A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Inside the Big Bang



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 4th 17, 09:58 PM posted to alt.astronomy
herbert glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,045
Default Inside the Big Bang

Was all there is to create two universes.Ours and Treb's .They both are 100% the same right down to the exact number of their electrons and positrons.They spin in opposite directions,and thus have opposite charge.Ours are electrons,and Treb's is Positrons. Positive universe(Treb's) came out of the big bang first,and as of now he is 285 years ahead of us(in the future) Three of my theories are now one due to this good thinking.Nature uses "TIME LAPS" to great advantage.It makes sure twins do not destroy each other by touching. TreBert
  #2  
Old May 4th 17, 10:35 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,515
Default Inside the Big Bang

On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 1:58:47 PM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
Was all there is to create two universes.Ours and Treb's .They both are 100% the same right down to the exact number of their electrons and positrons.They spin in opposite directions,and thus have opposite charge.Ours are electrons,and Treb's is Positrons. Positive universe(Treb's) came out of the big bang first,and as of now he is 285 years ahead of us(in the future) Three of my theories are now one due to this good thinking.Nature uses "TIME LAPS" to great advantage.It makes sure twins do not destroy each other by touching. TreBert



But if Treb's positive universe came into being 285 years ahead of ours, weren't this grossly out of balance for the first 285 years? Mother nature likes parity!

Double-A

  #3  
Old May 6th 17, 12:48 AM posted to alt.astronomy
herbert glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,045
Default Inside the Big Bang

On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 1:58:47 PM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
Was all there is to create two universes.Ours and Treb's .They both are 100% the same right down to the exact number of their electrons and positrons.They spin in opposite directions,and thus have opposite charge.Ours are electrons,and Treb's is Positrons. Positive universe(Treb's) came out of the big bang first,and as of now he is 285 years ahead of us(in the future) Three of my theories are now one due to this good thinking.Nature uses "TIME LAPS" to great advantage.It makes sure twins do not destroy each other by touching. TreBert


After 22 billion years Treb's positive universe became 285byears ahead of our negative universe.At the explosion it was only first by a trillion trillion of a second TreBert
  #4  
Old May 6th 17, 07:07 PM posted to alt.astronomy
herbert glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,045
Default Inside the Big Bang

On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 2:35:54 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 1:58:47 PM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
Was all there is to create two universes.Ours and Treb's .They both are 100% the same right down to the exact number of their electrons and positrons.They spin in opposite directions,and thus have opposite charge.Ours are electrons,and Treb's is Positrons. Positive universe(Treb's) came out of the big bang first,and as of now he is 285 years ahead of us(in the future) Three of my theories are now one due to this good thinking.Nature uses "TIME LAPS" to great advantage.It makes sure twins do not destroy each other by touching. TreBert



But if Treb's positive universe came into being 285 years ahead of ours, weren't this grossly out of balance for the first 285 years? Mother nature likes parity!

Double-A

  #5  
Old May 16th 17, 05:51 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Richard A.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default Inside the Big Bang

SmellBert says
After 22 billion years Treb's positive universe became 285byears ahead of our negative universe.At the explosion it was only first by a trillion trillion of a second TreBert
---------

Are you on glue?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
(no, he doesn’t) (yes, he does) BANG BANG Arc Michael Misc 0 May 14th 16 08:49 PM
Article: Inside inflation - after the big bang Robert Karl Stonjek Astronomy Misc 3 March 7th 07 12:04 AM
Cum Drips Down My Chin, for Ralph the teacher's cold, inside me it's bitter, whereas inside you it's living open, Great Rich Drunkard. Rob Kelk Astronomy Misc 0 June 27th 06 10:52 AM
B, Big, Big Bang, Big Bang Books... socalsw Amateur Astronomy 6 June 7th 04 09:17 AM
BIG BANG really a Big Bang BUST Ed Conrad Astronomy Misc 27 November 7th 03 11:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.