A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

You May Be On File



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 17th 05, 08:05 PM
Saul Levy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default You May Be On File

Did Fred Hoyle put in a disclaimer about crackpotism? He should have!
Kook data is WORTHLESS!

Saul Levy


On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:59:56 +0200, "Warhol"
wrote:

ET Abductees - You
May Be On File
From Bill Hamilton

From UFOCCI's weblog file
By Ray W. Boeche
9-16-5

Abduction cases are rapidly becoming standard fare in UFOlogy. The abduction
of an individual, or individuals, and the subsequent "medical examination"
which have been related countless times are famliar to most researchers.
However, we may have a new twist to add to the old story.

In 1984, a Lincoln, Nebraska woman we will call simply "Joan," mentioned
that she had experienced a recurring dream since childhood. In this dream,
someone appears outside her bedroom window, and attempts to coax her to come
with them. This subject arose during a casual conversation, and over the
next few days, I made a decision to explore this dream with Joan, if she
were willing to pursue it.

Joan (whose full name is on file and available to qualified reseachers with
her permission) holds a position of some authority with a state governmental
agency. An extremely intelligent and engaging woman, Joan had almost no
prior knowledge of the UFO subject, and, in fact, was uninterested in it.
She did, however, agree to explore this rcurring dream through the use of
regressive hypnosis.

On April 11, 1984, Joan was hypnotically regressed to the point in time when
the dream fist occurred. This, we discovered, was October 7, 1955, when Joan
was 12 years old. The hypnosis was performed by Stacey Vornbrock, a
psychological social worker, and a skilled hypnotist.

The story which unforlded was for the most part very similar to that of
other abductees. She was awakened in her bedroom by a figure standing
outside her window, who asked her to come with him. This entity was
described as about four feet in height, dressed in a hite tight-fitting
suit.

This entity conducts Joan on a "craft" which is resting on the ground in a
large vacant lot next to her home. After entering, she is given the
well-known medical exam described by others (sampling of skin tissue, blood,
hair, etc.) and is returned to her home, and subsequently her bedroom.

The entity who escorted her from the bedroom, and subsequently performed the
examination, was assisted by 5 other similar beings, who were described as
identical, but slightly smaller, than the "leader." The leader, who Joan had
originally met, was the only one who communicated with her. However, she
indicated that she was able to discern what he was telling his apparent
subordinates. This is where the totally new dimension enters.

According to Joan's testimony under hypnosis, the subordinates were quite
worried about being caught, that it was too obvious a location with too many
people nearby, and that they shouldn't take chances and endanger themselves.
The leader told them apparently quite sternly that plans had changed, they
had to make up time, and that's why Joan was chosen.

The leader then indicated to Joan that they had intended to examine someone
else, a man who was out driving in his automobile, but he had returned home,
(apparently an unexpected turn of events to the entities) and they were
unable to pick him up then. The leader then indicated to the others not to
be concerned, that he had done this many times before.

He then indicated to Joan that she was, quoting now, "very far back in the
files, and they hadn't intended to choose her, but the change in plans
necessitated it. This being then begins the examination, Joan having been
instructed to lie on a smooth, metallic table. Clamps emerge from the table,
holding her ankles, wrists, and head immobile. Again, without going into
great detail, the examination which follows is quite similar to that related
by many others.

However, throughout this examination, the leader apparently had to reassure
the others that it was quite alright for this to be going on, and made
mention several times again of Joan being "back in the files." This presents
a novel idea, which could conceivably tie in with Budd Hopkin's work on
abductions.

Hopkins had found that (as chronicled in his book Missing Time) many of the
abductees he has worked with have had multiple experiences - first as a
child, and then again later as an adult. Making the great assumption that
what all of these people have experienced is exactly what they have
described, is it not conceivable that the individuals abducted may indeed be
"on file" - genetically, by random chance, or by some deliberative process
which we could not begin to fathom? This appears to add an entirely new
dimension to the entire abduction question.

One other startling fact emerged at the end of the abduction experience. The
following information is so coincidentally strange, that I was quite
literally shocked when it came out during the session. Joan was describing
being back in her room, and the leader was reassuring her that she was
alright, and she wouldn't remember the event in the morning. We asked Joan
to recall this conversation exactly, word for word, much as if she were
watching herself and this entity carry on a conversation. Here is the
transcription of that conversation.

JOAN: I want to talk.

ENTITY: About what?

J: What went on?

E: Nothing.

J: Who are you?

E: An explorer.

J: An explorer of what?

E: An explorer of all.

J: Like who?

E: Like your christopher Columbus.

J: Should I be afraid?

E: Not of us.

J: Who should I be afraid of?

E: The men in black.

J: You mean the priests?

E: No, no, the men in black.

J: What men in black?

