A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 31st 12, 03:24 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.physics
Wretch Fossil
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,002
Default The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.

The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.

The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Meteorites
were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they
were used in the radioactive dating method to compare their
radioactive isotopic elements against those of Earth rocks. But
meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most
meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the “Genesis Rock”,
dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). If
meteorites were the oldest material in the solar system, where did the
animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites
and the “Genesis Rock”? It is obvious that such animals existed on a
land before the “Genesis Rock” and the meteorites formed. Such a land
did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).

The above shows the basic premise for dating Earth is wrong. So, the
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is ten times older than 4.54 billion years.

Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420

Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
  #2  
Old April 1st 12, 01:12 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.physics
Wretch Fossil
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,002
Default The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.

On 3꜈31ę—„, äø‹åˆ10Ꙃ24分, Wretch Fossil wrote:
The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.

The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 Ā± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Meteorites
were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they
were used in the radioactive dating method to compare their
radioactive isotopic elements against those of Earth rocks. But
meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most
meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€,
dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). If
meteorites were the oldest material in the solar system, where did the
animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites
and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a
land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites formed. Such a land
did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).

The above shows the basic premise for dating Earth is wrong. So, the
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is ten times older than 4.54 billion years.

Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420

Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:

The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 Ā± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2).

Some meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system
formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to
determine the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites did NOT exist
before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal
fossils (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5 billion years
old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist
before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the
ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land
before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites formed. Such a land did
not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).

The above shows the basic premise is wrong in dating the Earth. The
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is billions of years older than 4.54 billion years.

Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420

Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


  #3  
Old April 1st 12, 05:59 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.physics
Wretch Fossil
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,002
Default The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.

On 4꜈1ę—„, äøŠåˆ8Ꙃ12分, Wretch Fossil wrote:
On 3꜈31ę—„, om wrote:









The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.


The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 Ā± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Meteorites
were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they
were used in the radioactive dating method to compare their
radioactive isotopic elements against those of Earth rocks. But
meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most
meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€,
dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). If
meteorites were the oldest material in the solar system, where did the
animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites
and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a
land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites formed. Such a land
did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).


The above shows the basic premise for dating Earth is wrong. So, the
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is ten times older than 4.54 billion years.


Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420


Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:

The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 Ā± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2).

Some meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system
formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to
determine the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites did NOT exist
before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal
fossils (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5 billion years
old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist
before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the
ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land
before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites formed. Such a land did
not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).

The above shows the basic premise is wrong in dating the Earth. The
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is billions of years older than 4.54 billion years.

Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420

Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:

The age of Earth is speculated to be 4.54 Ā± 0.05 billion years (ref.
1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least
45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest
meteorites to get the age of Earth (ref. 2).

The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when
our Sun and Earth were formed, so the age of the oldest meteorites
represents the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites were NOT
formed around the time our Sun and Earth were formed, period. The
reason is simply because most, if not all, meteorites contain numerous
remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5
billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the
animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites
and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a
land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites were formed. Such a
land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar
system (and is called Mars).

The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest
meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been
speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any
planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions
of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are
multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old ā€œGenesis
Rockā€.

Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420

Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
  #4  
Old April 1st 12, 11:53 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.physics
Wretch Fossil
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,002
Default The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.

On 4꜈1ę—„, äø‹åˆ12Ꙃ59分, Wretch Fossil wrote:
On 4꜈1ę—„, m wrote:









On 3꜈31ę—„, om wrote:


The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.


The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 Ā± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Meteorites
were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they
were used in the radioactive dating method to compare their
radioactive isotopic elements against those of Earth rocks. But
meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most
meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€,
dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). If
meteorites were the oldest material in the solar system, where did the
animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites
and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a
land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites formed. Such a land
did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).


The above shows the basic premise for dating Earth is wrong. So, the
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is ten times older than 4.54 billion years.


Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420


Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:


The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 Ā± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2).


Some meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system
formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to
determine the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites did NOT exist
before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal
fossils (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5 billion years
old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist
before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the
ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land
before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites formed. Such a land did
not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).


