Aether has mass

On Dec 27, 5:51*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

Those are each good but complex interpretations, though without a
shred of objective proof or even that of replicated science from
others independent of the aether investment (especially where it's
applied to gravity).

The following is evidence of the aether.

'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011...U_Voyager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like
cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity
of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar
space is compacting it."

It is not the particles of matter which exist in quantities less than
in any vacuum artifically created on Earth which are pushing back and
exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

It is the aether, which the particles of matter exist in, which is the
interstellar medium. It is the aether which is displaced by the matter
the solar system consists of which is pushing back and exerting inward
pressure toward the solar system.

Every time a double slit experiment is performed is evidence of the
aether.

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory -
Louis de BROGLIE'
http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

“When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics I was
looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles,
of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in
his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the
physical reality of waves and particles.”

“any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous
“energetic contact” with a hidden medium”

The hidden medium of de Broglie wave mechanics is the aether. The
“energetic contact” is the state of displacement of the aether.

"For me, the particle, precisely located in space at every instant,
forms on the v wave a small region of high energy concentration, which
may be likened in a first approximation, to a moving singularity."

A particle is a moving singularity which has an associated aether
displacement wave.

In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined path
which takes it through one slit. The associated wave in the aether
passes through both. As the aether wave exits the slits it creates
wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction
it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave
piloting the particle of pilot-wave theory. Detecting the particle
strongly exiting a single slit turns the associated aether wave into
chop. The aether waves exiting the slits interact with the detectors
and become many short waves with irregular motion. The waves are
disorganized. There is no wave interference. The particle pitches and
rolls through the chop. The particle gets knocked around by the chop
and it no longer creates an interference pattern.

'Surprise! IBEX Finds No Bow ‘Shock’ Outside our Solar System'
http://www.universetoday.com/95094/s...-solar-system/

'“While bow shocks certainly exist ahead of many other stars, we’re
finding that our Sun’s interaction doesn’t reach the critical
threshold to form a shock,” said Dr. David McComas, principal
investigator of the IBEX mission, “so a wave is a more accurate
depiction of what’s happening ahead of our heliosphere — much like the
wave made by the bow of a boat as it glides through the water.”'

The wave ahead of our heliosphere is an aether displacement wave. This
is evidence of a moving 'particle', the solar system, having an
associated aether wave.

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hu...g_feature.html

"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view
of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two
galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is
somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the
water."

The 'pond' consists of aether. The moving 'particles' are the galaxy
clusters. The ripple is an aether displacement wave. The ripple is a
gravitational wave. This is also evidence of a moving 'particle', the
galaxy clusters, having an associated aether wave.

'Giant black hole kicked out of home galaxy'
http://www.astronomy.com/en/News-Obs...0 galaxy.aspx

"But these new data support the idea that gravitational waves —
ripples in the fabric of space first predicted by Albert Einstein but
never detected directly — can exert an extremely powerful force."

The fabric of space is the aether.

Gravitational waves are ripples in the aether.

What ripples when galaxy clusters collide is what waves in a double
slit experiment; the aether.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

They are both aether displacement waves.

'Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a
sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies'
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/...004.1475v1.pdf

"Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential
in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic
field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very
closely."

The offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether.
The analogy is a submarine moving through the water. You are under
water. Two miles away from you are many lights. Moving between you and
the lights one mile away is a submarine. The submarine displaces the
water. The state of displacement of the water causes the center of the
lensing of the light propagating through the water to be offset from
the center of the submarine itself. The offset between the center of
the lensing of the light propagating through the water displaced by
the submarine and the center of the submarine itself is going to
remain the same as the submarine moves through the water. The
submarine continually displaces different regions of the water. The
state of the water connected to and neighboring the submarine remains
the same as the submarine moves through the water even though it is
not the same water the submarine continually displaces. This is what
is occurring physically in nature as the galaxy clusters move through
and displace the aether.

'Milky Way's halo more squished than spherical'
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34735679.../#.TjkpbmDmE2c

The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether. The
matter which would form the Milky Way was moving as it displaced the
aether. The aether displaced perpendicular to the major direction of
motion became the majority force of the displaced aether and forced
the matter into the disk. This resulted in the angular momentum of the
matter. It is the aether which is displaced outward relative to the
plane of the angular momentum which exerts force toward the center of
the Milky Way. This force, along with the state of displacement of the
aether as determined by the angular momentum of the Milky Way, forced
the matter closer together which resulted in the displaced aether
looking like a squished beach ball. Aether displacement explains how
the Milky Way was created, how the disk and halo formed and why the
rotational speed can not be accounted for by the mass of the matter of
the Milky Way itself.