E: You don't have to be afraid.

J: What do they look like?

E: They're your people (Joan then described a mental picture of men dressed
completely in black clothing - suits, overcoats, hats, sunglasses, gloves,
which she said was the way the entity communicated this description to her).

J: What do they do?

E: They scare people.

J: Like ghosts?

E: No, like bad people scare others.

J: Like J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI?

E: No.

J: What will they do?

E: They don't want people to know we explorers won't hurt them.

J: Are you going to help us?

E: No, we're just explorers, but we watch.

J: What will they do?

E: You like animals.

J: Yes.

E: What if I tell you that they killed someone's dog because he saw some
explorers.

J: Joan then goes on to describe a "mental motion picture," in which she is
shown a man walking in the woods with his dog, when he stumbles on a landed
UFO. Later that same night, she witnesses the men in black clothing come to
his home, kill his dog, and question the man about what he had seen.

She is then made aware of these men in black calling the man's work place,
discrediting him, causing the loss of his job. After suffering further
harassment from friends and family, Joan is shown the man back in his home,
placing a gun in his mouth, and pulling the trigger.

J: What else?

E: You're afraid - I don't want to tell you any more because I don't want
you to be afraid. I've only told you this much because you are a child, and
curious. Just know they are bad. You are safe.

J: Can you keep me safe?

E: No, when we are gone, we can do nothing more. The men in black won't
know, you are too far back in our files.

J: Who should I tell?

E: You won't remember.

J: Who will know?

E: No one - they aren't watching you, not like the man in Maine. Don't be
afraid, goodbye.

As I mentioned earlier, I was shocked to hear this portion of the session.
Also, the first question which Joan asked upon awakening from the hypnotic
state was "Have you ever heard of these men in black?" She literally had no
concept that a term such as this even existed.

I am well aware of the doubts expressed by many researchers as to the
validity of abduction cases as a whole. I feel, however, that the whole
abduction question is one for serious consideration, and I doubt highly that
they are all the products of the imagination, or the oft-touted
"birth-trauma" memories. In short, I believe a great many of these people
experienced something exceedingly strange, and which took place
substantially as they claim it did.

I am also aware of the highly skeptical attitude taken by many researchers
toward the question of the notorious men in black, or MIB reports. I have a
great interest in this aspect of UFOlogy, and for approximately the last 3
years, I have been collecting as much substantiated information as possible
for a serious book-length work on this subject. I am also certain that the
question of the MIB phenomenon is not one to be taken lightly.

Let me make some comments relative to this, since these two controversial
topics are woven together in this instance. People in great numbers are
having these experiences, both abductions, and MIB events. Of that there can
be no doubt. Before criticizing this attitude, however, you must realize
that we still have no firm, concrete proof of what the causal factor in
these events might be.

At this point in time, we can see only the effect the descriptions of these
events as given to us by the percipients. We don't know the cause. Is it a
psychological phenomenon? If so, then what is triggering it? Budd Hopkins
and Dr. Aphrodite Clamar have shown that the psychological profiles of many
abduction victims show no abnormalities, but suggest that they have suffered
a psychological trauma-like an abduction. So, if the cause is psychological,
what is the intrusive factor which "tickles" the psyche into constructing
this event. I cannot accept at this time, with the available facts, that it
is either an overactive imagination, or a memory of the birth trauma.
The same can be said of MIB experiences. What is the causal factor? I quite
honestly don't know. And before anyone attempts to dismiss these events as
being hoaxes, delusions, or plays for publicity, they had better be able to
explain the many legitimate cases of MIB activity; the cases which have lain
silent until, with much effort I have been able to ferret them out. No plays
for publicity, no hoaxes, just a good many genuinely frightened people who
have no idea why they experienced what they did.

At any rate, here is an abduction case which raises a good many questions --
many of which are rather uncomfortable to face. As a matter of fact, it was
quite uncomfortable to make the decision to publish this report. However,
unless we can look at all of the evidence with unbiased eyes, we will never
be able to make any headway toward understanding these problems.

Bill Hamilton
AstroScience Research Network
http://www.astrosciences.info/
"I don't see the logic of rejecting data just because they seem incredible."
Fred Hoyle

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Catalogues for short-period binaries and Astroplanner? canopus56 Amateur Astronomy 6 May 16th 05 02:46 AM
Compressing an AVI File by a Moving Integration & Media Player W. Watson Amateur Astronomy 8 February 11th 04 10:45 PM
VxWorks (?) Flash File System on the MERs Jan C. Vorbrüggen Technology 6 February 6th 04 05:39 AM
currupt file mack rc jonathan SETI 4 November 30th 03 01:07 PM
AAVSO file type question Hogrider Amateur Astronomy 4 September 22nd 03 04:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.