|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Parametric down-conversion in the Solar system
# http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?planet_phys_par
From the table of physical parametres of planets we choose column Sidereal Orbit Period. Then (frequency in terms of [1 / (sidereal year)]): f_Mercury: = 1/0.2408467; f_Venus: = 1/0.61519726; f_Earth: = 1/1.0000174; f_Mars: = 1/1.8808476; f_Jupiter: = 1/11.862615; f_Saturn: = 1/29.447498; f_Uranus: = 1/84.016846; f_Neptune: = 1/164.79132; Now we find value of the sum of frequencies for all planets: f_Sys: = f_Mercury+f_Venus+f_Earth+f_Mars+f_Jupiter+f_Satur n+f_Uranus+f_Neptune; f_Sys: = 7.445399207 # http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?constants From Astrodynamic Constants we find duration of the sidereal year in days sidereal_year: = 365.25636; [d] sidereal_year/f_Sys; sidereal_year/f_Sys = 49.05799539 days http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun Sun Sidereal rotation period: (at equator) 25.05 days [1] (at 16 latitude) 25.38 days [1] 25d 9h 7min 12s [8] (at poles) 34.4 days [1] So we have parametric down-conversion in the Solar system: 1. Sun Sidereal rotation period at equator: Sun_Sidereal_rotation_period = 25.05 days 2. The characteristic period of the solar system as a whole: characteristic period = 49.05799539 days |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Parametric down-conversion in the Solar system
On Sat, 9 Jul 2011 12:45:16 -0700 (PDT), Aleksandr Timofeev wrote:
# http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?planet_phys_par From the table of physical parametres of planets we choose column Sidereal Orbit Period. Then (frequency in terms of [1 / (sidereal year)]): f_Mercury: = 1/0.2408467; f_Venus: = 1/0.61519726; f_Earth: = 1/1.0000174; f_Mars: = 1/1.8808476; f_Jupiter: = 1/11.862615; f_Saturn: = 1/29.447498; f_Uranus: = 1/84.016846; f_Neptune: = 1/164.79132; Now we find value of the sum of frequencies for all planets: f_Sys: = f_Mercury+f_Venus+f_Earth+f_Mars+f_Jupiter+f_Satur n+f_Uranus+f_Neptune; f_Sys: = 7.445399207 # http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?constants From Astrodynamic Constants we find duration of the sidereal year in days sidereal_year: = 365.25636; [d] sidereal_year/f_Sys; sidereal_year/f_Sys = 49.05799539 days http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun Sun Sidereal rotation period: (at equator) 25.05 days [1] (at 16 latitude) 25.38 days [1] 25d 9h 7min 12s [8] (at poles) 34.4 days [1] So we have parametric down-conversion in the Solar system: 1. Sun Sidereal rotation period at equator: Sun_Sidereal_rotation_period = 25.05 days 2. The characteristic period of the solar system as a whole: characteristic period = 49.05799539 days Characteristic how? What happens every 49 days? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Parametric down-conversion in the Solar system
Aleksandr Timofeev wrote:
# http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?planet_phys_par From the table of physical parametres of planets we choose column Sidereal Orbit Period. Then (frequency in terms of [1 / (sidereal year)]): f_Mercury: = 1/0.2408467; f_Venus: = 1/0.61519726; f_Earth: = 1/1.0000174; f_Mars: = 1/1.8808476; f_Jupiter: = 1/11.862615; f_Saturn: = 1/29.447498; f_Uranus: = 1/84.016846; f_Neptune: = 1/164.79132; Now we find value of the sum of frequencies for all planets: f_Sys: = f_Mercury+f_Venus+f_Earth+f_Mars+f_Jupiter+f_Satur n+f_Uranus+f_Neptune; f_Sys: = 7.445399207 # http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?constants From Astrodynamic Constants we find duration of the sidereal year in days sidereal_year: = 365.25636; [d] sidereal_year/f_Sys; sidereal_year/f_Sys = 49.05799539 days http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun Sun Sidereal rotation period: (at equator) 25.05 days [1] (at 16 latitude) 25.38 days [1] 25d 9h 7min 12s [8] (at poles) 34.4 days [1] So we have parametric down-conversion in the Solar system: 1. Sun Sidereal rotation period at equator: Sun_Sidereal_rotation_period = 25.05 days 2. The characteristic period of the solar system as a whole: characteristic period = 49.05799539 days As Wally asked, characteristic how? And shouldn't you weight these frequencies by mass? If not, why not? Is the orbital frequency of Earth as important (in some way not yet defined) as the orbital frequency of Jupiter? If not, why not? And why are you not taking the rotation periods of each planet into consideration somehow, if you are including the rotation period of the Sun? Finally, the rotation period of the Sun is stated for the equator, but it varies by latitude. Why is zero latitude the only value considered? Surely some sort of weighted average would be more characteristic? -- Mike Dworetsky (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Parametric down-conversion in the Solar system
On Jul 10, 12:24*pm, "Mike Dworetsky"
