|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Venus for dummies (1.0) / Brad Guth (GuthVenus)
On Jan 2, 7:45*am, Brad Guth wrote:
Is Venus as truly insurmountable as we’ve been taught to believe? It’s not exactly a Goldilocks kind of place, because it’s certainly hot and seriously pressurized. Those perfectly natural looking mountains, canyons and the associated rock seem about right. The atmosphere is mostly toxic to us, but well above them thick acidic clouds it gets way colder than anywhere here or above Earth, and so what gives with that? As to its surface, is there anything that’s otherwise out of place or irregular upon its hot crust and of the mountainous geology of its roasted to death terrain and subsequent erosion that’s perhaps even a wee bit unnatural or unexpected? http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”,GuthVenus “GuthVenus” at 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in question:https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...8634/BradGuth# Why not instead of our having to geoengineer a very hard and outrageously spendy solution in order to alter the global environment of the whole planet, or having to wait millions of years for nature to take its course of gradually cooling off from the inside out, whereas instead we could just as easily adapt ourselves by using raw intelligence and applied physics, because any number of products already exist that can withstand 811 K. Are terrestrial open pit mining operations doing anything as to making their pits look and feel pretty? Do underground mining operations have to make their excavated tunnels into tunnels of Eden? Do submarine crews ever attempt to drain their oceans so that the surrounding pressure and the issues of pesky buoyancy goes away? Do astronauts have to keep sucking up any nearby or passing particles, so that space remains a vacuum? Where exactly does it say that heaven isn't too hot or too cold, or simply too wet or too dry, and having an atmosphere that isn’t any different than our terrestrial air? Is there any terrain on any other planet or moon that’s as unusual or as geometric utility looking, as what this one small area of Venus (aka GuthVenus) has to offer? Earth isn’t hardly 5% directly usable as is to naked Goldilocks that are too dumbfounded and otherwise helpless to begin with. The vast majority of other planets are not going to be naked Goldilocks approved, although perhaps at least .1% should be exactly right and via applied physics should make at least 1% as good enough or better than Earth. Be my guest and apply your very own photographic enlargement software, as to viewing this one small but rather interesting area of Venus, using your independent expertise as to enlarge or magnify this mountainous area of Venus that I’ve focused upon shouldn’t be asking too much. Most of modern PhotoZoom and other photographic software variations tend to accomplish this automatically (including iPhone and Safari), although some extra filtering and dynamic range compensations can further improve on the end result (no direct pixel modifications necessary). “GuthVenus” 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in question: https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...18595926178146 http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...8634/BradGuth# http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”,GuthVenus |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Venus for dummies (1.0) / Brad Guth (GuthVenus)
On Feb 5, 6:33*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Jan 2, 7:45*am, Brad Guth wrote: Is Venus as truly insurmountable as we’ve been taught to believe? It’s not exactly a Goldilocks kind of place, because it’s certainly hot and seriously pressurized. Those perfectly natural looking mountains, canyons and the associated rock seem about right. The atmosphere is mostly toxic to us, but well above them thick acidic clouds it gets way colder than anywhere here or above Earth, and so what gives with that? As to its surface, is there anything that’s otherwise out of place or irregular upon its hot crust and of the mountainous geology of its roasted to death terrain and subsequent erosion that’s perhaps even a wee bit unnatural or unexpected? http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”,GuthVenus “GuthVenus” at 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in question:https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...Guth#slideshow... Why not instead of our having to geoengineer a very hard and outrageously spendy solution in order to alter the global environment of the whole planet, or having to wait millions of years for nature to take its course of gradually cooling off from the inside out, whereas instead we could just as easily adapt ourselves by using raw intelligence and applied physics, because any number of products already exist that can withstand 811 K. Are terrestrial open pit mining operations doing anything as to making their pits look and feel pretty? Do underground mining operations have to make their excavated tunnels into tunnels of Eden? Do submarine crews ever attempt to drain their oceans so that the surrounding pressure and the issues of pesky buoyancy goes away? Do astronauts have to keep sucking up any nearby or passing particles, so that space remains a vacuum? Where exactly does it say that heaven isn't too hot or too cold, or simply too wet or too dry, and having an atmosphere that isn’t any different than our terrestrial air? Is there any