|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The speed of the light barrier broken- pro or con
On Nov 24, 5:12*pm, Tom Roberts wrote in
sci.physics.relativity: On 11/24/11 11/24/11 * 7:23 AM, bbwilliams wrote: Peer review is very important. Yes. The unfortunate thing is that peer reviews are organized by journals. Journals are concerned with profit, not science. I know, I have had many many rejections of my work based not on the fact that the work was improper, or that the results were wrong. In stead, the only reason is that it is not mainstream and therefor not published because the EDITORs do not think it important. This is complete bull****. Non-mainstream papers get published all the time in the primary physics literature. But they are written by people who understand physics. The complaint you make is from people who DON'T understand physics, and who make very elementary errors in their writing -- their papers are rejected for being nonsense or including elementary errors, not for being non-mainstream. A primary purpose of peer review is to save time for the bulk of the community by having a few reviewers prevent nonsense and errors from entering the journal. Moreover, there are journals who specialize in non-mainstream papers, and whose standards are quite relaxed (but, of course, most physicists don't bother to read them, and they routinely publish papers with elementary errors) -- these are referable, and their papers are not "unpublished evidence". * * * * This newsgroup is a good example -- it is 99% junk and nonsense. Then it is so nice that 1% does make sense, especially Honest Roberts' deep insights. For instance: Even if "light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz transform", Divine Albert's Divine Special Relativity "would be unaffected" (on reading this, Paul Draper fiercely sings "Divine Einstein", tumbles to the floor, starts tearing his clothes and goes into convulsions): http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.ph...1ebdf49c012de2 Tom Roberts: "If it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a nonzero mass (i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both Maxwell's equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains of applicability would be reduced)." http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...d3ebf3b94d89ad Tom Roberts: "As I said before, Special Relativity would not be affected by a non-zero photon mass, as Einstein's second postulate is not required in a modern derivation (using group theory one obtains three related theories, two of which are solidly refuted experimentally and the third is SR). So today's foundations of modern physics would not be threatened." Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Quantum tunneling across the light barrier. | Zanthius[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 8th 10 11:34 AM |
What are the Physiological Effects of Breaking the Light Barrier? | American | Policy | 1 | August 25th 10 04:05 PM |
What are the Physiological Effects of Breaking the Light Barrier? | American | Misc | 8 | August 24th 10 10:43 PM |
EINSTEINIANS WILL CHEAT THE LIGHT-SPEED BARRIER AS WELL | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 11th 07 06:29 AM |
German physicists claim to have broken the speed of light | algomeysa2 | Misc | 2 | August 19th 07 03:52 AM |