|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy.
To read more download the document he http://www.pixelphase.com/sun/sun.pdf http://www.tikunim.co.il/sun/sun.pdf Its title is: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy. Abstract: The sun energy source thought to be a nuclear fusion reactor inside the sun core. The sun is not heated by fusion reaction but by magnetic fields coming from the galactic center. The nuclear fusion is a by product of the magnetic fields heating. The changing magnetic fields from the galactic center induce electric currents inside the sun that heat the sun. The heat and the high kinetic energy of particles in the sun core, trigger high energy collisions that create the main constituents of matter, electron, proton and neutron. The collisions also fuse or nucleosynthesis heavier elements like deuterium, tritium, helium and lithium. This leads to the fact that the stars and galaxies constantly produce mass and energy. The article will explain the clockworks behinds the galaxies energy production. The galaxy energy and mass production cancel out the Big Bang theory and leads to a steady state cosmological model with large amount of new mass created that expand and accelerate the universe. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy.
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:07:10 GMT, Sam Wormley
wrote: Thus theory does not contradict the density, pressure and temperature of the sun. It also does not contradict the observed amount of solar neutrinos. The neutrinos are created in two separate processes. The first is the fusion and the second is the transformation of energy to mass. For instance when high speed electrons and positron collide in the sun, or in a collider, heavier particles is created accompanied by a neutrino. This is also written in the document: Neutrino emission from the sun For three decades there was a neutrino paradox related to the sun. The sun emitted only third of the neutrinos that where expected from the standard solar model based on the sun fusion. However the paradox was solved lately by experiments done at SNO neutrino detector. The neutrinos once believed to be massless like photons but know are known that the neutrinos have mass. The existence of mass of the neutrino is based on the fact that when neutrinos pass in space there are oscillations between the three flavors of the neutrinos. The SNO neutrino detector confirmed that and settled the long neutrino paradox. Assuming that the SNO findings are correct and there is no contamination that influenced the data, there is seemingly a conflict between the theory presented here and the SNO findings. If the sun is heated by the galactic center magnetic fields and the fusion is only a by product and limited in scope, then the neutrino emission supposes to be much smaller then in the full scale fusion of the standard solar model. The solution to this conflict is that the nucleosynthesis of the building blocks of matter electron, proton and neutron emits neutrinos. For instance you can see the emission of neutrino in the collision of electron and positron that creates a quark: e+e- W+W- q qbar uv The collision creates quark pair, muon and neutrino. The emission of neutrinos from the sun is the sum of the neutrinos from the small scale fusion reaction, and mainly from creation of new particles and mass. wrote: To read more download the document he http://www.pixelphase.com/sun/sun.pdf http://www.tikunim.co.il/sun/sun.pdf Its title is: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy. Abstract: The sun energy source thought to be a nuclear fusion reactor inside the sun core. The sun is not heated by fusion reaction but by magnetic fields coming from the galactic center. The nuclear fusion is a by product of the magnetic fields heating. The changing magnetic fields from the galactic center induce electric currents inside the sun that heat the sun. The heat and the high kinetic energy of particles in the sun core, trigger high energy collisions that create the main constituents of matter, electron, proton and neutron. The collisions also fuse or nucleosynthesis heavier elements like deuterium, tritium, helium and lithium. This leads to the fact that the stars and galaxies constantly produce mass and energy. The article will explain the clockworks behinds the galaxies energy production. The galaxy energy and mass production cancel out the Big Bang theory and leads to a steady state cosmological model with large amount of new mass created that expand and accelerate the universe. Your theory is contradicted by direct evidence for the pp-chain nuclear reactions going on in the core of the Sun (Marty). The original gravitational collapse heated the gas... kinetic energy was great enough for nuclear fusion (pp-chain) to begin and sustain itself. See: http://www.mhhe.com/physsci/astronom...r17/17f02.html The Sun's primary energy source is the p-p chain whereby helium is fused from hydrogen in the core of our sun. Density, pressure and temperature profiles, solar neutrino (anti neutrino) energies and total radiated energy confirm the standard solar model. Density, pressure an temperature profiles are measured by analysis of the Sun's vibration modes, rates, etc. The [once] Solar Neutrino Problem Has Been Closed http://www.aip.org/enews/physnews/2002/split/586-1.html PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Physics News Number 617 December 13, 2002 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and James Riordon PHYSICS STORIES OF 2002. The top two physics stories for the past 12 months were the total accounting of neutrinos from the sun by the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO), thus solving the solar neutrino problem (Update 586; http://www.aip.org/enews/physnews/20...t/586-1.html); and the formation and detection of antihydrogen atoms at CERN (Updates 605 and 611, www.aip.org/enews/physnews/2002/split/605-1.html