A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » FITS
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

[fitsbits] Question about CROTA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 8th 05, 04:16 AM
Mark Calabretta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default [fitsbits] Question about CROTA


On Wed 2005/10/26 18:47:17 -0400, William Thompson wrote
in a message to: FITSBITS

We've always been in the habit of putting CROTAi keywords in for both spatial
coordinate axes, with exactly the same value for each. That seems the most
reasonable interpretation of the original FITS documentation.


The original FITS paper simply says "The rotation parameters CROTAn
describe a coordinate system which is rotated with respect to the normal
(specified) coordinate system. Users of this option should provide
extensive explanatory comments".

AIPS wrote FITS files with CROTAn attached to the latitude axis and
documented this usage in its memos and programming manuals. It was an
informal usage, but the only one we know of and widely used in other
astronomical software packages (if you know of any other usage then
we would be extreeeemly interested to know). This is fortunate because
if there had been two or more conflicting usages then interpretative
software would have been confronted with the problem of disambiguation.

Not withstanding that, if you want to write CROTAn with the old WCS
keywords, then according to the original spec you can do whatever you
like except that you "should provide extensive explanatory comments".
Realistically though, we believe that all software will interpret any
CROTAn according to the AIPS convention since that's the only one they
are likely to have been programmed for.

In fact, two CDELTn and two CROTAn, one on each axis, would have been
enough to construct a completely general 2 x 2 linear transformation
matrix; the CROTAn could even have been given a sensible geometric
interpretation. However, that only works for 2-D images and was never
done, at least as far as we know. But you never know, and how would
you know?

Thus the new WCS standard deprecates CROTAn because it has no formally
defined interpretation. Writing it with the new WCS keywords/values,
whether on one axis or two, violates the spirit, if not always the
letter, of the standard.

Mark Calabretta
ATNF

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, March 2005 [email protected] Astronomy Misc 108 May 16th 05 02:55 AM
Just a big question... Double-A Misc 2 May 8th 05 03:05 PM
[fitsbits] Cartesian coordinates question. Mark Calabretta FITS 1 May 17th 04 04:59 PM
Moon key to space future? James White Policy 90 January 6th 04 04:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.