|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Light inside a black hole?
If you move to the centre of a black hole, where gravitational forces sort
of cancel, can light and normal matter exist in some area there? Or does the black hole simply get denser when you move towards it center, as opposed to haveing a center with a dense shell around it (black egg)? As a follow up question: Is what we see of the universe perhaps the inside of a black hole? Sorry, early morning question :-) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Light inside a black hole?
"Jan Panteltje" wrote in message ...
If you move to the centre of a black hole, where gravitational forces sort of cancel, can light and normal matter exist in some area there? Gravitational forces don't cancel because the mass of a black hole (except for the infalling matter from its "feeding") is located at a singlularity at the center. Gravitational acceleration and tidal forces increase without limit as you approach the center. Or does the black hole simply get denser when you move towards it center, as opposed to haveing a center with a dense shell around it (black egg)? There's no shell. The event horizon is about as substantial as a property line; it just demarkates the boundary beyond which there's no escape. As a follow up question: Is what we see of the universe perhaps the inside of a black hole? No, the physics isn't right. Inside the event horizon of a black hole theory indicates that spacial coordinates take on a timelike property. That is to say, all trajectories (paths of particles) lead inexorably towards the central singularity, much like time inexorably leads to the future outside of the event horizon. In our space environment we have freedom to move freely in all directions, and we don't see any evidence of a single point of convergence. Sorry, early morning question :-) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Light inside a black hole?
Dear Jan Panteltje:
Jan Panteltje wrote: If you move to the centre of a black hole, where gravitational forces sort of cancel, .... the central singularity ... can light and normal matter exist in some area there? "normal matter" requires c-moderated forces to behave like we "outside the black hole" beings expect. Light propagates "less than 0 distance" towards an outside observer, since the "0 distance" propagation occurs at the event horizon. So... Any object infalling can have non-zero "radial" extension (radial to external observer). Any object "at rest" to the external observer can have *at most* indeterminate size, and expected (by anyone that really studies) to have 0 size. Or does the black hole simply get denser when you move towards it center, as opposed to haveing a center with a dense shell around it (black egg)? There is nothing we know of that would impress "outer meaning" to the contents of a BH. What we expect, based on what we know and can model, is that all contents end up in a singular "point", where "quantum phenomenon" will have sway. As a follow up question: Is what we see of the universe perhaps the inside of a black hole? I personally expect that the CMBR is a distorted image of the Universe that contains the BH(s) that open into our Universe. George Dishman has valiantly tried to dissuade me from my (wacky) opinion. It would allow complete, fully-developed structures to exist right up to the CMBR. It has the difficulties: * having the amount of hydrogen the amount of iron, * internal GR solutions have information from the past and future of non-local objects available (assuming *now* for you and the remote object starts at EH crossing), * probably more. Since "coordinate rotation" at the EH is only by 90 deg, then our container Universe cannot be located at the bottom of our BHs. To fully reverse handedness, there would need to be four or more (never was good at more than 3D) Universe's in series, connected via BHs, to obtain closure. This allows Dark Matter to be "+/- 90 degrees" from normal matter, and antimatter to be in another Universe "two steps removed". Most likely not. Sorry, early morning question :-) Have some coffee. Just finished mine. ;) David A. Smith |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Light inside a black hole?
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Jan 2007 09:31:03 -0500) it happened "Greg Neill"
wrote in : "Jan Panteltje" wrote in message ... If you move to the centre of a black hole, where gravitational forces sort of cancel, can light and normal matter exist in some area there? Gravitational forces don't cancel because the mass of a black hole (except for the infalling matter from its "feeding") is located at a singlularity at the center. But why? image for a moment matter falling into a body. As its mass increases, the escape speed from it will increase. At some point the escape speed will be greater then C, so light cannot escape, we no longer see any EM waves coming from it, we call it a black hole (is this correct?). There is nothing that says that the thing could not be a bit hollow, its being black only depends on the escape speed. (I could imagine somebody compressing an object, to comprss it all the way to the center may be prevented by the outer layers becoming too strong). Gravitational acceleration and tidal forces increase without limit as you approach the center. Nobody has been or even measured anything there via remote methods. So that would be a postulate, creating nasty infinities. Nature does not accommodate infinities :-) Or does the black hole simply get denser when you move towards it center, as opposed to haveing a center with a dense shell around it (black egg)? There's no shell. The event horizon is about as substantial as a property line; it just demarkates the boundary beyond which there's no escape. I agree with that (except for 'evaporation' of particles). |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Light inside a black hole?
