|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Genesis Auger - End of Manned Capsule Worship?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Rusty B" wrote in message om... I don't believe the Genesis had a backup parachute system that a manned capsule would have had. There isn't any rule that says backup parachute systems have to be limited to manned spacecraft. A backup system in an unmanned craft could be activated by a simple timing circuit, independent of the primary system. If it doesn't detect that the primary chute has deployed at such and such mission time, it fires the backup chute (which ought to have an independent power supply, etc.). Jeff -- Remove icky phrase from email address to get a valid address. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Rusty B wrote:
On 8 Sep 2004 11:13:16 -0700, wrote: It is not hard to imagine a similar result with a manned capsule. Perhaps Constellation will have wings after all. I don't believe the Genesis had a backup parachute system that a manned capsule would have had. ... there have been 129 manned capsule landings with 1-failure (Soyuz 1) and one partial failure (Apollo 15 - one parachute collapsed ). Both of those failures were over 30-years ago. It looks like parachute/capsules probably have about the same failure rate as winged/reusables. What I'm wondering is whether an event on live TV similar to Genesis, but with people inside, would be more traumatic to the public (and the program) than the shuttle losses weve seen. If a failed chute happened, the astronauts would know it - and would presumably be in communication all the way down... And consider that if it had happened with a previous US manned capsule, the capsule probably would have simply splashed and sunk - a bit different event than getting extended closeup views of cracked capsule sticking out the desert floor. - Ed Kyle |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On 8 Sep 2004 12:46:09 -0700, wrote:
It looks like parachute/capsules probably have about the same failure rate as winged/reusables. What I'm wondering is whether an event on live TV similar to Genesis, but with people inside, would be more traumatic to the public (and the program) than the shuttle losses we've seen. If a failed chute happened, the astronauts would know it - and would presumably be in communication all the way down... - Ed Kyle In all the years of operation of Soyuz the chutes have failed to deploy once in over 150 flights. Besides the reason that Genesis's parachutes failed to deploy seems to be that the electronics never triggered the mortar. In a manned ship the astronauts would have a way to trigger them manually if the automatic deployment failed. I am still convinced that a capsule is a inherently more sensible and safe than a space plane. Both at launch and reentry. -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"John Thingstad" wrote in message news Besides the reason that Genesis's parachutes failed to deploy seems to be that the electronics never triggered the mortar. In a manned ship the astronauts would have a way to trigger them manually if the automatic deployment failed. I am still convinced that a capsule is a inherently more sensible and safe than a space plane. Both at launch and reentry. On an unmanned ship, there ought to be an automatic timer that would deploy the chute in the absence of the primary sensor inputs that would normally trigger the chute deploy. Even better would be a fully redundant backup chute tied to the independent, backup, timer. Who says backup systems ought to be limited to manned spacecraft? Jeff -- Remove icky phrase from email address to get a valid address. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On 8 Sep 2004 15:46:42 -0700, (Christian Ramos)
wrote: (Rusty B) wrote in message . com... On 8 Sep 2004 11:13:16 -0700, wrote: It is not hard to imagine a similar result with a manned capsule. Perhaps Constellation will have wings after all. - Ed Kyle I don't believe the Genesis had a backup parachute system that a manned capsule would have had. Manned capsule landings: Vostok - 6 Mercruy - 6 Voskhod - 2 Gemini - 10 Soyuz - 89 (not counting Soyuz TMA-4 currently in orbit on the ISS, but counting two successful launch aborts). Apollo - 15 Shenzhou - 1 So there have been 129 manned capsule landings with 1-failure (Soyuz 1) and one partial failure (Apollo 15 - one parachute collapsed ). Both of those failures were over 30-years ago. - Rusty Barton 15 apollos ? I only make 11 missions. Apollo 7 - Earth Orbital Apollo 8 - Lunar Orbital Apollo 9 - Earth Orbital Apollo 10 - Lunar Orbital Apollo 11/12/13/14/15/16/17 - Lunar Landing What am I missing??? Skylab 2, Skylab 3, Skylab 4 and Apollo-Soyuz Test Project all used Apollo CSM hardware. - Rusty Barton |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"John Thingstad" wrote in
news In all the years of operation of Soyuz the chutes have failed to deploy once in over 150 flights. Nope, Soyuz has only flown 90 flights. -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Christian Ramos wrote:
15 apollos ? I only make 11 missions. Apollo 7 - Earth Orbital Apollo 8 - Lunar Orbital Apollo 9 - Earth Orbital Apollo 10 - Lunar Orbital Apollo 11/12/13/14/15/16/17 - Lunar Landing What am I missing??? A: skylab B: Apollo 13 is in the wrong category |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Genesis Auger - End of Manned Capsule Worship? | [email protected] | Policy | 59 | October 29th 04 01:36 AM |
[GENESIS] First photo of Genesis auger now online | Rusty B | Policy | 3 | September 9th 04 11:42 AM |
[GENESIS] First photo of Genesis auger now online | OM | Policy | 2 | September 8th 04 09:20 PM |
NASA to capture fiery Genesis re-entry with 'eyes in the sky' (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 5th 04 07:02 PM |
3 chances to get genesis capsule!!!!!!!!! | Ed | UK Astronomy | 4 | August 27th 04 10:12 PM |