On 12/27/2012 5:55 PM, Brad Guth wrote:


They could call it a God fart, as representing the dark matter of his
holy flatulence which surrounds and invades throughout everything.


U can't help yourself, can you Goth?





--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. �亮
http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg

On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 05:37:41 -0800, Linuxgal wrote:

benj wrote:

Sorry Linuxgal, but Faraday's law (or Maxwell's equation in usual form)
are not causal. EMFs are NOT caused by a changing magnetic field. They
are caused by changing currents as are the accompanying magnetic
fields.

Gosh, then I suppose we get our electric power by pure ****ing magic
rather than coils of wire rotating in a magnetic field.

Excellent insight, Linuxgal, but you'll notice above I was not talking
about Lorentz motional E fields. I was talking about "electrokinetic" E
fields. Note there are three types of E fields with totally different
properties: Electrostatic, Electrokinetic, and Lorentz. Obviously our
electric power comes from the last one. However, it's distributed by
transformers which utilize Electrokinetic fields.

I'm confident you haven't a clue what the **** I'm talking about, right?

On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:59:17 -0500, HVAC wrote:

On 12/27/2012 8:37 AM, Linuxgal wrote:
benj wrote:

Sorry Linuxgal, but Faraday's law (or Maxwell's equation in usual
form) are not causal. EMFs are NOT caused by a changing magnetic
field. They are caused by changing currents as are the accompanying
magnetic fields.

Gosh, then I suppose we get our electric power by pure ****ing magic
rather than coils of wire rotating in a magnetic field.


BJ believes that god causes the electrons to flow.

ACDC believes electrons just start to flow by chance and then "evolve"
from there...

On Dec 27, 3:11*pm, mpc755 wrote:
On Dec 27, 5:51*pm, Brad Guth wrote:



Those are each good but complex interpretations, though without a
shred of objective proof or even that of replicated science from
others independent of the aether investment (especially where it's
applied to gravity).

The following is evidence of the aether.

'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/dec/HQ_11-402_AGU_Voyager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like
cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity
of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar
space is compacting it."

It is not the particles of matter which exist in quantities less than
in any vacuum artifically created on Earth which are pushing back and
exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

It is the aether, which the particles of matter exist in, which is the
interstellar medium. It is the aether which is displaced by the matter
the solar system consists of which is pushing back and exerting inward
pressure toward the solar system.

Every time a double slit experiment is performed is evidence of the
aether.

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory -
Louis de BROGLIE'http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

“When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics I was
looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles,
of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in
his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the
physical reality of waves and particles.”

“any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous
“energetic contact” with a hidden medium”

The hidden medium of de Broglie wave mechanics is the aether. The
“energetic contact” is the state of displacement of the aether.

"For me, the particle, precisely located in space at every instant,
forms on the v wave a small region of high energy concentration, which
may be likened in a first approximation, to a moving singularity."

A particle is a moving singularity which has an associated aether
displacement wave.

In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined path
which takes it through one slit. The associated wave in the aether
passes through both. As the aether wave exits the slits it creates
wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction
it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave
piloting the particle of pilot-wave theory. Detecting the particle
strongly exiting a single slit turns the associated aether wave into
chop. The aether waves exiting the slits interact with the detectors
and become many short waves with irregular motion. The waves are
disorganized. There is no wave interference. The particle pitches and
rolls through the chop. The particle gets knocked around by the chop
and it no longer creates an interference pattern.

'Surprise! IBEX Finds No Bow ‘Shock’ Outside our Solar System'http://www.universetoday.com/95094/surprise-ibex-finds-no-bow-shock-o...

'“While bow shocks certainly exist ahead of many other stars, we’re
finding that our Sun’s interaction doesn’t reach the critical
threshold to form a shock,” said Dr. David McComas, principal
investigator of the IBEX mission, “so a wave is a more accurate
depiction of what’s happening ahead of our heliosphere — much like the
wave made by the bow of a boat as it glides through the water.”'

The wave ahead of our heliosphere is an aether displacement wave. This
is evidence of a moving 'particle', the solar system, having an
associated aether wave.

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_featur...

"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view
of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two
galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is
somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the
water."

The 'pond' consists of aether. The moving 'particles' are the galaxy
clusters. The ripple is an aether displacement wave. The ripple is a
gravitational wave. This is also evidence of a moving 'particle', the
galaxy clusters, having an associated aether wave.

