|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts
With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes
you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the "Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it, or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one last go around, as it suffers its death knell. Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap. Come on. Where is the hole? John Ayres |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts
On Sep 21, 10:46*am, Saul Levy wrote:
That BLACK HOLE is inside your HEAD, John! It's NOT HIDING either! GOOFY has one too! Saul Levy On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:26:12 -0700 (PDT), John wrote: With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the "Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it, or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one last go around, as it suffers its death knell. Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap. Come on. Where is the hole? John Ayres Are you suggesting that empty space turned into a black hole somehow, and began swallowing up every thing like a vacuum cleaner, and it is working in reverse to how it started out by exploding outwardsly, now, sucking every thing back inside of it, back to another singularity, so we can't find it? Ha. Must be one pretty big black hole. Well, if that's the case, where is it? Shouldn't we all be racing back to it if it's got us moving in reverse, now? John Ayres ..Smoggy days *and* .. City light, Hazy nights ! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts
"John" wrote in message ... With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the "Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it, or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one last go around, as it suffers its death knell. Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap. Come on. Where is the hole? You are even more of an idiot than Panus. Your fundamental lack of knowledge in the areas of physics, astrophysics and cosmology, preclude any rational discussion of subjects that are complex. Have a nice day tho...... -- Too Stupid to Understand Science? Try Religion |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts
On Sep 21, 10:26*am, John wrote:
With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the "Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it, or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one last go around, as it suffers its death knell. Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap. Come on. Where is the hole? John Ayres Perhaps that Big Hole of that supposed Big Bang got sucked into the Great Attractor Wormhole. ~ BG |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts
On Sep 21, 11:04*am, John wrote:
On Sep 21, 10:46*am, Saul Levy wrote: That BLACK HOLE is inside your HEAD, John! It's NOT HIDING either! GOOFY has one too! Saul Levy On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:26:12 -0700 (PDT), John wrote: With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the "Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it, or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one last go around, as it suffers its death knell. Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap. Come on. Where is the hole? John Ayres Are you suggesting that empty space turned into a black hole somehow, and began swallowing up every thing like a vacuum cleaner, and it is working in reverse to how it started out by exploding outwardsly, now, sucking every thing back inside of it, back to another singularity, so we can't find it? Ha. Must be one pretty big black hole. Well, if that's the case, where is it? Shouldn't we all be racing back to it if it's got us moving in reverse, now? John Ayres .Smoggy days *and* . * City light, Hazy nights ! Any reply to rabbi Saul Levy is exactly the same thing as communicating with a Zionist approved black hole, so perhaps that's where the BB hole went and has been hiding ever since. ~ BG |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts
On Sep 21, 1:38*pm, "HVAC" wrote:
"John" wrote in message ... With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the "Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it, or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one last go around, as it suffers its death knell. Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap. Come on. Where is the hole? You are even more of an idiot than Panus. Your fundamental lack of knowledge in the areas of physics, astrophysics and cosmology, preclude any rational discussion of subjects that are complex. Have a nice day tho...... -- Too Stupid to Understand Science? Try Religion Why don't you try replying to the question, rather than an attack on the person asking the question. I mean, if you just don't know, you should come out and say so. Is this immense void hiding somewhere? Maybe it's in your basement in your artificial universe you mentioned you were building? John Ayres |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts
On Sep 21, 3:30*pm, John wrote:
On Sep 21, 1:38*pm, "HVAC" wrote: "John" wrote in message .... With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the "Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it, or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one last go around, as it suffers its death knell. Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap. Come on. Where is the hole? You are even more of an idiot than Panus. Your fundamental lack of knowledge in the areas of physics, astrophysics and cosmology, preclude any rational discussion of subjects that are complex. Have a nice day tho...... -- Too Stupid to Understand Science? Try Religion Why don't you try replying to the question, rather than an attack on the person asking the question. I mean, if you just don't know, you should come out and say so. Is this immense void hiding somewhere? Maybe it's in your basement in your artificial universe you mentioned you were building? John Ayres GOP rednecks are simply ZNRs in hiding, and HVAC is one of their LLPOF leaders, so don't expect much other than the usual brown-nosed clown and parrot cabal of topic/author stalking, naysay and denial of their being in denial. That BB hole or near empty sphere of space has got to be out there unless everything bounced back in and out several times before taking shape, whereas each cycle must have taken tens of billions of years, and causing all sorts of cosmology grief. Perhaps we should be asking Alan Guth to point out that original BB hole for us. ~ BG |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts
On Sep 21, 10:26*am, John wrote:
