A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 21st 10, 06:26 PM posted to alt.astronomy
John[_29_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 144
Default Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts

With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes
you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the
"Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there
somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it,
or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It
never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or
that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go
faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas
Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these
days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one
last go around, as it suffers its death knell.

Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness
training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal
karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing
away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap.

Come on. Where is the hole?

John Ayres
  #2  
Old September 21st 10, 07:04 PM posted to alt.astronomy
John[_29_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 144
Default Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts

On Sep 21, 10:46*am, Saul Levy wrote:
That BLACK HOLE is inside your HEAD, John!

It's NOT HIDING either!

GOOFY has one too!

Saul Levy

On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:26:12 -0700 (PDT), John

wrote:
With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes
you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the
"Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there
somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it,
or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It
never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or
that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go
faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas
Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these
days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one
last go around, as it suffers its death knell.


Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness
training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal
karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing
away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap.


Come on. Where is the hole?


John Ayres


Are you suggesting that empty space turned into a black hole somehow,
and began swallowing up every thing like a vacuum cleaner, and it is
working in reverse to how it started out by exploding outwardsly, now,
sucking every thing back inside of it, back to another singularity, so
we can't find it? Ha. Must be one pretty big black hole. Well, if
that's the case, where is it? Shouldn't we all be racing back to it if
it's got us moving in reverse, now?

John Ayres

..Smoggy days *and*
.. City light, Hazy nights !
  #3  
Old September 21st 10, 09:38 PM posted to alt.astronomy
HVAC[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,114
Default Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts


"John" wrote in message
...
With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes
you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the
"Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there
somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it,
or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It
never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or
that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go
faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas
Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these
days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one
last go around, as it suffers its death knell.

Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness
training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal
karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing
away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap.

Come on. Where is the hole?


You are even more of an idiot than Panus.

Your fundamental lack of knowledge in the areas
of physics, astrophysics and cosmology, preclude
any rational discussion of subjects that are complex.

Have a nice day tho......




--
Too Stupid to Understand Science? Try Religion


  #4  
Old September 21st 10, 09:50 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts

On Sep 21, 10:26*am, John wrote:
With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes
you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the
"Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there
somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it,
or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It
never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or
that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go
faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas
Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these
days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one
last go around, as it suffers its death knell.

Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness
training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal
karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing
away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap.

Come on. Where is the hole?

John Ayres


Perhaps that Big Hole of that supposed Big Bang got sucked into the
Great Attractor Wormhole.

~ BG
  #5  
Old September 21st 10, 09:53 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts

On Sep 21, 11:04*am, John wrote:
On Sep 21, 10:46*am, Saul Levy wrote:



That BLACK HOLE is inside your HEAD, John!


It's NOT HIDING either!


GOOFY has one too!


Saul Levy


On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:26:12 -0700 (PDT), John


wrote:
With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes
you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the
"Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there
somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it,
or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It
never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or
that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go
faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas
Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these
days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one
last go around, as it suffers its death knell.


Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness
training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal
karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing
away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap.


Come on. Where is the hole?


John Ayres


Are you suggesting that empty space turned into a black hole somehow,
and began swallowing up every thing like a vacuum cleaner, and it is
working in reverse to how it started out by exploding outwardsly, now,
sucking every thing back inside of it, back to another singularity, so
we can't find it? Ha. Must be one pretty big black hole. Well, if
that's the case, where is it? Shouldn't we all be racing back to it if
it's got us moving in reverse, now?

John Ayres

.Smoggy days *and*
. * City light, Hazy nights !


Any reply to rabbi Saul Levy is exactly the same thing as
communicating with a Zionist approved black hole, so perhaps that's
where the BB hole went and has been hiding ever since.

~ BG
  #6  
Old September 21st 10, 11:30 PM posted to alt.astronomy
John[_29_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 144
Default Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts

On Sep 21, 1:38*pm, "HVAC" wrote:
"John" wrote in message

...



With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes
you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the
"Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there
somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it,
or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It
never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or
that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go
faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas
Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these
days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one
last go around, as it suffers its death knell.


Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness
training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal
karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing
away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap.


Come on. Where is the hole?


You are even more of an idiot than Panus.

Your fundamental lack of knowledge in the areas
of physics, astrophysics and cosmology, preclude
any rational discussion of subjects that are complex.

Have a nice day tho......

--
Too Stupid to Understand Science? Try Religion


Why don't you try replying to the question, rather than an attack on
the person asking the question. I mean, if you just don't know, you
should come out and say so. Is this immense void hiding somewhere?
Maybe it's in your basement in your artificial universe you mentioned
you were building?

John Ayres
  #7  
Old September 21st 10, 11:47 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts

On Sep 21, 3:30*pm, John wrote:
On Sep 21, 1:38*pm, "HVAC" wrote:



"John" wrote in message


....