'Giant black hole kicked out of home galaxy'http://www.astronomy.com/en/News-Observing/News/2012/06/Giant%20black...

"But these new data support the idea that gravitational waves —
ripples in the fabric of space first predicted by Albert Einstein but
never detected directly — can exert an extremely powerful force."

The fabric of space is the aether.

Gravitational waves are ripples in the aether.

What ripples when galaxy clusters collide is what waves in a double
slit experiment; the aether.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

They are both aether displacement waves.

'Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a
sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies'http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1004/1004.1475v1.pdf

"Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential
in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic
field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very
closely."

The offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether.
The analogy is a submarine moving through the water. You are under
water. Two miles away from you are many lights. Moving between you and
the lights one mile away is a submarine. The submarine displaces the
water. The state of displacement of the water causes the center of the
lensing of the light propagating through the water to be offset from
the center of the submarine itself. The offset between the center of
the lensing of the light propagating through the water displaced by
the submarine and the center of the submarine itself is going to
remain the same as the submarine moves through the water. The
submarine continually displaces different regions of the water. The
state of the water connected to and neighboring the submarine remains
the same as the submarine moves through the water even though it is
not the same water the submarine continually displaces. This is what
is occurring physically in nature as the galaxy clusters move through
and displace the aether.

'Milky Way's halo more squished than spherical'http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34735679/ns/technology_and_science-space/...

The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether. The
matter which would form the Milky Way was moving as it displaced the
aether. The aether displaced perpendicular to the major direction of
motion became the majority force of the displaced aether and forced
the matter into the disk. This resulted in the angular momentum of the
matter. It is the aether which is displaced outward relative to the
plane of the angular momentum which exerts force toward the center of
the Milky Way. This force, along with the state of displacement of the
aether as determined by the angular momentum of the Milky Way, forced
the matter closer together which resulted in the displaced aether
looking like a squished beach ball. Aether displacement explains how
the Milky Way was created, how the disk and halo formed and why the
rotational speed can not be accounted for by the mass of the matter of
the Milky Way itself.

The Aether Lens:
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap111221.html
The foreground galaxy (LRG-3-757) is either a truly massive
composition of an extremely super-large and massive galaxy, or that of
representing a galactic cluster of at least ten to a hundred or more
fairly massive galaxies, that which their tightly combined mass
distorts our extremely distant perspective having morphed their
surrounding aether, as reformulated into an enormous lens of something
more than a couple million ly diameter, as well as offering an
illumination boost of at least 10:1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lensshoe_hubble.jpg

The required galactic mass for accomplishing such a terrific lens
might have to be a hundred times that of either our Milky Way. So, is
it the cosmic distortion of time, or is it the morphed aether as
having been displaced by the galactic cluster blocking our view?

On Dec 27, 7:36*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Dec 27, 3:11*pm, mpc755 wrote:









On Dec 27, 5:51*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

Those are each good but complex interpretations, though without a
shred of objective proof or even that of replicated science from
others independent of the aether investment (especially where it's
applied to gravity).

The following is evidence of the aether.

'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/dec/HQ_11-402_AGU_Voyager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like
cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity
of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar
space is compacting it."

It is not the particles of matter which exist in quantities less than
in any vacuum artifically created on Earth which are pushing back and
exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

It is the aether, which the particles of matter exist in, which is the
interstellar medium. It is the aether which is displaced by the matter
the solar system consists of which is pushing back and exerting inward
pressure toward the solar system.

Every time a double slit experiment is performed is evidence of the
aether.

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory -
Louis de BROGLIE'http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

“When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics I was
looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles,
of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in
his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the
physical reality of waves and particles.”

“any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous
“energetic contact” with a hidden medium”

The hidden medium of de Broglie wave mechanics is the aether. The
“energetic contact” is the state of displacement of the aether.

"For me, the particle, precisely located in space at every instant,
forms on the v wave a small region of high energy concentration, which
may be likened in a first approximation, to a moving singularity."

A particle is a moving singularity which has an associated aether
displacement wave.

In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined path
which takes it through one slit. The associated wave in the aether
passes through both. As the aether wave exits the slits it creates
wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction
it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave
piloting the particle of pilot-wave theory. Detecting the particle
strongly exiting a single slit turns the associated aether wave into
chop. The aether waves exiting the slits interact with the detectors
and become many short waves with irregular motion. The waves are
disorganized. There is no wave interference. The particle pitches and
rolls through the chop. The particle gets knocked around by the chop
and it no longer creates an interference pattern.

