|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 06:47:17 -0500, Mister Sinister
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell: On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 22:04:28 -0700, STAPLETONSASTROLOGY wrote: WE HAVE LACTATION! Hey Lisa, Sweet or Buttermilk? Depends on whether she's gone jogging or not. -- V.G. "People are more violently opposed to fur than leather, because it is easier to harrass rich women than it is motorcycle gangs." - Bumper Sticker (This sig file contains not less than 80% recycled SPAM) Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 18:29:18 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
wrote: Depends on whether she's gone jogging or not. OH GAWD I GOT WOOD ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?
"STAPLETONSASTROLOGY" wrote [I said:] Yes. And there could be interesting things going on with schizophrenia. Not really. Some badly formed bridges and fouled networks in your brain. Entirely physical and mundane in nature. Oh, well, then maybe these things could be rebuilt? Maybe some binary searchs to narrow things down to the badly functioning segments or noisy net cards, then some replacement or repair. Or would you rather just leave malfunctioning things in the state they are in, because 'they just aren't working, and that's all' and 'if you disable the computer some, then you won't have to listen to that noisy netcard any'. Well, network techs usually don't take this approach - they troubleshoot and try to repair. Since you're big guy with knowledgable sounding jargon here, you should know that. Oh, but... if the network has been hacked and downed by someone so that it can serve that person or those people's *own* aims, then I guess it is a good idea to keep all the DNS's and other 'network information gathering' servers and the computers they run on, *completely downed and confused all of the time*. And you'd better keep the watchdog processes the original network designer set up, *downed and/or under your control to*, or they might send out some sort of alert to the system admin, wherever he is. Um, I guess you could do this by attacking your own network via sustained and constant DDOS attacks, but - that's kind of stupid, don't you think? Nevertheless it is the approach I think you set of idiots usually take. If you really want to be sure about things though, you could always kill the system admin and then try like deranged and stupid monkeys, to take over and run - according to whatever you could decipher based upon the network tech books you find in the side room - the network as best you could. But you'd better keep all of those watchdog processes and those 'what does the network look like' information gathering server processes, *really confused about the current shape of the network* - or fool them into thinking that the network looks some way it doesn't - if you don't want someone to come around trying to see what's going on. There's one thing that'll almost always call the sys admin, though, right? And that's a core dump. That's the machine trying to dump out of itself all the accumulated **** that has piled up inside of it due to your ****ed up usuage of it and your cluelessness about how the system needs to be run, right? And if you manage to down one of your major servers, well then you are really up **** creek, aren't you? Because you move into a major downtime for those who use that system, and they aren't going to be happy about any of that. But now, you know what? I am a living, breathing woman, not a computer. I have my own will and I intend to assert it. You are welcome to your stepford wives, they should suit your needs quite well. Since they aren't really alive in the first place, well, they can't really disobey you too much or do anything messy like that. Good bye now. Lisa Agnes Gardner |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 20:19:47 -0700, "Lisa Agnes Gardner"
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell: Good bye now. Lisa Agnes Gardner You are SUCH a tease! -- V.G. "People are more violently opposed to fur than leather, because it is easier to harrass rich women than it is motorcycle gangs." - Bumper Sticker (This sig file contains not less than 80% recycled SPAM) Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?
PLONK
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?
"Dick Hertz (Hey, who's Dick Hertz?)" wrote: STAPLETONSASTROLOGY wrote: [...] Sends out mind control rays that make you act crazy? She isn't acting. That's right, I'm not. However, I can be sane too whenever I want to. So-called 'insanity' (the only term many people like you will accept for talking about what is happening to me) gives me more leeway to act and to grow as a person. Lisa Agnes Gardner |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?
