|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming v. Solar warming
At the risk of waking up the trolls - Sorry!
There has been a lot of talk lately about the rise in earth temperature being caused by a secular increase in solar output rather than the greenhouse effect of various pollutants. Surely there is an easy way of getting some objective evidence on this? Mars has been closely observed for many years. If this is a solar effect, the polar caps, as seen at different apparitions, but at comparable distances from the sun, should show a variation over time. If not, then the greenhouse gasses are to blame. But that might settle the argument, so perhaps it's a bad idea. Roger |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming v. Solar warming
Roger Steer wrote:
At the risk of waking up the trolls - Sorry! There has been a lot of talk lately about the rise in earth temperature being caused by a secular increase in solar output rather than the greenhouse effect of various pollutants. The sun is gradually getting brighter. There is good evidence for this and it is predicted by all the models of stellar evolution and confirmed by direct measurements of solar flux by satellites since the 1970's. Not even GW sceptic scientists can balance the Earth's energy budget post 1970 without taking into account the contribution of anthropogenic greenhouse gas forcing. They may say "there is still reasonable doubt" but the scientific evidence for GW is unambiguous. Surely there is an easy way of getting some objective evidence on this? Mars has been closely observed for many years. If this is a solar effect, the polar caps, as seen at different apparitions, but at comparable distances from the sun, should show a variation over time. If not, then the greenhouse gasses are to blame. But that might settle the argument, so perhaps it's a bad idea. This exploits a common logical fallacy. We know the sun is brightening so we should expect to see Mars warming slightly and indeed we do. Its atmospheric pressure of CO2 is rather sensitive to solar flux. But that tells us nothing useful about greenhouse gas forcing on Earth. Both solar and atmospheric composition effects are present and act to make the Earth warmer. Finding evidence of one does not exclude the other. There are many other competing effects like cloud type and coverage too. A simpler example exploiting the same cause/effect fallacy. I walk conspicuously into a shop wearing a very obvious ID card that sets off the stock control alarm at the door. Apologise profusely to the guard and go in to shop. I can then steal whatever I want and on leaving the alarm will go off again. Put shopping down outside the shop and wait looking really embarrassed. Then I demonstrate to the security guard again that my ID badge sets off their alarm. Because he remembers I set off the alarm going in he assumes (incorrectly) that is the only cause on the way out. Security guards should be trained not to fall for this trick, but until they are shown it most are easily fooled. It is necessary to show that none of the other shopping bags trigger the alarm to prove innocence. I am not surprised that the anti-GW lobby are using this old chestnut. Regards, Martin Brown |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Probability of solar caused global warming | [email protected] | Policy | 0 | October 6th 05 02:32 PM |
PDF (Planetary Distance Formula) explains DW 2004 / Quaoar and Kuiper Belt | hermesnines | Astronomy Misc | 10 | February 27th 04 02:14 AM |
Scientists Report First-Ever 3D Observations of Solar Storms Using Ulysses Spacecraft | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 17th 03 03:28 AM |
Voyager Spacecraft Approaching Solar System's Final Frontier | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 5th 03 06:56 PM |
ESA Sees Stardust Storms Heading For Solar System | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | August 20th 03 08:10 PM |