|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
10% of PNN patent for sale
10% of the patent of the PNN F432 (reactionless drive) prototype for sale http://www.asps.it/patportions.htm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
10% of PNN patent for sale
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
10% of PNN patent for sale
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 04:43:37 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 11:38 am, wrote: 10% of the patent of the PNN F432 (reactionless drive) prototype for sale http://www.asps.it/patportions.htm This has scam written all over it. Sylvia. There are those who live by cheating billions for 50 years with human bases on the Moon and Mars https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonatha.../#7f0dc0022af5 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
10% of PNN patent for sale
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 12:28:05 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 7:18 pm, wrote: Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 04:43:37 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 18/02/2020 11:38 am, wrote: 10% of the patent of the PNN F432 (reactionless drive) prototype for sale http://www.asps.it/patportions.htm This has scam written all over it. Sylvia. There are those who live by cheating billions for 50 years with human bases on the Moon and Mars https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonatha.../#7f0dc0022af5 And the relevance of that is? you understand the meaning of the motto "two weights two measures" ? Sylvia. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
10% of PNN patent for sale
On 18/02/2020 11:14 pm, wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 12:28:05 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 18/02/2020 7:18 pm, wrote: Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 04:43:37 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 18/02/2020 11:38 am, wrote: 10% of the patent of the PNN F432 (reactionless drive) prototype for sale http://www.asps.it/patportions.htm This has scam written all over it. Sylvia. There are those who live by cheating billions for 50 years with human bases on the Moon and Mars https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonatha.../#7f0dc0022af5 And the relevance of that is? you understand the meaning of the motto "two weights two measures" ? No. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
10% of PNN patent for sale
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 14:16:14 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 11:14 pm, wrote: Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 12:28:05 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 18/02/2020 7:18 pm, wrote: Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 04:43:37 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 18/02/2020 11:38 am, wrote: 10% of the patent of the PNN F432 (reactionless drive) prototype for sale http://www.asps.it/patportions.htm This has scam written all over it. Sylvia. There are those who live by cheating billions for 50 years with human bases on the Moon and Mars https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonatha.../#7f0dc0022af5 And the relevance of that is? you understand the meaning of the motto "two weights two measures" ? No. “to operate/use/adopt/have double standards“ from https://www.parolaio.it/dizionario-i...si-due-misure/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
10% of PNN patent for sale
On 19/02/2020 3:23 am, wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 14:16:14 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 18/02/2020 11:14 pm, wrote: Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 12:28:05 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 18/02/2020 7:18 pm, wrote: Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 04:43:37 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 18/02/2020 11:38 am, wrote: 10% of the patent of the PNN F432 (reactionless drive) prototype for sale http://www.asps.it/patportions.htm This has scam written all over it. Sylvia. There are those who live by cheating billions for 50 years with human bases on the Moon and Mars https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonatha.../#7f0dc0022af5 And the relevance of that is? you understand the meaning of the motto "two weights two measures" ? No. “to operate/use/adopt/have double standards“ from https://www.parolaio.it/dizionario-i...si-due-misure/ I really cannot follow your line of thought. Is it that since other people have scammed, that makes scamming OK? Or that the fact that other such proposals have been scams, this must not be a scam? Perhaps it's that because a better propulsion system is desirable (which I don't dispute), anything that proposes one is necessarily real. Sylvia. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
10% of PNN patent for sale
Il giorno mercoledì 19 febbraio 2020 02:41:18 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 19/02/2020 3:23 am, wrote: Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 14:16:14 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 18/02/2020 11:14 pm, wrote: Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 12:28:05 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 18/02/2020 7:18 pm, wrote: Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 04:43:37 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 18/02/2020 11:38 am, wrote: 10% of the patent of the PNN F432 (reactionless drive) prototype for sale http://www.asps.it/patportions.htm This has scam written all over it. Sylvia. There are those who live by cheating billions for 50 years with human bases on the Moon and Mars https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonatha.../#7f0dc0022af5 And the relevance of that is? you understand the meaning of the motto "two weights two measures" ? No. “to operate/use/adopt/have double standards“ from https://www.parolaio.it/dizionario-i...si-due-misure/ I really cannot follow your line of thought. Is it that since other people have scammed, that makes scamming OK? Or that the fact that other such proposals have been scams, this must not be a scam? Perhaps it's that because a better propulsion system is desirable (which I don't dispute), anything that proposes one is necessarily real. Sylvia. The scams are decided