you may not always find posts that you know are there. Martin Brown;1221008 Wrote: If you know your location, date and time when you saw them and direction of travel there is a very good chance of identifying them. Try: http://www.heavens-above.com/ Set your location from the map or database (database gets the time zone right for you) and select daily predictions for all satellites brighter than 4.5 (dimmest) and you should be in business. I tried that site when I first started looking around here but it kinda confused me more than anything so I quit and registered here lol The trouble is "here" isn't where you think it is. Here is actually Usenet and you are seeing a pale reflection of it inside a website. Many old hands consider the parasitic behaviour of -banter sites rather distasteful since they are making money off freely given advice. Regards, Martin Brown |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"What is that?"
Martin Brown wrote:
Huh? I'm confused. spacebanter.com? Yes. That is a parasitic website that takes conversations occurring on the ancient *free* Usenet text newsgroups (in this case sci.astro) and repackages them with adverts for commercial gain. The posts you make on that site are reflected onto Usenet where experts hang out. Hello Martin What am I missing? I went to spacebanter.com and expected to see what you describe. I agree the site is "parasitic" in some sense, but so is Google Groups! But - where are the adverts? Don't you see them unless you register? I use Safari 6.0 with everything enabled and no pop-up blocking. Having said that, groups are much less readable on the site thanif you are using a threaded newsreader or Google Groups.. -- I recommend Macs to my friends, and Windows machines to those whom I don't mind billing by the hour |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
might Odissey-Moon be the Google's expected, preferred, designed,"chosen" and (maybe) "funded" GLXP team to WIN the prize? with ALL otherteams that just play the "sparring partners" role? | gaetanomarano | Policy | 3 | September 27th 08 06:47 PM |
just THREE YEARS AFTER my "CREWLESS Space Shuttle" article, theNSF """experts""" discover the idea of an unmanned Shuttle to fill the2010-2016 cargo-to-ISS (six+ years) GAP | gaetanomarano | Policy | 3 | September 15th 08 04:47 PM |
and now, Ladies and Gentlemen, the NSF "slow motion experts" have(finally) "invented" MY "Multipurpose Orbital Rescue Vehicle"... just 20 | gaetanomarano | Policy | 9 | August 30th 08 12:05 AM |