'Surprise! IBEX Finds No Bow ‘Shock’ Outside our Solar System'http://www.universetoday.com/95094/surprise-ibex-finds-no-bow-shock-o...

'“While bow shocks certainly exist ahead of many other stars, we’re
finding that our Sun’s interaction doesn’t reach the critical
threshold to form a shock,” said Dr. David McComas, principal
investigator of the IBEX mission, “so a wave is a more accurate
depiction of what’s happening ahead of our heliosphere — much like the
wave made by the bow of a boat as it glides through the water.”'

The wave ahead of our heliosphere is an aether displacement wave. This
is evidence of a moving 'particle', the solar system, having an
associated aether wave.

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_featur...

"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view
of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two
galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is
somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the
water."

The 'pond' consists of aether. The moving 'particles' are the galaxy
clusters. The ripple is an aether displacement wave. The ripple is a
gravitational wave. This is also evidence of a moving 'particle', the
galaxy clusters, having an associated aether wave.

'Giant black hole kicked out of home galaxy'http://www.astronomy.com/en/News-Observing/News/2012/06/Giant%20black...

"But these new data support the idea that gravitational waves —
ripples in the fabric of space first predicted by Albert Einstein but
never detected directly — can exert an extremely powerful force."

The fabric of space is the aether.

Gravitational waves are ripples in the aether.

What ripples when galaxy clusters collide is what waves in a double
slit experiment; the aether.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

They are both aether displacement waves.

'Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a
sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies'http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1004/1004.1475v1.pdf

"Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential
in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic
field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very
closely."

The offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether.
The analogy is a submarine moving through the water. You are under
water. Two miles away from you are many lights. Moving between you and
the lights one mile away is a submarine. The submarine displaces the
water. The state of displacement of the water causes the center of the
lensing of the light propagating through the water to be offset from
the center of the submarine itself. The offset between the center of
the lensing of the light propagating through the water displaced by
the submarine and the center of the submarine itself is going to
remain the same as the submarine moves through the water. The
submarine continually displaces different regions of the water. The
state of the water connected to and neighboring the submarine remains
the same as the submarine moves through the water even though it is
not the same water the submarine continually displaces. This is what
is occurring physically in nature as the galaxy clusters move through
and displace the aether.

'Milky Way's halo more squished than spherical'http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34735679/ns/technology_and_science-space/...

The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether. The
matter which would form the Milky Way was moving as it displaced the
aether. The aether displaced perpendicular to the major direction of
motion became the majority force of the displaced aether and forced
the matter into the disk. This resulted in the angular momentum of the
matter. It is the aether which is displaced outward relative to the
plane of the angular momentum which exerts force toward the center of
the Milky Way. This force, along with the state of displacement of the
aether as determined by the angular momentum of the Milky Way, forced
the matter closer together which resulted in the displaced aether
looking like a squished beach ball. Aether displacement explains how
the Milky Way was created, how the disk and halo formed and why the
rotational speed can not be accounted for by the mass of the matter of
the Milky Way itself.

The Aether Lens:
*http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap111221.html
*The foreground galaxy (LRG-3-757) is either a truly massive
composition of an extremely super-large and massive galaxy, or that of
representing a galactic cluster of at least ten to a hundred or more
fairly massive galaxies, that which their tightly combined mass
distorts our extremely distant perspective having morphed their
surrounding aether, as reformulated into an enormous lens of something
more than a couple million ly diameter, as well as offering an
illumination boost of at least 10:1.
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lensshoe_hubble.jpg

The required galactic mass for accomplishing such a terrific lens
might have to be a hundred times that of either our Milky Way. *So, is
it the cosmic distortion of time, or is it the morphed aether as
having been displaced by the galactic cluster blocking our view?

The light from the distant blue galaxy is propagating through the
aether displaced by the foreground red galaxy.

On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:06:18 -0500, HVAC wrote:

On 12/27/2012 1:35 PM, Painius wrote:


Yes, the increased mass must come from somewhere -- it doesn't just
magically form as velocity increases.


That's part of your problem...You believe in magic.


No, I believe that many people believe in magic, which makes them easy
marks. Fact is, every single instance of "magic" I've encountered in
my lifetime was explainable, and therefore was not really magic.


And you smell too.


Yes, with my nose, which is how I detect your foul odor everytime you
post. LOL !


