|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Next Space Station: 7.35e22 kg worth at Earth's L1
Our Next Space Station = Earth L1
Master CM(counter mass) of 7.35e22 kg worth, efficiently situated at Earth L1. Perhaps my previous topic of having imposed certain weird notions and those pesky question(s), such as about our environment going entirely naked w/o moon was asking a bit too much, especially since Earth would eventually thereafter get extra cold, as without sufficient tidal forces to motivate our molten core's thermal interior of transferring 40 TJ that might even further degrade our failing magnetosphere, plus vast oceans of roughly 40,000 ~ 60,000 TJ of solar thermal energy wouldn't migrate about to nearly the present extent, whereas such we'd likely be unavoidably icing up really good, while keeping sufficienly toasty and thus frost and ice free within the tropics of Cancer/Capricorn, plus a few aquatic areas getting somewhat extra algae bloom and/or dead-zone stinky at the same time, all because of those reduced tidal forced actions taking place. Not to feer, as there would still be a sol+moon forced tide, just not nearly as strong, and only one such composite tide per day. However, as a perfectly viable compromise to Earth entirely w/o moon; Have I got a nifty L1 shade for accommodating your next ISS and otherwise for the best ever salvation of Earth's environment: http://mygate.mailgate.org/mynews/sc...=smart&p=1/360 http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...25b2f50bea63b9 In addition to this method of establishing a great deal of shade (perhaps a touch more than necessary), we'd also have established the absolute ideal TRACE, ACE and SOHO outpost or mother platform, as well as keeping the Chinese or possibly Russian LSE-CM/ISS as 100% viable to boot (actually far better yet because of the moon's L1 (MEL1/facing Earth) becoming so nicely shaded and obviously the moon becomes near zelch worth of being reactive to the solar energy that passing by, so much so improved that even Bigalow's POOFs could be safely utilized most anywhere along the tethers). I'm asking; What's so terribly wrong, or even all that technically insurmountable with my notions of relocating our very own cosmic morgue of a mascon, as our nasty old salty and global warming moon is relocated all the way out to Earth L1? Utilizing the tethered mass at 2X L2 seems like a perfectly good alternative to having applied those millions of spendy rockets (that we obviously don't have nor could we actually apply to such a daunting task) or via whatever nuclear produced delta-v, especially since most every required tonne and of the L2 tether itself would be extracted from the moon. This being where the truly smart folks get to shine like never before. Where's all of your warm and fuzzy Usenet yaysay and of whatever wizardly applied expertise of eye popping candy, and otherwise on behalf of knocking our socks off, especially when our badly failing environment and extremely frail DNA needs such efforts the most? What's actually all that negative or otherwise naysay about relocating our moon, for obtaining such absolute spare loads of ice age rebuilding shade, and of so much more to come? Since we're still into losing our DNA/RNA protective magnetosphere at the ongoing demise of 0.05%/year, as such, what other long-term options for protecting Earth's atmosphere and of our sequestered butts on this badly polluted surface do we have? - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Next Space Station: 7.35e22 kg worth at Earth's L1
"Brad Guth" wrote in message
news:466f9161c535bd68fd1d8c377c041861.49644@mygate .mailgate.org Relocating lunar mass via L2 deployed tether, as actually having placed such mass far out past the moon's L2 point of no return seems like the perfectly good way to go. Say for the effort of going way out there using 2X L2, and to say we/robotics somehow manage to place 1e9 tonnes on the tippy end of that nifty 2X L2 tethered distance away from the moon's CG, a remote placement distance of roughly 129,400 km, whereas at least for starters may seem a touch daunting but otherwise perfectly doable, and the pulling or tug affect obviously only gets better as the moon gets moved away from Earth. How much applied exit or delta-v force is that remote placement of such mass going to provide? Here's the best preliminary math that seems about right. 2X moon L2 = 129,400 km 129,400 / 384,400 = .33663 Orbital velocity: 1.33663 x 1.023 km/s = 1.367 km/s 2X L2 orbital Earth velocity = 1.367 km/s (in relation to Earth) 2X L2 orbital moon velocity = 344.421 m/s (in relation to the moon) Centripetal/Centrifugal force: Fc=MV2/r http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/cf.html#cf If we're given the 2X L2 orbital mass of 1e12 kg (including whatever's tether) Moon's 2X L2: Fc=MV2/r = 9.167374e8 N = 93,481 tonnes Earth/moon 2X L2: Fc=MV2/r = 3.637e9 N = 370,871 tonnes That's either 93,481 applied tonnes of continous force or perhaps the combined total of 464,353 tonnes of centrifugal applied force that's worthy of accomplishing something in delta-v, especially when applied over the time span of perhaps a few years, of which I don't believe it'll actually take all that long, or even nearly the suggested 1e12 kg placement of mass at the moon's 2X L2. Roughly/swag speaking; using this moon 2XL2 as the CM package of 1e12 kg in tethered mass acting as a physical CM/tug upon getting that nasty moon further away from Earth; How long will it take for that process of getting rid of our moon (ideally relocated to Earth L1 that is)? Seems once having our moon relocated to Earth's L1 is actually offering a multi-tasking and do-everything sort of win-win for accomplishing all sorts of future science and space exploration, and otherwise of direct primary benefit to having shaded our environment, and of most everything else I can think of seems better off. As for the naysay or whatever negatives, at least thus far I have a list of zilch to offer because, it even benefits my LSE-CM/ISS that can still deploy its tether dipole element to within 4r of Earth, and there's lots more to consider, especially on behalf of the moon's L1, that is if you still have that yaysay open mindset to work with. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Path to Finding Life on Mars and in Outer Space Begins By Lookingat Earth's Inner Space (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 2nd 06 04:02 PM |
Is Space Exploration Worth the Cost? | Virgiliu Pop | Policy | 40 | February 9th 04 12:36 PM |
Lost in Space: NASA Badly Needs a Mission That's Worth Dying For | Scott M. Kozel | Policy | 22 | September 10th 03 04:41 PM |
Lost in Space: NASA Badly Needs a Mission That's Worth Dying For | Scott M. Kozel | Space Shuttle | 16 | September 10th 03 10:32 AM |