What To Do With a Two Body Gravity Problem (That Can Vary in OneSpace and One Time Dimension)

On Nov 21, 1:22*pm, William Mook wrote:

Sorry, Mook, but you always seem to have a repetoire of
past experiences with which to back your worthless claim
that you somehow know more than I do about the system
that I am studying,

: Its not about who knows more. Its about what's true.

WRONG. It's about who knows MORE of the truth – NOT LESS. Who's
talking about motors here? You?

: You claim things that are not true. I recognize that you believe

No, YOU are claiming they are not true. YOU haven't given any
worthwhile data to base your claim that my theory of the "motor in the
magnet" is wrong - you're just blowing smoke by presenting your own,
disconnected and unrelated ideas as something "sound", when you're not
even referring to the same fundamentals that I am using! Two separate
magnets with unpaired spins actually emulate two quantum electrons!

Have you ever heard that anywhere?

No, I doubt it, so therefore you are concluding that my facts are
flawed, when in fact, it is the status-quo thinking of regarding the
electron as just a simple unit of voltage that is flawed!

It's all based upon the field structure around a magnet, that was
previously described as a mobius strip!

: what you say about 'the system' you described is true. This
: doesn't change the fact what you say cannot be and never
: will be for very sound fundamental principles. That you

Once again, electrons in a magnetic field precess at the resonance of
spin or or magnetic resonance of spin in ferrous metal, known as the
Larmour frequency – but it can only be accomplished at microwave
frequencies.

: associate your flawed technical understanding with very
: true and correct ideas about how we have mismanaged our
: energy infrastructure merely serves to discredit those
: important ideas.

There is also an absence of phase coherence, but all of seven
different phases that the electrons find themselves with the armature,
are found in the "aspects" of the magnet that uses 12 different ways
to arrange the four sections of three in the armature. It is like
there are precessing gyroscopes within the armature having mechanical
magnetic energy stored in the precessing electrons. The amount of
mechanical energy stored in the magnet depends upon the type and size
of the magnet itself. A tiny magnet the size of 1" x 1-3/4" x 0.03mm
contains about 30J of energy, thus an upstart of 75 watts initially
(which is only 1% of30J !) to an rpm of 25,000 produces at 85%
efficiency (because the solenoid must divert some of the energy back
into the system).

: Interesting that I support your notion that change is
: needed in the way we approach energy, yet you wish to
: focus on bogus bull**** rather than sound points where
: we agree. This suggests that you merely wish to promote
: bogus bull**** and tar valid concerns about energy use.

If you think my "B.S". is just mental, then really what YOU need a
mental makeover!

There is direct evidence that the human body forms a magnet that
always seems to oscillate between the positive and the negative -
between the right side (positive) and the left side (negative) - which
also symbolizes interpersonal/imaginative (right), vs. analytical/
sequential (left).

One may start with a particular "imagination" - which may represent
the "evidence of things not seen", i.e. intuition, innovation,
conception, spiritualize, emoting, emulation, etc., and then proceed
to "substance of things hoped for", in having the ability to cause
things to come into "fruition" (i.e. self-organize) by changing the
body's polarization from right side to left side.

(In this respect, one's "perception" of sound becomes the "fruition"
that one experiences - but this is only in the purest sense of having
a singular, self-organizing directive, which is what consciousness
tries to do, as it swirls clockwise or counterclockwise, in order to
either accept or reject some spooky action for understanding and
reacting to the world around itself).

Similarly, one may start with having a perfect model drawn of a thing,
with complete material list, dimensions, technical notes, operating
instructions, specifications, i.e. "substance of things hoped for",
and proceed to expanding one's "imagination" by having the ability to
listen, collect, read, reason, share, investigate, sense, or study -
i.e. again 'self-organize' - by USING the thing in question as a
'tool' for something else - thus "fruition" occurs by changing the
body's polarization from left side to right side.

(Again, one's perception of sound becomes another type of "fruition"
that one experiences - again only in the purest sense of having a
singular, self-organizing directive, but rather than input, we have
output, or even vice versa, which is what the opposite of the above
kind of consciousness is after, in order to understand and react to
the world around itself).

