|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
EXCLUSIVE PHOTO -- FIRST MAN IN THE MOON
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SimplyMagic/TightFit.jpg Chris Krolczyk, former Smithsonian anthropologist (and an evolutionist, obviously), does his thing outside National Museum of Natural History. Amazingly, Krolczyk reported meeting Tony Blair, President Bush and Rush Limbaugh inside the tunnel. Krolczyk has since left the Smithsonian to join Monty Pyton's Flying Circus. ===================== Now a word from our sponsor: PETRIFIED BONES EMBEDDED IN SLATE FROM COAL VEINS http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/N...s/MVC-002S.JPG http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/N...s/MVC-003S.JPG http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/N...s/MVC-004S.JPG http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/N...s/MVC-005S.JPG http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/N...s/MVC-006S.JPG http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/N...s/MVC-007S.JPG http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/N...s/MVC-008S.JPG http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/N...s/MVC-009S.JPG http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/N...s/MVC-010S.JPG http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/N...s/MVC-011S.JPG http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/N...s/MVC-012S.JPG It means the bone has to be older than the material in which it is encased. Same as many thousands of other petrified bones, teeth and soft organs I've discovered between anthracite veins, they offer the undeniable physical evidence that large land animals -- man included -- had existed on earth while coal was being formed more than 280 million years ago. And it means that Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution ain't worth the paper it was written on. ========================================== DISCOVERY OF PETRIFIED BONES, TEETH AND SOFT ORGANS BETWEEN ANTHRACITE VEINS CONFIRMS THEORY OF MAN'S EVOLUTION UNMITIGATED CRAP (And Here's the Proof in a Nutshell) http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FOSSILS/ManasOldasCoal.jpg http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/ManasOl...iscoveries.jpg http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FOSSILS/FirstDiscovery.jpg http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Evidence/MoreFossils.jpg http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FOSSILS/TestResults.jpg http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FOSSILS/OldestTool.jpg Ed Conrad http://ww.edconrad.com Man as Old as Coal ===================== A FEW MAJOR WORLD NEWSPAPERS ALBANIA Albanian Times (English) Koha Jone Rilindja Demokratike ANDORRA Diari d'Andorra AUSTRIA Amtsblatt der Republik ÷sterreich (Vienna) Kronen Zeitung Kurier Die Presse Ober*sterreichischen Nachrichten Salzburger Nachrichten (Salzburg) Der Standard (Vienna) Vorarlberger Nachrichten (Bregenz) Wiener Zeitung (Vienna) BELARUS Belarusnews Vecherny Minsk BELGIUM De Financieel Ekonomische Tijd (Antwerp) Het Belang van Limburg (Limburg) Het Volk (Brussels) La Libre Belgique (Brussels) La Meuse (Liege, Sud Presse) La Nouvelle Gazette (Charleroi) De Standaard ( (Brussels) BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA Dnevni avaz (Sarajevo) Hrvatska Rijec (Sarajevo) Oslobodjenje (Sarajevo) BULGARIA ITK PARI (Sofia) Kapital (Sofia) Sega (Sofia) Standart News (Sofia) CROATIA Feral Tribune (Split) Glas Koncila (Hrvatska, Zagreb) Monitor (Zagreb) Slobodna Dalmacija (Split) Vecernji list (Zagreb) Vjesnik (Zagreb) CYPRUS Cyprus Mail (Nicosia) (English) Cyprus News Agency Politis news (Nicosia) Simerini (Nicosia) CZECH REPUBLIC CeskÈe; Noviny (Prague) Hospodarske Noviny (Prague) Idnes (Prague) Lidove Noviny (Prague) Neviditelny Pes (Prague) Prague Daily Monitor (Prague) (English) Prague Post (Prague) (English) DENMARK Stiftstidende (Copenhagen) Berlingske Tidende (Copenhagen) Bornholms Tidende (Ronne) Copenhagen Post, The (Copenhagen) (English) Dagbladet B¯rsen (Copenhagen) DanskeNyheder Ekstra Bladet (Copenhagen) Engineering Weekly (Copenhagen) Folkebladet Fyens Stiftstidende (Odense) Jydske Vestkysten Jyllands-Posten (Viby) Lolland-Falsters Folketidende Nordjyske Stiftstidende (Aalborg) Politiken (Copenhagen) ESTONIA The Baltic Times (English) Delovye Vedomosti (Tallinn) Eesti Ekspress Eesti Paevaleht Postimees (Tallinn) Sonumileht (Tallinn) FINLAND Aamulehti (Tampere) Finnish Newspapers H”meen Sanomat (Hameenlinna) Helsingin Sanomat (Helsinki) Helsingin Sanomat International Edition (Helsinki) (English) Hufvudstadsbladet (Helsinki) Iltalehti (Helsinki) Ilta-Sanomat (Helsinki) Jakobstads Tidning (Jakobstad) Kaleva (Oulu) Kauppalehti Online Keskisuomalainen Laitilan Sanomat L”nsi-Savo Laukaa-Konnevesi Turun Sanomat (Turku) Vasabladet FRANCE L'Alsace Journal (Alsace) Le Bien Public (Bourgogne) Charente Libre (Charente) Le Courrier de Mantes (Mantes) Le Courrier Picard (Picardie) La DÈpÍche du Midi Dernieres Nouvelles d'Alsace (Alsace) Les Echos L'Eclaireur du G’tinais (Montargis) L'Est RÈpublicain (Nancy) Le Figaro (Paris) France-Amerique (Paris) International Herald Tribune (English) (Paris) Le Monde (Paris) Le Monde Diplomatique (France) Le Telegramme - Bretagne On Line (Brittany) Liberation (Paris) Monaco Actualite (Monaco) Nice-Matin (Nice) Le Nouvel Observateur (Paris) Ouest France (Brittany, Rennes) Le Parisien (Paris) Le RÈpublicain Lorrain (Lorraine, Metz) Regards (Paris) Sud Oest (Aquitaine, Bordeaux) La Tribune (Paris) Voix du Nord GEORGIA Daily Georgia Times (English) Svobodnaya Gruzia GERMANY Augsburger Allgemeine (Bavaria, Augsburg) Badische Zeitung (Freiburg) Berliner Morgenpost (Berlin) Berlin Online (Berlin) Berliner Zeitung (Berlin) Bild Die Tageszeitung Online Die Welt Die Zeit Online Frankenpost Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (Frankfurt) Frankfurter Rundschau (Frankfurt) General-Anzeiger (Nordrhein-Westfalen, Bonn) German Daily Newspapers Haller Tagblatt & KreisKurier (Baden-Wurttemberg, Schwabisch Hall ) Hamburger Abendblatt (Hamburg) Hamburger Morgenpost (Hamburg) Handelsblatt (D¸sseldorf) Holsteinischer Courier (Schleswig-Holstein, Neumunster) Iserlohner Kreisanzeiger und Zeitung (Nordrhein-Westfalen , Iserlohn) K*lner Stadt-Anzeiger (Koln) Leipziger Volkszeitung (Sachsen, Leipzig) L¸becker Nachrichten (Schleswig Holstein, Lubeck) Main-Echo (Bavaria, Aschaffenburg) Mainpost (Wurzburg) Neue Presse (Hannover) Norddeutsche Neueste Nachrichten (Rostock) Nordwest-Zeitung (Oldenburg) Rheinische Post Online (Dusseldorf) Rhein-Zeitung (Koblenz) (Koblenz) Saarbr¸cker Zeitung (Saarbr¸cken, Saarland) Schwabacher Tagblatt (Schwabach, Bavaria) Suddeutsche Zeitung (Bavaria, Munich) Der Tagesspiegel (Berlin) Trierischer Volksfreund (Trier) Verlagsgruppe Passau Online Westdeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung (Ruhrgebiet) Westf”lische Nachrichten (Nordrhein-Westfalen, Munster) Westf”lischen Rundschau (Nordrhein-Westfalen, Dortmund) GIBRALTAR Gibraltar Chronicle (Gibraltar) (English) Panorama (Gibraltar) (English) GREECE Athens News (Athens) (English) Eleftherotypia (Athens) Kathimerini (Athens) (English) Ta Nea (Athens) HUNGARY Budapest Business Journal (Budapest) (English) The Budapest Sun (Budapest) (English) Duna™jv·ros (Fejer, Dunaujvaros) Magyar Demokrata (Budapest) Magyar Forum (Budapest) Magyar HÌrlap (Budapest) Nepszabadsag (Budapest) NÈpszava (Budapest) ICELAND Morgunbladid · Netinu (Reykjavik) Skarpur (Reykjavik) VÌsir (Reykjavik) IRELAND Examiner, The (Cork) Galway Advertiser, The (Galway) Irish Independent, The (Dublin) Irish News (Belfast) Irish Times (Dublin) Kerryman Newspaper, The (County Kerry) Munster Express, The Newshound - Northern Ireland and related topics. Sunday Business Post, The ITALY Alto Adige (Bolzano) Brescia Oggi (Brescia) Il Centro (Abruzzo, Pescara) Chiamami Cittý (Rimini) Corriere Adriatico (Marche) Corriere del Giorno (Taranto) Corriere della Sera Dolomiten L'Eco di Bergamo (Bergamo) Il Foglio Gazzetta de Mantova (Mantova) Gazzetta di Reggio (Reggio) Giornale (Bologna) Internazionale Il Giornale di Vicenza (Vicenza) Il Manifesto (Rome) L'Arena (Verona) La Nazione (Florence) Nuova Ferrara (Ferrara) La Nuova Sardegna (Sassari) La Nuova Venezia (Venezia) Il Piccolo di Trieste (Trieste) La Provincia Pavese (Pavia, Pavia) La Repubblica Il Resto del Carlino (Bologna) La Stampa (Turin) Il Tirreno (Livorno) La Tribuna di Treviso (Treviso) L'Unione Sarda (Cagliari) LATVIA The Baltic Times (English) Diena (Riga) Latvijas Vestnesis (Riga) Neatariga Rita Avize (Riga) Zemgales Zinas (Jelgava) LIECHTENSTEIN Liechenstein News (English) Liechtensteiner Vaterland LITHUANIA Lietuvos Rytas (Vilnius) Lietuvos Zinios (Vilnius) LUXEMBOURG LÎtzebuerger Journal Luxemburger Wort Tageblatt MACEDONIA Dnevnik (Skopje) Makedonsko Sonce (Skopje) Utrinski Vesnik (Skopje) MALTA The Business Times (Valletta) (English) The Malta Independent (Valletta) (English) Malta Today (Valletta) (English) The Times & Sunday Times (Valletta) (English) MOLDOVA Tineretul (Chisinau) NETHERLANDS Algemeen Dagblad (Zuid-Holland, Rotterdam) Cobouw (Zuid-Holland, The Hague) Dagblad De Limburger (Limburg, Maastricht) Het Financieele Dagblad (Noord-Brabant, Eindhoven) Eindhovens Dagblad (Noord-Holland, Amsterdam) Haagsche Courant (Zuid-Holland, The Hague) Haarlems Dagblad (Noord-Holland, Haarlem) Het Belang van Limburg (Giessen, Limburg) Het Parool (Noord-Holland, Amsterdam) NRC Handelsblad (Zuid-Holland, Rotterdam) Rotterdams Dagblad (Rotterdam) Tctubantia (Overijssel, Enschede) Trouw (Noord-Holland, Amsterdam) De Volkskrant (Noord-Holland, Amsterdam) NORWAY Adresseavisen (Trondheim) Aftenposten (Oslo) Aftenposten: English Version (Oslo) (English) Agderposten (Aust-Agder, Arendal) Avisa Nordland (Bodo) Avisa S¯r-Tr¯ndelag (Sor-Trondelag, Orkanger) Bergens Tidende (Hordaland, Bergen) Bergensavisen (Hordaland, Bergen) Dag og Tid (Oslo) Dagbladet (Oslo) Dagens NÊringsliv (Oslo) Dagsavisen (Oslo) FÊdrelandsvennen (Vest-Agder, Kristiansand) Firdaposten (Sogn og Fjordane, Floro) Fredriksstad Blad Fremover (Nordland, Narvik) Gudbrandsd¯len Dagningen (Oppland, Lillehammer) Hamar Arbeiderblad (Hedmark, Hamar) Hamar Dagblad (Hedmark, Hamar) Haugesunds Avis (Haugesund) Laagendalsposten (Kongsberg) Nettavisen (Oslo) (English) Nettavisen (Oslo) Nordlys (North Norway, Tromsoe) Norway Post, The (Oslo) (English) Oppland Arbeiderblad (Gjoevik) ÿstlands-Posten (Larvik) Porsgrunns Dagblad (Telemark) Ringerikes Blad (Akershus, Lillestr¯m) Rogalands Avis (Rogaland, Stavanger) Romerikes Blad (Akershus, Lillestrom) Sandefjords Blad (Vestfold, Sandefjord) Sunnmorsp¯sten (Alesund) Teknisk Ukeblad (Oslo) Telemarksavisa (Telemark, Skien) Tonsbergs Blad (Tonsberg) Tr¯nder-Avisa (Nord Trondelag, Steinkjer) Verdens Gang (Oslo) POLAND Dziennik Polski (Maloposkie, Krakow) Gazeta Wyborcza (Warsaw) Glos Wybrzeza (Pomorskie, Gdansk) Rzeczpospolita (Warsaw) Tygodnik Powszechny Trybuna (Mazowieckie, Warsaw) Warsaw Voice, The (Warsaw) Zycie Warszawy (Warsaw) PORTUGAL A Bola (Lisboa, Lisbon) Canal de NegÛcios (Lisboa, Lisbon) Correio da Manh“ (Lisboa, Lisbon) Di·rio de NotÌcias (Funchal) Di·rio Digital (Lisboa, Lisbon) Di·rio EconÛmico (Lisboa, Lisbon) O Jogo Jornal de Noticias ( (Oporto) P™blico (Lisbon) Record (Lisbon) ROMANIA Adevarul Cotidianul (Bucuresti, Bucharest) Evenimentul Zilei Online Nine O'Clock (Bucuresti, Bucharest) (English) ZIUA (Bucuresti, Bucharest) RUSSIA Evening Kazan (Tatarstan, Kazan) Itar-Tass (Moscow) Izvestia (Moscow) Kazanskii Universitet (Moscow) Kommersant Daily (Moscow) Komsomolskaya Pravda (Moscow) The Moscow Times (Moscow) (English) Moskovskii Komsomolets (Moscow) Nezavisimaya Gazeta (Moscow) Novosti (Vladivostok) Pravda (Moscow) Russia Today St. Petersburg Times (St. Petersburg) Trud (Moscow) Vladivostok News (Vladivostok) SCOTLAND Courier On-Line, The (Dundee) Daily Record (Glasgow) Press and Journal, The(Aberdeen) Scotsman, The (Edinburgh) Sunday Mail (Glasgow) Sunday Post, The (Dundee) SLOVAKIA Praca (Zapadoslovenska, Bratislava) Pravda (Zapadoslovenska, Bratislava) Slovakia Daily Surveyor Slovak Spectator, The (Zapadoslovenska, Bratislava) SME Online SLOVENIA Delo (Ljubljana) Dnevnik (Ljubljana) SPAIN ABC (Madrid) AVUI (Catalonia, Barcelona; Premsa Catalana) Cinco Dias (Madrid) El Correo (Pais Vasco, Bilbao) El Correo Gallego (Galicia) Costa Blanca News (English) DEIA (Pais Vasco, Bilbao) El DÌa de Baleares (Baleares, Palma de Mallorca) Diario de Mallorca (Baleares, Palma de Mallorca) El Diario Montanes (Cantabria, Santander) El Diario Vasco (Pais Vasco, San Sebastian) La Estrella Digital ExpansiÛn Directo (Madrid) Faro de Vigo (Galicia, Vigo) Heraldo de AragÛn (Aragon, Zaragoza) Hoy Diario de Extremadura (Extremadura, Merida) Ideal (Andalucia, Granada) El Ideal Gallego (Galicia) Levante-El Mercantil Valenciano (Valencia) Marca (Madrid) El Mundo El Norte de Castilla (Castilla y Leon, Valladolid) El Pais (Madrid) El Periodico de Catalunya (Barcelona) El Progreso (Galicia, Lugo) Las Provincias (Valencia) RegiÛ7 (Catalonia, Manresa) La Rioja (La Rioja, Logrono) Sport La Vanguardia (Catalonia, Barcelona) SUR (English) SWEDEN Aff”rsv”rlden (Stockholm) Aftonbladet (Stockholm) BorÂs Tidning (Vastra Gotaland, Boras) Dagens Nyheter (Stockholm) Expressen (Stockholm) G*teborgs-Posten (G*teborg) Hallands Nyheter Nerikes Allehande Hallandspostenr Norrbottens-Kuriren (Norrbotten, Lulea) Norrkopings Tidningar Ostersund Posten ÷stg*ta Correnspondenten (Ostergotland, Linkoping) Svenska Dagbladet (Stockholm) Sydsvenska Dagbladet (Malm*) V”sterbottens-Kuriren (Vasterbotten, Umea) Vestmanlands L”ns Tidning (V”stmanland) SWITZERLAND Basler Zeitung (Basel-Stadt, Basel) Berner Zeitung (Bern) Bote der Urschweiz (Central Switzerland) Der Bund (Bern) Corriere del Ticino (Ticino, Lugano) Der