With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes
you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the
"Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there
somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it,
or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It
never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or
that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go
faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas
Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these
days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one
last go around, as it suffers its death knell.


Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness
training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal
karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing
away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap.


Come on. Where is the hole?


You are even more of an idiot than Panus.


Your fundamental lack of knowledge in the areas
of physics, astrophysics and cosmology, preclude
any rational discussion of subjects that are complex.


Have a nice day tho......


--
Too Stupid to Understand Science? Try Religion


Why don't you try replying to the question, rather than an attack on
the person asking the question. I mean, if you just don't know, you
should come out and say so. Is this immense void hiding somewhere?
Maybe it's in your basement in your artificial universe you mentioned
you were building?

John Ayres


GOP rednecks are simply ZNRs in hiding, and HVAC is one of their LLPOF
leaders, so don't expect much other than the usual brown-nosed clown
and parrot cabal of topic/author stalking, naysay and denial of their
being in denial.

That BB hole or near empty sphere of space has got to be out there
unless everything bounced back in and out several times before taking
shape, whereas each cycle must have taken tens of billions of years,
and causing all sorts of cosmology grief. Perhaps we should be asking
Alan Guth to point out that original BB hole for us.

~ BG
  #8  
Old September 22nd 10, 12:12 AM posted to alt.astronomy
John[_29_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 144
Default Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts

On Sep 21, 10:26*am, John wrote:
With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes
you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the
"Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there
somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it,
or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It
never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or
that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go
faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas
Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these
days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one
last go around, as it suffers its death knell.

Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness
training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal
karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing
away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap.

Come on. Where is the hole?

John Ayres


We know there are lots of folks lurking, such as eminent scientists
from every country in the world; NASA scientists, DOD scientists, and
your university and college professor types, not to mention students
at all levels of graduate and post graduate work. Why don't we hear
from someone? I mean is it so difficult a question that you just can't
figure out a possible answer? There has to be one, otherwise, the Big
Bang theory just falls over, dead on its head. Well, are you just
going to let that happen without even registering your ideas on the
subject? What could have happened to it? Didn't one of the great
scientists themselves, Einstein or Hubble have anything to say on it?
It should have been an obvious question in their mind. How about Mr.
Stephen Hawking? What? His mouth is silent on that one? No one has
postulated anything plausible? It just vanished somehow?

Gosh. You would think that within the first twenty-four hours, if not
sooner, after becoming aware of this theory, these great minds would
have had that question in their mind?

Okay. So apparently you don't have any answers for me. So, I'll give
you an alternative theory. The great singularity, as you call it, was
flat, and nearly infinite two dimensionally, but the thickness of less
than the tiniest particle imaginable, and it just expanded outwards in
both directions, slowly. It had been sitting there, squished flat,
somehow, paper thin, like a sheet of paper, and it just began expanded
in an outwards direction. We'll have to call it something else, other
than the Big Bang, as it was a slow ungluing of the stuff of the
universe. How about the "Great Unfolding" or, the "Great Expansion"?

How does that jive with Hubble's idea that the universe is expanding,
and galaxies are racing away in all directions at different speeds?

Has anyone ever tried to see if there was an explanation as to why
different galaxies are apparently speeding away from each other at
different speeds and possibly in different directions? That is, they
seem to be just randomly running away from each other. Shouldn't there
be some sort of regularity or conformity as to how they run away from
each other? If there was this Big Bang, shouldn't you be able to trace
the directions of these galaxies, and run or trace each one backwards
to come to the starting point for where they initially got their start
thereby finding the great void?

Well. Why hasn't someone done it? It seems easy enough.

Come on. You guys aren't a bunch of idiots now are you? Speak up and
let yourself be heard!

John Ayres

..Smoggy days *and*
.. City light, Hazy nights !

  #9  
Old September 22nd 10, 12:56 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts

On Sep 21, 4:12*pm, John wrote:
On Sep 21, 10:26*am, John wrote:



With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes
you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the
"Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there
somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it,
or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It
never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or
that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go
faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas
Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these
days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one
last go around, as it suffers its death knell.


Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness
training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal
karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing
away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap.


Come on. Where is the hole?


John Ayres


We know there are lots of folks lurking, such as eminent scientists
from every country in the world; NASA scientists, DOD scientists, and
your university and college professor types, not to mention students
at all levels of graduate and post graduate work. Why don't we hear
from someone? I mean is it so difficult a question that you just can't
figure out a possible answer? There has to be one, otherwise, the Big
Bang theory just falls over, dead on its head. Well, are you just
going to let that happen without even registering your ideas on the
subject? What could have happened to it? Didn't one of the great
scientists themselves, Einstein or Hubble have anything to say on it?
It should have been an obvious question in their mind. How about Mr.
Stephen Hawking? What? His mouth is silent on that one? No one has
postulated anything plausible? It just vanished somehow?

