|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism Disproof
On Sep 23, 3:48*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
Robert Higgins wrote: On Sep 23, 4:23 pm, PD wrote: On Sep 23, 3:05 pm, Robert Higgins wrote: What do you think this means? To me, it means that inductive reasoning is not a "scientific method", because induction BEGINS with the axioms, whereas science DISCOVERS the axioms. No, sir, you have it EXACTLY backwards. Please try reading for comprehension. My bad - mistyping. I meant to say that "deductive" reasoning *where I wrote "inductive". It means induction is easier than deduction. Ah, again we're back to not being able to read for comprehension. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Finite Relativism Undisproven | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 2 | August 26th 09 03:02 PM |
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 1366 | May 2nd 09 12:04 AM |
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof | Eric Gisse | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 3rd 09 06:14 AM |
25% OFF -- Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 28th 09 09:54 AM |
Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 4 | January 26th 09 09:00 PM |