and http://www.aip.org/enews/physnews/20...it/611-1.html). Other notable physics developments for the year include stopping and storing light in a solid (Update 571), the observation of phase-transition behavior in nuclei (572), publication of some unsent letters by Niels Bohr to Werner Heisenberg (576), interferometry with C-70 molecules (579), a dispute over "fusion" in sonoluminescence (579, 599), most precise tests of special relativity (571, 590), sharper maps of the cosmic microwave background (591), "droplet" of light (596), claims for element 118 retracted (597), verification of the notion that the second law of thermodynamics can be violated on small spacetime intervals (598), high precision measurements of CP violation in B meson decays and in the g-2 factor of the muon (600), scandal at Lucent (606), record high laboratory magnetic fields (614), polarization in the cosmic microwave background detected (606), 2002 Nobel prize for physics (608), noise can improve balance (612), and longest measured atomic lifetime (616). All the above Update items can be retrieved from our archive at www.aip.org/physnews/update. REACTOR ANTI-NEUTRINO DISAPPEARANCE, measured by a detector in Japan, supports the idea that neutrinos oscillate from one type to another and that they possess mass. Nuclear reactors produce several things: heat, electricity, spent fuel rods, and neutrinos. The neutrinos (or, to be more exact, electron anti-neutrinos) are a result of fission reactions inside the reactor core. But some of the electron antineutrinos, once they're underway and moving through the Earth, manifest one of the weirdest phenomena in all of physics, namely the ability to exist as a composite of several sub-species. That is, what we call a neutrino is really several (perhaps three) neutrinos in one. At any point along its trajectory the generic neutrino might (if you were to capture it just then) appear as an electron neutrino, but farther along it might look like a muon neutrino, in which case it would elude detectors tuned to detect only electron nu's. The Kamioka Liquid Scintillator Anti-Neutrino Detector (KamLAND) sets out to sample this odd mode of being. The apparatus, basically a huge reservoir of optically-active liquid viewed by numerous phototubes, looks for interactions in which an incoming nu strikes a proton, creating in their stead a trackable neutron-positron pair. KamLAND resides in an underground lab beneath Toyama, Japan. It is a sort of telescope peering not at galaxies in the sky; instead it stares through a block of terrestrial crust looking for the neutrino warmth cast off by a constellation of 69 reactors in Japan and Korea. Taking into account the laws of physics governing the reactions in the reactor cores, the known power ratings for the reactors, their aggregate reactor-detector distances, and the duration of the experiment (145 days), one would expect seeing 86 true events, whereas the actual number was 54. The researchers conclude that the disappearance of events is due to neutrino oscillation. This result is not merely a confirmation of oscillation research carried out with solar nu's at such detectors as Super Kamiokande in Japan and the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) in Canada (see Update 586, http://www.aip.org/enews/physnews/20...it/586-1.html). For one thing KamLAND studies anti-neutrinos rather than neutrinos. Furthermore, the production of neutrinos in a reactor is much closer at hand and better understood than is the case for the sun. The KamLAND finding also serves to narrow the theoretical explanation of the neutrino's split personality. (Eguchi et al., paper submitted to Physical Review Letters, text and background information at: http://hep.stanford.edu/neutrino/KamLAND/KamLAND.html) The "solar neutrino problem" was solve a few years ago: http://www.aip.org/enews/physnews/2002/split/586-1.html http://www.aip.org/enews/physnews/2002/split/608-1.html Note these papers by John N. Bahcall, Sarbani Basu, M. H. Pinsonneault: http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/9805135 http://pdg.lbl.gov/1998/solarnu_s005313.pdf http://www.slac.stanford.edu/pubs/be...-3-bahcall.pdf Also read: http://www.sns.ias.edu/~jnb/Papers/P...ayhistory.html http://www.fynu.ucl.ac.be/librairie/...ns/node26.html http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/kirsten/gallex/detector.htm Neutrino producing reactions adapted [by Lang] from Bahcall (1989). The termination percentage is a fraction of terminations of the proton-proton (pp) chain, 4p -- alpha + 2e+ + 2v_e, in which each reaction occurs. Since in essentially all terminations at least one pp neutrino is produced and in a few terminations one pp and one pep neutrino are created, the total of pp and pep terminations exceeds 100% Name Reaction % Termination Neutrino Energy, q ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ pp p + p -- H² + e+ + v_e 100 q 0.420 MeV pep p + e- + p -- H² + v_e 0.4 q = 1.442 MeV hep He³ + p -- He4 + v_e 0.00002 q 18.773 MeV Be7 Be7 + e- -- Li7 + v_e 15 q = 0.862 MeV 89.7% q = 0.384 MeV 10.3% B8 B8 -- Be7 + e+ + v_e 0.02 q 15 MeV Calculated Solar neutrino fluxes at the Earth's Surface ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ pp 6.0 x 10^10 cm^-2 s^-1 pep 0.014 x 10^10 cm^-2 s^-1 hep 8 x 10^3 cm^-2 s^-1 Be7 0.47 x 10^10 cm^-2 s^-1 B8 5.8 x 10^6 cm^-2 s^-1 Other relevant papers by John N. Bahcall, Sarbani Basu, M. H. Pinsonneault: http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/9805135 http://pdg.lbl.gov/1998/solarnu_s005313.pdf http://www.slac.stanford.edu/pubs/be...-3-bahcall.pdf And here is something fun you can do: http://www.physics.mun.ca/~jjerrett/...proton/pp.html More fun references: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...o/solarpp.html http://www.britannica.com/bcom/eb/ar...+61627,00.html http://www.eps.org/aps/meet/APR00/ba.../S5690002.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy.
