Again: Relativity for Thought Experiments

why cannot He give us any qualitative resolution
of the twins' paradox, to show us that it really is
an insoluble paradox, like Russell's village idiot,
I mean, barber?

PS: your format is hard to read; personally,
I prefer top-posting, but apparently it may be the case that
folks' newsreaders are not set like the default-setting
in the googolplex, so they sometimes whine about it.

It looks like PD is trapped by exposing itself. *shrug
____________________________________
You are ranting again. You will never learn anything in this manner.

On Nov 13, 10:53 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
Daryl McCullough pooped all over the thread:

Why do Einstein Dingleberries worship Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar? The biggest misunderstanding comes from the
myth that special relativity (SR) predicts the following energy-mass
relationship.

** E = m c^2 / sqrt(1 – v^2 /c^2)

Well, SR gives no such result if the mathematics that supports the
derivation is done correctly. The mistake come forth by Einstein the
nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar can be found in section 10 of
that mistake-prone 1905 paper.

At first, Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was able
to derive the acceleration transform form the Lorentz transform. The
x component is:

** dx’^2/dt’^2 = gamma^3 dx^2/dt^2

Where

** gamma = 1 / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2)

Following the logic and intention of Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar, the work done is:

** W’ = Integral(m dx’^2/dt’^2 dx’)

Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was able to do a
mathemaGic trick similar to the mathemaGical resolution to the twins’
paradox:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/31aa975f93a....

Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was able to write
down the following after a series of mathemaGic tricks which true
scholars of physics would call them mathematical errors. shrug

** W = Integral[v, 0](m v dv / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2)^(3/2))

These mathematic errors reflect how much lacking in understanding of
the Galilean or the Lorentz transforms among the self-styled
physicists. shrug

As He had said, there are only two words to describe the Einstein
Dingleberrries --- “fvcking sad”. shrug

Hint: The Lorentz transform should be written in the following form
where there is no confusion able to lend itself upon these
mathemaGical tricks.

** dt_3 = (dt_1 + v_31 dx_12 / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2)
** dx_32 = (dx_12 + v_31 dt_1) / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2)
** dy_32 = dy_12, dz_31 = dz_12

Where

** dx_12/dt_1 != v_13

[****, ****, and more **** snipped for sanitation purposes]

McCullough is pooping all over the thread again with his useless
mathemaGical nonsense. Notice Tom Roberts, Paul Andersen, or other
high-ranking self-styled physicists are not coming to the rescue.
Notice PD the coward has no balls to agree with the crap spewed by
McCullough but continues to weasel himself out of the discussion.
Notice McCullough has no heart to include all the newsgroups to spread
his bull****. Gee! The only buddy that McCullough has in this dire
situation is Dirk Van de moortel, the sperm lover. It looks like
these two enjoy spraying sperm all over each other. shrug

they're letting me handle it;
you have only replied to me, once,
that I barely recall (that is to say,
insubstantively, as with your sniping, now).

Continue on this issue outside of the cunning of man is interpreted as a wake-up part of PD. That means that PD need to educate as Daryl McCullough, Deke Fan de moortel, Peter Webb and the other Einstein Dingleberries of trashcans there is no resolution of the twin conflicts.