Logical (Non-Experimental) Refutations of Einstein's relativity

All consequences of Einstein's false constant-speed-of-light postulate are absurd, even idiotic, so Einstein's relativity can be disproved logically, through reductio ad absurdum. Here is a length contraction idiocy:

"Einstein's Relativistic Train in a Tunnel Paradox: Special Relativity" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xrqj88zQZJg

At 9:01 in the above video Sarah sees the train falling through the hole - an event obviously impossible in Adam's frame. We have reductio ad absurdum and relativity should be abandoned but ... there is always salvation in Einstein's schizophrenic world. In Adam's frame the train undergoes an absurd bending (disintegration), as shown at 9:53 in the video and in this pictu

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped..._variation.PNG

We have reductio ad absurdum again: An absurd bending (disintegration) is required - it does occur in Adam's reference frame but doesn't in Sarah's.

Conclusion: The underlying premise, Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light postulate, is false.

Pentcho Valev