911 sun angle question

Just wondering if the author used the correct azimuth and altitude ...

http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/prod/di...qrf00/ggua175/

IMHO his amazing discovery is

a) very hard to accept
b) the physics leave no room for doubt
... the pictures of UA175 hitting the south tower are fake.


feel free to reject out of hand. That's what I did (at first).

On 30 May 2006 15:44:51 -0700, wrote:

feel free to reject out of hand. That's what I did (at first).

As you well should have. Amazing how much time these wackos have on
their hands to produce silly analyses. Most silly of all is the belief
that holograms can be projected.

_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com

On 2006-05-30, wrote:

Just wondering if the author used the correct azimuth and altitude ...

http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/prod/di...qrf00/ggua175/

IMHO his amazing discovery is

a) very hard to accept
b) the physics leave no room for doubt
... the pictures of UA175 hitting the south tower are fake.


feel free to reject out of hand. That's what I did (at first).

I think that people who indulge in this sort of thing either

a) have some delusion

or

b) have some sinister motive

I am not kidding.

dismiss, delusion ... maybe.

I like to be tolerant.

Anyway, all I was really asking was

did he get the angles right?

Because if he did... its is truely spooky how the port wing could have
been shown shadowed.

Because if he did... its is truely spooky how the port wing could have
been shown shadowed.


FO with your moon hoax mentality!!!

holograms can be projected.

what are holograms, please?

I think what he meant was that there would have been a real-world
component.

The RICK SIEGEL show many helicopters. One emitted an very bright
light, like from a projector.

I don't want to get under your skin, but it is now fairly well
established that the 3 (!) WTC towers were demolished with explosives.
Just a few days ago this documentary was released that shows the
unmistakable evidence.

If you ignore that, I am sorry for you.

If you refuse to see it, you are like the germans in 1930s who
preferred to not see the going-ons, but thereby became guilty in not
stopping further crimes.

I am truly sorry if I offend you, but you will think better of me after
you watched this documentary:

http://www.911podcasts.com/files/vid...sCollapse.rmvb


(you see, after the WTC-murder the cgi-fake planes don't seem so
outlandish anymore.. just think deception, perception management,
hollywood...)

I think that people who indulge in this sort of thing either

a) have some delusion

or

b) have some sinister motive

I am not kidding.



I think that people who just believe what they see and what they are told
need a lot of help...
but that's just me.

There is no way a Boeing 757 could have hit the pentagon and left hardly any
wreckage. The damage profile is all suspect too!
Stick this in your pipe a while too
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...81991288263801

don't be affraid!

**** Off?

Michal,

do I detect anti-free-speech mentality?

I sympathize with you though. (that'll make you mad!)

Moon hoax, crop circles, astrology ... I wish they would go away, too.

On 30 May 2006 17:20:59 -0700, wrote:

what are holograms, please?

Holograms are virtual images resulting from the transmission or
reflection of light from a phase modifying plate. You can only see them
by looking directly at a physical object like a piece of film. They
cannot be projected except in Star Wars (the movie, not the defense
project).

silliness snipped

_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com

Let us not discuss what hit the pentagon. Suffice to say that it is a
weird impact at a weird location made by weird people and while there
must be 100 cameras around, its so weird that only two cameras with
lame frame rates detected some wierd going-ons. (The white-hot
explosion-fireball shows serious grade explosives, not jet fuel, [lamp
oil].)

My favourite is the FASTER THAN LIGHT conspiracy:

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap031205.html