on the merits of the facts. I say that a reaction mass ejection propulsion system (rockets) that in 50 years has failed to place a human outpost on the moon and that loses more than 99% of the mass going and returning to the Moon (Apollo 11) is, although it got there! A fraud. A scam is to hope that an evolution is possible with a miracle is a scam. And the disastrous history of the Shuttle taught nothing. We come to PNN because you are talking about the scandal of asking for funds for your patent and development. Have you understood that in www.asps.it/pnndatabase.htm the three physicists Moretti, Fabri and Pastore say that the principle of action and reaction is violable in electrodynamics? No you didn't understand it and they cheat too. Also in that link, did you understand that a patent of mine filed in 1998 was granted in 2000? And that the patent said how to violate Newton's third? No ! No you did not understand it: even those of the Italian patent office were participating in the PNN scam! Did you understand that 2 Japanese people copied (bad) months after in 1998 the filing of my patent, the basic idea of the same and they republished it in their name? No you didn't understand! Now I'm going to patent the PNN more enhanced than in this video http://www..asps.it/qct05_ENG.mp4 However, I will patent whether or not I find funding. The F432 patent will be copied at the speed of light because the real and not bogus conquest of space will go. I will annoy you as long as you at least recognize that the only functioning reactionless drive (the Emdrive does not work!) is PNN and can take the money from the nobel prize. I hope it is not a scam for you to receive (perhaps!) the nobel prize too, and of course ridicule and punish people like you who have always hindered me. I repeat again: The scams are decided on the merits of the facts E.Laureti |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
10% of PNN patent for sale
On 19/02/2020 7:27 pm, wrote:
Il giorno mercoledì 19 febbraio 2020 02:41:18 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 19/02/2020 3:23 am, wrote: Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 14:16:14 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 18/02/2020 11:14 pm, wrote: Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 12:28:05 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 18/02/2020 7:18 pm, wrote: Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 04:43:37 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto: On 18/02/2020 11:38 am, wrote: 10% of the patent of the PNN F432 (reactionless drive) prototype for sale http://www.asps.it/patportions.htm This has scam written all over it. Sylvia. There are those who live by cheating billions for 50 years with human bases on the Moon and Mars https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonatha.../#7f0dc0022af5 And the relevance of that is? you understand the meaning of the motto "two weights two measures" ? No. “to operate/use/adopt/have double standards“ from https://www.parolaio.it/dizionario-i...si-due-misure/ I really cannot follow your line of thought. Is it that since other people have scammed, that makes scamming OK? Or that the fact that other such proposals have been scams, this must not be a scam? Perhaps it's that because a better propulsion system is desirable (which I don't dispute), anything that proposes one is necessarily real. Sylvia. The scams are decided on the merits of the facts. I say that a reaction mass ejection propulsion system (rockets) that in 50 years has failed to place a human outpost on the moon and that loses more than 99% of the mass going and returning to the Moon (Apollo 11) is, although it got there! A fraud. A scam is to hope that an evolution is possible with a miracle is a scam. And the disastrous history of the Shuttle taught nothing. Rockets have limitations. That doesn't make them a fraud or a scam. They do at least work. We come to PNN because you are talking about the scandal of asking for funds for your patent and development. Have you understood that in www.asps.it/pnndatabase.htm the three physicists Moretti, Fabri and Pastore say that the principle of action and reaction is violable in electrodynamics? No you didn't understand it and they cheat too. Also in that link, did you understand that a patent of mine filed in 1998 was granted in 2000? And that the patent said how to violate Newton's third? No ! No you did not understand it: even those of the Italian patent office were participating in the PNN scam! The Italian patent office may have failed to grasp the significance of what your patent was claiming. That doesn't mean they will similarly fail next time, and it certainly does not suggest they were participating in a scam. Did you understand that 2 Japanese people copied (bad) months after in 1998 the filing of my patent, the basic idea of the same and they republished it in their name? So scammers can also be plagerists. Quelle surprise. No you didn't understand! Now I'm going to patent the PNN more enhanced than in this video http://www.asps.it/qct05_ENG.mp4 However, I will patent whether or not I find funding. You don't know that you will succeed in getting the patent. The F432 patent will be copied at the speed of light because the real and not bogus conquest of space will go. I will annoy you as long as you at least recognize that the only functioning reactionless drive (the Emdrive does not work!) is PNN and can take the money from the nobel prize. I hope it is not a scam for you to receive (perhaps!) the nobel prize too, and of course ridicule and punish people like you who have always hindered me. I repeat again: The scams are decided on the merits of the facts E.Laureti Why not allow device, and the experimental demonstration that it works, to be examined by scientists of impeccable credentials, under a non-disclosure agreement that does, however, allow them to say whether or not they think the effect is real? Sylvia. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to get a Patent | Jim[_26_] | Misc | 0 | January 23rd 11 02:56 PM |
Bigelow patent | Allen Thomson | Policy | 36 | August 27th 06 06:48 AM |
Wooo! Patent | Scott Lowther | Policy | 4 | December 2nd 03 07:39 AM |
Woo hoo! New patent ... | Scott Lowther | Space Shuttle | 4 | July 3rd 03 06:09 PM |
Woo hoo! New patent ... | Scott Lowther | Policy | 4 | July 3rd 03 06:09 PM |