Ongoing Big-Bang Theory of Galaxy Evolution

Although the Big Bang Theory is mathematically sound, the a priori existence
of a nearly infinite supermassive density from which the big bang arose is
an unsupported assumption that doesn$B!G(Bt make physical sense. Where did the
supermassive density come from? The nearly infinite supermassive density of
the original theory is in effect an uncaused cause. Using a Gravity
Implosion?Energy Explosion Model that has two sides to the equation of
galaxy and universe evolution (Pre-Bang Universe plus Post-Bang Universe), I
have developed an Ongoing Big-Bang Theory that accounts for hydrogen
nucleosynthesis within a very real supermassive density: The Quasar! I
redefined the $B!H(BBig Bang$B!I(B origin of hydrogen as a threshold point in a
physical process that has two sides to the equation, wherein particle fusion
of quark-gluon plasma into the atomic nucleus of hydrogen is the threshold
of a visible an Ongoing Big-Bang process.

This Ongoing Big-Bang Theory is based on a Gravity Implosion?Energy
Explosion Model that is similar to the process of stellar evolution. Stellar
evolution begins with gravitational collapse of a hydrogen nebula that
reaches the threshold of thermonuclear fusion of hydrogen into helium, which
results in the stable equilibrium of each newborn star. In this Ongoing
Big-Bang Theory, Quasar evolution begins with gravitational collapse of dark
matter composed of pre- and non-atomic particles within a Pre-Bang Universe
that reaches the threshold conditions of quark-gluon particle fusion into
the atomic nucleus of hydrogen, which results in gravitational equilibrium
of a supermassive burning orb (Quasar) that explosively jettisons newly
formed hydrogen into surrounding regional space. This Ongoing Big-Bang
process floods surrounding space with hydrogen that transitions regionally
from plasma to ionic to atomic to molecular form, gathers into nebulae, and
collapses into first-generation stars. Therefrom, the evolution of the
galaxies occurs as an uninterrupted continuum beginning with the ignition of
this Ongoing $B!H(BBig-Bang" process within the supermassive gravitational
density of the Quasar. Quasar is the first born star of a uniquely different
nature. Quasars are formed from pre- and non-atomic particles (dark matter)
that gravitationally collapse into a supermassive "black hole" density that
reaches the "Big-Bang" threshold of quark-gluon particle fusion into the
atomic nucleus of hydrogen. Plasma jets composed of protons and electrons
(Hydrogen!) are jettisoned by the explosive Ongoing "Big-Bang" process into
surrounding space. Ongoing saturation of surrounding space with hydrogen in
plasma, ionic, atomic and molecular form gradually evolves into a Radio
Galaxy. First generation star birth conditions are reached within the
radio-emitting hydrogen atmosphere and give rise to the first optical
evidence of stellar evolution in the form of active Blue Dwarf Galaxy.
Ongoing hydrogen formation fuels regional stellar evolution and the
resulting optical galaxy grows in size from E0 to E7 (Edwin Hubble
classification). Stellar evolution within the growing elliptical galaxy
transforms the galaxy content from young blue to old red stars
(Hertzsprung-Russell diagram) culminating in supernova explosions that
regionally change the atomic composition of the galaxy's star forming areas,
which systematically accounts for the regional distribution of Population I
and Population II Stars within the galaxy, thereby defining stellar
formation and optical galaxy anatomy for each stage of galaxy growth and
evolution. Active Galactic Nucleus (AGN) formation resulting from Ongoing
"Big-Bang" nucleosynthesis of hydrogen within the Quasar and regional
stellar evolution at galaxy center result in the gradual formation of
circumnuclear rings of atomic-molecular dust. The accumulation and
centrifugal spread of this intragalactic dust is what changes the shape of
the galaxy from spherical to elliptical (E0 to E7) and results in
morphological conversion from ellipse to disk (S0). Ongoing massive dust
formation within the AGN region spills into bars and spiral arms of visible
atomic-molecular dust which centrifugally reshapes the growing mass and
density of the galaxy from elliptical into spiral form (Sa to Sc).