terrain on any other planet or moon that’s as unusual or as geometric utility looking, as what this one small area of Venus (aka GuthVenus) has to offer? Earth isn’t hardly 5% directly usable as is to naked Goldilocks that are too dumbfounded and otherwise helpless to begin with. *The vast majority of other planets are not going to be naked Goldilocks approved, although perhaps at least .1% should be exactly right and via applied physics should make at least 1% as good enough or better than Earth. Be my guest and apply your very own photographic enlargement software, as to viewing this one small but rather interesting area of Venus, using your independent expertise as to enlarge or magnify this mountainous area of Venus that I’ve focused upon shouldn’t be asking too much. *Most of modern PhotoZoom and other photographic software variations tend to accomplish this automatically (including iPhone and Safari), although some extra filtering and dynamic range compensations can further improve on the end result (no direct pixel modifications necessary). “GuthVenus” 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in question: *https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...Guth#slideshow.... *http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif *https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...8634/BradGuth# *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”,GuthVenus Putting Goldilocks in harms way isn't necessary for accomplishing the exploitation of Venus. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Venus for dummies (1.0) / Brad Guth (GuthVenus)
On Feb 6, 6:54*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Feb 5, 6:33*am, Brad Guth wrote: On Jan 2, 7:45*am, Brad Guth wrote: Is Venus as truly insurmountable as we’ve been taught to believe? It’s not exactly a Goldilocks kind of place, because it’s certainly hot and seriously pressurized. Those perfectly natural looking mountains, canyons and the associated rock seem about right. The atmosphere is mostly toxic to us, but well above them thick acidic clouds it gets way colder than anywhere here or above Earth, and so what gives with that? As to its surface, is there anything that’s otherwise out of place or irregular upon its hot crust and of the mountainous geology of its roasted to death terrain and subsequent erosion that’s perhaps even a wee bit unnatural or unexpected? http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”,GuthVenus “GuthVenus” at 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in question:https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...Guth#slideshow... Why not instead of our having to geoengineer a very hard and outrageously spendy solution in order to alter the global environment of the whole planet, or having to wait millions of years for nature to take its course of gradually cooling off from the inside out, whereas instead we could just as easily adapt ourselves by using raw intelligence and applied physics, because any number of products already exist that can withstand 811 K. Are terrestrial open pit mining operations doing anything as to making their pits look and feel pretty? Do underground mining operations have to make their excavated tunnels into tunnels of Eden? Do submarine crews ever attempt to drain their oceans so that the surrounding pressure and the issues of pesky buoyancy goes away? Do astronauts have to keep sucking up any nearby or passing particles, so that space remains a vacuum? Where exactly does it say that heaven isn't too hot or too cold, or simply too wet or too dry, and having an atmosphere that isn’t any different than our terrestrial air? Is there any terrain on any other planet or moon that’s as unusual or as geometric utility looking, as what this one small area of Venus (aka GuthVenus) has to offer? Earth isn’t hardly 5% directly usable as is to naked Goldilocks that are too dumbfounded and otherwise helpless to begin with. *The vast majority of other planets are not going to be naked Goldilocks approved, although perhaps at least .1% should be exactly right and via applied physics should make at least 1% as good enough or better than Earth. Be my guest and apply your very own photographic enlargement software, as to viewing this one small but rather interesting area of Venus, using your independent expertise as to enlarge or magnify this mountainous area of Venus that I’ve focused upon shouldn’t be asking too much. *Most of modern PhotoZoom and other photographic software variations tend to accomplish this automatically (including iPhone and Safari), although some extra filtering and dynamic range compensations can further improve on the end result (no direct pixel modifications necessary). “GuthVenus” 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in question: *https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...Guth#slideshow... *http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif *https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...8634/BradGuth# *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”,GuthVenus Putting Goldilocks in harms way isn't necessary for accomplishing the exploitation of Venus. No doubt microbes exist within the upper atmosphere of Venus, as they do right here at 30,000+'. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Venus for dummies (1.0) / Brad Guth (GuthVenus) | Brad Guth[_3_] | Policy | 2 | February 9th 13 02:24 PM |
Venus for dummies (6.0) / Brad Guth (GuthVenus) | Sylvia Else | Policy | 10 | October 10th 12 03:24 PM |