Landbote (Zurich, Winterthur) Freiburger Nachrichten (Freiburger) La LibertÈ Le Matin (Vaud, Lausanne) Neue Zurcher Zeitung Schaffhauser Nachrichten St. Galler Tagblatt (St. Gallen) Die S¸dostschweiz (Graubunden, Chur) Tages-Anzeiger (Zurich) Tribune de Geneve (Geneva) Webdo (Lausanne) WochenZeitung Zisch (Luzern, Central Switzerland) Zurcher Unterlander (Zurich, Dielsdorf) TURKEY Aksam (Istanbul) Cumhuriyet Gazetesi (Istanbul) D¸nya (Istanbul) Fanatik (Istanbul) G¸nes (Istanbul) Hurriyet Gazetesi (Istanbul) Milli Gazete (Istanbul) Milliyet Gazetesi (Istanbul) Ozgur Politika (Istanbul) Radikal (Istanbul) Sabah (Istanbul) Star (Istanbul) T¸rkiye Yeni Asya Yeni Mesaj Yeni Safak (Istanbul) Zaman UKRAINE The Day (Kiev) Facty i Kommentarii (Kiev) Postup (Lviv) Segodnya (Kiev) UNITED KINGDOM Index - UK Newspapers Bristol Evening Post (Bristol) Cambridge Evening News (Cambridge) Coventry Evening Telegraph (Coventry) Daily Record (Glasgow) The Daily Telegraph (London) Derbyshire Evening Telegraph (Derby) Evening Argus (Brighton) Evening Chronicle (Newcastle) Evening Standard (London) Evening Telegraph Evening Times (Glasgow) Express & Star (Wolverhampton) Financial Times (London) Financial Times (U.S. mirror site) (London) Go2 Birmingham (Grimsby) Grimsby Evening Telegraph (Birmingham) Guardian, The (London) The Herald (Glasgow) Huddersfield Daily Examiner (Huddersfield) Hull Daily Mail (Hull) Independent, The (London) Jersey Evening Post, The (Channel Islands) The Journal (Newcastle) Lancashire Evening Telegraph London Evening Standard (London) The Mirror (London) The News (Portsmouth) Norfolk Now (Norfolk) Northampton Chronicle & Echo (Northampton) The Nottingham Evening Post (Nottingham) Observer, The (London) Oldham Evening Chronicle, The Sentinel Online, The Socialist Worker (London) South Wales Argus (Newport) South Wales Evening Post South West News The Sun (London) Sunday Mall (Glasgow) Sunderland Echo (Sunderland) Telegraph, The (London) This is Local London (London) The Times and Sunday Times (London) The Sunday Times (London) West Sussex Observer (Chichester) Western Mail, The (Cardiff) Yorkshire Evening Post (Leeds) YUGOSLAVIA Blic Online (Begrade) Borba (Begrade) Dnevnik (Vojvodina) Politika (Belgrade) Vecernje Novosti (Belgrade) Vijesti (Montenegro) BAHRAIN Bahrain Tribune (English) Gulf Daily News (English) EGYPT Middle East Times (English) IRAN Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA) (English) Tehran Times (English) IRAQ Iraqi Net (Some English) ISRAEL [ Top of Page ] Globes (Jerusalem) Ha'aretz - Israel Online (Jerusalem) Jerusalem Post (Jerusalem) (English) YnetNews (Tel Aviv) (English) KUWAIT Al-Qabas Newspaper Arab Times (English) Kuwait Times (English) LEBANON Al Anwar An Nahar Daily Star (English) PALESTINE Al-Ayyam Al-Hayat Al-Jadedah Al-Quds Assabeel Weekly Palestine News Agency - WAFA (English) QATAR Gulf Times (Qatar) (English) SAUDI ARABIA Al-Jazirah Al-Riyadh Arab News (English) Asharq Al-Awsat SYRIA Syria Times (English) UNITED ARAB EMIRATES Al Itihad Newspaper Gulf News (English) Khaleej Times Online (English) MIDDLE EAST NEWSPAPERS AHRAIN Bahrain Tribune (English) Gulf Daily News (English) EGYPT Middle East Times (English) IRAN Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA) (English) Tehran Times (English) IRAQ Iraqi Net (Some English) ISRAEL [ Top of Page ] Globes (Jerusalem) Ha'aretz - Israel Online (Jerusalem) Jerusalem Post (Jerusalem) (English) YnetNews (Tel Aviv) (English) KUWAIT Al-Qabas Newspaper Arab Times (English) Kuwait Times (English) LEBANON Al Anwar An Nahar Daily Star (English) PALESTINE Al-Ayyam Al-Hayat Al-Jadedah Al-Quds Assabeel Weekly Palestine News Agency - WAFA (English) QATAR Gulf Times (Qatar) (English) SAUDI ARABIA Al-Jazirah Al-Riyadh Arab News (English) Asharq Al-Awsat SYRIA Syria Times (English) UNITED ARAB EMIRATES Al Itihad Newspaper Gulf News (English) Khaleej Times Online (English) AFRICAN NEWSPAPERS ALGERIA El Moudjahid Le Quotidien d'Oran El Watan BENIN EGYPT Ahram Daily Ahram Weekly Egyptian Gazette Al Shaab ETHIOPIA Addis Tribune (Addis Ababa) Fiameta Ethiopia GHANA Daily Graphic The Ghanaian Chronicle GUINEA Le Lynx IVORY COAST Fraternite Matin KENYA Daily Nation, The East African, The East African Standard LIBERIA New Democrat MADAGASCAR Madagascar Tribune MAURITIUS l'Express Le Mauricien MOROCCO La Vie Economique NAMIBIA The Namibian NIGERIA Guardian, The This Day Vanguard REUNION ISLAND Le Journal de I'lle SOUTH AFRICA Business Day Cape Argus Cape Times City Press Daily News Independent Online Mail & Guardian, The Mercury, The Post Pretoria News Star, The Sunday Times, The Witness, The TANZANIA Arusha Times, The Express, The TUNISIA La Presse de Tunisie UGANDA Monitor, The New Vision, The ZAMBIA Post, The Times of Zambia, The Zambia Daily Mail ZIMBABWE Daily News, The Zimbabwe Independent, The AUSTRALIA NEWSPAPERS Adelaide Advertiser (South Australia) The Advertiser (Cessnock, NSW) The Advertiser (Bendigo, Victoria) The Advocate (NW & W Tasmania) The Age (Melbourne, Victoria) Al-Furat (NSW) [In Arabic] Albany & Great Southern Weekender (Western Australia) Alice Springs News (Northern Territory) Alpine News (Bright & Porepunkah, Victoria) Alpine Observer (Victoria) Altona - Laverton Mail (Melbourne, Victoria) The Ararat Advertiser (Victoria) Armidale Express (NSW) The Armidale Independent (Armidale, NSW) Auburn Review (NSW) Augusta Margaret River Mail (SW Western Australia) Australia Daily [In Chinese] The Australian (National) The Australian Financial Review (National) The Australian Jewish News (National) The Australian Times The Avon Valley Advocate (Western Australia) Bankstown-Canturbury Torch (NSW) Barossa & Light Herald (South Australia) Bayside Bulletin (Queensland) Bega District News (Bega, NSW) Berwick Gazette (Berwick, Victoria) Berwick News (Berwick, Victoria) Bharat Times (Melbourne, Victoria - For the Indian Community) Blaze (South Australia) Blue Mountains Gazette Bnews (Melbourne, Victoria) The Border Mail (Albury Wodonga) The Bunyip (Gawler, South Australia) The Byron Shire Echo (Byron Bay, NSW) Camden Haven Courier (Laurieton NSW) Campaspe News (Victoria) Canberra Times (Canberra, ACT) Canowindra News (NSW) Catholic Voice (Canberra, ACT) Central Midland & Coastal Advocate (Moora, Western Australia) Central Murray Informer (Victoria & NSW) Central Online (Spencer Gulf & Broken Hill, NSW) Central Western Daily (Orange, NSW) The Chronicle (Wangaratta, Victoria) The Chronicle (Toowoomba, Queensland) The Chronicle (Wangaratta, Victoria) City News (Canberra, ACT) Clarence Valley Review (NSW) Cobar Age (NSW) Cobram Courier (Victoria) Collie Mail (Western Australia) Coober Pedy News (South Australia) Cooma-Monaro Express (NSW) Cootamundra Herald (NSW) Country News (Victoria) The Courier (Ballarat, Victoria) The Courier (Adelaide Hills, South Australia) The Courier-Mail (Brisbane, Queensland) Cowra Guardian (NSW) Cranbourne Independent (Melbourne, Victoria) Cranbourne News (Cranbourne, Victoria) Croatian Herald (National) Crookwell Gazette (NSW) The Cygnet & Channel Classifieds (Southern Tasmania) The Daily Advertiser (Riverina, NSW) Daily Liberal (Dubbo, NSW) Daily Mercury (Mackay, Queensland) The Daily Telegraph (Sydney, NSW) Dandenong Examiner (Melbourne, Victoria) Dandenong Star (Dandenong, Victoria) Deni Pastoral Times (Victoria) District News (Canada Bay, Sydney, NSW) Divesa News [In Sinhalese] Donny Bridgetown Mail (Western Australia) The Down Under (Finnish Community - In Finnish) Dunoon & District Gazette (NSW) Dunya (National - In Turkish) Eastern Riverina Observer (Henty, NSW) The Epoch Times The Esperance Express (Western Australia) eTUonline (Victoria & Tasmania) The Examiner (Launceston, Tasmania) Eyre Peninsula Tribune (Cleve, South Australia) Farm Weekly Ferntree Gully / Belgrave Mail (Ferntree Gully / Belgrave, Victoria) Fifty-Plus News (Victoria) Footscray, Yarraville, Braybrook Star (Footscray / Yarraville / Braybrook, Victoria) Forbes Advocate (NSW) Frankston & Hastings Independent (Victoria) Geelong Advertiser (Victoria) Glasshouse Country News (Sunshine Coast, Queensland) Glen Innes Examiner (NSW) Gloucester Advocate (NSW) The Gold Coast Bulletin (Gold Coast, Queensland) The Golden Mile (Kalgoolie, Western Australia) Goulburn Post (NSW) Great Lakes Advocate (Forster, NSW) Green Left Weekly (Sydney, NSW) Grenfell Record (NSW) The Guardian (Surry Hills, NSW) The Guyra Argus (NSW) Halls Creek Herald (The Kimberley Region, Western Australia) Hamshahri Weekly (NSW) [In Arabic] Harden-Murrumburrah Express (NSW) Hastings Gazette (NSW) Hawkesbury Gazette (NSW) Herald Sun (Melbourne, Victoria) Holbrook, Billabong & Upper Murray Chronicle (NSW) Hume Star (Melbourne, Victoria) The Hunter Advocate (NSW) The Hutt River Guardian (Hutt River Province, Western Australia) Hrvatski Vjesnik / Croatian Herald [Croatian & English available] Illawarra Mercury (Wollongong, NSW) Inverell Times (NSW) Irish Echo (Sydney) The Islander (Kangaroo Island, South Australia) Keilor, Taylors Lakes, Sydenham Star (Keilor / Taylors Lakes / Sydenham, Victoria) The Kiama Independent (Kiama, New South Wales) The Kimberley Echo (Western Australia) Kyabram Free Press (Victoria) Labor Herald (Canberra, ACT) Lake Times (Shellharbour, News South Wales) The Land Launceston Examiner (Northern Tasmania) Lithgow Mercury (NSW) Local Government Focus (National) Lyndhurst Shire Chronicle (NSW) The Macleay Argus (Kempsey, NSW) Magnetic Times (Magnetic Island, Queensland) The Mail (Mornington & Southern Pensinular, Victoria) The Maitland Mercury (NSW) Mandurah Mail (Mandurah, Western Australia) The Manly Daily (Sydney / Northern Beaches, NSW) Manning River Times (Taree, NSW) Mansfield Courier (Victoria) Mary Valley Voice (Sunshine Coast, Queensland) Melbourne Community Voice (Victoria & Tasmania) The Mercury (Hobart, Tasmania) Merimbula News Weekly (NSW) Merredin-Wheatbelt Mercury (Western Australia) Messenger Newspapers (Adelaide) Midwest Times (Geraldton, Western) Milton Ulladulla/Sussex Inlet Times (NSW) The Morning Bulletin (Rockhampton, Queensland) Mountain Views Mail (Yarra Valley, Victoria) Mt Buller/Sterling News (Victoria) Mt Hotham/Falls Creek News (Victoria) Mudgee Guardian (NSW) The Murray Pioneer (Renmark, South Australia) The Murray Valley Standard (Murray Bridge, South Australia) Muswellbrook Chronicle (NSW) Myrtleford News (Victoria) Narooma News (NSW) Narromine News & Trangie Advocate (NSW) National Indigenous Times (National) Neighbourhood News (Beaudesert Shire, Queensland) Neos Kosmos (In Greek - National) The New Australian The Newcastle Herald (NSW - Subscription Only) News-Mail (Bundaberg, Queensland) The News Weekender (Victoria) NEWSonline (Queensland) Noosa News (Noosa, Queensland) The North East Telegraph (Victoria) North Queensland Register (Queensland) Northern Argus (Clare, South Australia) Northern Beaches Weekender (NSW) The Northern Daily Leader (Tamworth, NSW) The Northern Rivers Echo (Lismore, NSW) The Northern Star (NSW) Northern Territory News Nova Hrvatska (Australian-Croatian Weekly, Sydney NSW) Nyngan Observer (NSW) OzENews Oberon Review (NSW) Pakenham Gazette (Pakenham, Victoria) Pakenham News (Pakenham, Victoria) Palmwoods District News (Sunshine Coast, Queensland) The Paper (Victoria) Parkes Champion-Post (NSW) Peninsula News (Gosford/Woy Woy/Umina/Hawkesbury, NSW) The Plains Producer (South Australia) Port Lincoln Times (South Australia) Port Macquarie News (NSW) The Post (Newcastle, NSW) Post Newspapers (Perth, WA) Q News (Queensland) The Queanbeyan Age (NSW) Queensland Country Life (Queensland) The Queensland Independent (Brisbane, Queensland) Queensland Muslim Times (Brisbane, Queensland) The Queensland Times (Ipswich) Rangers Trader Mail (Yarra Valley, Victoria) The Recorder (Port Pirie, South Australia) The Ridge News (Lightning Ridge, NSW) Riverine Herald (Echuca, Victoria) Roxburgh Park, Craigieburn Star (Roxburgh Park / Craigieburn, Victoria) Sada-e-Watan Sydney (Sydney, NSW) [In Urdu & English available] The Scone Advocate (NSW) Serendib News (National) Seymour Telegraph (Victoria) Shepparton News (Victoria) The Singleton Argus (NSW) Socialist Worker South Asia Times (Melbourne, Victoria) South Coast Register (Nowra, NSW) South Morang, Mill Park, Bundoora Star (South Morang / Mill Park / Bundoora, Victoria) Southern Free Times (Border NSW & Queensland) Southern Highland News (Bowral, NSW) Southern Riverina News (Victoria) The Spectator (Hamilton, Victoria) Springvale, Noble Park Star (Springvale / Noble Park, Victoria) St Albans, Deer Park, Caroline Springs Star (Melbourne, NSW) The Star (Newcastle, NSW) The Stawell Times-News (Victoria) Stock & Land Stock Journal Sada-e-Watan (Sydney, NSW) [In Urdu & English available] Summit Sun (Jindabyrne, NSW) Sun City News (Yanchep & Two Rocks, WA) The Sun-Herald (Sydney, NSW) Sunday Mail (Adelaide, South Australia) The Sunday Mail (Brisbane, Queensland) The Sunday Telegraph (NSW) The Sunday Times (Perth, Western Australia) Sunshine, Ardeer, Albion Star (Sunshine / Ardeer / Albion Victoria) The Sunshine Coast Daily (Queensland) The Surf Coast Times (Victoria) Surry Scene (Surry Hills, Redfern, NSW) Sydney Morning Herald (NSW) Tallaganda Times (NSW) Tenterfield Star (NSW) Thomastown, Epping, Lalor Star (Thomastown / Epping / Lalor, Victoria) Thursday Magnet (Eden, NSW) The Times (Victor Harbor, South Australia) The Top End Review (Northern Territory) Townsville Bulletin (Queensland) The Trading Post (National) The Transcontinential (Port Augusta, South Australia) Upper Yarra Mail (Yarra Valley, Victoria) Valley Times (NSW) The Village Journal (NSW) WA Business News (Perth, Western Australia) The Wagin Argus (Western Australia) The Warrandyte Diary (Victoria) Warren Advocate (NSW) Warwick Daily News (Queensland) The Warrnambool Standard (Warrnambool, Victoria) The Weekly Times (National) Wellington Times (NSW) The