Revisiting the P'loon

Cool artickle-

http://www.airspacemag.com/space-exp...ng_Apollo.html

wrote in message
...
Cool artickle-

http://www.airspacemag.com/space-exp...ng_Apollo.html

Thanks for the post. I sure hope they locate something, anything man made,
if for no other reason than to permanently shut up those brain dead Moon
Hoax loons.

On Apr 25, 3:26*pm, "Hagar" wrote:
wrote in message

...

Cool artickle-

http://www.airspacemag.com/space-exp...ng_Apollo.html

Thanks for the post. *I sure hope they locate something, anything man made,
if for no other reason than to permanently shut up those brain dead Moon
Hoax loons.

According to Hoagland we will see a lot more than a flag pole......

RT

On Apr 25, 2:23*pm, vtcapo wrote:
On Apr 25, 3:26*pm, "Hagar" wrote:

wrote in message

....

Cool artickle-

http://www.airspacemag.com/space-exp...ng_Apollo.html

Thanks for the post. *I sure hope they locate something, anything man made,
if for no other reason than to permanently shut up those brain dead Moon
Hoax loons.

According to Hoagland we will see a lot more than a flag pole......

RT

It's always nice having a ruse within a ruse. It's exactly what I
would do if put in charge of DARPA, pulling off the great ruse/sting
of the mutually perpetrated cold-war century.

A very nice Apollo 15 impact crater:
http://www.airspacemag.com/photos?c=...9979884&page=2
http://www.airspacemag.com/photos?c=...9979884&page=3

Ian Regan, a supposed UK amateur has clearly outperformed all other
agency expertise in analog to digital image processing:
http://www.airspacemag.com/photos?c=...9979884&page=4

In the following analog to digital image, take notice of the rather
unusual dynamic range of that old film, and of course notice how Ian
Regan is very much a part of our NASA insider team of rusemasters.
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/IanR81Apollo11.jpg
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/IanRegan.html

~ BG

On Apr 25, 12:26*pm, "Hagar" wrote:
wrote in message

...

Cool artickle-

http://www.airspacemag.com/space-exp...ng_Apollo.html

Thanks for the post. *I sure hope they locate something, anything man made,
if for no other reason than to permanently shut up those brain dead Moon
Hoax loons.

I certainly hope so too, and the sooner the better. Oddly, it seems
our USAF could have accomplished this task as of 4 decades ago.
~ BG

On Apr 26, 6:42*am, Saul Levy wrote:
You must believe HoaxFart then, vt? *lmfjao!

And don't forget GOOFBALL'S claims about Venus?

Saul Levy

On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:23:41 -0700 (PDT), vtcapo
wrote:

On Apr 25, 3:26*pm, "Hagar" wrote:
wrote in message

....

Cool artickle-

http://www.airspacemag.com/space-exp...ng_Apollo.html

Thanks for the post. *I sure hope they locate something, anything man made,
if for no other reason than to permanently shut up those brain dead Moon
Hoax loons.

According to Hoagland we will see a lot more than a flag pole......

RT

Saul,
Have you read Hoaglands last book The Secret life of NASA? Compelling
stuff. I wouldn't dismiss him since NASA has been covering up UFO
sightings for decades. I used to have a neighbor who's son was a
Shuttle commander. I asked him to ask his son about Santa Claus, the
term used by NASA to describe UFO's. His son would not comment on the
subject. Silence to me is in itself conformation.

RT

"BradGuth" wrote in message
...
On Apr 25, 12:26 pm, "Hagar" wrote:
wrote in message

...

Cool artickle-

http://www.airspacemag.com/space-exp...ng_Apollo.html

Thanks for the post. I sure hope they locate something, anything man made,
if for no other reason than to permanently shut up those brain dead Moon
Hoax loons.

I certainly hope so too, and the sooner the better. Oddly, it seems
our USAF could have accomplished this task as of 4 decades ago.
~ BG

**************************************
Surprise, GuthBall, they did. There were a good number of photographs
taken,
however, loons like you spent the next four decades in futile attempts to
discredit the pictures as fakes, even though every one of your hare-brained
arguments was successfully countered by specialists in the field of
photography.

Even if a moon orbiter with a high enough resolution were to send back
discernible details of materials left behind, you loons would just start
your idiotic attacks all over again.

On Apr 27, 11:50*am, "Hagar" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...
On Apr 25, 12:26 pm, "Hagar" wrote:

wrote in message

....

Cool artickle-

http://www.airspacemag.com/space-exp...ng_Apollo.html

Thanks for the post. I sure hope they locate something, anything man made,
if for no other reason than to permanently shut up those brain dead Moon
Hoax loons.

I certainly hope so too, and the sooner the better. *Oddly, it seems
our USAF could have accomplished this task as of 4 decades ago.
*~ BG

* * * * **************************************
Surprise, GuthBall, they did. *There were a good number of photographs
taken,
however, loons like you spent the next four decades in futile attempts to
discredit the pictures as fakes, even though every one of your hare-brained
arguments was successfully countered by specialists in the field of
photography.

Even if a moon orbiter with a high enough resolution were to send back
discernible details of materials left behind, you loons would just start
your idiotic attacks all over again.

And those images were so gosh darn good and conclusive that you've
posted links to such?

Obviously there's something fairly subjective or perhaps fishy about
those images, as otherwise many others and myself would have taken
proper notice.

Try to remember, I'm the one and only observationology good guy here.

Are you folks still saying the laws of physics are actually different
for our Selene/moon?

~ BG

"BradGuth" wrote in message
...
On Apr 27, 11:50 am, "Hagar" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...
On Apr 25, 12:26 pm, "Hagar" wrote:

wrote in message

...

Cool artickle-

http://www.airspacemag.com/space-exp...ng_Apollo.html

Thanks for the post. I sure hope they locate something, anything man
made,
if for no other reason than to permanently shut up those brain dead Moon
Hoax loons.

I certainly hope so too, and the sooner the better. Oddly, it seems
our USAF could have accomplished this task as of 4 decades ago.
~ BG

**************************************
Surprise, GuthBall, they did. There were a good number of photographs
taken,
however, loons like you spent the next four decades in futile attempts to
discredit the pictures as fakes, even though every one of your
hare-brained
arguments was successfully countered by specialists in the field of
photography.

Even if a moon orbiter with a high enough resolution were to send back
discernible details of materials left behind, you loons would just start
your idiotic attacks all over again.

And those images were so gosh darn good and conclusive that you've
posted links to such?

Obviously there's something fairly subjective or perhaps fishy about
those images, as otherwise many others and myself would have taken
proper notice.

Try to remember, I'm the one and only observationology good guy here.

Are you folks still saying the laws of physics are actually different
for our Selene/moon?

~ BG
****************************
I was referring to all the photos the astronauts took, while on the Moon,
you ****ing moron. Did you have to work hard on becoming an imbecile or was
it a natural gift ??

LikeÂ*Hagar, I too enjoyed oldCoot's link:
http://www.airspacemag.com/space-exp...ng_Apollo.html

Which billionaire will be the first to spend 100 million dollars
to run his robot on the surface of the moon ?

Is Panius alive or dead ?