A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Today



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 1st 07, 10:15 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Christopher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 221
Default Today

Happy New Year to you all.

  #2  
Old January 1st 07, 03:40 PM posted to sci.space.policy
kT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,032
Default Today

Christopher wrote:

Happy New Year to you all.


Haven't you heard? Space and time are relative.

The whole new year's thing is imaginary.

--
The Tsiolkovsky Group : http://www.lifeform.org

My Planetary BLOB : http://cosmic.lifeform.org

Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator :

http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
  #3  
Old January 1st 07, 05:37 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Christopher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 221
Default Today

On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:40:05 -0600, kT wrote:

Christopher wrote:

Happy New Year to you all.


Haven't you heard? Space and time are relative.

The whole new year's thing is imaginary.


Nothing imaginary about the planets orbit, or human society
celebrating the start of a new and fresh year.


  #4  
Old January 1st 07, 08:20 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default Today



Christopher wrote:

Nothing imaginary about the planets orbit, or human society
celebrating the start of a new and fresh year.



You know what is funny?
We're celebrating New Years at the wrong time every three out of four years.
Remember Leap Year.
To get it at the right time, we'd have to move the celebration forwards
from midnight by several hours to get the sun in the right place in the
heavens in three out of four years.

Pat
  #5  
Old January 2nd 07, 11:37 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Eric Chomko
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,630
Default Today


Christopher wrote:
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:40:05 -0600, kT wrote:

Christopher wrote:

Happy New Year to you all.


Haven't you heard? Space and time are relative.

The whole new year's thing is imaginary.


Nothing imaginary about the planets orbit, or human society
celebrating the start of a new and fresh year.


Agreed. It's simply a cycle that best matches the Earth's year using
whole numbers. Cripes, every 400 years has only 97 leap years as we
must actually remove three from the typical 1 every 4 year cycle to
make things match up.

Eric

  #6  
Old January 3rd 07, 12:09 AM posted to sci.space.policy
kT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,032
Default Today

Eric Chomko wrote:
Christopher wrote:
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:40:05 -0600, kT wrote:

Christopher wrote:

Happy New Year to you all.
Haven't you heard? Space and time are relative.

The whole new year's thing is imaginary.

Nothing imaginary about the planets orbit, or human society
celebrating the start of a new and fresh year.


Agreed. It's simply a cycle that best matches the Earth's year using
whole numbers. Cripes, every 400 years has only 97 leap years as we
must actually remove three from the typical 1 every 4 year cycle to
make things match up.


I agree, our solar system and wonderful planet is a fortuitous best of
all probable worlds, but I hardly think the ancients called it Earth.

The year isn't even calibrated on an equinox or solstice, what the hell
kind of system is that? The fact that the whole thing ended up near 360
is bizarre enough. Lunar and calendar months aren't quite matched up,
the whole thing is a cockup. God's angels just aren't doing their job.
The whole thing is just creative accounting.

Why can't everything just be perfect?

--
The Tsiolkovsky Group : http://www.lifeform.org

My Planetary BLOB : http://cosmic.lifeform.org

Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator :

http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
  #7  
Old January 3rd 07, 03:18 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Fred J. McCall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,736
Default Today

Pat Flannery wrote:

:You know what is funny?
:We're celebrating New Years at the wrong time every three out of four years.
:Remember Leap Year.
:To get it at the right time, we'd have to move the celebration forwards
:from midnight by several hours to get the sun in the right place in the
:heavens in three out of four years.

And as soon as we take care of that, I want to talk to you about this
'Daylight Savings Time' thing. I think that extra hour of sunlight is
burning the crops...

--
"Well, I met a girl in West Hollywood. I ain't naming names.
She really worked me over good. She was just like Jesse James.
She really worked me over good. She was a credit to her gender.
She put me through some changes, Lord.
Sort of like a Waring blender."
-- Warren Zevon, "Poor, Poor, Pitiful Me"
  #8  
Old January 4th 07, 05:51 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Eric Chomko
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,630
Default Today


kT wrote:
Eric Chomko wrote:
Christopher wrote:
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:40:05 -0600, kT wrote:

Christopher wrote:

Happy New Year to you all.
Haven't you heard? Space and time are relative.

The whole new year's thing is imaginary.
Nothing imaginary about the planets orbit, or human society
celebrating the start of a new and fresh year.


Agreed. It's simply a cycle that best matches the Earth's year using
whole numbers. Cripes, every 400 years has only 97 leap years as we
must actually remove three from the typical 1 every 4 year cycle to
make things match up.


I agree, our solar system and wonderful planet is a fortuitous best of
all probable worlds, but I hardly think the ancients called it Earth.

The year isn't even calibrated on an equinox or solstice, what the hell
kind of system is that? The fact that the whole thing ended up near 360
is bizarre enough. Lunar and calendar months aren't quite matched up,
the whole thing is a cockup. God's angels just aren't doing their job.
The whole thing is just creative accounting.

Why can't everything just be perfect?


That's what politics tries to do, make science perfect. Science knows
better, yet politics won't go away. Look how many people believe that
the Iraq war was both necessary and tied to 9/11. How many of them are
scientists?

Eric


--
The Tsiolkovsky Group : http://www.lifeform.org

My Planetary BLOB : http://cosmic.lifeform.org

Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator :

http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Today for everyone Christopher Policy 0 January 1st 06 11:39 AM
the Sun today nytecam UK Astronomy 0 August 2nd 05 11:58 AM
Today Christopher Space Shuttle 0 January 1st 05 12:52 PM
Today Christopher Space Station 0 January 1st 05 12:51 PM
Today Christopher Policy 0 January 1st 05 12:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.