In summary, Ongoing "Big-Bang" nucleosynthesis of Hydrogen leads to regional
Stellar Evolution. Regional Stellar Evolution leads to sequential fusion and
evolution of the Periodic Table of Atoms. Atomic-molecular coupling in the
AGN region leads to the gradual molecular formation of visible Galaxy Dust.
Ongoing formation of massive amounts of visible galaxy dust centrifugally
reshapes the galaxy from elliptical to spiral form. Atomic-molecular
amassment and evolution within the spiral plane of spiral galaxies accounts
for the formation of planets and the evolution of the creatures and
Microcosm of Man.

This entire theory is based upon the author$B!G(Bs insight that the supermassive
"black hole" density of the Quasar is the site of an Ongoing "Big-Bang"
process of quark-gluon particle fusion into the atomic nucleus of hydrogen.
Through this insight I have been able to define the entire Mainstream
Sequence of Galaxy Evolution and resulting Large Scale Structure of the
Universe. The entire scientific theory is available to everyone at the
following web site:

Origin and Evolution of the Universe, a Unified Scientific Theory by Paul
Hollister, M.D. http://www.Origin-of-Universe.com

Author$B!G(Bs e-mail address:

Paul Hollister wrote:
Although the Big Bang Theory is mathematically sound, the a priori existence
of a nearly infinite supermassive density from which the big bang arose is
an unsupported assumption...

May I suggest reading Alan Guth's book.
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Inflation.html

Also you might want to look at Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial:
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm

Paul Hollister wrote:

Although the Big Bang Theory is mathematically sound, the a priori existence
of a nearly infinite supermassive density from which the big bang arose is
an unsupported assumption that doesn$B!G(Bt make physical sense.

it only "matter"s to you and Sam Wormley.

John




Where did the
supermassive density come from? The nearly infinite supermassive density of
the original theory is in effect an uncaused cause. Using a Gravity
Implosion?Energy Explosion Model that has two sides to the equation of
galaxy and universe evolution (Pre-Bang Universe plus Post-Bang Universe), I
have developed an Ongoing Big-Bang Theory that accounts for hydrogen
nucleosynthesis within a very real supermassive density: The Quasar! I
redefined the $B!H(BBig Bang$B!I(B origin of hydrogen as a threshold point in a
physical process that has two sides to the equation, wherein particle fusion
of quark-gluon plasma into the atomic nucleus of hydrogen is the threshold
of a visible an Ongoing Big-Bang process.

This Ongoing Big-Bang Theory is based on a Gravity Implosion?Energy
Explosion Model that is similar to the process of stellar evolution. Stellar
evolution begins with gravitational collapse of a hydrogen nebula that
reaches the threshold of thermonuclear fusion of hydrogen into helium, which
results in the stable equilibrium of each newborn star. In this Ongoing
Big-Bang Theory, Quasar evolution begins with gravitational collapse of dark
matter composed of pre- and non-atomic particles within a Pre-Bang Universe
that reaches the threshold conditions of quark-gluon particle fusion into
the atomic nucleus of hydrogen, which results in gravitational equilibrium
of a supermassive burning orb (Quasar) that explosively jettisons newly
formed hydrogen into surrounding regional space. This Ongoing Big-Bang
process floods surrounding space with hydrogen that transitions regionally
from plasma to ionic to atomic to molecular form, gathers into nebulae, and
collapses into first-generation stars. Therefrom, the evolution of the
galaxies occurs as an uninterrupted continuum beginning with the ignition of
this Ongoing $B!H(BBig-Bang" process within the supermassive gravitational
density of the Quasar. Quasar is the first born star of a uniquely different
nature. Quasars are formed from pre- and non-atomic particles (dark matter)
that gravitationally collapse into a supermassive "black hole" density that
reaches the "Big-Bang" threshold of quark-gluon particle fusion into the
atomic nucleus of hydrogen. Plasma jets composed of protons and electrons
(Hydrogen!) are jettisoned by the explosive Ongoing "Big-Bang" process into
surrounding space. Ongoing saturation of surrounding space with hydrogen in
plasma, ionic, atomic and molecular form gradually evolves into a Radio
Galaxy. First generation star birth conditions are reached within the
radio-emitting hydrogen atmosphere and give rise to the first optical
evidence of stellar evolution in the form of active Blue Dwarf Galaxy.
Ongoing hydrogen formation fuels regional stellar evolution and the
resulting optical galaxy grows in size from E0 to E7 (Edwin Hubble
classification). Stellar evolution within the growing elliptical galaxy
transforms the galaxy content from young blue to old red stars
(Hertzsprung-Russell diagram) culminating in supernova explosions that
regionally change the atomic composition of the galaxy's star forming areas,
which systematically accounts for the regional distribution of Population I
and Population II Stars within the galaxy, thereby defining stellar
formation and optical galaxy anatomy for each stage of galaxy growth and
evolution. Active Galactic Nucleus (AGN) formation resulting from Ongoing
"Big-Bang" nucleosynthesis of hydrogen within the Quasar and regional
stellar evolution at galaxy center result in the gradual formation of
circumnuclear rings of atomic-molecular dust. The accumulation and
centrifugal spread of this intragalactic dust is what changes the shape of
the galaxy from spherical to elliptical (E0 to E7) and results in
morphological conversion from ellipse to disk (S0). Ongoing massive dust
formation within the AGN region spills into bars and spiral arms of visible
atomic-molecular dust which centrifugally reshapes the growing mass and
density of the galaxy from elliptical into spiral form (Sa to Sc).

