A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How the Doppler Effect Refutes Einstein



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 22nd 17, 06:27 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default How the Doppler Effect Refutes Einstein

Setup:

A light source emits a series of pulses equally distanced from one another. A stationary observer (receiver) measures the frequency:

http://www.einstein-online.info/imag...ler_static.gif

The observer starts moving with constant speed towards the light source and measures the frequency again:

http://www.einstein-online.info/imag...ector_blue.gif

Premise 1: The moving observer measures the frequency to be higher.

Premise 2: The formula

(measured frequency) = (speed of the pulses relative to the observer)/(distance between the pulses)

is correct.

Conclusion: The speed of the pulses relative to the moving observer is higher than relative to the stationary observer. In other words, the speed of light varies with the speed of the observer, in violation of Einstein's relativity.

Pentcho Valev
  #2  
Old May 22nd 17, 11:12 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default How the Doppler Effect Refutes Einstein

Stephen Hawking, "A Brief History of Time", Chapter 3: "Now imagine a source of light at a constant distance from us, such as a star, emitting waves of light at a constant wavelength. Obviously the wavelength of the waves we receive will be the same as the wavelength at which they are emitted (the gravitational field of the galaxy will not be large enough to have a significant effect). Suppose now that the source starts moving toward us. When the source emits the next wave crest it will be nearer to us, so the distance between wave crests will be smaller than when the star was stationary." http://www.fisica.net/relatividade/s...ry_of_time.pdf

This interpretation, universally taught by Einsteinians, implies that the speed of the wavecrests relative to the moving source is smaller than c - unlike the stationary source, the moving source is chasing the fleeing wavecrest. Accordingly, the following argument is valid:

Premise 1: The speed of the wavecrests relative to both the stationary and the moving source is c.

Premise 2: The frequency measured by the observer is higher when the source is moving toward the observer.

Conclusion: The moving source does not emit shorter wavelength - rather, it emits faster light. If the speed of the moving source is v, the speed of the light relative to the observer is c'=c+v. In other words, the speed of light varies with the speed of the source, as predicted by Newton's emission theory of light and in violation of Einstein's relativity.

Pentcho Valev
  #3  
Old May 23rd 17, 08:39 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default How the Doppler Effect Refutes Einstein

The speed of light varies with the speed of the observer - this is so obvious that Einsteinians often suggest it explicitly, thereby unconsciously repudiating Einstein's relativity:

Albert Einstein Institute: "In this particular animation

http://www.einstein-online.info/imag...ector_blue.gif

which has the receiver moving towards the source at one third the speed of the pulses themselves, four pulses are received in the time it takes the source to emit three pulses." http://www.einstein-online.info/spotlights/doppler

Since "four pulses are received in the time it takes the source to emit three pulses", the speed of the pulses relative to the receiver (observer) is greater than their speed relative to the source, in violation of Einstein's relativity.

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Doppler Effect Disproves Einstein Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 February 7th 17 09:42 AM
Doppler Unambiguously Refutes Einstein Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 November 21st 16 10:04 AM
DOPPLER REFUTES EINSTEIN, CONFIRMS NEWTON Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 October 28th 13 09:03 AM
DOPPLER EFFECT REFUTES SPECIAL RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 7 December 30th 11 12:08 PM
DOPPLER EFFECT IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 October 27th 08 08:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.