Werribee Banner (Werribee, Victoria) Werribee, Hoppers Crossing Star (Werribee / Hoppers Crossing, Victoria) The West Australian (Perth) West Coast Sentinal (Ceduna, South Australia) Westender (Brisbane, Queensland) Western Advocate (Bathurst, NSW) Western Australian Business News (Western Australia) The Western Echo (Brisbane) Whitsunday Times (Queensland) Whittlesea, Wallan, Kilmore Star (Whittlesea / Wallan / Kilmore, Victoria) Whyalla News (South Australia) Williamstown Advertiser (Melbourne, Victoria) Williamstown, Altona, Laverton Star (Williamstown / Altona / Laverton, Victoria) Wingham Chronicle (NSW) Workers Online (NSW) Yass Tribune (NSW) Yorke Peninsula Country Times (South Australia) The Young Witness (NSW) (cc) Wall Street Journal New York Stock Market European Union Nikita Khrushchev Boston Globe World News and World Report Afghanistan Iraq Lebanon Israel Turkey in the Straw New York Times Daily News Mirror Post Newsday Popular Mechanics 911 Conspiracy Britney Spears Roseanna Roseannadanna Hubble Space Travel Alan Mann University of Pennsylvania Allan Walker Johns Hopkins University alt.talk.creationism Saint Judas Iscariot Jmmanuel Billy Meier Michael Horn Extraterrestrials Roswell UFOs Clem Kadillehopper Larry King Live Ed Sullivan Lunar Prehistoric Evolution Intelligent Design Pamela Anderson Global Warming and a fond greeting to all our evolutionist friends... http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FOSSILS/SaveTheWhale.jpg |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
EXCLUSIVE PHOTO -- FIRST MAN IN THE MOON
I hope this latest improvement isn't too imposing of myself. Since I'm
one of those banished from posting into "sci.space.research", you may have to accommodate this contribution on my behalf, as you may have done before. In spite of what the mainstream status quo has had to say all of these decades, and that includes each and every one of their mainstream publishing puppets and otherwise infomercial-science for a buck such-ups like the Smithsonian and NOVA, I happen to know exactly where Venus was at the times that count, as basicially residing above that Apollo lunar horizon and unavoidably in the general direction of our sun, but Venus is not always to the inside of Earth as viewed from ththat physically dark moon. I also know that the GOOGLE/Usenet insider folks are still nothing but a Jewish collaborating Third Reich LLPOF cultism, of an absolute pagan and otherwise ******* minion collective that sucks and blows whenever they get the opportunity. The regular laws of physics that'll suit their Einstein, of orbital mechanics that never lies and of the replicated hard-science of Kodak is what proves that I'm right and that all others are not, just as it proves that such NASA/Apollo folks have been the worse possible liars from their very perpetrated cold-war get go. See you folks in court as we get around to publicly frying each of your sorry bigoted asses, and of every associated other such ass ******* of your incest mutated kind that we can get our hands on (and I bet you folks had thought being Islamic was a bad idea). In addition to all the other status quo of what's ongoing and up-hill flowing crapolla of those Smithsonian and of their NOVA and NASA/Apollo rusemasters of supposed wizards that we honest folks have to continually deal with, it seems we're stuck with the all-knowing likes of photographic wizard "George Evans" and as always that of lord "David Knisely" and "Sam Wormley" that'll systematically avoid and/or having excluded the truth at the drop of a typically Jewish hat. That recent contribution by Ed Conrad of the "SimplyMagic/TightFit.jpg" is certainly a good one of "Chris Krolczyk, former Smithsonian anthropologist (and anevolutionist, obviously) does his thing outside National Museum of Natural History. Krolczyk has left the Smithsonian to join a carnival" is impressive but otherwise a bit too much to ask for. Although, at each of their trials for crimes against humanity, we might require that you folks perform that very same act as part of your butt-ugly defense, because that's exactly where your incest bigoted head would have had to have been for the past 4 decades and counting, as your one and only viable defense. However, the rest of Ed Conrad's "RARE PHOTO OF FIRST MAN IN THE MOON -- FOX NEWS EXCLUSIVE" topic is also sharing the truth and nothing but the truth. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...86a2ae5fb3c491 or offered by this "EXCLUSIVE PHOTO -- FIRST MAN IN THE MOON" http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...326bc56dc99e86 Ed's 280 million year "old as coal" stuff goes right along with the sorts of notions that I've had about the evolution of complex humans taking much longer to having evolved, or perhaps as having somewhat recently de-evolved if taking our dip**** GW Bush into account, thereby much longer than any timeline of what Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution had suggested. Hundreds of millions if not billions of years sounds about right, unless we're dealing with some ET 4H efforts of creation that had been fooling around with a little intelligent design of their own, and having located a viable planet(Earth) as their dumping/disposal solution of accomplishing their biohazard isolation, so that we'd be technically sequestered and thereby couldn't so easily contaminate other species throughout this vast universe of truly intelligent life, or even so easily get ourselves to/from other planets within our solar system. But then no matters what, we still have to contend with the perverted sick mindset likes of our extremely brown nosed NASA/Apollo suck-ups as "George Evans", "David Knisely", "Sam Wormley" and of so many of their mutually incest mutated kind, that we'll simply have to one by one round up and deal with. George Evans; "So even from the earth, Venus is harder to spot than the moon. I would assume that holds true when standing within 10 feet of the moon." Your lordship "assume" wrong, especially pixel per pixel or via photographic film grain per grain is where that vibrant speck of a crescent Venus is obviously smaller but otherwise so much brighter than our physically dark moon. Sorry about that. I had only used such images of our moon as having other planets and a few stars like Spica as examples of what can be obtained within the same exposed frame that's having a look-see at that physically dark moon of ours. There are even NASA/Apollo images from lunar orbit of our moon and Earth within the same frame, and if you can see Earth along with our physically golden dark and otherwise mineral rich moon is what represents that the likes of having the much brighter though obviously smaller item of Venus and most any other planet that's within view is going to become unavoidably included, that is unless having been PhotoShop removed, or in the case of certain vibrant bluish stars as