Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity

On Sep 27, 7:25*am, Tom Roberts wrote in
sci.physics.relativity:
SR's LOGICAL foundations have NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with light at
all. Today we know several other sets of postulates for SR that do not
involve any assumptions about light. Indeed, as SR is much more general
than electrodynamics, it would be rather silly to use a postulate about
light.

Bravo Roberts bravo Tom bravo Albert Einstein of our generation
(Hawking is no longer the Albert Einstein of our generation because
European taxpayers hate him)! Nevertheless Master Lee Smolin and
Master Joao Magueijo will never allow you to go to the Perimeter
Institute (the only place where Einsteinians are still given money for
replacing old theoretical idiocies with new theoretical idiocies)
because these two Masters have abandoned not only Einstein's 1905
false light postulate but also its Frankensteinian product called
"special relativity":

http://groups.google.com/group/fr.sc...5ce51fd2a17e72

Pentcho Valev