In summary, Ongoing "Big-Bang" nucleosynthesis of Hydrogen leads to regional
Stellar Evolution. Regional Stellar Evolution leads to sequential fusion and
evolution of the Periodic Table of Atoms. Atomic-molecular coupling in the
AGN region leads to the gradual molecular formation of visible Galaxy Dust.
Ongoing formation of massive amounts of visible galaxy dust centrifugally
reshapes the galaxy from elliptical to spiral form. Atomic-molecular
amassment and evolution within the spiral plane of spiral galaxies accounts
for the formation of planets and the evolution of the creatures and
Microcosm of Man.

This entire theory is based upon the author$B!G(Bs insight that the supermassive
"black hole" density of the Quasar is the site of an Ongoing "Big-Bang"
process of quark-gluon particle fusion into the atomic nucleus of hydrogen.
Through this insight I have been able to define the entire Mainstream
Sequence of Galaxy Evolution and resulting Large Scale Structure of the
Universe. The entire scientific theory is available to everyone at the
following web site:

Origin and Evolution of the Universe, a Unified Scientific Theory by Paul
Hollister, M.D. http://www.Origin-of-Universe.com

Author$B!G(Bs e-mail address:

Paul Hollister:

Paul Hollister wrote:
Although the Big Bang Theory is mathematically sound, the a priori existence
of a nearly infinite supermassive density from which the big bang arose is
an unsupported assumption that doesn$B!G(Bt make physical sense. Where did the
supermassive density come from? The nearly infinite supermassive density of
the original theory is in effect an uncaused cause.

[clip]


You said it right. They are wrong.

What can be identified and demonstrated is that, the universe is a
plurality of existents that continues to exist. That is irrefutable, and
all the scientific identifications, proofs, and demonstrations ever done
have been based upon and verify that fact.


The things in the universe can be identified - they are there and that can
be proved and found to be the basis of all knowledge. The universe is
there. We can know the properties and the facts of the things in universe.

There exists a plurality of things, e.g., there are numerous existents and
objects in the universe. There are more than one. There is a multitude of
them the ancients have said.

The things that are the universe, taken together to mean everything,
continue to exist. From minute to minute everything is still there -
existing and continuing. Things don't pop into existence or disappear for
no reason. The universe is eternal in its continuity. Eternal means
continuous. The BB-creationists want to deny that - and they can never
prove their claims of a supposed non-eternal and discontinuous universe.


The BB-creationists place the paradox that you describe in the forefront of
our minds in order to deny the validity of human sense perception and
reason as the means of identifying the facts of the universe. They want to
deny reason, and vision, for example, that are man's basic tools of
identification.

They want to fuse all things together into a single metaphysical unit. That
is a type of singular Platonic religionist ideal. Contrary to that idea
some would say that the universe not only exists but that the very same
universe is God. Not that God was a prior cause that existed in a state of
nothingness, rather, that view says that one should use reason and valid
sense perception to identify the many facts that are God. That it is proper
to use reason in identifying the numerous separate facts of the universe.

