|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Telescope comming along...
Hi Guys,
Since I last posted here I managed to get hold of a Dobsonian base and have pretty much finished putting the drive in place to automate it. All I need to do now are the electronics to drive the actual motors, which shouldn't be too hard once I settle on how I want to do it. Something I wanted to start keeping an eye open for is a decent camera to use. I was wondering if any of you guys have any suggestions on a camera capable of taking a clear picture which I can hook up to the telescope. I would like to be able to have the camera hooked up to the computer via a USB cable so I don't need to be anywhere near the telescope to use it. Most of the cameras Ive seen people use have been glorified WebCams. I can't see the image quality being anything above appalling from these though, am I wrong? 300K pixel resolution doesn't seem like it could give too good a picture when the image is so small and dark to start off with. Is it possible to hook a decent Digital SLR up to a telescope and is it worth while? Regards, Garreth |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I heard Canon Eos digital is a good choice and a lot of people use it.
"none" ""gcain\"@(none)" wrote in message ... Hi Guys, Since I last posted here I managed to get hold of a Dobsonian base and have pretty much finished putting the drive in place to automate it. All I need to do now are the electronics to drive the actual motors, which shouldn't be too hard once I settle on how I want to do it. Something I wanted to start keeping an eye open for is a decent camera to use. I was wondering if any of you guys have any suggestions on a camera capable of taking a clear picture which I can hook up to the telescope. I would like to be able to have the camera hooked up to the computer via a USB cable so I don't need to be anywhere near the telescope to use it. Most of the cameras Ive seen people use have been glorified WebCams. I can't see the image quality being anything above appalling from these though, am I wrong? 300K pixel resolution doesn't seem like it could give too good a picture when the image is so small and dark to start off with. Is it possible to hook a decent Digital SLR up to a telescope and is it worth while? Regards, Garreth |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
none ""gcain\"@(none)" wrote:
[snip] I would like to be able to have the camera hooked up to the computer via a USB cable so I don't need to be anywhere near the telescope to use it. Most of the cameras Ive seen people use have been glorified WebCams. I can't see the image quality being anything above appalling from these though, am I wrong? 300K pixel resolution doesn't seem like it could give too good a picture when the image is so small and dark to start off with. Webcams are the best thing for lunar/planetary imaging, where the subject is bright and the limitation is generally seeing. The high frame-rate of webcams lets you take hundreds or thousands of images and select the best - the ones with minimal atmospheric distortion. Stacking the 'cream of the crop' then removes the noise introduced by the sensor. Webcams are poor for other targets though. Is it possible to hook a decent Digital SLR up to a telescope and is it worth while? Yes and yes. The main limitation is the lack of IR sensitivity, even far red like Ha is quite seriously attenuated by the filters (designed for terrestrial photography) on the sensor. It's not a show-stopper though, you can still take decent images with the filter in place. Canon do a special version of the 20D (no internal IR filter and some other tweaks) specifically for astro-imaging, the Canon 20Da. Hutech sell pre-modified DSLRs and external filters to covert back to terrestrial use: http://www.sciencecenter.net/hutech/ You can remove the filter yourself (there are guides for various models on the web), but I left the one in place on my 20D. I didn't like the idea of taking my new £1100 camera to bits, at least not till the guarantee has run out! Tim -- You are being watched. This gives you power. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Tim Auton" wrote in message ... none ""gcain\"@(none)" wrote: Is it possible to hook a decent Digital SLR up to a telescope and is it worth while? Yes and yes. The main limitation is the lack of IR sensitivity, even far red like Ha is quite seriously attenuated by the filters (designed for terrestrial photography) on the sensor. It's not a show-stopper though, you can still take decent images with the filter in place. Canon do a special version of the 20D (no internal IR filter and some other tweaks) specifically for astro-imaging, the Canon 20Da. Hutech sell pre-modified DSLRs and external filters to covert back to terrestrial use: http://www.sciencecenter.net/hutech/ You can remove the filter yourself (there are guides for various models on the web), but I left the one in place on my 20D. I didn't like the idea of taking my new £1100 camera to bits, at least not till the guarantee has run out! I would just add a caution here. I purchased a user modified Rebel off of Astromart, and it died within 6 months. I sent the seller an email and asked that he split the cost of an umodified replacement, but he didn't have the courtesy to respond. I ended up spending the cost of a new Hutech modified Rebel, for a dead modified and a working unmodified. I'm still a little pist, but I'm also glad to be back in business, even if it is Ha poor. The modified model was wicked awesome. 1 minute with the 200F4 reflector was blazingly fast and rich in the red. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Large Binocular Telescope to be Dedicated in October 2004 | Ron | Misc | 3 | September 25th 04 06:15 PM |
Infrared Space Telescope Returns First Images, Gets New Name | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 18th 03 07:15 PM |
Sky & Telescope News Bulletin - August 29, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | August 30th 03 01:51 AM |
A tale of a small telescope. | Chuck Simmons | Amateur Astronomy | 13 | August 10th 03 09:51 PM |
World's Largest Astronomical CCD Camera Installed On Palomar Observatory Telescope | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | July 29th 03 08:54 PM |