The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy.

The document could be downloaded at:
http://www.pixelphase.com/sun/sun.pdf
http://www.tikunim.co.il/sun/sun.pdf



Its title is:
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from
the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass
to energy.

Abstract:
The sun energy source thought to be a nuclear fusion reactor inside
the sun core. The sun is not heated by fusion reaction but by magnetic
fields coming from the galactic center. The nuclear fusion is a by
product of the magnetic fields heating. The changing magnetic fields
from the galactic center induce electric currents inside the sun that
heat the sun. The heat and the high kinetic energy of particles in the
sun core, trigger high energy collisions that create the main
constituents of matter, electron, proton and neutron. The collisions
also fuse or nucleosynthesis heavier elements like deuterium, tritium,
helium and lithium. This leads to the fact that the stars and galaxies
constantly produce mass and energy. The article will explain the
clockworks behinds the galaxies energy production. The galaxy energy
and mass production cancel out the Big Bang theory and leads to a
steady state cosmological model with large amount of new mass created
that expand and accelerate the universe.

wrote:

The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from
the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass
to energy.

Oh boy, I can't wait to hear the reaction (so to speak) of the guys at ITER.
Looks like they are barking up the wrong tree and that generating energy
instead through harnessing these mag fields will be a heck of a lot easier!!!

Qute idea, but he is clueless about many facts.

The most obvious mistake is the strengths of magnetic fields needed to create any significant energy in the Sun.
These magnetic fields would have to be so strong and so fast changing, that all metal objects would heat up considerably.
And metal rings would fly around as if obsessed by Harry Potter,
Not to mention that magnetic compasses would go insane.

Maybe that is why he did not give any calculations...

I think he should stick to his Table Animator software.
Although it looks like that is not paying the rent for him :
http://www.project-for-sell.com/project41.php

Rob


wrote in message news


The document could be downloaded at:
http://www.pixelphase.com/sun/sun.pdf
http://www.tikunim.co.il/sun/sun.pdf



Its title is:
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from
the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass
to energy.

Abstract:
The sun energy source thought to be a nuclear fusion reactor inside
the sun core. The sun is not heated by fusion reaction but by magnetic
fields coming from the galactic center. The nuclear fusion is a by
product of the magnetic fields heating. The changing magnetic fields
from the galactic center induce electric currents inside the sun that
heat the sun. The heat and the high kinetic energy of particles in the
sun core, trigger high energy collisions that create the main
constituents of matter, electron, proton and neutron. The collisions
also fuse or nucleosynthesis heavier elements like deuterium, tritium,
helium and lithium. This leads to the fact that the stars and galaxies
constantly produce mass and energy. The article will explain the
clockworks behinds the galaxies energy production. The galaxy energy
and mass production cancel out the Big Bang theory and leads to a
steady state cosmological model with large amount of new mass created
that expand and accelerate the universe.

Quite an interestng story but lacks one fundamental ingredient, namely
a working model based on actual numerical data for the strengths of all
the forces and fields that would be required on the scale of
interstellar space. The models presented are essentially descriptive
only and have little in the way of actual quantity.

I'm not an astrophysicist but even I as a relative lay person on the
subject am aware that electomagnetic forces are relativey relatively
insignificant compared with gravity over interstellar or intergalactic
distances.

The author seems to be saying essentially that if you discount the
presence of dark matter you can explain the anomalies that arise from
the absence of the accompanying gravity fields with large scale
electromagnetic effects.

I'm not qualified to challenge this but I'd have thought that if this
were tenable it would be among the mainstream competitors of
cosmological (or even astronomical) theory. Electomagnetism is after
all a comparatively well understood part of nature and is easy to
experiment with. If there were any substance in the proposed theory the
verdict would have been in by now.