|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Question, pioneer anomality because of magnetic induction?
I had the strangest idea this morning,
_could_ it be that if pioneer has some magnets (even it if is just current carrying wires), it is slowed by magnetic interaction with mu space? You know, if you drop a magnet in a copper pipe it is slowed down.... In how far does 'the rest of the universe' behave like a conductor around pioneer? Just shoot it down (the idea), probably wrong. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Question, pioneer anomality because of magnetic induction?
schrieb im Newsbeitrag
ups.com... The CMBR falsifies SR SRists forget that since Einstein, the CMBR has been discovered. To day, the spaceship observer, as well as the Earth observer, can determine their velocity wrt the CMBR. Those velocities can be called "absolute", hence the relative velocity between the Earth and the spaceship are also "absolute". Iow, thanks to the CMBR, one knows which one is "really" moving fast, and which one is not. If SRists recognize this, they should realize that the theoretical foundation of SR is wrong. Marcel Luttgens Yes we have absolute velocities with respect to CMBR locally. Fully right. And these abolute velocities decrease by the local CMBR zero velocity when the distance becomes greater. Thats Pioneer anomaly.depending on Hubble Constant. Therefore also the rotational Spin slows down the second Pioneer anomaly depending on Hubble Constant. The CMBR zero velocity is the same as the Hubble velocity v = r/T You see the absolute and the relative must be unified to obtain new SR. GR is wrong so or so. The most physicists know this. Only some like Hawking of shure see it otherwise. The main mistake in SR are the Lorentz transforms they are wrong. They must be replaced or be corrected by the right SR cosmology including Hubble law maybe corrected for large distances, CMBR background, .... Because GR is wrong only this only remaining SR cosmology can be true. Now who can connect the absolute and the relative. The world is not absolute or relative as the former thoughts all have been, it is relalute or absotive, something containing both. Josef Matz "Jan Panteltje" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... I had the strangest idea this morning, _could_ it be that if pioneer has some magnets (even it if is just current carrying wires), it is slowed by magnetic interaction with mu space? You know, if you drop a magnet in a copper pipe it is slowed down.... In how far does 'the rest of the universe' behave like a conductor around pioneer? Just shoot it down (the idea), probably wrong. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Question, pioneer anomality because of magnetic induction?
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:29:05 +0000, Jan Panteltje wrote:
I had the strangest idea this morning, _could_ it be that if pioneer has some magnets (even it if is just current carrying wires), it is slowed by magnetic interaction with mu space? You know, if you drop a magnet in a copper pipe it is slowed down.... In how far does 'the rest of the universe' behave like a conductor around pioneer? Just shoot it down (the idea), probably wrong. Good question, and possibly right. I would think a rotating magnetic field would vastly increase the Pioneer's apparent size (volume of space of the field) wrt all the protons and electrons (reaction mass) flying by. -- Craig Fink Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Question, pioneer anomality because of magnetic induction?
"Craig Fink" wrote in message news On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:29:05 +0000, Jan Panteltje wrote: I had the strangest idea this morning, _could_ it be that if pioneer has some magnets (even it if is just current carrying wires), it is slowed by magnetic interaction with mu space? You know, if you drop a magnet in a copper pipe it is slowed down.... In how far does 'the rest of the universe' behave like a conductor around pioneer? Just shoot it down (the idea), probably wrong. Good question, and possibly right. I would think a rotating magnetic field would vastly increase the Pioneer's apparent size (volume of space of the field) wrt all the protons and electrons (reaction mass) flying by. The 'protons and electrons flying by' are leaving the system at ~400 km/s. Pioneer is leaving at ~12km/s. Any drag would accelerate the craft away from the Sun which is the wrong direction. George |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Question, pioneer anomality because of magnetic induction?
On a sunny day (Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:06:05 +0100) it happened "George Dishman"
wrote in : "Craig Fink" wrote in message news On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:29:05 +0000, Jan Panteltje wrote: I had the strangest idea this morning, _could_ it be that if pioneer has some magnets (even it if is just current carrying wires), it is slowed by magnetic interaction with mu space? You know, if you drop a magnet in a copper pipe it is slowed down.... In how far does 'the rest of the universe' behave like a conductor around pioneer? Just shoot it down (the idea), probably wrong. Good question, and possibly right. I would think a rotating magnetic field would vastly increase the Pioneer's apparent size (volume of space of the field) wrt all the protons and electrons (reaction mass) flying by. The 'protons and electrons flying by' are leaving the system at ~400 km/s. Pioneer is leaving at ~12km/s. Any drag would accelerate the craft away from the Sun which is the wrong direction. George Yes, you are like right.... Maybe it is Le Saga particles coming in that slow it down... Or simply maybe space is not that empty as we think.... dark matter? I really do not know. Maybe something we do not know about is flowing into the sun. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Question, pioneer anomality because of magnetic induction?
