|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Reaching orbit cheaply through riding airstreams
dlzc wrote:
Actually that's about 1000 mph, even greater and about 6% of the velocity needed. But still only 0.3% of the energy required, and a single propensity for final orbital momentum. But rocket propellant needed for a single burn is (more than) proportional to delta-v, so you really do save that much fuel. The other problem is that rockets are pretty complicated pieces of machinery and lots can go wrong that would require significant infrastructure to fix before a launch. =A0You would have to bring all that (people, equipment, infrastructure, etc) =A0along with you to the platform. Which could use an elevator. An elevator that high would be some feat, tethered only to a moving platform! Such a 'platform', if ever built, would not be a balloon but a real tower, which is practical to at least 100,000 ft if you can spend enough money. Fuller's "Cloud Nines" could be used, should such be better than a fixed terrorist target. Actually, a 100,000 foot tower would have to be so heavy at the base that most terrorist bombs would hardly damage it, I think. I looked up those 'cloud nines' - interesting, a kind of rigid balloon. But they do need to be very large to work, and I'm not sure how vulnerable they'd be to a single point of damage. But such a structure (either tower or balloon) should only be the starting point. Landings should not be attempted there. If only for safety reasons, yes. So it is necessary to have some kind of elevator to bring them back up. Yes, this is probably the ideal way to get to space. Wasn't it the first concept for the Space Shuttle, that was then abandoned for developement cost reasons? The rocket stage should probably also be reusable. I still don't understand why we don't use a catapult, for maximum efficiency (shy of a space elevator). Obviously, the g-force would be too high for humans (and some machines, too). But beyond that, a catapult can't go faster than the speed of sound in the material it's made of, I believe, which is not enough for orbit. Andrew Usher |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Reaching orbit cheaply through riding airstreams
In sci.astro message , Sun,
31 Jul 2011 21:33:19, Andrew Usher posted: Obviously, the g-force would be too high for humans (and some machines, too). But beyond that, a catapult can't go faster than the speed of sound in the material it's made of, I believe, which is not enough for orbit. One can make a two-stage catapult, though. One needs to worry, rather more than usual, about where the first stage lands. To get, on any body with unimportant rotation, to low-orbit speed from the surface takes half a radian at one local gee of horizontal acceleration. On Earth, that's about 3200 km. It reduces in proportion to the increase of acceleration. The rocket has the advantage that it does not need a structure that big, -- (c) John Stockton, nr London, UK. Turnpike v6.05 MIME. Web http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/ - FAQqish topics, acronyms and links; Astro stuff via astron-1.htm, gravity0.htm ; quotings.htm, pascal.htm, etc. No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reaching orbit cheaply through riding airstreams | Bob Telson | Astronomy Misc | 16 | July 29th 11 03:56 PM |
Reaching orbit cheaply through riding airstreams | Andrew Usher[_3_] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | July 26th 11 05:54 PM |
Reaching For The Stars | nightbat[_1_] | Misc | 0 | June 14th 11 08:42 AM |
Five years riding the white elephant | Rich | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 26th 05 04:25 AM |
Spirit Looks Down Into Crater After Reaching Rim | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 12th 04 01:45 AM |