The above shows the basic premise is wrong in dating the Earth. The
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is billions of years older than 4.54 billion years.


Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420


Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:

The age of Earth is speculated to be 4.54 Ā± 0.05 billion years (ref.
1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least
45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest
meteorites to get the age of Earth (ref. 2).

The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when
our Sun and Earth were formed, so the age of the oldest meteorites
represents the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites were NOT
formed Ā*around the time our Sun and Earth were formed, period. The
reason is simply because most, if not all, meteorites contain numerous
remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5
billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the
animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites
and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a
land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites were formed. Such a
land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar
system (and is called Mars).

The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest
meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been
speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any
planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions
of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are
multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old ā€œGenesis
Rockā€.

Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420

Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:

The age of Earth is said to be 4.54 Ā± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1).
That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4
billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest meteorites
to get the age of Earth.

The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when
our Sun and Earth were formed (ref. 2). So, the age of the oldest
meteorites is considered the upper limit of the age of Earth (ref. 2).
But meteorites were NOT formed around the time our Sun and Earth were
formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all,
meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the
ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal
fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies
got preserved in the meteorites and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious
that such animals existed on a land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the
meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar
system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars).

The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest
meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been
speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any
planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions
of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are
multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old ā€œGenesis
Rockā€.

Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Quote from Ref. 1: " The age of the Earth is 4.54 Ā± 0.05 billion
years(4.54 Ɨ 109 years Ā± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence
from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent
with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar
samplesā€¦.Comparing the mass and luminosity of the Sun to the
multitudes of other stars, it appears that the solar system cannot be
much older than those rocks. Ca-Al-rich inclusions (inclusions rich in
calcium andaluminium) ā€“ the oldest known solid constituents within
meteorites that are formed within the solar system ā€“ are 4.567 billion
years old,[8][9] giving an age for the solar system and an upper limit
for the age of Earth.
It is hypothesised that the accretion of Earth began soon after the
formation of the Ca-Al-rich inclusions and the meteorites."

Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Quote from Ref. 2: ā€œSome meteorites are furthermore considered to
represent the primitive material from which the accreting solar disk
was formed.[26] ā€œ

Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420

Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
  #5  
Old April 2nd 12, 12:34 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.physics
Wretch Fossil
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,002
Default The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.

On 4꜈1ę—„, äø‹åˆ6Ꙃ53分, Wretch Fossil wrote:
On 4꜈1ę—„, om wrote:









On 4꜈1ę—„, m wrote:


On 3꜈31ę—„, om wrote:


The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.


The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 Ā± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Meteorites
were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they
were used in the radioactive dating method to compare their
radioactive isotopic elements against those of Earth rocks. But
meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most
meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€,
dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). If
meteorites were the oldest material in the solar system, where did the
animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites
and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a
land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites formed. Such a land
did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).


The above shows the basic premise for dating Earth is wrong. So, the
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is ten times older than 4.54 billion years.


Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420


Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:


The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 Ā± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2).


Some meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system
formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to
determine the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites did NOT exist
before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal
fossils (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4..5 billion years
old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist
before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the
ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land
before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites formed. Such a land did
not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).


The above shows the basic premise is wrong in dating the Earth. The
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is billions of years older than 4.54 billion years.


Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420


Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:


The age of Earth is speculated to be 4.54 Ā± 0.05 billion years (ref.
1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least
45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest
meteorites to get the age of Earth (ref. 2).


The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when
our Sun and Earth were formed, so the age of the oldest meteorites
represents the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites were NOT
formed Ā*around the time our Sun and Earth were formed, period. The
reason is simply because most, if not all, meteorites contain numerous
remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5
billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the
animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites
and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a
land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites were formed. Such a
land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar
system (and is called Mars).


The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest
meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been
speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any
planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions
of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are
multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old ā€œGenesis
Rockā€.


Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420


Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:

The age of Earth is said to be 4.54 Ā± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1).
That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4
billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest meteorites
to get the age of Earth.