having been band-pass filtered out, or simply having been avoided at all cost. Ektachrome film demonstrated as having more than sufficient DR to work with (at least 9 f/stops worth), and those were unfiltered camera and lens applications that would have recorded into the UV-a spectrum. Therefore, you and others of your kind have no physics nor scientific basis for your side of this argument, unless the physics and science of either being dumbfounded or flat out lying counts. I've already posted those terrestrial obtained image URLs and so much more... I say forget about those atmospherically spectrum filtered and otherwise optically moderated terrestrial shots as having included our moon along with other planets and of a few stars as being within the same frame. I'd nicely asked of others, on multiple occasions none the less, as I'll ask of yourself; as observed From the moon, where's Venus? For an absolute certainty, on three of those Apollo missions it was sufficiently nearby and situated somewhere above that physically dark lunar horizon, and at the time of those three Apollo missions (11/14/16) it was not ever entirely hidden by the moon or Earth, and without a spectrum filtering atmosphere between is also why Venus was especially damn bright to that unfiltered Kodak eye, by as much a three fold brighter albedo than the spectrum of the albedo afforded by earthshine which absorbs a good deal of that UV-a spectrum (making Earth look as though somewhat bluish and Venus looking a bit violet), and since there's hardly any moderation nor spectrum filtration afforded by that wussy lunar atmosphere is exactly why the UV-a reflected off Venus should have been absolutely impressive to those unfiltered Kodak moments. As I'd stipulated before, Venus should have been unavoidably included in at least three Apollo missions of such extensive picture takings. Obviously that guano moon of their's that is dusted in portland cement and representing such a 0.55 to 0.65 reflective/retroreflective surface is simply not the real thing. I know for an absolute matter of replicated hard-science and of physics fact upon fact that Venus was not being nearly as stealth as were all of those WMD that each of your remorseless naysay kind had otherwise claimed existed. Of course, and only if you'd dare, you folks could easily have proven that I'm wrong, but obviously you can't afford to take that chance or that risk of essentially proving that I'm right. For certain, the truth and nothing but the truth is going rather nuts these days, just like our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) has gone far beyond nuts (more like 10+ trillion plus butt-loads of his collateral damage and the nearly endless carnage of the innocent, insane). With further regard to our seriously rad-hard Apollo astronauts having easily and rather unavoidably photographed a few sufficiently bright items other than the physically dark moon itself, and that of mother Earth that isn't half as humanly albedo bright as Venus and not a third as unfiltered Kodak moment bright, Brad Guth wrote: : Eliminating atmospheric filtration, and the matter of fact that the : unfiltered Kodak film was extremely sensitive to such blue, indigo, : violet, near-UV and even a bit of UV-a, by which the likes of the : Sirius star system has way more than it's fair share of such photons. kmmposting; Reference for that, please. KODAK, NASA, ESA, team KECK and just about any other source that's equally approved and replicated to death. BTW; Where the heck is all of that hard-science of what should have included moon sodium/salt and other tidbits of lead and the unavoidable radium deposits from our supposed moon samples? How can the likes of the moon's radium, lead and of so many other fundamental heavy elements have vanished? (certainly not into thin air) Why is having more gravity and of being such a much larger target of Mars offer a good hundred fold more of those relatively dark surface deposited meteorites per km2, plus having loads of secondary impact shards to show us? In other words, how the heck did our moon according to those NASA/Apollo EVA photographs get so devoid of meteorites and having depicted such few secondary shards? Why are those few and far between meteorites and secondary impact shards, that reside upon our passive guano and portand cement like moon, offering such low contrast (0.45~0.65 albedo), and otherwise w/o hardly any raw mineral colors? Why is that highly reflective if not selectively retroreflective moon-dust that's affording such a nice amount of surface-tension, as offering such terrific physical support of such good clumping compression capacity and/or simply robust, and otherwise so unusually shallow, especially when much smaller moons are way more covered in deep layers of their fluffy moon-dust that isn't the least bit compacted. Since the GSO environment of what our Van Allen belt can be worth 2e3 Sv/year, as based upon being shielded by 5/16" worth of 5086 aluminum, and since our naked moon has always been measurably worse off; How the heck did they do it? I had asked; "Where do you suppose all of that sodium/salt is coming from?" KMM; eh? KMM, You've got to be absolutely kidding, as even our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) isn't that dumbfounded. The well documented and even photographed 900,000 km comet like trail of that solar wind extracted element of sodium away from our moon isn't hardly a secret. In spite of that NASA/Apollo koran you worship; that physically dark and double IR roasted to death nasty moon of ours is still as salty as all get out. Though "KMM" has provided those nice infomercial-science links of what we've all been informed of and thus knew about for decades, and otherwise more of those unfiltered Kodak moments of that guano moon that's so lightly dusted in such a thin layer of portland cement that's so bone-dry yet clumping and/or as having been selectively retroreflective under such nifty xenon lamp illumination to boot. Thanks ever so much. I'll ask again as to what's so complicated or otherwise taboo/nondisclosure about honest folks sharing the truth and nothing but the truth? What's so unusable or otherwise taboo about the regular laws of physics and of the sorts of hard-science that's fully replicated? What's so unlikely about various individuals of great wealth and power and/or of their puppet governments as having made mistakes or simply having been favorably dishonest, greedy and highly bigoted? What's your all-knowing expertise or best SWAG of an answer as to each of these pesky "blue-screen" frames? http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/ap...m/magazine/?73 http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/ap...?AS14-73-10182 http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/ap...m/magazine/?72 What's your all-knowing best answers to their having photographed a greater than half illuminated Earth along with their highly reflective moon as having been well past sunrise, and otherwise that of having recorded such an unusually slim crescent of Earth as photographed from the moon? http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...