On a sunny day (5 Jan 2007 06:36:47 -0800) it happened "dlzc"
wrote in .com: Dear Jan Panteltje: Jan Panteltje wrote: If you move to the centre of a black hole, where gravitational forces sort of cancel, ... the central singularity ... can light and normal matter exist in some area there? "normal matter" requires c-moderated forces to behave like we "outside the black hole" beings expect. Light propagates "less than 0 distance" towards an outside observer, since the "0 distance" propagation occurs at the event horizon. So... Any object infalling can have non-zero "radial" extension (radial to external observer). Any object "at rest" to the external observer can have *at most* indeterminate size, and expected (by anyone that really studies) to have 0 size. Or does the black hole simply get denser when you move towards it center, as opposed to haveing a center with a dense shell around it (black egg)? There is nothing we know of that would impress "outer meaning" to the contents of a BH. What we expect, based on what we know and can model, is that all contents end up in a singular "point", where "quantum phenomenon" will have sway. As a follow up question: Is what we see of the universe perhaps the inside of a black hole? I personally expect that the CMBR is a distorted image of the Universe that contains the BH(s) that open into our Universe. George Dishman has valiantly tried to dissuade me from my (wacky) opinion. It would allow complete, fully-developed structures to exist right up to the CMBR. It has the difficulties: * having the amount of hydrogen the amount of iron, * internal GR solutions have information from the past and future of non-local objects available (assuming *now* for you and the remote object starts at EH crossing), * probably more. Since "coordinate rotation" at the EH is only by 90 deg, then our container Universe cannot be located at the bottom of our BHs. To fully reverse handedness, there would need to be four or more (never was good at more than 3D) Universe's in series, connected via BHs, to obtain closure. This allows Dark Matter to be "+/- 90 degrees" from normal matter, and antimatter to be in another Universe "two steps removed". Most likely not. Sorry, early morning question :-) Have some coffee. Just finished mine. ;) David A. Smith Thank you for the long explanation and theory. I am not sure if I understand it, will read it again a couple of times. I will now get some coffee too:-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Light inside a black hole?
Dear Jan Panteltje:
Jan Panteltje wrote: On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Jan 2007 09:31:03 -0500) it happened "Greg Neill" wrote in : "Jan Panteltje" wrote in message ... If you move to the centre of a black hole, where gravitational forces sort of cancel, can light and normal matter exist in some area there? Gravitational forces don't cancel because the mass of a black hole (except for the infalling matter from its "feeding") is located at a singlularity at the center. But why? image for a moment matter falling into a body. As its mass increases, The mass of infalling matter does not increase. Its "kinetic energy" comes from the gestalt of the BH, so crossing the EH makes any change in "system center of mass" problematic. David A. Smith |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Light inside a black hole?
On a sunny day (5 Jan 2007 07:45:35 -0800) it happened "dlzc"
wrote in . com: Dear Jan Panteltje: Jan Panteltje wrote: On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Jan 2007 09:31:03 -0500) it happened "Greg Neill" wrote in : "Jan Panteltje" wrote in message ... If you move to the centre of a black hole, where gravitational forces sort of cancel, can light and normal matter exist in some area there? Gravitational forces don't cancel because the mass of a black hole (except for the infalling matter from its "feeding") is located at a singlularity at the center. But why? image for a moment matter falling into a body. As its mass increases, The mass of infalling matter does not increase. I was trying to say that the mass of the body increaes. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Light inside a black hole?
"Jan Panteltje" wrote in message ...