wrote: Aleksandr Timofeev wrote: #http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?planet_phys_par From the table of physical parametres of planets we choose column Sidereal Orbit Period. Then (frequency in terms of [1 / (sidereal year)]): f_Mercury: = 1/0.2408467; f_Venus: = 1/0.61519726; f_Earth: = 1/1.0000174; f_Mars: = 1/1.8808476; f_Jupiter: = 1/11.862615; f_Saturn: = 1/29.447498; f_Uranus: = 1/84.016846; f_Neptune: = 1/164.79132; Now we find value of the sum of frequencies for all planets: f_Sys: = f_Mercury+f_Venus+f_Earth+f_Mars+f_Jupiter+f_Satur n+f_Uranus+f_Neptune; f_Sys: = 7.445399207 #http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?constants From Astrodynamic Constants we find duration of the sidereal year in days sidereal_year: = 365.25636; [d] sidereal_year/f_Sys; sidereal_year/f_Sys = 49.05799539 days http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun Sun Sidereal rotation period: (at equator) 25.05 days [1] (at 16° latitude) 25.38 days [1] *25d 9h 7min 12s [8] (at poles) 34.4 days [1] So we have parametric down-conversion in the Solar system: 1. Sun Sidereal rotation period at equator: * * * * * Sun_Sidereal_rotation_period = 25.05 days 2. The characteristic period of the solar system as a whole: * * * * * characteristic period = 49.05799539 days As Wally asked, characteristic how? And shouldn't you weight these frequencies by mass? *If not, why not? Is the orbital frequency of Earth as important (in some way not yet defined) as the orbital frequency of Jupiter? If not, why not? And why are you not taking the rotation periods of each planet into consideration somehow, if you are including the rotation period of the Sun? " A parametric oscillator is a harmonic oscillator whose parameters oscillate in time. For example, a well known parametric oscillator is a child on a swing where periodically changing the child's center of gravity causes the swing to oscillate.[1][2] The varying of the parameters drives the system. Examples of parameters that may be varied are its resonance frequency ω and damping β. Parametric oscillators are used in many applications. The classical varactor parametric oscillator will oscillate when the diode's capacitance is varied periodically. The circuit that varies the diode's capacitance is called the "pump" or "driver". In microwave electronics, waveguide/YAG based parametric oscillators operate in the same fashion. The designer varies a parameter periodically in order to induce oscillations. Parametric oscillators have been developed as low-noise amplifiers, especially in the radio and microwave frequency range. Thermal noise is minimal, since a reactance (not a resistance) is varied. Another common use is frequency conversion, e.g., conversion from audio to radio frequencies. For example, the Optical parametric oscillator converts an input laser wave into two output waves of lower frequency (ωs,ωi). Parametric resonance occurs in a mechanical system when a system is parametrically excited and oscillates at one of its resonant frequencies. Parametric excitation differs from forcing since the action appears as a time varying modification on a system parameter. This effect is different from regular resonance because it exhibits the instability phenomenon." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parametric_oscillator "Parametric resonance is the parametrical resonance phenomenon of mechanical excitation and oscillation at certain frequencies (and the associated harmonics). This effect is different from regular resonance because it exhibits the instability phenomenon. Parametric resonance occurs in a mechanical system when a system is parametrically excited and oscillates at one of its resonant frequencies.Parametric resonance takes place when the external excitation frequency equals to twice the natural frequency of the system. Parametric excitation differs from forcing since the action appears as a time varying modification on a system parameter. The classical example of parametric resonance is that of the vertically forced pendulum. For small amplitudes and by linearising, the stability of the periodic solution is given by : \ddot{u} + (a + B \cos t)u =0 \ where u is some perturbation from the periodic solution. Here the B\ \cos(t) term acts as an ‘energy’ source and is said to parametrically excite the system. The Mathieu equation describes many other physical systems to a sinusoidal parametric excitation such as an LC Circuit where the capacitor plates move sinusoidally." Finally, the rotation period of the Sun is stated for the equator, but it varies by latitude. *Why is zero latitude the only value considered? temporal gravitational variations at the bottom of the convection zone... Tidal forces of the detailed modern picture of the internal rotation of the Sun... http://solarphysics.livingreviews.or...009-1Color.pdf Solar Interior Rotation and its Variation Rachel Howe National Solar Observatory, 950 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson AZ 85719, U.S.A. http://www.noao.edu/staff/rhowe/ http://www.noao.edu/staff/rhowe/present.htm Accepted