Einstein-æther gravity

On Nov 21, 8:06 am, Glyd wrote:

Can someone acquainted with this please comment or refute it (I'm
studying its flaws)?

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/...801.1547v2.pdf

"This paper reviews the theory, phenomenology, and observational
constraints on the coupling parameters of Einstein-æther gravity, i.e.
General Relativity coupled to a dynamical unit timelike vector field.
Several new remarks and a discussion of open issues are included."

The paper just suggested another Einstein-Hilbert action on top of
what Hilbert had pulled out of his ass back in 1915. Recall Hilbert’s
Lagrangian to his action was:

** L = sqrt(-det[g]) (k R + rho)

Where

** [g] = the matrix representing the metric
** det[] = determinant of the matrix
** k = constant
** R = Ricci scalar
** rho = mass density

To this day, why this action is important or what it means is still
elusive, but you can now derive the Einstein field equations in just
one more step. The whole GR **** is just so fvcking easy. Of course,
it does not prevent some other buffoons to create more imaginary
(hallucinating) mass Lagrangian term. shrug

You can foliage your universes with just a few variations of the
mathematics that does not bind to any physical meanings in real life.
Even after the field equations are derived, there are always an
infinite numbers of solutions that are static, spherically symmetric,
and asymptotically flat. There is just no way in hell that you can
find boundary conditions to favor one from the others. shrug

Connecting Riemann/Ricci tensor to gravitation or spacetime is just a
joke. The math is actually very simple in concept despite exhibiting
extreme complexity in mechanical operations. Hilbert understood the
fallacy of what he had done, walked away from the crap he created, and
allowed Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar to claim
full credit. The rest is history with hordes of Einstein
Dingleberries eagerly to swallow the last drop of the fermented
diarrhea of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. What a
circus for self-styled physicists! shrug

On Nov 22, 3:52*am, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Nov 21, 8:06 am, Glyd wrote:

Can someone acquainted with this please comment or refute it (I'm
studying its flaws)?

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/...801.1547v2.pdf

"This paper reviews the theory, phenomenology, and observational
constraints on the coupling parameters of Einstein-æther gravity, i.e..
General Relativity coupled to a dynamical unit timelike vector field.
Several new remarks and a discussion of open issues are included."

The paper just suggested another Einstein-Hilbert action on top of
what Hilbert had pulled out of his ass back in 1915. *Recall Hilbert’s
Lagrangian to his action was:

** *L = sqrt(-det[g]) (k R + rho)

Where

** *[g] = the matrix representing the metric
** *det[] = determinant of the matrix
** *k = constant
** *R = Ricci scalar
** *rho = mass density

To this day, why this action is important or what it means is still
elusive, but you can now derive the Einstein field equations in just
one more step. *The whole GR **** is just so fvcking easy. *Of course,
it does not prevent some other buffoons to create more imaginary
(hallucinating) mass Lagrangian term. *shrug

You can foliage your universes with just a few variations of the
mathematics that does not bind to any physical meanings in real life.
Even after the field equations are derived, there are always an
infinite numbers of solutions that are static, spherically symmetric,
and asymptotically flat. *There is just no way in hell that you can
find boundary conditions to favor one from the others. *shrug

Connecting Riemann/Ricci tensor to gravitation or spacetime is just a
joke. *The math is actually very simple in concept despite exhibiting
extreme complexity in mechanical operations. *Hilbert understood the
fallacy of what he had done, walked away from the crap he created, and
allowed Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar to claim
full credit. *The rest is history with hordes of Einstein
Dingleberries eagerly to swallow the last drop of the fermented
diarrhea of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. *What a
circus for self-styled physicists! *shrug

THIS IS OUR MATH FORUM NOT YOUR PHYSISCS FORUM