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Jan 2007 09:31:03 -0500) it happened "Greg Neill" wrote in : "Jan Panteltje" wrote in message ... If you move to the centre of a black hole, where gravitational forces sort of cancel, can light and normal matter exist in some area there? Gravitational forces don't cancel because the mass of a black hole (except for the infalling matter from its "feeding") is located at a singlularity at the center. But why? image for a moment matter falling into a body. As its mass increases, the escape speed from it will increase. At some point the escape speed will be greater then C, so light cannot escape, we no longer see any EM waves coming from it, we call it a black hole (is this correct?). There is nothing that says that the thing could not be a bit hollow, its being black only depends on the escape speed. (I could imagine somebody compressing an object, to comprss it all the way to the center may be prevented by the outer layers becoming too strong). A black hole forms when the pressure due to self-gravitation of the constituents exceeds the support capability of these constituents. That is, when the inward pressure exceeds the electron degeneracy pressure of matter, there is nothing that can prevent gravity from "winning" and collapsing the matter to a singularity (nothing, that is, that we currently know about). There is no known from or state of matter that can withstand the pressures created by gravity at the extremes of a black hole. Gravitational acceleration and tidal forces increase without limit as you approach the center. Nobody has been or even measured anything there via remote methods. So that would be a postulate, creating nasty infinities. Nature does not accommodate infinities :-) That, too, is a postulate! Since we haven't been there, we cannot know. General Relativity, which should hold true until very close to the purported singularity, indicates that the end of all matter entering the black hole will be to end at a singular point at its center. Or does the black hole simply get denser when you move towards it center, as opposed to haveing a center with a dense shell around it (black egg)? There's no shell. The event horizon is about as substantial as a property line; it just demarkates the boundary beyond which there's no escape. I agree with that (except for 'evaporation' of particles). One could speculate that the same process that generates the particle pairs for Hawking Radiation might increase in effect as one approaches the singularity, so that rather than being devoid of matter between the horizon and singularity, the mass is spontaneously and continuously being recycled close to the singularity as particle pairs. So the space inside could be populated by a continuously annihilating soup of particles which increases in density towards the center. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Light inside a black hole?
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:05:20 -0500) it happened "Greg Neill"
wrote in : Gravitational acceleration and tidal forces increase without limit as you approach the center. Nobody has been or even measured anything there via remote methods. So that would be a postulate, creating nasty infinities. Nature does not accommodate infinities :-) That, too, is a postulate! Since we haven't been there, we cannot know. General Relativity, which should hold true until very close to the purported singularity, indicates that the end of all matter entering the black hole will be to end at a singular point at its center. I do not know enough about particle physics to argue one way or the other here. But 'singular point' is purely theory, and if I would bet, then I would bet that it is of finite size. If _anything_ in nature was infinite, then there would be no place for us to exist :-)' A bit philosophical perhaps. For example, we say the electron is a point charge, but at the same time they are trying very hard to find out what its size is :-) Assuming those exist, if you press hard enough and all the quarks become lose, and a quark-soup, can these occupy zero space? Or even the same space? If not, then we no longer have a point. Perhaps long before that new structures form..... structures we do not even now know about. But _point_ no, no point :-) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Light inside a black hole?
"Jan Panteltje" wrote in message ...
For example, we say the electron is a point charge, but at the same time they are trying very hard to find out what its size is :-) True. All measurements to date are consistent with an electron radius of zero. Assuming those exist, if you press hard enough and all the quarks become lose, and a quark-soup, can these occupy zero space? Or even the same space? If not, then we no longer have a point. Perhaps long before that new structures form..... structures we do not even now know about. There would needs be new forces that come into play for any structure to exist that opposes the gravitational pressure. So far there's no sign of any such thing. But _point_ no, no point :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Black hole boldly goes where no black hole has gone before (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 4th 07 09:49 PM |
Black hole boldly goes where no black hole has gone before (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | January 4th 07 09:49 PM |
Inside a Black Hole | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 14 | July 17th 06 05:33 AM |
Inside a Black Hole | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 0 | July 1st 06 09:47 PM |
Could we be inside a black hole ? | Robert Finch | Misc | 3 | March 9th 04 12:28 PM |