|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why the dwarf stars are flying away ?
...almost all dwarf stars have an higth positive radial velocity ... like if its should be to flying away ...and more if farest-ones and more if hottest-ones.. also confronting with its normal ''proper motus''..???
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why the dwarf stars are flying away ?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why the dwarf stars are flying away ?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why the dwarf stars are flying away ?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Why the dwarf stars are flying away ?
Il giorno marted́ 7 aprile 2015 16:33:36 UTC+2, Jim Newman ha scritto:
On 07/04/2015 08:42, wrote: ..almost all dwarf stars have an higth positive radial velocity ... like if its should be to flying away ...and more if farest-ones and more if hottest-ones.. also confronting with its normal ''proper motus''..??? Do you have any evidence for your claim that "almost all dwarf stars have high positive radial velocity"? ...i am a little old...in the old sense , the dwarf stars were very little , very heavy and very hot.. the idea of bigbang is very beautifull but with some contradictions.. drived with the idea that the temperature could influence the redshift , i began tosee the astronomy in this perespective .. and the dwarf cat. III/235A in CDS Strsbourg seemed to be rigth ...like in other situations for quasars , supernovae , galaxies etc... can we repeit togheter the various found steps and to discuss ? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Why the dwarf stars are flying away ?
Il giorno venerd́ 10 aprile 2015 18:52:13 UTC+2, Jim Newman ha scritto:
On 10/04/2015 17:02, wrote: Il giorno marted́ 7 aprile 2015 16:33:36 UTC+2, Jim Newman ha scritto: On 07/04/2015 08:42, wrote: ..almost all dwarf stars have an higth positive radial velocity ... like if its should be to flying away ...and more if farest-ones and more if hottest-ones.. also confronting with its normal ''proper motus''..??? Do you have any evidence for your claim that "almost all dwarf stars have high positive radial velocity"? ..i am a little old...in the old sense , the dwarf stars were very little , very heavy and very hot.. the idea of bigbang is very beautifull but with some contradictions.. drived with the idea that the temperature could influence the redshift , i began tosee the astronomy in this perespective .. and the dwarf cat. III/235A in CDS Strsbourg seemed to be rigth ...like in other situations for quasars , supernovae , galaxies etc... can we repeit togheter the various found steps and to discuss ? I suggest you borrow a book on general astronomy from your local library and start from there. ...From the cat. Vizier III/235B , putting != in the rigth boxes of Rad. Vel. , parallax , m p and B-V (temp.) , we can get only about 200 dwarfs with the necessary characteristics for our work ; it is clear that the dwarfs seem to fly away because only the 15% have negative Rad.Vel....and all the warmer dwarfs (i.e. with negative B-V ) have only positive Rad. Vel.... My hipothesis was not that the dwarfs are flying away (that was only a little provocation ):the doppler effect , with which we measure the Rad. Vel. and the redshift , is influenced by the temperature ...througth the Raman effect ! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Why the dwarf stars are flying away ?
On 11/04/2015 14:00, wrote:
..From the cat. Vizier III/235B , putting != in the rigth boxes of Rad. Vel. , parallax , m p and B-V (temp.) , we can get only about 200 dwarfs with the necessary characteristics for our work ; it is clear that the dwarfs seem to fly away because only the 15% have negative Rad.Vel....and all the warmer dwarfs (i.e. with negative B-V ) have only positive Rad. Vel.... My hipothesis was not that the dwarfs are flying away (that was only a little provocation ):the doppler effect , with which we measure the Rad. Vel. and the redshift , is influenced by the temperature ...througth the Raman effect ! Really? what are your selection criteria? If I select all stars with catalogued values for B-V and Radial Velocity, I have 403 entries. I'm not seeing a particular correlation between colour and velocity https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-d...2Bvelocity.jpg |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Why the dwarf stars are flying away ?
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 06:00:38 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
is influenced by the temperature ...througth the Raman effect ! 1 in 10 million, hardly enough to screw the results! 'A small fraction of the scattered photons (approximately 1 in 10 million) are scattered by an excitation, with the scattered photons having a frequency different from, and usually lower than, that of the incident photons' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raman_scattering -- Faster, cheaper, quieter than HS2 and built in 5 years; UKUltraspeed http://www.500kmh.com/ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Why the dwarf stars are flying away ?
Il giorno marted́ 7 aprile 2015 09:42:04 UTC+2, ha scritto:
..almost all dwarf stars have an higth positive radial velocity ... like if its should be to flying away ...and more if farest-ones and more if hottest-ones.. also confronting with its normal ''proper motus''..??? the Raman is the killer ..and the autostructured ligth is the gun If the O stars in Magellano Cloud are flyng away , i say : it can be a proof ..and they say : it is an indication .. If the dwarfs are flyuing away ..and warmer..and farer ..., i say : it can be a proof ..and they say : it is an indication .. Drived by my vision , i found more than 50 prooves ,..pardon ,indications ... The Raman gives the best in higth frequencies ,coherence , density , lower room ' temperature ...and autostructure The autostructure is a characteristic , coming out when you try to disperd by prismas the beam ..; you can use infinite prismas (at least more than 30 , when theorically 4-5 should be enougth ) but the spot remains without dispersion also if it contains many different frequencies (: you can easily distroy the autostructure sending the ligth througth lens (telescopes , collimators..)or hitting a surface with 160-175 degrees .. When an autostructured ligth makes the Raman , probabely , in the structure cames many holes and the structure collapses with all its frequencies (existing and not existing lines ) : the changement is not easy to distinguish from the redshift of a moving body .. I wrote to CDS searching the kind man (Ochsenbein?) that ,unrequested , fournished me the report of rad vel in Magellano Cloud 12 years ago The Pioneer had not leakage of gas , because the frequency'drift has inside an annual and a dayly sinusoidal increasement ; i had calculated and foreseen tin which week of the year happened the larger excursion and its amount.. p.s.you have been patient ...i hope a smile for you : we largely speak about the misterious dark matter , because the galaxies and the clusters'galaxies are turning too quikly .. the first datas from HST ,around the stars parallaxes , had the 20% of negative values ...i asked and they aswered that the ligth'beams were (probabely?) deviated by intermedium bodies ..: so the 80%are deviated strongly in the four directions ..and more than 100% are deviated less strongly ..: how many stars we don't see? Why to search a misterious dark matter ? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nearby dwarf protogalaxies found, no stars yet! | Yousuf Khan[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 17th 13 07:06 AM |
ASTRO: Arp 5 Weird dwarf galaxies and stars | Rick Johnson[_2_] | Astro Pictures | 1 | April 27th 11 08:19 PM |
A Re-appraisal of the Habitability of Planets Around M Dwarf Stars | Joseph Lazio | SETI | 0 | October 2nd 06 11:32 AM |
BREAKING NEWS: The Lives of Red Dwarf Stars | Magnificent Universe | Astronomy Misc | 1 | September 22nd 06 04:27 AM |