|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The nuclear power sky is falling...
On Mar 9, 1:35*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote: Swiss court orders nuclear shutdown So they'll be buying more power from France, then? -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar *territory." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * --G. Behn well japan just announced they are building solar and wind farms and going to harvest methane slush near their country. such diversfication may make nuke power totally unnecessary. the head of japan doesnt sound poro nuke either. the country made major screw ups when fukashima melted down espically with a too small evacuation zone. some people died of starvation in the excusion zone, those who failed to leave for one reason or another..... i wonder if japans cancer rate will soar for people that really should of been evacuated? its possible far from fukashima some radiation levels remain much higher than close by even today |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The nuclear power sky is falling...
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The nuclear power sky is falling...
On Mar 9, 10:39*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...ke-nuclear-saf... US slow to respond to lessons of japan Perhaps that's because we don't have a lot of plants that are subject to 8+ magnitude earthquakes followed by meter 10 tsunamis. -- "Der Feige droht nur, wo er sicher ist." * * * * --Johann Wolfgang von Goethe oh really how about along the west coast? The NRC admitted publically we have plants at the same risks |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The nuclear power sky is falling...
On Mar 9, 7:27*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote: On Mar 9, 10:39*am, Fred J. McCall wrote: bob haller wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...ke-nuclear-saf.... US slow to respond to lessons of japan Perhaps that's because we don't have a lot of plants that are subject to 8+ magnitude earthquakes followed by meter 10 tsunamis. oh really how about along the west coast? The NRC admitted publically we have plants at the same risks Yeah, really. *When was the last time we saw 9.0 earthquake combined with a 15 meter tsunami anywhere on the west coast? *How about 'never'? Just what IS the largest offshore earthquake and the largest tsunami ever to occur off the west coast anywhere near any nuclear plant, Bobbert? You talk a lot of ****e, but you're always real light on the facts. Now's your chance. *Try making a REAL case with REAL facts and REAL probabilities. -- "Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is *only stupid." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine even you should of heard of the san andreas fault. how about the san francisco earthquake |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The nuclear power sky is falling...
On Mar 9, 10:33*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote: On Mar 9, 7:27*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote: bob haller wrote: On Mar 9, 10:39*am, Fred J. McCall wrote: bob haller wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...ke-nuclear-saf... US slow to respond to lessons of japan Perhaps that's because we don't have a lot of plants that are subject to 8+ magnitude earthquakes followed by meter 10 tsunamis. oh really how about along the west coast? The NRC admitted publically we have plants at the same risks Yeah, really. *When was the last time we saw 9.0 earthquake combined with a 15 meter tsunami anywhere on the west coast? *How about 'never'? Just what IS the largest offshore earthquake and the largest tsunami ever to occur off the west coast anywhere near any nuclear plant, Bobbert? You talk a lot of ****e, but you're always real light on the facts. Now's your chance. *Try making a REAL case with REAL facts and REAL probabilities. even you should of heard of the san andreas fault. how about the san francisco earthquake Yep. *The San Andreas fault is on LAND until you get to the northern sector and doesn't generally create tsunamis. *You should go look at the geologic history of 'the Ring of Fire' and get a clue about this stuff. The San Francisco earthquake was under an 8. *Keep in mind that the earthquake scale is logarithmic, so that means even the massive 1906 San Francisco earthquake only had around 10% of the energy of the one at Fukashima. *And keep in mind that it is the TSUNAMI on top of the earthquake that was the problem at Fukashima. *Without the tsunami, everything would have been fine. *Despite having an epicenter that was offshore, there was no massive tsunami accompanying the San Francisco earthquake. *Ok, there WAS a tsunami, but it was only about 3 INCHES high. So, let's try again: Just what IS the largest offshore earthquake and the largest tsunami ever to occur off the west coast anywhere near any nuclear plant, Bobbert? *Please give epicenter location and nearest nuclear facility, strength of the earthquake, and height of the tsunami that followed. You talk a lot of ****e, but you're always real light on the facts. Now's your chance. *Try making a REAL case with REAL facts and REAL probabilities. Not Chicken Little arm waving, like what you just did. -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar *territory." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * --G. Behn geez you sound like the japanese BEFORE fukashima. they lived in a all is fine dont worry about it world..... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The nuclear power sky is falling...
