|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
...Will the next 50 Years of the Space-age be Better?
"Jim Oberg" wrote in message
... How about this AP story that reported that Apollo landed on the moon 22 years after sputnik? Ya know, people seem drawn to correcting these kind of historical mistakes. It's our nature to want them remembered properly. But what about spending the same amount of effort correcting ....future... mistakes of the space program? After 50 years of the space age we have plenty of mistakes and successes with which to compare to current policy. And these past mistakes and successes are so obvious most layman can see them, and often easier than those too closely associated with the subject. Why did Kennedy succeed so completely? While the shuttle has fallen somewhat short and the ISS is quickly bringing new meaning to the term 'space-junk'. Is there a common thread among the three? The goal set by Kennedy was clearly defined and narrowly drawn. The shuttle attempted to be everything for everybody. And no one even tries to justify the ISS anymore. Doesn't anyone see a trend here??? I mean...chrissakes. The goal is the thing. Success is directly proportional to the clarity of purpose and benefit to society. So now we have this goal of going to the moon, that has virtually ...no... clarity of purpose or benefit to society. I'm sorry, but philosophical meanderings about discovery and survival of humanity, and h3 and all those 'promises' just don't cut it. 'Show me the money!' In the past such empty 'promises' were enough for big corporate America to secure unlimited govt funding for things designed to produce nothing in the end ....but itself. A space station and moon base to nowhere. But now I expect some resemblence of scientific thought put into our long term space goals. Not just be forced to accept a goal designed solely as a massive subsidy to equally massive Lockheed. I find it incredible sad that so many people seem willing to accept whatever big business and big govt decide is best for themselves. While ignoring our earthly needs, such as global warming and replacing fossil fuels. Those are the things the people need solved. How does our space goal help ...us...and how much does it help the contractors and lobbyists and politicians....them? Right now they are getting everything, while we get to watch...watch a rape in process. Can anyone here think of a reason why Pres Bush and his friends from Texas and Saudi Arabia would like to kill our Space Solar Power Program and replace it with a make-work program for his ..next best friend....Lockheed??? Come on! The only reason these very large corporations and very powerful people are getting away with this is because of the war. No one is really watching or caring because of the overwhelming issues of Iraq. So on the upcoming 50th anniversary of the space-age lets raise a glass, and celebrate how we sat and idly watched while the next 50 years were being ****ed-up. http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/s...kssecrets.html Sputnik at 50: first space race won with scrounged rocket, improvised satellite By Vladimir Isachenkov ASSOCIATED PRESS 10:00 a.m. September 30, 2007 MOSCOW - When Sputnik took off 50 years ago, the world gazed at the heavens in awe and apprehension, watching what seemed like the unveiling of a sustained Soviet effort to conquer space and score a stunning Cold War triumph. snip In the end, it was the Americans who won the race to the moon, nearly 22 years later. Khrushchev wasn't interested in getting there, his son says, and the effort made under his successor, Leonid Brezhnev, was underfunded and badly hampered by rifts between Korolyov and other designers. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
...Will the next 50 Years of the Space-age be Better?
On Oct 1, 4:08 pm, "Jonathan" wrote:
"Jim Oberg" wrote in message ... How about this AP story that reported that Apollo landed on the moon 22 years after sputnik? Ya know, people seem drawn to correcting these kind of historical mistakes. It's our nature to want them remembered properly. But what about spending the same amount of effort correcting ....future... mistakes of the space program? After 50 years of the space age we have plenty of mistakes and successes with which to compare to current policy. And these past mistakes and successes are so obvious most layman can see them, and often easier than those too closely associated with the subject. Why did Kennedy succeed so completely? While the shuttle has fallen somewhat short and the ISS is quickly bringing new meaning to the term 'space-junk'. Is there a common thread among the three? The goal set by Kennedy was clearly defined and narrowly drawn. The shuttle attempted to be everything for everybody. And no one even tries to justify the ISS anymore. Doesn't anyone see a trend here??? I mean...chrissakes. The goal is the thing. Success is directly proportional to the clarity of purpose and benefit to society. So now we have this goal of going to the moon, that has virtually ...no... clarity of purpose or benefit to society. I'm sorry, but philosophical meanderings about discovery and survival of humanity, and h3 and all those 'promises' just don't cut it. 