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:34:42 -0600, Ho Ho Ho
wrote: You dont need magetic fields for magnetic induction heating. It can be demonstrated with simple experiment. You can read this in the document near the integral. wrote: To read more download the document he http://www.pixelphase.com/sun/sun.pdf http://www.tikunim.co.il/sun/sun.pdf Its title is: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy. Abstract: The sun energy source thought to be a nuclear fusion reactor inside the sun core. The sun is not heated by fusion reaction but by magnetic fields coming from the galactic center. The nuclear fusion is a by product of the magnetic fields heating. The changing magnetic fields from the galactic center induce electric currents inside the sun that heat the sun. Have you ever measured the galactic core's magnetic field at the Sun's position, to be generating an energymass transform, ... or even be heating a weiner for that matter! The next time you go to MacDonalds dont think of it as you eating a hamburger, rather it eating (even creating!), you. What else do the Golden Arches mean? The one thing your theory does invoke, however, is the thinking patterns of small children. They see ice and fire on a rocket on television and assume: "ice makes fire", and the reverse ! Think about it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fieldsfrom the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not massto energy.
wrote:
To read more download the document he http://www.pixelphase.com/sun/sun.pdf http://www.tikunim.co.il/sun/sun.pdf Its title is: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy. Abstract: The sun energy source thought to be a nuclear fusion reactor inside the sun core. The sun is not heated by fusion reaction but by magnetic fields coming from the galactic center. The nuclear fusion is a by product of the magnetic fields heating. The changing magnetic fields from the galactic center induce electric currents inside the sun that heat the sun. The heat and the high kinetic energy of particles in the sun core, trigger high energy collisions that create the main constituents of matter, electron, proton and neutron. The collisions also fuse or nucleosynthesis heavier elements like deuterium, tritium, helium and lithium. This leads to the fact that the stars and galaxies constantly produce mass and energy. The article will explain the clockworks behinds the galaxies energy production. The galaxy energy and mass production cancel out the Big Bang theory and leads to a steady state cosmological model with large amount of new mass created that expand and accelerate the universe. What a great theory! Why hadn't I thought of that before? Stupot |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy.
wrote in message ...
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:34:42 -0600, Ho Ho Ho wrote: You dont need magetic fields for magnetic induction heating. It can be demonstrated with simple experiment. You can read this in the document near the integral. Okay, you're right off the deep end and into the region of "what color is the sky in your world?" With such a flimsy grasp of physics and technology, how can you hope to generate your own consistent and viable theories? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy.
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:53:32 +1100, Stuart Chapman
wrote: What a great theory! Why hadn't I thought of that before? Because you were crippled by a properly functioning brain and a good education? _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy.
Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:53:32 +1100, Stuart Chapman wrote: What a great theory! Why hadn't I thought of that before? Because you were crippled by a properly functioning brain and a good education? Seems he lacks a healthy dose of gullibility as well. A totally dysfunctional dupe in other words. Eugene L Griessel ...Every morning is the dawn of a new error... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fieldsfrom the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and notmass to energy.
Greg Neill wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:34:42 -0600, Ho Ho Ho wrote: You dont need magetic fields for magnetic induction heating. It can be demonstrated with simple experiment. You can read this in the document near the integral. Okay, you're right off the deep end and into the region of "what color is the sky in your world?" With such a flimsy grasp of physics and technology, how can you hope to generate your own consistent and viable theories? Same as on FOX News! You say it, sort of, so it must exist - somewhere? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fieldsfromthe center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not masstoenergy.
Stuart Chapman wrote: wrote: To read more download the document he http://www.pixelphase.com/sun/sun.pdf http://www.tikunim.co.il/sun/sun.pdf Its title is: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy. Abstract: The sun energy source thought to be a nuclear fusion reactor inside the sun core. The sun is not heated by fusion reaction but by magnetic fields coming from the galactic center. The nuclear fusion is a by product of the magnetic fields heating. The changing magnetic fields from the galactic center induce electric currents inside the sun that heat the sun. The heat and the high kinetic energy of particles in the sun core, trigger high energy collisions that create the main constituents of matter, electron, proton and neutron. The collisions also fuse or nucleosynthesis heavier elements like deuterium, tritium, helium and lithium. This leads to the fact that the stars and galaxies constantly produce mass and energy. The article will explain the clockworks behinds the galaxies energy production. The galaxy energy and mass production cancel out the Big Bang theory and leads to a steady state cosmological model with large amount of new mass created that expand and accelerate the universe. What a great theory! Why hadn't I thought of that before? Stupot Spoof understood! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy. | [email protected] | SETI | 3 | January 8th 07 11:42 PM |
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy. | [email protected] | Misc | 2 | December 13th 06 01:15 PM |
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy. | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 13th 06 12:37 AM |
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy. | [email protected] | Solar | 0 | December 12th 06 10:58 PM |
Unified Force-Energy-Mass Theory of CPH | Hossein Javadi | CCD Imaging | 0 | January 29th 04 08:24 AM |