On Mar 10, 9:27*am, bob haller wrote:
On Mar 9, 10:33*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote: bob haller wrote: On Mar 9, 7:27*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote: bob haller wrote: On Mar 9, 10:39*am, Fred J. McCall wrote: bob haller wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...ke-nuclear-saf... US slow to respond to lessons of japan Perhaps that's because we don't have a lot of plants that are subject to 8+ magnitude earthquakes followed by meter 10 tsunamis. oh really how about along the west coast? The NRC admitted publically we have plants at the same risks Yeah, really. *When was the last time we saw 9.0 earthquake combined with a 15 meter tsunami anywhere on the west coast? *How about 'never'? Just what IS the largest offshore earthquake and the largest tsunami ever to occur off the west coast anywhere near any nuclear plant, Bobbert? You talk a lot of ****e, but you're always real light on the facts. Now's your chance. *Try making a REAL case with REAL facts and REAL probabilities. even you should of heard of the san andreas fault. how about the san francisco earthquake Yep. *The San Andreas fault is on LAND until you get to the northern sector and doesn't generally create tsunamis. *You should go look at the geologic history of 'the Ring of Fire' and get a clue about this stuff. The San Francisco earthquake was under an 8. *Keep in mind that the earthquake scale is logarithmic, so that means even the massive 1906 San Francisco earthquake only had around 10% of the energy of the one at Fukashima. *And keep in mind that it is the TSUNAMI on top of the earthquake that was the problem at Fukashima. *Without the tsunami, everything would have been fine. *Despite having an epicenter that was offshore, there was no massive tsunami accompanying the San Francisco earthquake. *Ok, there WAS a tsunami, but it was only about 3 INCHES high. So, let's try again: Just what IS the largest offshore earthquake and the largest tsunami ever to occur off the west coast anywhere near any nuclear plant, Bobbert? *Please give epicenter location and nearest nuclear facility, strength of the earthquake, and height of the tsunami that followed. You talk a lot of ****e, but you're always real light on the facts. Now's your chance. *Try making a REAL case with REAL facts and REAL probabilities. Not Chicken Little arm waving, like what you just did. -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar *territory." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * --G. Behn geez you sound like the japanese BEFORE fukashima. they lived in a all is fine dont worry about it world..... Fred likes others to pretend everything is just fine and dandy, just like the upper cast of Zionist Jews told their lower caste to trust whatever Hitler was doing because, in the end the Zionist religion and their satanic policies would get to dominate Earth regardless of the warlord(s) in charge. http://groups.google.com/groups/search http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The nuclear power sky is falling...
: Brad Guth
: Fred likes others to pretend everything is just fine and dandy Yet you claim he's spereading "Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt". Now you're claiming the exact opposite. Make up your mind. : , just like the upper cast of Zionist Jews told their lower caste to : trust whatever Hitler was doing because, in the end the Zionist : religion and their satanic policies would get to dominate Earth : regardless of the warlord(s) in charge. Well, OK, so you don't *have* a mind, just basal galglia and reflexive word torrents. But shouldn't there be *some* consistrency in your rants? Or at least come up with some fresh word salad someday. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The nuclear power sky is falling...
On Mar 12, 1:43*pm, (Wayne Throop) wrote:
: Brad Guth : Fred likes others to pretend everything is just fine and dandy Yet you claim he's spereading "Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt". Now you're claiming the exact opposite. *Make up your mind. : , just like the upper cast of Zionist Jews told their lower caste to : trust whatever Hitler was doing because, in the end the Zionist : religion and their satanic policies would get to dominate Earth : regardless of the warlord(s) in charge. Well, OK, so you don't *have* a mind, just basal galglia and reflexive word torrents. *But shouldn't there be *some* consistrency in your rants? Or at least come up with some fresh word salad someday. If you only like the bad guys, especially if they're Semites, then noting I or anyone else has to say can possibly change your closed mindset. BTW; we don't see you or those of your family living anywhere downwind or downstream from any nuclear or even a coal fired power plant, or even near heavy industry. Why is that? Why don't you tell us how those pesky carcinogens and radiation of various kinds are not accumulative and have absolutely no genetic impact whatsoever? http://groups.google.com/groups/search http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The nuclear power sky is falling...
I wonder how long the US will play russian roulette before it bites
us? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- US: Nebraska nuclear plant fire was serious threat US nuclear regulators say a fire that knocked out the cooling system for spent fuel at a nuclear plant in Nebraska last year represented a serious safety threat. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued a preliminary report on Monday into the fire at the Fort Calhoun plant last June. The report says the plant operator could have prevented the fire if it had investigated an unusual smell coming from an electric breaker 3 days earlier. The fire caused a loss of power that knocked out the system to cool spent nuclear fuel for about 90 minutes. However, the report says temperatures never exceeded safe levels as the plant had been shut down for refueling maintenance from about 2 months earlier. US nuclear regulators are keen to avoid any nuclear accident, drawing lessons from the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan. Tuesday, March 13, 2012 09:47 +0900 (JST) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
The nuclear power sky is falling...
On Mar 13, 4:38*am, bob haller wrote:
I wonder how long the US will play russian roulette before it bites us? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- US: Nebraska nuclear plant fire was serious threat US nuclear regulators say a fire that knocked out the cooling system for spent fuel at a nuclear plant in Nebraska last year represented a serious safety threat. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued a preliminary report on Monday into the fire at the Fort Calhoun plant last June. The report says the plant operator could have prevented the fire if it had investigated an unusual smell coming from an electric breaker 3 days earlier. The fire caused a loss of power that knocked out the system to cool spent nuclear fuel for about 90 minutes. However, the report says temperatures never exceeded safe levels as the plant had been shut down for refueling maintenance from about 2 months earlier. US nuclear regulators are keen to avoid any nuclear accident, drawing lessons from the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan. Tuesday, March 13, 2012 09:47 +0900 (JST) The US has been playing Russian roulette for decades with lots of nasty stuff other than reactors. You don't honestly think the cold-war wasn't mutually contrived for government job security, benefits and terrific profits on both sides? http://groups.google.com/groups/search http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The nuclear power sky is falling... | [email protected] | | Policy | 68 | March 5th 12 04:40 AM |
Nuclear power is safe | HVAC[_2_] | Misc | 4 | March 17th 11 09:53 PM |
Why Not (nuclear power) | AM | Amateur Astronomy | 9 | February 12th 10 06:00 PM |
Why nuclear power is better = solar power stinks | Rich[_1_] | Amateur Astronomy | 29 | November 18th 08 05:55 AM |
Nuclear power in space | Brian Gaff | Space Shuttle | 5 | August 2nd 03 01:58 AM |