'Show me the money!' In the past such empty 'promises' were enough for big corporate America to secure unlimited govt funding for things designed to produce nothing in the end ...but itself. A space station and moon base to nowhere. But now I expect some resemblence of scientific thought put into our long term space goals. Not just be forced to accept a goal designed solely as a massive subsidy to equally massive Lockheed. I find it incredible sad that so many people seem willing to accept whatever big business and big govt decide is best for themselves. While ignoring our earthly needs, such as global warming and replacing fossil fuels. Those are the things the people need solved. How does our space goal help ...us...and how much does it help the contractors and lobbyists and politicians....them? Right now they are getting everything, while we get to watch...watch a rape in process. Can anyone here think of a reason why Pres Bush and his friends from Texas and Saudi Arabia would like to kill our Space Solar Power Program and replace it with a make-work program for his ..next best friend....Lockheed??? Come on! The only reason these very large corporations and very powerful people are getting away with this is because of the war. No one is really watching or caring because of the overwhelming issues of Iraq. So on the upcoming 50th anniversary of the space-age lets raise a glass, and celebrate how we sat and idly watched while the next 50 years were being ****ed-up. http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/s...0-sputnikssecr... Sputnik at 50: first space race won with scrounged rocket, improvised satellite By Vladimir Isachenkov ASSOCIATED PRESS 10:00 a.m. September 30, 2007 MOSCOW - When Sputnik took off 50 years ago, the world gazed at the heavens in awe and apprehension, watching what seemed like the unveiling of a sustained Soviet effort to conquer space and score a stunning Cold War triumph. snip In the end, it was the Americans who won the race to the moon, nearly 22 years later. Khrushchev wasn't interested in getting there, his son says, and the effort made under his successor, Leonid Brezhnev, was underfunded and badly hampered by rifts between Korolyov and other designers.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - There's always book and witch burnings at the stake that works most every time, as otherwise there's always a spare cross for sticking those of us causing waves for their good ship LOLLIPOP. I assume most folks would much rather believe in whatever's the ongoing mainstream swarm mindset, than trust their own deductive gut reasoning. (always much safer and loads of fun to go with the flow, even if it's the up hill flow of their own crapolla) You know, I've often stipulated that not all Yids are bad, just that some of the bad ones are rather extra special bad enough to account against tens if not hundreds of the good ones, and by way of their own faith-based mindset is why there's damn little if any policing of their own kind in sight. However, not all the bad guys helping out Hitler's global domination agenda (for a small share of the pie) were actual hard core Zion Jews, although many of their best minions were certainly being well enough educated by Jews, so that it didn't hardly matter if you were Jewish smart or just smart because of being educated by Jews, as either way it was an Old Testament provided win- win for the old Third Reich gipper, and otherwise pure hell on Earth for most of everyone else, including a good many of their own kind. Clearly there are a number of fuzzy family tree issues that rather nicely connect the rich and powerful DNA of our resident warlord president(GW Bush) with the sorted past of their having collaborated along with some of the worse kind of humanity on Earth. "George W. Bush's grandfather helped finance the Nazi Party. Karl Rove's grandfather allegedly helped run the Nazi Party, and helped build the Birkenau Death Camp. Arnold Schwarzenegger's Austrian father volunteered for the infamous Nazi SA and became a ranking officer." "Siege Heil: The Bush-Rove-Schwarzenegger Nazi Nexus and the Destabilization of California" As it turns out, California isn't quite that far gone, thanks to Schwarzenegger's ability to kick a few of those spendy girly-men in the the butt. "The Bush family ties to the Nazi party are well known. In their 1994 Secret War Against the Jews, Mark Aarons and John Loftus use official US documents to establish that George Herbert Walker, George W. Bush's maternal great-grandfather, was one of Hitler's most important early backers. He funneled money to the rising young fascist through the Union Banking Corporation." - read more -- http://www.commondreams.org/views03/1006-08.htm "In Nazi Germany there were Jewish leaders, the Judenrate, who similarly advised their followers not to resist Adolf Hitler. Elevating a few members of a targeted group is an effective way to disarm your victims." [1] "The Bush family fortune came from the Third Reich." -John Loftus, former US Justice Dept. Nazi War Crimes investigator and President of the Florida Holocaust Museum quoted in the Sarasota Herald-Tribune 11/11/2000 http://www.newscoast.com/headlinesstory2.cfm?ID=35115 - read more -- http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com...pespective.htm - read more -- http://www.bushnews.com/jews.htm - read more -- http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/...312540,00.html Or don't bother searching for or much less read through anything if you simply do not what to learn of the whole truth and nothing but the truth, or much less figure out why so much of today has gotten so lethal, spendy and otherwise so screwed up. After all, your being snookered and subsequently dumbfounded past the point of no return means that you too will not require any of that pesky remorse crap, plus you'll get to make those very same mistakes over and over until you get each of those mistakes down pat, like that one of putting your own kind on a stick for a faith-based PR stunt, which may need a little polish before the next time roles around. - Brad Guth - |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Biggest void in space is 1 billion light years across - space - 24 August 2007 - New Scientist Space | [email protected] | UK Astronomy | 0 | August 24th 07 08:07 PM |
_ Your thoughts on the next 100 YEARS in space ! _ | ItCameFromTheFuture | Policy | 34 | December 11th 06 01:21 AM |
What the......the Shuttle can't be in space over new years day? | Lee Jay | Space Shuttle | 58 | November 13th 06 02:30 PM |
What the......the Shuttle can't be in space over new years day? | Jonathan Silverlight | History | 3 | November 10th 06 10:54 PM |
In space, where will we be in 30 years? | Adrian B. | Policy | 7 | July 5th 04 11:39 PM |