Theory of Everything (my attempt)

(I don't believe the theory of everything is a formula.
It explains how matter comes to life, in this explanation
it follows a very old energy cycle)

Imagine:

zero gravitational field = 0c = black hole = infinite vaccum.

2c = max anti-gravitational field = white hole = zero vaccum

(in between these two forces is c)

meaning there is no black hole formation in regions carrying mass
and no white hole formation in vaccums. (don't see it, its ok)

One more thing. If g grows to c in the vaccum due to an extension
of the Universe, then a likely reaction occurs (due to dark energy
rising toward infinity). In that case space curves into itself to form
a black hole, in which case:

g transforms to speed (energy).

Perhaps something like this happens:

Near the center of the Milky Way, as matter
approaches the event horizon, it heats up.
To cool down matter, space is converted out
of energy at a certain energy threshold.

The same opposite may occur in deep space.
As galaxies move apart generating greater and
greater vaccums, dark energy grows. As dark
energy reaches very high levels, space transforms
into heat, energy.

Perhaps that means, that the greater the vaccum
and dark energy, the warmer the temperature of
space becomes. And that coolness is introduced
in highly massive and energized zones, where in
a way matter is annihilated, but space is warped
by this transformation process.

oh and since space warms with greater vaccums,
it produces radiation CMBR. So the big bang may have
been a gradual process of vaccum gaining energy.

Since its hard to understand, it will never gain Republican
acceptance.

And it needs more than two proofs too, and that's
too much, in terms of the old models saying that
dark energy is mystic, so its not supposed to be
not mystic, and that big bang was a bang, it says
in the name stupid. So, something was said.

The vaccum is slowly transforming into energy (CMBR).

--

If there is no supermassive black hole in the core
of the Milky Way as predicted based on the descriptions
above (there are scientific evidences building up already
that the black hole models may fail there, look up no
X-Rays found arriving from the nucleus of a quasar,
and the magnetic fields of jets are not centrally linear
as priorly thought but stronger along the edge of the
jets), then simply an opening exists in the core, an
eye, a torus, and strong magnetic fields generating
strong light toward the North and South poles along the
magnetic fields of the jets (if jets are visible). A galaxy
facing earth head on with its torus would appear as a
quasar, based on my understanding.

correction: white hole = anti-infinite vaccum, not zero
vaccum, whatever

zero gravitational field = 0c = black hole = infinite vaccum.
2c = max anti-gravitational field = white hole = anti-infinite vaccum

oh, I was thinking no vaccum at all, never mind, I don't
understand my own theory.

Its funny how perfectly I imagined it: That CMBR grows as the
vaccum grows, and it gets stronger and stronger as the Universe
expands, until energies reach near infinity and bang! Space and
radiation transforms in this hot space universe into matter.

Once mo

I am not a physicist, not even a scientist, perhaps
a computer scientist, I have made a few posts on
the galaxy nucleus, and sharing my final thoughts
with you on the theory of everything, as I see it.
Thank you for EVERYTHING!

(I don't believe the theory of everything is a
formula. It explains how matter comes to life,
in this explanation it follows a very old energy
cycle)

Imagine:

zero gravitational field = 0c = black hole = infinite
vaccum.

2c = max anti-gravitational field = white hole = zero
vaccum

(in between these two forces is c)

meaning there is no black hole formation in regions
carrying mass and no white hole formation in vaccums.
(don't see it, its ok)

One more thing. If g grows to c in the vaccum due to
an extension of the Universe, then a likely reaction
occurs (due to dark energy rising toward infinity).
In that case space curves into itself to form
a black hole, in which case:

g transforms to speed (energy).

Perhaps something like this happens:

Near the center of the Milky Way, as matter
approaches the event horizon, it heats up.
To cool down matter, space is converted out
of energy at a certain energy threshold.

The same opposite may occur in deep space.
As galaxies move apart generating greater and
greater vaccums, dark energy grows. As dark
energy reaches very high levels, space transforms
into heat, energy.

Perhaps that means, that the greater the vaccum
and dark energy, the warmer the temperature of
space becomes. And that coolness is introduced
in highly massive and energized zones, where in
a way matter is annihilated, but space is warped
by this transformation process.

Oh, and since space warms with greater vaccums,
it produces radiation CMBR. So the big bang may have
been a gradual process of vaccum gaining energy.
(And it needs more than two proofs too.)

The vaccum is slowly transforming into energy (CMBR).

--

If there is no supermassive black hole in the core
of the Milky Way as predicted based on the
descriptions above (there are scientific evidences
building up already that the black hole models may
fail there, look up no X-Rays found arriving from the
nucleus of a quasar, and the magnetic fields of jets
are not centrally linear as priorly thought but
stronger along the edge of the jets), then simply an
opening exists in the core, an eye, a torus, and
strong magnetic fields generating strong light toward
the North and South poles along the magnetic fields
of the jets (if jets are visible). A galaxy
facing earth head on with its torus would appear as a
quasar, based on my understanding.

Oh, still not clarified: Was there a big bang or was
it a result of a gradual process?

Personally I think a gradual process of high energy.
In the movies I see a big bang.

Dude, why don't you let the "people with brains" do the job?


Thanx.
rAgAv

People with brains apparently can't solve it.

Poof!!,

Another proof that you're brainless