They don't want to identify that the universe, meaning everything that
makes up the universe, does exist continually. That means that most of the
laws of physics, e.g., conservation, location, facts or properties could
not be said to exist. They mean that there was a start to the existence of
everything following northing, and that there would be no physical cause
and effect principle that was or that can be operative in all of actual
existence.

The universe is, however, existing, plural, continuous, and eternal; and
the facts of the universe are knowable.

Anyone who says the contrary has the burden of proof.

Ralph Hertle

"Although the Big Bang Theory is mathematically sound, the a priori
existence
of a nearly infinite supermassive density from which the big bang arose
is
an unsupported assumption that doesn't make physical sense."

The BB theory does not make this assumption. The BB theory assumes that
where the BB occured in what is known as the quantum vacuum--that is a
vast
volume of space with absolutely nothing (bigger than quantum
fluxuations).

Paul Hollister wrote:
Although the Big Bang Theory is mathematically sound, the a priori existence
of a nearly infinite supermassive density from which the big bang arose is
an unsupported assumption that doesn$B!G(Bt make physical sense.

I find this quote on your site illuminating:

With a Big Bang origin for each galaxy, the expansion of the universe
would need further study for understanding, because Space itself would
not explode into existence and expand from a Point of Singularity; and
the cosmic microwave background radiation would need further study for
understanding, because it would no longer be just the lingering embers
from of a single Hot Point of explosion affecting the temperature of
the entire Cosmos for 20 billion years;

So forget the data that supports the Big Bang? Your model needs to
convincingly explain this FIRST. If not, your dead in the water.
When I searched your site for "red shift" I came up with zippo.


Shawn

you know? I asked my friend 6 about the bing bang and she said "I've been to
a lot of big bangs, and if one of them had started the universe I'd have
known about it"
Eric

In article ,
Eric wrote:

you know? I asked my friend 6 about the bing bang and she said "I've been to
a lot of big bangs, and if one of them had started the universe I'd have
known about it"

Cool. What's her phone number? I wanna discuss, uhh, cosmology, and
stuff.

Shawn wrote:

So forget the data that supports the Big Bang? Your model needs to
convincingly explain this FIRST. If not, your dead in the water.
When I searched your site for "red shift" I came up with zippo.

What did you search the site with Shawn? The search engine at the bottom of
each page in the site, which contains a book that is 340 pages long,
provides positive search results for both "red shift" and "redshift". Under
Highlights and Overview of Scientific Theory on the Home Page, the "Large
Scale Structure of Universe" hyperlink specifically cites the galaxy
redshift surveys, including illustration and citing of the recently
completed 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (Colless et al. 2003). The following
excerpt from Chapter 4 discusses the red shift of the galaxies in
relationship to the Big Bang (Click Table of Contents, Chapter 4, Hyperlink
Gravity Implosion/Energy Explosion Model of Big Bang):



"This theory provides a conceptual model for the cause of the Big Bang, a
model in which the cause is just as accessible and subject to the laws of
physics and scientific research as the result.

I have difficulty trying to envision the entire physical universe beginning
from a single point, the Point of Singularity of the Big Bang. I understand
how the red shift of the galaxies is evidence for the expansion of the
intergalactic universe, and I understand how this expansion can be
extrapolated back to a Point of Singularity, but when I consider the
magnitude of what was going on at the time of the Big-Bang beginning of
atomic physical existence, and the timeframes in which the origin of the
universe is said to have occurred, I become somewhat confused: such that the
physical universe is said to have come into existence from a single Big Bang
that is roughly estimated to have occurred sometime between 10 and 20
billion years ago, and the Big Bang is said to have materialized the total
baryonic mass of the entire physical universe into existence within one
second and, according to one article I read recently about baryonogenesis
during the Big Bang, "the creation of the excess baryons occurred when the
universe was about one thousandth of a billionth of a second old."