In one case, the polarization has been inclined to left side, and in
the other case, the polarization has been inclined to the right side.
A left inclination represents a "great attractor" on the left, whereas
a right inclination represents a "great attractor" on the right. A
left-handed "great attractor" spirals inward, and a right-handed
"great attractor" spirals outward. Both are bosonic, and both are
mirror images of one another, however, since one's consciousness is
filtered, both left/right polarities are usually not self-aware
simultaneously, and most times will remain unconnected in time and
space - thus the name 'deltron'.

The 'spooky action' of entanglement is when inclinations, or focii of
polarized consciousness (anti-resonant consciousness) will possess
objects through contact - and this includes objects that have not been
'quartically filtered' of their sub-quantum noise[1]. One strange
property of objects being possessed by a former owner who may have not
bequeathed any of his belongings to those who inherited them later,
may have been more of a negative great attractor, rather than a
positive great attractor, and thus the objects that he or she may have
come in contact with in a past life will still have the same deltronic
property that existed before the 'thing', idea, or 'object of passion'
was passed on to its new owner.

If the new owner that inherited either the idea, or the object - the
object that was bequeathed to him from a former generation, did not
have the same inclination or 'handedness' that the idea or object
possessed, then there would be sub-quantum 'noise' inherent in the
system being used, that might interfere with the amplification of a
newer, deltronic resonance. Crisp harmonies of tapped subsummations of
left- or right-handed consciousness (that are in resonance with the
current deltrons) are the key for achieving a strong radius of
polarization, as well as great attractor.

: That's why I have said nothing about your system

snip rhetoric designed to obfuscate, suppress, diminish, project
blame, mask the truth, point fingers, distort, lie, oppose, temporize,
escape culpability, cover up, downplay, gainsay, pilfer, and/or troll
for your own status-quo spam, in the hope that one day all roads will
lead to the Mook Dynasty of Oscilloville…

“The nation’s elite universities disdain honest intellectual inquiry,
which is by its nature distrustful of authority, fiercely independent
and often subversive. They organize learning around minutely
specialized disciplines, narrow answers and rigid structures that are
designed to produce certain answers.

The established corporate hierarchies these institutions service --
economic, political and social – come with clear parameters, such as
the primacy of an unfettered free market, and with a highly
specialized vocabulary. This vocabulary, a sign of the "specialist"
and of course the elitist, thwarts universal understanding. It keeps
the uninitiated from asking unpleasant questions. It destroys the
search for the common good. It dices disciplines, faculty, students
and, finally, experts into tiny, specialized fragments. It allows
students and faculty to retreat into these self-imposed fiefdoms and
neglect the most-pressing moral, political and cultural questions.
Those who defy the system -- people like Ralph Nader -- are branded as
irrational and irrelevant. These elite universities have banished self-
criticism. They refuse to question a self-justifying system.
Organization, technology, self-advancement and information systems are
the only things that matter.”

- Jim Marrs

The only thing I disagree with in the above quote is the mention of
Ralph Nader. That person is a hard-core liberal (see ref. 2).

Dwight Schultz from Star Trek Fame is more like the real thing.

Schultz mentions the Ike Eisenhower speech that warns Americans to
“beware of the military industrial complex” among other things –
Eisenhower also mentioned “…that public policy could itself become the
captive of a scientific-technological elite,” and “…Partly because of
the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a
substitute for intellectual curiosity.” Also, “The prospect of
domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project
allocations, and the power of money is ever present – and is gravely
to be regarded.”

It’s happening right now in the country with bills like the “Brown
Bailout” – a bill designed to form a monopoly of the UPS service and
limit overnight delivery! It would cripple FedEx delivery
under a $500B Obama Infrastructure plan:

http://www.brownbailout.com/article-...id=wvETa1dXOt6
http://www.brownbailout.com/article-...id=wvETa1dXOt6



American

"They forget that God created the world in a round shape so that no
one could be first in the circle”

[1]

Deltrons are the name given to units of consciousness, as theorized by
William A. Tiller, Professor Emeritus of the
Department of Materials Science and Engineering at Stanford
University: "an emotional particle that serves as a coupling
ingredient for faster than light and slower than light velocities,"
and gave the equation c squared = (velocity of particle) * (velocity
of pilot wave) with an illustration that showed four quadrants with
velocity expressed on the x-axis and energy on the y-axis.

[2]

http://www.ontheissues.org/ralph_nader.htm
so