With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the "Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it, or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one last go around, as it suffers its death knell. Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap. Come on. Where is the hole? John Ayres We know there are lots of folks lurking, such as eminent scientists from every country in the world; NASA scientists, DOD scientists, and your university and college professor types, not to mention students at all levels of graduate and post graduate work. Why don't we hear from someone? I mean is it so difficult a question that you just can't figure out a possible answer? There has to be one, otherwise, the Big Bang theory just falls over, dead on its head. Well, are you just going to let that happen without even registering your ideas on the subject? What could have happened to it? Didn't one of the great scientists themselves, Einstein or Hubble have anything to say on it? It should have been an obvious question in their mind. How about Mr. Stephen Hawking? What? His mouth is silent on that one? No one has postulated anything plausible? It just vanished somehow? Gosh. You would think that within the first twenty-four hours, if not sooner, after becoming aware of this theory, these great minds would have had that question in their mind? Okay. So apparently you don't have any answers for me. So, I'll give you an alternative theory. The great singularity, as you call it, was flat, and nearly infinite two dimensionally, but the thickness of less than the tiniest particle imaginable, and it just expanded outwards in both directions, slowly. It had been sitting there, squished flat, somehow, paper thin, like a sheet of paper, and it just began expanded in an outwards direction. We'll have to call it something else, other than the Big Bang, as it was a slow ungluing of the stuff of the universe. How about the "Great Unfolding" or, the "Great Expansion"? How does that jive with Hubble's idea that the universe is expanding, and galaxies are racing away in all directions at different speeds? Has anyone ever tried to see if there was an explanation as to why different galaxies are apparently speeding away from each other at different speeds and possibly in different directions? That is, they seem to be just randomly running away from each other. Shouldn't there be some sort of regularity or conformity as to how they run away from each other? If there was this Big Bang, shouldn't you be able to trace the directions of these galaxies, and run or trace each one backwards to come to the starting point for where they initially got their start thereby finding the great void? Well. Why hasn't someone done it? It seems easy enough. Come on. You guys aren't a bunch of idiots now are you? Speak up and let yourself be heard! John Ayres ..Smoggy days *and* .. City light, Hazy nights ! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts
On Sep 21, 4:12*pm, John wrote:
On Sep 21, 10:26*am, John wrote: With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the "Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it, or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one last go around, as it suffers its death knell. Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap. Come on. Where is the hole? John Ayres We know there are lots of folks lurking, such as eminent scientists from every country in the world; NASA scientists, DOD scientists, and your university and college professor types, not to mention students at all levels of graduate and post graduate work. Why don't we hear from someone? I mean is it so difficult a question that you just can't figure out a possible answer? There has to be one, otherwise, the Big Bang theory just falls over, dead on its head. Well, are you just going to let that happen without even registering your ideas on the subject? What could have happened to it? Didn't one of the great scientists themselves, Einstein or Hubble have anything to say on it? It should have been an obvious question in their mind. How about Mr. Stephen Hawking? What? His mouth is silent on that one? No one has postulated anything plausible? It just vanished somehow? Gosh. You would think that within the first twenty-four hours, if not sooner, after becoming aware of this theory, these great minds would have had that question in their mind? Okay. So apparently you don't have any answers for me. So, I'll give you an alternative theory. The great singularity, as you call it, was flat, and nearly infinite two dimensionally, but the thickness of less than the tiniest particle imaginable, and it just expanded outwards in both directions, slowly. It had been sitting there, squished flat, somehow, paper thin, like a sheet of paper, and it just began expanded in an outwards direction. We'll have to call it something else, other than the Big Bang, as it was a slow ungluing of the stuff of the universe. How about the "Great Unfolding" or, the "Great Expansion"? How does that jive with Hubble's idea that the universe is expanding, and galaxies are racing away in all directions at different speeds? Has anyone ever tried to see if there was an explanation as to why different galaxies are apparently speeding away from each other at different speeds and possibly in different directions? That is, they seem to be just randomly running away from each other. Shouldn't there be some sort of regularity or conformity as to how they run away from each other? If there was this Big Bang, shouldn't you be able to trace the directions of these galaxies, and run or trace each one backwards to come to the starting point for where they initially got their start thereby finding the great void? Well. Why hasn't someone done it? It seems easy enough. Come on. You guys aren't a bunch of idiots now are you? Speak up and let yourself be heard! John Ayres .Smoggy days *and* . * City light, Hazy nights ! I happen to like the inflated balloon theory, whereas we're just in a small portion of the 28 billion ly thick skin or shell of this expanding balloon like cosmic sphere. So, anything further away than 14e9 ly is simply not viewable as long as our best astronomy technology remains limited or somehow restricted due to physics or the fact that the universe has simply gotten so freaking big that it's technically insurmountable to see much past our nose (so to speak). The radii of this cosmic balloon universe could easily be 100+ billion ly, which gives it a 72e9 ly radii hollow core or balloon interior that's pretty much empty. How's that? (it's actually not even my idea to begin with) ~ BG |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts
On Sep 21, 2:04*pm, John wrote:
On Sep 21, 10:46*am, Saul Levy wrote: That BLACK HOLE is inside your HEAD, John! It's NOT HIDING either! GOOFY has one too! Saul Levy On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:26:12 -0700 (PDT), John wrote: With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the "Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it, or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one last go around, as it suffers its death knell. Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap. Come on. Where is the hole? John Ayres Are you suggesting that empty space turned into a black hole somehow, and began swallowing up every thing like a vacuum cleaner, and it is working in reverse to how it started out by exploding outwardsly, now, sucking every thing back inside of it, back to another singularity, so we can't find it? Ha. Must be one pretty big black hole. Well, if that's the case, where is it? Shouldn't we all be racing back to it if it's got us moving in reverse, now? John Ayres .Smoggy days *and* . * City light, Hazy nights !- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - John Keep an open mind on the birth of universes. Read stuff by Andei Linde Alan Guth. Lots of cosmologist do. Reality is the inflationary universe theory answers hard questions. Information given to us from the WMAP and COBE satterlites fits with the big bang theory. Here is a kicker Guth even has this far out thinking. Highly advanced aliens can create universes. WOW TreBert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Einstein's Simple Mistake; All Big Bang Theorists Are Incorrect | John[_29_] | Misc | 51 | September 28th 10 12:25 PM |
Foolish Folly Of The Big Bang Theorists - Cosmic Background Noise | John[_29_] | Misc | 26 | September 24th 10 06:32 AM |
Retrograde Planets Confound Theorists | General Omar Windbottom | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 17th 10 02:04 AM |
EVEN STRING THEORISTS NEED A SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 6 | January 18th 09 07:41 AM |
Observing in shorts | Pete Lawrence | UK Astronomy | 20 | September 23rd 04 04:24 PM |