Gosh. You would think that within the first twenty-four hours, if not
sooner, after becoming aware of this theory, these great minds would
have had that question in their mind?

Okay. So apparently you don't have any answers for me. So, I'll give
you an alternative theory. The great singularity, as you call it, was
flat, and nearly infinite two dimensionally, but the thickness of less
than the tiniest particle imaginable, and it just expanded outwards in
both directions, slowly. It had been sitting there, squished flat,
somehow, paper thin, like a sheet of paper, and it just began expanded
in an outwards direction. We'll have to call it something else, other
than the Big Bang, as it was a slow ungluing of the stuff of the
universe. How about the "Great Unfolding" or, the "Great Expansion"?

How does that jive with Hubble's idea that the universe is expanding,
and galaxies are racing away in all directions at different speeds?

Has anyone ever tried to see if there was an explanation as to why
different galaxies are apparently speeding away from each other at
different speeds and possibly in different directions? That is, they
seem to be just randomly running away from each other. Shouldn't there
be some sort of regularity or conformity as to how they run away from
each other? If there was this Big Bang, shouldn't you be able to trace
the directions of these galaxies, and run or trace each one backwards
to come to the starting point for where they initially got their start
thereby finding the great void?

Well. Why hasn't someone done it? It seems easy enough.

Come on. You guys aren't a bunch of idiots now are you? Speak up and
let yourself be heard!

John Ayres

.Smoggy days *and*
. * City light, Hazy nights !


I happen to like the inflated balloon theory, whereas we're just in a
small portion of the 28 billion ly thick skin or shell of this
expanding balloon like cosmic sphere. So, anything further away than
14e9 ly is simply not viewable as long as our best astronomy
technology remains limited or somehow restricted due to physics or the
fact that the universe has simply gotten so freaking big that it's
technically insurmountable to see much past our nose (so to speak).

The radii of this cosmic balloon universe could easily be 100+ billion
ly, which gives it a 72e9 ly radii hollow core or balloon interior
that's pretty much empty.

How's that? (it's actually not even my idea to begin with)

~ BG
  #10  
Old September 22nd 10, 01:33 AM posted to alt.astronomy
bert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,997
Default Big Bang Theorists Are Crapping In Their Shorts

On Sep 21, 2:04*pm, John wrote:
On Sep 21, 10:46*am, Saul Levy wrote:





That BLACK HOLE is inside your HEAD, John!


It's NOT HIDING either!


GOOFY has one too!


Saul Levy


On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:26:12 -0700 (PDT), John


wrote:
With the Hubble telescope, and all the other sophisticated telescopes
you've got peering into the night sky, how come no one can find the
"Big Hole" that the Big Bang left behind? It's got to be there
somewhere, if you are correct. How come you can't find a trace of it,
or even an indicator to it of some kind. Because it ain't there. It
never was. The whole idea is pure SciFi, just like Time Dilation, or
that time stands still at the speed of light, or that nothing can go
faster than the speed of light, and the countless other idiotic ideas
Einstein, Hubble, and Hawkins, etc., have postulated. One of these
days you'll get over it. But not before it hits the tabloids for one
last go around, as it suffers its death knell.


Maybe you should all start practicing Hare Krisna consciousness
training courses to help get you straightened out. But alas, personal
karma isn't that easily changed. You'll be here until you die, typing
away, jamming the usenet boards with your crap.


Come on. Where is the hole?


John Ayres


Are you suggesting that empty space turned into a black hole somehow,
and began swallowing up every thing like a vacuum cleaner, and it is
working in reverse to how it started out by exploding outwardsly, now,
sucking every thing back inside of it, back to another singularity, so
we can't find it? Ha. Must be one pretty big black hole. Well, if
that's the case, where is it? Shouldn't we all be racing back to it if
it's got us moving in reverse, now?

John Ayres

.Smoggy days *and*
. * City light, Hazy nights !- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


John Keep an open mind on the birth of universes. Read stuff by Andei
Linde Alan Guth. Lots of cosmologist do. Reality is the inflationary
universe theory answers hard questions. Information given to us from
the WMAP and COBE satterlites fits with the big bang theory. Here is
a kicker Guth even has this far out thinking. Highly advanced aliens
can create universes. WOW TreBert
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Einstein's Simple Mistake; All Big Bang Theorists Are Incorrect John[_29_] Misc 51 September 28th 10 12:25 PM
Foolish Folly Of The Big Bang Theorists - Cosmic Background Noise John[_29_] Misc 26 September 24th 10 06:32 AM
Retrograde Planets Confound Theorists General Omar Windbottom Astronomy Misc 0 April 17th 10 02:04 AM
EVEN STRING THEORISTS NEED A SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 6 January 18th 09 07:41 AM
Observing in shorts Pete Lawrence UK Astronomy 20 September 23rd 04 04:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.