on 10 February 2009 Published on 23 February 2009 Abstract «This article surveys the development of observational understanding of the interior rotation of the Sun and its temporal variation over approximately forty years, starting with the 1960s attempts to determine the solar core rotation from oblateness and proceeding through the development of helioseismology to the detailed modern picture of the internal rotation deduced from continuous helioseismic observations during solar cycle 23. After introducing some basic helioseismic concepts, it covers, in turn, the rotation of the core and radiative interior, the “tachocline” shear layer at the base of the convection zone, the differential rotation in the convection zone, the near- surface shear, the pattern of migrating zonal flows known as the torsional oscillation, and the possible temporal variations at the bottom of the convection zone. For each area, the article also briefly explores the relationship between observations and models.» *Surely some sort of weighted average would be more characteristic? -- Mike Dworetsky (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Parametric down-conversion in the Solar system
On Jul 10, 12:45*am, Wally W. wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jul 2011 12:45:16 -0700 (PDT), Aleksandr Timofeev wrote: #http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?planet_phys_par From the table of physical parametres of planets we choose column Sidereal Orbit Period. Then (frequency in terms of [1 / (sidereal year)]): f_Mercury: = 1/0.2408467; f_Venus: = 1/0.61519726; f_Earth: = 1/1.0000174; f_Mars: = 1/1.8808476; f_Jupiter: = 1/11.862615; f_Saturn: = 1/29.447498; f_Uranus: = 1/84.016846; f_Neptune: = 1/164.79132; Now we find value of the sum of frequencies for all planets: f_Sys: = f_Mercury+f_Venus+f_Earth+f_Mars+f_Jupiter+f_Satur n+f_Uranus+f_Neptune; f_Sys: = 7.445399207 #http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?constants From Astrodynamic Constants we find duration of the sidereal year in days sidereal_year: = 365.25636; [d] sidereal_year/f_Sys; sidereal_year/f_Sys = 49.05799539 days http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun Sun Sidereal rotation period: (at equator) 25.05 days [1] (at 16 latitude) 25.38 days [1] *25d 9h 7min 12s [8] (at poles) 34.4 days [1] So we have parametric down-conversion in the Solar system: 1. *Sun Sidereal rotation period at equator: * * * * *Sun_Sidereal_rotation_period = 25.05 days 2. *The characteristic period of the solar system as a whole: * * * * *characteristic period = 49.05799539 days Characteristic how? What happens every 49 days? "Parametric resonance is the parametrical resonance phenomenon of mechanical excitation and oscillation at certain frequencies (and the associated harmonics). This effect is different from regular resonance because it exhibits the instability phenomenon. Parametric resonance occurs in a mechanical system when a system is parametrically excited and oscillates at one of its resonant frequencies.Parametric resonance takes place when the external excitation frequency equals to twice the natural frequency of the system. " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paramet...ric_excitation Sun_Sidereal_rotation_period of the convection zone = 25.05 days The characteristic period of the solar system as a whole: = 49.05799539 days "Parametric resonance takes place when the external excitation frequency equals to twice the natural frequency of the system. " |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Parametric down-conversion in the Solar system
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:24:46 +0100, Mike Dworetsky wrote:
Aleksandr Timofeev wrote: # http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?planet_phys_par From the table of physical parametres of planets we choose column Sidereal Orbit Period. Then (frequency in terms of [1 / (sidereal year)]): f_Mercury: = 1/0.2408467; f_Venus: = 1/0.61519726; f_Earth: = 1/1.0000174; f_Mars: = 1/1.8808476; f_Jupiter: = 1/11.862615; f_Saturn: = 1/29.447498; f_Uranus: = 1/84.016846; f_Neptune: = 1/164.79132; Now we find value of the sum of frequencies for all planets: f_Sys: = f_Mercury+f_Venus+f_Earth+f_Mars+f_Jupiter+f_Satur n+f_Uranus+f_Neptune; f_Sys: = 7.445399207 # http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?constants From Astrodynamic Constants we find duration of the sidereal year in days sidereal_year: = 365.25636; [d] sidereal_year/f_Sys; sidereal_year/f_Sys = 49.05799539 days http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun Sun Sidereal rotation period: (at equator) 25.05 days [1] (at 16 latitude) 25.38 days [1] 25d 9h 7min 12s [8] (at poles) 34.4 days [1] So we have parametric down-conversion in the Solar system: 1. Sun Sidereal rotation period at equator: Sun_Sidereal_rotation_period = 25.05 days 2. The characteristic period of the solar system as a whole: characteristic period = 49.05799539 days As Wally asked, characteristic how? And shouldn't