--
Happy Holidays!
and Warm Wishes for the New Year!
Indelibly yours,
Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
"When most people run the other way, courage runs toward danger."

On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 14:55:22 -0800 (PST), Brad Guth
wrote:

On Dec 27, 10:35*am, Painius wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:12:14 -0800 (PST), mpc755
wrote:

On Dec 27, 9:59*am, Painius wrote:

Well, no, not exactly.

* *". . . according to a kind of induction law . . ."

The backreaction is compared to an inductive "back EMF" or the
electromotive force that opposes the voltage of a circuit. *So they
are saying that space does not react instantly to the motion of
objects moving through it due to this proposed backreaction.

That is pure boloney, of course, because space not only reacts
instantly to the movement of physical objects through it, space flows
into those objects at a speed determined by an object's mass. *We call
that speed "escape velocity", which is precisely equal to the speed at
which space flows into the object.

Space flows into an object constantly and with a uniform pressure over
the object's entire surface area. *This is to rejuvenate the nuclear
forces of each and every atom that composes the object. *A fortunate
byproduct of this flow of space into objects is what is called
"gravitation" or "gravity".

The following article describes the aether as that which produces
resistance to acceleration and is responsible for the increase in mass
of an object with velocity.

'Fluidic Electrodynamics: On parallels between electromagnetic and
fluidic inertia'
http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.4611

"It is shown that the force exerted on a particle by an ideal fluid
produces two effects: i) resistance to acceleration and, ii) an
increase of mass with velocity. ... The interaction between the
particle and the entrained space flow gives rise to the observed
properties of inertia and the relativistic increase of mass. ...
Accordingly, in this framework the non resistance of a particle in
uniform motion through an ideal fluid (D’Alembert’s paradox)
corresponds to Newton’s first law. The law of inertia suggests that
the physical vacuum can be modeled as an ideal fluid, agreeing with
the space-time ideal fluid approach from general relativity."

The relativistic mass of an object is the mass of the object and the
mass of the aether connected to and neighboring the object which is
displaced by the object.

Yes, the increased mass must come from somewhere -- it doesn't just
magically form as velocity increases. *Where else can it come from but
the surrounding space? *Scientists are beginning to grasp this, to
take hold of it and shake it to see what falls off.

The truly comedic thing is their dogmatic inability to name it! *They
hesitate to give the spatial medium a new name, because it already has
a name from classical physics, the "aether". *BUT NOOooo! *That word
can't be used due to the hideous negative connotations.

Silly sometimes, that thing called science.

They could call it a God fart, as representing the dark matter of his
holy flatulence which surrounds and invades throughout everything.


LOL ! Spatial medium = dark matter = surrounds and invades all things
= Christian deity passing gas.

Good one, Brad.


--
Happy Holidays!
and Warm Wishes for the New Year!
Indelibly yours,
Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
"When most people run the other way, courage runs toward danger."

On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 12:31:02 -0800 (PST), mpc755
wrote:

On Dec 27, 3:20*pm, Painius wrote:

. . .

2) *in a double-slit experiment the particle goes through one slit
while its associated spatial-medium wave goes through the second slit,
which results in an interference pattern on a nearby screen. . . .

. . .

In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
the associated wave in the aether passes through BOTH.


Thank you for the correction, Mike. Yes, the particle's associated
wave of the spatial medium travels through both slits and not just the
second slit.


--
Happy Holidays!
and Warm Wishes for the New Year!
Indelibly yours,
Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
"When most people run the other way, courage runs toward danger."

On Dec 27, 7:16*pm, mpc755 wrote:
On Dec 27, 7:36*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

The Aether Lens:
*http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap111221.html
*The foreground galaxy (LRG-3-757) is either a truly massive
composition of an extremely super-large and massive galaxy, or that of
representing a galactic cluster of at least ten to a hundred or more
fairly massive galaxies, that which their tightly combined mass
distorts our extremely distant perspective having morphed their
surrounding aether, as reformulated into an enormous lens of something
more than a couple million ly diameter, as well as offering an
illumination boost of at least 10:1.
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lensshoe_hubble.jpg

The required galactic mass for accomplishing such a terrific lens
might have to be a hundred times that of either our Milky Way. *So, is
it the cosmic distortion of time, or is it the morphed aether as
having been displaced by the galactic cluster blocking our view?

The light from the distant blue galaxy is propagating through the
aether displaced by the foreground red galaxy.- Hide quoted text -

Yes, it is propagated through something, and it might as well be
aether, or helium.