"STAPLETONSASTROLOGY" wrote in message ... Lisa Agnes Gardner wrote: "STAPLETONSASTROLOGY" wrote [I said:] Yes. And there could be interesting things going on with schizophrenia. Not really. Some badly formed bridges and fouled networks in your brain. Entirely physical and mundane in nature. Oh, well, then maybe these things could be rebuilt? Not in your case, no. Hmmmm. and you know this because...? Let's see an argument on that comment. Sometimes it's better just to throw these damn things out and get new ones. Uh huh. You and yours go ahead and purchase yourself a new bitch then, if you can find any or anyone who is willing to let their daughters come your way then given the track record here. I think you're going to have to go with the robots, guy. Maybe some binary searchs to narrow things down to the badly functioning segments or noisy net cards, then some replacement or repair. You're dreaming. Do you know what a binary search is as the term is applied to networking? I haven't done it myself - I'm not a network tech - but I have seen it done by someone in my former job as a graveyard shift computer operator. Again, give me a reason why you say I am dreaming. Or would you rather just leave malfunctioning things in the state they are in, because 'they just aren't working, and that's all' and 'if you disable the computer some, then you won't have to listen to that noisy netcard any'. That's more like it. Ooooooookay. You aren't going to be passing your Cisco test anytime soon. Well, network techs usually don't take this approach - they troubleshoot and try to repair. Since you're big guy with knowledgable sounding jargon here, you should know that. Network techs always have a big drawer full of bad parts that aren't worth fixin', babes. They usually don't include the cpu, etc., guy. Those things are fairly costly. And if you throw out a good one fella, somebody else might find it and take the trouble to rehabilitate it for themselves. In the case of women like me and abuse, you might not ever find another one coming your way again - because people have feelings, souls, and spirits and they shouldn't be brutalized and treated like machines. Robots for you. Oh, but... if the network has been hacked and downed by someone so that it can serve that person or those people's *own* aims, then I guess it is a good idea to keep all the DNS's and other 'network information gathering' servers and the computers they run on, *completely downed and confused all of the time*. And you'd better keep the watchdog processes the original network designer set up, *downed and/or under your control to*, or they might send out some sort of alert to the system admin, wherever he is. Rants like that are the reason you're about one of the deepest boards in the drawer, kook. I'm not in your drawer and I believe I was stolen in the first place most likely. Um, I guess you could do this by attacking your own network via sustained and constant DDOS attacks, but - that's kind of stupid, don't you think? Nevertheless it is the approach I think you set of idiots usually take. Your main logic board is damaged beyond all repair, HAL. University of California at Berkeley doesn't think so, because they awarded me a bachelor's degree in mathematics in 1991. Would you like to talk logic? I can put on that hat and talk that if you'd like. Choose your subject. What you think is all ****ed up. Oh. *How*, exactly? Support this assertion of yours with an argument. If you really want to be sure about things though, you could always kill the system admin and then try like deranged and stupid monkeys, to take over and run - according to whatever you could decipher based upon the network tech books you find in the side room - the network as best you could. That we do. Yes, that is how it seems to me. But you'd better keep all of those watchdog processes and those 'what does the network look like' information gathering server processes, *really confused about the current shape of the network* - or fool them into thinking that the network looks some way it doesn't - if you don't want someone to come around trying to see what's going on. That we do. Yes, this is again how it seems to me. There's one thing that'll almost always call the sys admin, though, right? And that's a core dump. That's the machine trying to dump out of itself all the accumulated **** that has piled up inside of it due to your ****ed up usuage of it and your cluelessness about how the system needs to be run, right? Wrong. We ran a core dump on you and all the data was bad. You 'ran a core dump' on me. Do you know what a core dump *is*, by any chance? Sometimes the machine does it on its own. That's the way that I have seen it happen before. The data was bad. Bad *how*? Since it was a core dump, I guess this would not be too surprising, they aren't usually as I have seen them the nicest and neatest things around. And if you manage to down one of your major servers, well then you are really up **** creek, aren't you? Because you move into a major downtime for those who use that system, and they aren't going to be happy about any of that. They'll take nothing and like it. Well, I guess we will see, eh? But now, you know what? I am a living, breathing woman, not a computer. You are an implanted bio-slave. Honor and obey, or else. Uh huh. Come to the front door of my physical place of residence and tell me that, would you? I'd love that. Please, would you or someone like you do that for me? I really would love it. I have my own will and I intend to assert it. Ah, the self-delusion circuit is operating as expected, at least. Ummmm, I don't know if you realize this, but part of what I am doing here *is* asserting my own will in my own kooky-but-sane way. You are welcome to your stepford wives, they should suit your needs quite well. Since they aren't really alive in the first place, well, they can't really disobey you too much or do anything messy like that. As a matter of fact, you can turn them all the way up to Extra Messy. But you don't like messy, remember? Because that is what I am like. You want neat and tidy and obeying. Good bye now. See you later tonight. Uh huh. No, I don't think so. You could **** me off. Lisa Agnes Gardner |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?
In sci.astro Lisa Agnes Gardner wrote on Mon, 23 Jun 2003 19:47:15 -0700:
:LAG What do you do at the lab, BTW? I research asteroids and comets, why? Jim. Jim Scotti Lunar & Planetary Laboratory University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 USA http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/ |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?
In sci.astro Lisa Agnes Gardner wrote on Mon, 23 Jun 2003 19:52:02 -0700:
:LAG **** you, asshole. I wonder if any funding you're getting is really :LAG worth that. Well isn't that special. Your first response si to lash out with expletives. This is the last you'll hear from me since your address is now a resident of my killfile with a select collection of usenet posters. Have a nice life. Jim Scotti Lunar & Planetary Laboratory University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 USA http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/ |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Whose fault will uncontrolled Hubble re-entry be? | Explorer8939 | Policy | 2 | February 24th 04 05:19 AM |
NASA Watch doesn't like Rand's columns... | jeff findley | Policy | 159 | November 3rd 03 01:11 AM |
The Mystery of Buzz's Lost (and found?) Moon Watch | wassup | History | 5 | November 2nd 03 03:56 PM |
NASA Keeps Watch Over Isabel, Captures Spectacular Images | Ron Baalke | Space Station | 0 | September 16th 03 03:53 AM |
NASA Watch: Early Shuttle Retirement? | ed kyle | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 29th 03 08:14 PM |