The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when
our Sun and Earth were formed (ref. 2). So, the age of the oldest
meteorites is considered the upper limit of the age of Earth (ref. 2).
But meteorites were NOT formed around the time our Sun and Earth were
formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all,
meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the
ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal
fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies
got preserved in the meteorites and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious
that such animals existed on a land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the
meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar
system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars).

The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest
meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been
speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any
planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions
of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are
multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old ā€œGenesis
Rockā€.

Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Quote from Ref. 1: " The age of the Earth is 4.54 Ā± 0.05 billion
years(4.54 Ɨ 109 years Ā± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence
from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent
with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar
samplesā€¦.Comparing the mass and luminosity of the Sun to the
multitudes of other stars, it appears that the solar system cannot be
much older than those rocks. Ca-Al-rich inclusions (inclusions rich in
calcium andaluminium) ā€“ the oldest known solid constituents within
meteorites that are formed within the solar system ā€“ are 4.567 billion
years old,[8][9] giving an age for the solar system and an upper limit
for the age of Earth.
It is hypothesised that the accretion of Earth began soon after the
formation of the Ca-Al-rich inclusions and the meteorites."

Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Quote from Ref. 2: ā€œSome meteorites are furthermore considered to
represent the primitive material from which the accreting solar disk
was formed.[26] ā€œ

Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420

Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:

The age of Earth is said to be 4.54 Ā± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1).
That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is eternal or at
least billions of years older than that. The mistake resulted from
dating the oldest meteorites to get the age of Earth.

The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when
our Sun and Earth were formed (ref. 2). So, the age of the oldest
meteorites is considered the upper limit of the age of Earth (ref. 2).
But meteorites were NOT formed around the time our Sun and Earth were
formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all,
meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the
ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal
fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies
got preserved in the meteorites and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious
that such animals existed on a land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the
meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar
system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars).

The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest
meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been
speculated to be much younger than it really is, because 99.99% of
planets had existed for billions of years before animals lived on any
of them. So, Mars and Earth are multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-
billion-year-old ā€œGenesis Rockā€.

Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Quote from Ref. 1: " The age of the Earth is 4.54 Ā± 0.05 billion
years(4.54 Ɨ 109 years Ā± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence
from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent
with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar
samplesā€¦.Comparing the mass and luminosity of the Sun to the
multitudes of other stars, it appears that the solar system cannot be
much older than those rocks. Ca-Al-rich inclusions (inclusions rich in
calcium andaluminium) ā€“ the oldest known solid constituents within
meteorites that are formed within the solar system ā€“ are 4.567 billion
years old,[8][9] giving an age for the solar system and an upper limit
for the age of Earth.
It is hypothesised that the accretion of Earth began soon after the
formation of the Ca-Al-rich inclusions and the meteorites."

Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Quote from Ref. 2: ā€œSome meteorites are furthermore considered to
represent the primitive material from which the accreting solar disk
was formed.[26] ā€œ

Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420

Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


  #6  
Old April 3rd 12, 01:23 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.physics
Ala
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 115
Default The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.


"Wretch Fossil" wrote in message
...
Ref. 2:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Quote from Ref. 2: ā€œSome meteorites are furthermore considered to
represent the primitive material from which the accreting solar disk
was formed.[26] ā€œ


why do they say the round one is better than the cushion shape?


  #7  
Old April 3rd 12, 01:54 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.physics
Ala
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 115
Default The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.


"Wretch Fossil" wrote in message
...
The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.


The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2).


It would be a real score to get some, because no one carries tektites in
anything other than
millimeter accents or cabachon.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What's wrong with this NG? vtcapo[_2_] Astronomy Misc 3 November 5th 10 12:59 AM
Valev right or wrong? - this is the wrong venue for this debate ukastronomy Astronomy Misc 1 January 29th 09 03:17 PM
breakdown at toe terribly throws Beth [email protected] Amateur Astronomy 0 August 16th 07 07:31 AM
Something wrong here Mike Thomas Amateur Astronomy 18 July 1st 04 06:19 AM
They got the wrong man!!! Kilolani Astronomy Misc 1 December 19th 03 11:14 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.