you weight these frequencies by mass? If not, why not? Is the orbital frequency of Earth as important (in some way not yet defined) as the orbital frequency of Jupiter? If not, why not? And why are you not taking the rotation periods of each planet into consideration somehow, if you are including the rotation period of the Sun? Finally, the rotation period of the Sun is stated for the equator, but it varies by latitude. Why is zero latitude the only value considered? Surely some sort of weighted average would be more characteristic? Also, does not every object in the Solar System contribute to the calculation? If so, it would seem that the calculation can't be done. We certainly haven't cataloged every speck speck orbiting in the asteroid belt. On what basis can we exclude them from the sum of frequencies calculated above? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Parametric down-conversion in the Solar system
On 10 июл, 17:58, Wally W. wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:24:46 +0100, Mike Dworetsky wrote: Aleksandr Timofeev wrote: #http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?planet_phys_par From the table of physical parametres of planets we choose column Sidereal Orbit Period. Then (frequency in terms of [1 / (sidereal year)]): f_Mercury: = 1/0.2408467; f_Venus: = 1/0.61519726; f_Earth: = 1/1.0000174; f_Mars: = 1/1.8808476; f_Jupiter: = 1/11.862615; f_Saturn: = 1/29.447498; f_Uranus: = 1/84.016846; f_Neptune: = 1/164.79132; Now we find value of the sum of frequencies for all planets: f_Sys: = f_Mercury+f_Venus+f_Earth+f_Mars+f_Jupiter+f_Satur n+f_Uranus+f_Neptune; f_Sys: = 7.445399207 #http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?constants From Astrodynamic Constants we find duration of the sidereal year in days sidereal_year: = 365.25636; [d] sidereal_year/f_Sys; sidereal_year/f_Sys = 49.05799539 days http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun Sun Sidereal rotation period: (at equator) 25.05 days [1] (at 16° latitude) 25.38 days [1] *25d 9h 7min 12s [8] (at poles) 34.4 days [1] So we have parametric down-conversion in the Solar system: 1. Sun Sidereal rotation period at equator: * * * * * Sun_Sidereal_rotation_period = 25..05 days 2. The characteristic period of the solar system as a whole: * * * * * characteristic period = 49.05799539 days As Wally asked, characteristic how? And shouldn't you weight these frequencies by mass? *If not, why not? Is the orbital frequency of Earth as important (in some way not yet defined) as the orbital frequency of Jupiter? If not, why not? And why are you not taking the rotation periods of each planet into consideration somehow, if you are including the rotation period of the Sun? Finally, the rotation period of the Sun is stated for the equator, but it varies by latitude. *Why is zero latitude the only value considered? *Surely some sort of weighted average would be more characteristic? Also, does not every object in the Solar System contribute to the calculation? If so, it would seem that the calculation can't be done. We certainly haven't cataloged every speck speck orbiting in the asteroid belt. On what basis can we exclude them from the sum of frequencies calculated above? The solar system is nonlinear system of interacting bodies. From the power point of view, in this system the main bodies are the Sun and planets. Other bodies can be neglected, since their total weight is insignificant. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Parametric down-conversion in the Solar system
The solar system is nonlinear system of interacting *bodies. From the power point of view, in this system the main bodies are the Sun and planets. Other bodies can be neglected, since their total weight is insignificant. Please, take a long hard look at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVkdfJ9PkRQ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Parametric down-conversion in the Solar system
Finally, the rotation period of the Sun is stated for the equator, but it
varies by latitude. *Why is zero latitude the only value considered? *Surely some sort of weighted average would be more characteristic? Orbits of planets lie close to an ecliptic plane. The ecliptic plane passes through the centre of a plane of equator of the Sun. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecliptic_plane 'The plane of the ecliptic (also known as the ecliptic plane) is the plane of the Earth's orbit around the Sun.[1] It is the primary reference plane when describing the position of bodies in the Solar System,[2] with celestial latitude being measured relative to the ecliptic plane.[3] In the course of a year, the Sun's apparent path through the sky lies in this plane. The planetary bodies of our Solar System all tend to lie near this plane, since they were formed from the Sun's spinning, flattened, protoplanetary disk.[1]' |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Parametric down-conversion in the Solar system
On Jul 21, 11:42*pm, "Androcles" .
