|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?
DrPostman wrote in message . ..
On 21 Jun 2003 09:36:55 -0700, (Lisa Gardner) wrote: DrPostman wrote in message . .. On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 17:36:32 -0700, "John Griffin" wrote: "DrPostman" wrote On 20 Jun 2003 11:01:30 -0700, (Lisa Gardner) wrote: Guy, I meant that I am not so ready to believe *Nancy's* assertion. How can you be ready AT ALL to believe it, especially now that her dates have come and gone and The White Lie is the excuse? Lisa wants to believe crazy stuff, as a sort of solidarity thing. Uh, what is with you guys? Are you functioning on auto-reply, or something? **Did you actually read what I wrote above**? I said that I was not too willing to believe this assertion of Nancy's. And did you read what I asked? How can you be willing AT ALL to believe Nancy's nonsense? Somehow that got translated into me wholeheartedly believing. Not from my question. What tiny, itty bitsy part are you willing to believe? She has been proven entirely wrong. [...] Uh, actually. I don't believe any of it straight out, but it is possible that she is looking psychically at someone's 'inner space' and misinterpreting what she senses there. Or, it is possible that she is being fed bull**** by people who are intentionally looking to decieve and lead others astray. Incidentally, I can't believe you gave this bull**** answer. How is it that you can give such unthinking replies and still be taken somewhat seriously? Or are you just not taken seriously? Lisa Agnes Gardner |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?
STAPLETONSASTROLOGY wrote in message ...
Lisa Gardner wrote: ] I have never really looked much into her stuff, but in general I do believe that channeling is a part of the whole bad of **** that eats at me. I also believe that it is possible that many so-called channelers are really just people who are having fed to them public opinion management propaganda by some organization or another, either from here here on earth or elsewhere, albeit through psychic communication. What matters is the content of what is said, though. If the stuff makes sense and seems right to you, than its origin is not all that important. The *content* is what should be paid attention to. If it *doesn't* make sense, than it doesn't make sense - no matter who claims to be channeling whom. But yeah: the whole phenomenon of 'channeling' is something that could easily be used to direct the opinions of the certain groups of people. I think it *is* used to do such a thing. Lisa, "chaneling" is just some made-up-bull**** done to impress people, get attention, and make money. It's not real. It's fake. It doesn't really happen. It would be cool it it were real, but it isn't. Sorry. Yes, some of it is fake. However, I have known several channels personally who were not "faking" it. Exactly what the process consists of is open for debate, but it is not always being "faked". I |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?
"Idon't" wrote in message m... STAPLETONSASTROLOGY wrote in message ... Lisa Gardner wrote: ] I have never really looked much into her stuff, but in general I do believe that channeling is a part of the whole bad of **** that eats at me. I also believe that it is possible that many so-called channelers are really just people who are having fed to them public opinion management propaganda by some organization or another, either from here here on earth or elsewhere, albeit through psychic communication. What matters is the content of what is said, though. If the stuff makes sense and seems right to you, than its origin is not all that important. The *content* is what should be paid attention to. If it *doesn't* make sense, than it doesn't make sense - no matter who claims to be channeling whom. But yeah: the whole phenomenon of 'channeling' is something that could easily be used to direct the opinions of the certain groups of people. I think it *is* used to do such a thing. Lisa, "chaneling" is just some made-up-bull**** done to impress people, get attention, and make money. It's not real. It's fake. It doesn't really happen. It would be cool it it were real, but it isn't. Sorry. Yes, some of it is fake. However, I have known several channels personally who were not "faking" it. Exactly what the process consists of is open for debate, but it is not always being "faked". I How could one verify if it were possible or not? It's just a buncha talk. -Ugly Bob |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?
Matthew Kriebel wrote in message ...
In article , (Idon't) wrote: It's not real. It's fake. It doesn't really happen. It would be cool it it were real, but it isn't. Sorry. Yes, some of it is fake. However, I have known several channels personally who were not "faking" it. Exactly what the process consists of is open for debate, but it is not always being "faked". And just how do you know its real? Real what? I only said that the people I knew personally were not intentionally "faking" it. That is the catch-all used to dismiss the entire phenomenon, but it is not universally applicable. It's not nearly that simple. I |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?
On 22 Jun 2003 14:34:21 -0700, (Idon't) wrote:
Matthew Kriebel wrote in message ... In article , (Idon't) wrote: It's not real. It's fake. It doesn't really happen. It would be cool it it were real, but it isn't. Sorry. Yes, some of it is fake. However, I have known several channels personally who were not "faking" it. Exactly what the process consists of is open for debate, but it is not always being "faked". And just how do you know its real? Real what? I only said that the people I knew personally were not intentionally "faking" it. That is the catch-all used to dismiss the entire phenomenon, but it is not universally applicable. It's not nearly that simple. Yes, it is exactly that simple. Although not quite as simple as your barely functioning mind. Pete Charest Founding Father DIY Insult Program Pete Charest Insult Yourself, I'm Busy |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?
"Idon't" wrote in message m... Matthew Kriebel wrote in message ... In article , (Idon't) wrote: It's not real. It's fake. It doesn't really happen. It would be cool it it were real, but it isn't. Sorry. Yes, some of it is fake. However, I have known several channels personally who were not "faking" it. Exactly what the process consists of is open for debate, but it is not always being "faked". And just how do you know its real? Real what? I only said that the people I knew personally were not intentionally "faking" it. That is the catch-all used to dismiss the entire phenomenon, but it is not universally applicable. It's not nearly that simple. There is a danger that people who believed it to be totally 'faked' and made up, will be unduly impressed if and when it is proven to them that it is actually happening by something like psychic means. Which in itself means nothing -that it is actually happening via 'psychic' means - there could be a hell of a lot of bull**** being psychically broadcast out there all of the time, for a whole hell of a lot of bull**** reasons. Even if there *are* aliens and they *do* have impressive tech, they **could still be** incredible assholes and dickheads who are just out for themselves. Lisa Agnes Gardner |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Whose fault will uncontrolled Hubble re-entry be? | Explorer8939 | Policy | 2 | February 24th 04 05:19 AM |
NASA Watch doesn't like Rand's columns... | jeff findley | Policy | 159 | November 3rd 03 01:11 AM |
The Mystery of Buzz's Lost (and found?) Moon Watch | wassup | History | 5 | November 2nd 03 03:56 PM |
NASA Keeps Watch Over Isabel, Captures Spectacular Images | Ron Baalke | Space Station | 0 | September 16th 03 03:53 AM |
NASA Watch: Early Shuttle Retirement? | ed kyle | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 29th 03 08:14 PM |