Jan Panteltje wrote: On a sunny day (Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:06:05 +0100) it happened "George Dishman" wrote in : "Craig Fink" wrote in message news On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:29:05 +0000, Jan Panteltje wrote: I had the strangest idea this morning, _could_ it be that if pioneer has some magnets (even it if is just current carrying wires), it is slowed by magnetic interaction with mu space? You know, if you drop a magnet in a copper pipe it is slowed down.... In how far does 'the rest of the universe' behave like a conductor around pioneer? Just shoot it down (the idea), probably wrong. Good question, and possibly right. I would think a rotating magnetic field would vastly increase the Pioneer's apparent size (volume of space of the field) wrt all the protons and electrons (reaction mass) flying by. The 'protons and electrons flying by' are leaving the system at ~400 km/s. Pioneer is leaving at ~12km/s. Any drag would accelerate the craft away from the Sun which is the wrong direction. Yes, you are like right.... Maybe it is Le Saga particles coming in that slow it down... Supposedly Le Sage particles would create the normal gravitational forces, the anomaly is additional. Or simply maybe space is not that empty as we think.... dark matter? I have been working on that. The parameter space is quite tightly constrained but there may just be enough room to squeeze in a solution. If so there will be testable predictions. :-) I really do not know. Maybe something we do not know about is flowing into the sun. Trouble with any idea of that form is that the flow density should increase as the inverse square of the heliocentric range if whatever is conserved while the anomaly is independent of range. George |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Question, pioneer anomality because of magnetic induction?
On a sunny day (16 Aug 2006 04:56:46 -0700) it happened "George Dishman"
wrote in . com: Or simply maybe space is not that empty as we think.... dark matter? I have been working on that. The parameter space is quite tightly constrained but there may just be enough room to squeeze in a solution. If so there will be testable predictions. :-) An other idea: if it is a 'red shift' like effect? For example because time (or space density) was less the further you go away from the sun. All guesswork I admit. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Question, pioneer anomality because of magnetic induction?
Jan Panteltje wrote: On a sunny day (16 Aug 2006 04:56:46 -0700) it happened "George Dishman" wrote in . com: Or simply maybe space is not that empty as we think.... dark matter? I have been working on that. The parameter space is quite tightly constrained but there may just be enough room to squeeze in a solution. If so there will be testable predictions. :-) An other idea: if it is a 'red shift' like effect? ... It isn't, it is a blue shift. The returned frequency is higher than anticipated indicating the craft is being slowed in its attempt to leave the Solar System. George |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Question, pioneer anomality because of magnetic induction?
On a sunny day (16 Aug 2006 05:08:28 -0700) it happened "George Dishman"
wrote in .com: Jan Panteltje wrote: On a sunny day (16 Aug 2006 04:56:46 -0700) it happened "George Dishman" wrote in . com: Or simply maybe space is not that empty as we think.... dark matter? I have been working on that. The parameter space is quite tightly constrained but there may just be enough room to squeeze in a solution. If so there will be testable predictions. :-) An other idea: if it is a 'red shift' like effect? ... It isn't, it is a blue shift. The returned frequency is higher than anticipated indicating the craft is being slowed in its attempt to leave the Solar System. George Ooops, OK, so blue shift, I actually knew that, space density increases?.. OK this is getting nowhere. I give up for now :-) One question, in case 'parameter space': would it be compatible with the effect as observed and corrected for in MOND theory? Space rotating along (or some matter in it), so 'dark matter' again? I like the space not empty idea, clearly for example a Le Saga gravity model _also_ predicts 'drag', the more the further you get away from a massive object, as near to the massive object you are in Le Saga particle shadow, at least from one side, so less particle density. This is _my_ favorite model :-) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Question, pioneer anomality because of magnetic induction?
Jan Panteltje wrote: On a sunny day (16 Aug 2006 05:08:28 -0700) it happened "George Dishman" wrote in .com: Jan Panteltje wrote: On a sunny day (16 Aug 2006 04:56:46 -0700) it happened "George Dishman" wrote in . com: Or simply maybe space is not that empty as we think.... dark matter? I have been working on that. The parameter space is quite tightly constrained but there may just be enough room to squeeze in a solution. If so there will be testable predictions. :-) .... One question, in case 'parameter space': would it be compatible with the effect as observed and corrected for in MOND theory? Interesting question. I couldn't say for sure but I think the answer would be no. MOND AIUI tries to match the gravitational effect of DM only while this would be a drag effect. George |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
30 Years of Pioneer Spacecraft Data Rescued: The Planetary Society Enables Study of the Mysterious Pioneer Anomaly | [email protected] | News | 0 | June 6th 06 05:35 PM |
Simulations shed light on Earth's history of magnetic field reversals(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 12th 05 03:51 PM |
The Gravitational Instability Theory on the Formation of the Universe | Br Dan Izzo | Policy | 6 | September 7th 04 09:29 PM |
Scientists measure Sun's smallest visible magnetic fields (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 2nd 04 03:19 AM |