2011 wrote: "Aleksandr Timofeev" wrote in message ... On 21 ???, 18:44, "Androcles" wrote: "Aleksandr Timofeev" wrote in message .... Finally, the rotation period of the Sun is stated for the equator, but it varies by latitude. Why is zero latitude the only value considered? Surely some sort of weighted average would be more characteristic? Orbits of planets lie close to an ecliptic plane. The ecliptic plane passes through the centre of a plane of equator of the Sun. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecliptic_plane 'The plane of the ecliptic (also known as the ecliptic plane) is the plane of the Earth's orbit around the Sun.[1] It is the primary reference plane when describing the position of bodies in the Solar System,[2] with celestial latitude being measured relative to the ecliptic plane.[3] In the course of a year, the Sun's apparent path through the sky lies in this plane. The planetary bodies of our Solar System all tend to lie near this plane, since they were formed from the Sun's spinning, flattened, protoplanetary disk.[1]' ============================================ "Finally, the rotation period of the Sun is stated for the equator, but it varies by latitude." Who does not agree with it? ============================================== Finally, it has nothing to do with any planets. Finally, any discussion of planets afterwards isn't final but a whole new subject. Finally, there is no good reason given for the plane of rotation of the Sun to be aligned with the ecliptic. And that's final. I have shown on this fact in the message 1 of this thread. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun Sun Sidereal rotation period: (at equator) 25.05 days [1] (at 16 latitude) 25.38 days [1] *25d 9h 7min 12s [8] (at poles) 34.4 days [1] So we have parametric down-conversion in the Solar system: 1. * * *Sun Sidereal rotation period at equator: * * * * * Sun_Sidereal_rotation_period = 25.05 days 2. * * *The characteristic period of the solar system as a whole: * * * * * characteristic period = 49.05799539 days ================================================== = Full marks for being able to copy wackypedia. Three cheers for good *old Alek. Hip hip... Hooray! Hip hip... Hooray! *Hip hip... Hooray! Although this statement has nothing at all to do with planets, wackypedia says Aleksandr Timofeev can't spell his own name.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandr_Timofeev Sorry, no cutting corners, the old rules still stand - My name is Aleksandr Nikolaevich Timofeev * ================================================== === Awww... I wanted to be cheered for copying wackypedia. Wackypedia says your name is really spelt "Timofeyev." As you expect me to trust wackypedia that you like to copy I have to conclude you can't spell your own name. What about ' parametric down-conversion in the Solar system'? ================================================== == Babble. Russian babble. Russian idiot babble. Huh, then: It is necessary for you to study carefully phenomena of tidal forces and the theory of nonlinear (processes) oscillations. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_forces The tidal force is a secondary effect of the force http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force of gravity http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Gravity and is responsible for the tides http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Tide. It arises because the gravitational force per unit mass exerted on one body by a second body is not constant across its diameter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diameter, the side nearest to the second being more attracted by it than the side farther away. Stated differently, the tidal force is a differential force. It makes sense you to familiarise with Convective zone. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun#Convective_zone " Convective zone In the Sun's outer layer, from its surface down to approximately 200,000 km (or 70 % of the solar radius), the solar plasma is not dense enough or hot enough to transfer the thermal energy of the interior outward through radiation; in other words it is opaque enough. As a result, thermal convection occurs as thermal columns carry hot material to the surface (photosphere) of the Sun. Once the material cools off at the surface, it plunges downward to the base of the convection zone, to receive more heat from the top of the radiative zone. At the visible surface of the Sun, the temperature has dropped to 5,700 K and the density to only 0.2 g/m3 (about 1/6,000th the density of air at sea level). [36] The thermal columns in the convection zone form an imprint on the surface of the Sun as the solar granulation and supergranulation. The turbulent convection of this outer part of the solar interior causes a "small-scale" dynamo that produces magnetic north and south poles all over the surface of the Sun. [36]" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
evolution of our solar-system as exo-solar-system and why global | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 14 | July 31st 09 03:15 AM |
Our Solar System | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | February 28th 07 11:20 AM |
ET in solar system | Chris | SETI | 22 | August 13th 05 05:22 AM |
Name our Solar System | [email protected] | Space Science Misc | 7 | May 12th 05 01:14 AM |
Solar concentration mirrors in the outer solar system | wlm | Policy | 26 | September 13th 04 07:54 AM |