This is confusing because the scale of reference for the Point of
Singularity of the Big Bang origin of the universe leaps back and forth
between astronomically different orders of magnitude, from "universe" to
"galaxies" to "subatomic particles" without clear distinction.
Disorientation about the mass magnitude of the subject can occur because the
word "Big Bang" is used interchangeably to describe the origin of the
universe as a whole and the origin of atoms, without scientists remembering
that they are talking about two separate scientific subjects that are at
most only hypothetically related to a common cause: 1) the origin of the
atoms, 2) the expansion of the universe as measured by the red shift of the
galaxies. So the complex processes involved in the origin and evolution of
the physical universe are being lumped together as a group around a term
that was originally defined as a mathematical Point of Singularity. As a
result, the origin of the total baryonic mass of the entire physical
universe has been crammed into an unrealistic timeframe of a single second.

My sense of proportion has a lot of difficulty with the notion of a
single-second Big BANG hurtling the galaxies apart for 20 billion years and
leaving a slowly fading afterglow of cosmic microwave background radiation
throughout the Cosmos as scientific evidence of a single immense historical
explosion. By contrast, the Big Bang as the process that formed the hydrogen
atoms seems like a very realistic theory because we know that atoms exist
and we know what they are made of-that atoms are made of a nucleus and
orbiting electrons, that the nucleus is made of baryons (protons and
neutrons), and baryons are made of quarks and gluon-so we know what had to
come first and what had to come next: first came the quarks and gluon, then
came the baryons, then came the atoms when the atomic nuclei were coupled
with orbiting electrons."



The entire scientific world assumes for a fact that all of the hydrogen in
the universe was formed fait accompli 10 to 20 billion years ago by the
single Big Bang, long before the galaxies began to form. On the blind side
of this assumption, nobody even considers for a moment that the Cosmic
Plasma Jets exploding out of Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs),
which are the most powerful explosions in the universe occurring in the most
extreme supermassive densities in the universe, may be the Big-Bang process
of hydrogen production exploding into evidence right in front of our eyes!

The insight and evidence I have assembled shows that hydrogen is being
produced by an ongoing process within each quasar, for which I coined the
term "Ongoing Big-Bang" to emphasize the ongoing nature of the
nucleosynthesis process. After demonstrating through evidence that this is
indeed how all the hydrogen in the universe is formed, I showed how this
"Ongoing Big-Bang" process gives rise to the growth and evolution of each
active galaxy, which defines the Mainstream Sequence of Galaxy Evolution!
This is an entirely new scientific insight Shawn. You can download Chapter 1
Introduction with just a click of your finger. Chapter 1 Introduction shows
how the 4-spatial dimensions of this theory correlates directly with
Einstein's Space-Time model of the universe.



With regard,



Paul Hollister

author of Origin and Evolution of the Universe, a Unified Scientific Theory
http://www.Origin-of-Universe.com

email address:

Paul Hollister wrote:
Shawn wrote:

So forget the data that supports the Big Bang? Your model needs to
convincingly explain this FIRST. If not, your dead in the water.
When I searched your site for "red shift" I came up with zippo.


What did you search the site with Shawn? The search engine at the bottom of
each page in the site, which contains a book that is 340 pages long,
provides positive search results for both "red shift" and "redshift"

snip

My bad. I only searched the fist page not the site.


The entire scientific world assumes for a fact that all of the hydrogen in
the universe was formed fait accompli 10 to 20 billion years ago by the
single Big Bang, long before the galaxies began to form. On the blind side
of this assumption, nobody even considers for a moment that the Cosmic
Plasma Jets exploding out of Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs),
which are the most powerful explosions in the universe occurring in the most
extreme supermassive densities in the universe, may be the Big-Bang process
of hydrogen production exploding into evidence right in front of our eyes!

The insight and evidence I have assembled shows that hydrogen is being
produced by an ongoing process within each quasar, for which I coined the
term "Ongoing Big-Bang" to emphasize the ongoing nature of the
nucleosynthesis process. After demonstrating through evidence that this is
indeed how all the hydrogen in the universe is formed, I showed how this
"Ongoing Big-Bang" process gives rise to the growth and evolution of each
active galaxy, which defines the Mainstream Sequence of Galaxy Evolution!
This is an entirely new scientific insight Shawn. You can download Chapter 1
Introduction with just a click of your finger. Chapter 1 Introduction shows
how the 4-spatial dimensions of this theory correlates directly with
Einstein's Space-Time model of the universe.

Maybe your right. Not for me to decide. Go convince the heavy
breathers in the cosmology world that your model's worth a look see,
then I'll be interested.

Shawn