-134-20384.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...87-cropped.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...4/20149603.jpg http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/ap.../?AS14-66-9329 http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/ap.../?AS14-66-9331 Once again; WHERE's VENUS ? On at least three Apollo missions of A-11, A-14, A-16, and especially since you've all had access to the very best supercomputer and of the fully interactive 3D solar system simulator that'll fully render a very photographically realistic (AKA true to life) representation of nearly all there is as viewed from anywhere at any date and time: Where's Venus, as having been viewed from the moon? While you're at it, utilizing that absolutely nifty supercomputer of ours, and of using that fully interactive 3D capable rendering software of what that absolutely nifty solar system simulator of ours can accommodate; where's the likes of the super-bright and otherwise extreem bluish/violet Sirius star system throughout all of those APOLLO and of so many other robotic missions before and especially of those after having at least an extra 4 db or 16 fold better worth of dynamic range to offer (these days a few of the 16 db capable CCDs are available as also having been in orbit and otherwise 100+% bought and paid for by public dollars, as well as via tax-avoidance dollars (thereby same as public dollars)? I bet that you folks are not about to tell us village idiots what the unfiltered Kodak photographic recorded difference is between that of using a xenon lamp spectrum and that of having to deal with the raw solar illumination spectrum. In that case I and Kodak or that of other film manufactures will gladly share and share alike. Here's another trick question; With a view of Earth situated within the same frame as obtained from orbit; Why is that moon of ours of such a deeply rich composite of golden brown tinted or soot coated basalts and of various other dark element deposits as having been viewed from orbit, and otherwise entirely of such clean portland cement and of somewhat lighter contrasting substances that's absolutely colorless and even somewhat selectively retroreflective as having been viewed from the surface? BTW No.2; Ed Conrad (http://www.edconrad.com/) has been saying all along that man, or at least of something very human or perhaps ET like, is at the very least as old as coal, and that we haven't yet walked on that physically dark and nasty moon of ours. got it? If walking upon that physically nasty and unavoidably sooty dark mineral and complex meteorite rich moon of ours (representing our best available solar/cosmic morgue that has to include loads of dead spores), besides that environment being extremely electrostatic dusty as all get out (tens of meters in fluffy depth none the less), I want you folks to think Van Allen belt and TBI dosage nasty, as in GSO times ten = 2e4 Sv/year while having been shielded by 5/16" worth of 5086 aluminum (~2 g/cm2). Gee whiz, folks, that's only worth 228 rads/hr. On a truly bad solar day you can go with that dosage being another ten fold worse off, and if it's a rare but totally passive solar day there's no chance in hell of that daytime surface environment offering less than 23 rads/hr and perhaps at best 2.3 rads/hr by way of the gamma and unavoidable secondary/recoil in hard-X-rays of the cosmic nighttime/earthshine environment while shielded by that same 2 g/cm2. Either way, I'm thinking that you'd best have that personal cash of banked bone marrow standing by, and perhaps a few of those vital spare body parts just in case things get a little nastier than you'd planned on. I would also advise that you learn braille and get yourself a good dog, especially since you could soon become blind. - Brad Guth |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
EXCLUSIVE PHOTO -- FIRST MAN IN THE MOON
Ed Conrad,
I hope this latest topic contribution, as yet another gradual word by word improvement, isn't too imposing of myself. BTW; I'm still banished from "sci.space.research", but perhaps you can fix that part on my behalf. In spite of what this GOOGLE accommodated Usenet and of what their mainstream status quo has had to say all of these decades, and that includes each and every one of their mainstream publishing puppets and otherwise infomercial-science for a buck of suck-ups like the Smithsonian and NOVA, I happen to know exactly where Venus was at the times that count, as basically residing above that Apollo lunar horizon and unavoidably in the general direction of our sun, but Venus is not always to the inside of Earth as viewed from that physically dark moon. I also know that the GOOGLE/Usenet insider folks are still nothing but a Jewish collaborating Third Reich LLPOF cultism, of an absolute pagan and otherwise ******* minion collective that sucks and blows whenever they get the opportunity. The regular laws of physics that'll suit their Einstein, of orbital mechanics that never lies and of the replicated hard-science of Kodak is what proves that I'm right and that all others are not, just as it proves that such NASA/Apollo folks have been the worse possible liars from their very perpetrated cold-war get go. See you folks in court as we get around to publicly frying each of your sorry bigoted asses, and of every associated other such ass ******* of your incest mutated kind that we can get our hands on (and I bet you folks had thought being Islamic was a bad idea). In addition to all the other status quo of what's ongoing and up-hill flowing crapolla of those Smithsonian and of their NOVA and NASA/Apollo rusemasters of supposed wizards that we honest folks have to continually deal with, it seems we're stuck with the all-knowing likes of photographic wizard "George Evans" and as always that of lord "David Knisely" and "Sam Wormley" that'll systematically avoid and/or having excluded the truth at the drop of a typically Jewish hat. That recent contribution by Ed Conrad of the "SimplyMagic/TightFit.jpg" is certainly a good one of "Chris Krolczyk, former Smithsonian anthropologist (and anevolutionist, obviously) does his thing outside National Museum of Natural History. Krolczyk has left the Smithsonian to join a carnival" is impressive but otherwise a bit too much to ask for. Although, at each of their trials for crimes against humanity, we might require that you folks perform that very same act as part of your butt-ugly defense, because that's exactly where your incest bigoted head would have had to have been for the past 4 decades and counting, as your one and only viable defense. However, the rest of Ed Conrad's "RARE PHOTO OF FIRST MAN IN THE MOON -- FOX NEWS EXCLUSIVE" topic is also sharing the truth and nothing but the truth. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...86a2ae5fb3c491 or offered by this "EXCLUSIVE PHOTO -- FIRST MAN IN THE MOON" http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...326bc56dc99e86 Ed's 280 million year "old as coal" stuff goes right along with the sorts of notions that I've had about the evolution of complex humans taking much longer to having evolved, or perhaps as having somewhat recently de-evolved if taking our dip**** warlord(GW Bush) into account, thereby much longer than any timeline of what Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution had suggested. Hundreds of millions if not billions of years sounds about right, unless we're dealing with some ET 4H efforts of creation that had been fooling around with a little intelligent design of their own, and having located a viable planet(Earth) as their dumping/disposal solution of accomplishing their biohazard isolation, so that we'd be technically sequestered and thereby couldn't so easily contaminate other species throughout this vast universe of truly intelligent life, or even so easily get ourselves to/from other planets within our solar system. But then no matters what, we still have to contend with the perverted sick mindset likes of our extremely brown nosed NASA/Apollo suck-ups as "George Evans", "David Knisely", "Sam Wormley" and of so many of their mutually incest mutated kind, that we'll simply have to one by one round up and deal with. George Evans; "So even from the earth, Venus is harder to spot than the moon. I would assume that holds true when standing within 10 feet of the moon." Your lordship "assume" wrong, especially pixel per pixel or via photographic film grain per grain is where that vibrant speck of a crescent Venus is obviously smaller but otherwise so much brighter than our physically dark moon. Sorry about that. I had only used such images of our moon as having other planets and a few stars like Spica as examples of what can be obtained within the same exposed frame that's having a look-see at that physically dark moon of ours. There are even NASA/Apollo images from lunar orbit of our moon and Earth within the same frame, and if you can see Earth along with our physically golden dark and otherwise mineral rich moon is what represents that the likes of having the much brighter though obviously smaller item of Venus and most any other planet that's within view is going to become unavoidably included, that is unless having been PhotoShop removed, or in the case of certain vibrant bluish stars as having been band-pass filtered out, or simply having been avoided at all cost. Ektachrome film demonstrated as having more than sufficient DR to work with (at least 9 f/stops worth), and those were unfiltered camera and lens applications that would have recorded into the UV-a spectrum. Therefore, you and others of your kind have no physics nor scientific basis for your side of this argument, unless the physics and science of either being dumbfounded or flat out lying counts. I've already posted those terrestrial obtained image URLs and so much more... I say forget about those atmospherically spectrum filtered and otherwise optically moderated terrestrial shots as having included our moon along with other planets and of a few stars as being within the same frame. I'd nicely asked of others, on multiple occasions none the less, as I'll ask of yourself; as observed From the moon, where's Venus? For an absolute certainty, on three of those Apollo missions it was sufficiently nearby and situated somewhere above that physically dark lunar horizon, and at the time of those three Apollo missions (11/14/16) it was not ever entirely hidden by the moon or Earth, and without a spectrum filtering atmosphere between is also why Venus was especially damn bright to that unfiltered Kodak eye, by as much a three fold brighter albedo than the spectrum of the albedo afforded by earthshine which absorbs a good deal of that UV-a spectrum (making Earth look as though somewhat bluish and Venus looking a bit violet), and since there's hardly any moderation nor spectrum filtration afforded by that wussy lunar atmosphere is exactly why the UV-a reflected off Venus should have been absolutely impressive to those unfiltered Kodak moments. As I'd stipulated before, Venus should have been unavoidably included in at least three Apollo missions of such extensive picture takings. Obviously that guano moon of their's that is dusted in portland cement and representing such a 0.55 to 0.65 reflective/retroreflective surface is simply not the real thing. I know for an absolute matter of replicated hard-science and of physics fact upon fact that Venus was not being nearly as stealth as were all of those WMD that each of your remorseless naysay kind had otherwise claimed existed. Of course, and only if you'd dare, you folks could easily have proven that I'm wrong, but obviously you can't afford to take that chance or that risk of essentially proving that I'm right. For certain, the truth and nothing but the truth is going rather nuts these days, just like our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) has gone far beyond nuts (more like 10+ trillion plus butt-loads of his collateral damage and the nearly endless carnage of the innocent, insane). With further regard to our seriously rad-hard Apollo astronauts having easily and rather unavoidably photographed a few sufficiently bright items other than the physically dark moon itself, and that of mother Earth that isn't half as humanly albedo bright as Venus and not a third as unfiltered Kodak moment bright, Brad Guth wrote: : Eliminating atmospheric filtration, and the matter of fact that the : unfiltered Kodak film was extremely sensitive to such blue, indigo, : violet, near-UV and even a bit of UV-a, by which the likes of the : Sirius star system has way more than it's fair share of such photons. kmmposting; Reference for that, please. KODAK, NASA, ESA, team KECK and just about any other source that's equally approved and replicated to death. BTW; Where the heck is all of that hard-science of what should have included moon sodium/salt and other tidbits of lead and the unavoidable radium deposits from our supposed moon samples? How can the likes of the moon's radium, lead and of so many other fundamental heavy elements have vanished? (certainly not into thin air) Why is having more gravity and of being such a much larger target of Mars offer a good hundred fold more of those relatively dark surface deposited meteorites per km2, plus having loads of secondary impact shards to show us? In other words, how the heck did our moon according to those NASA/Apollo EVA photographs get so devoid of meteorites and having depicted such few secondary shards? Why are those few and far between meteorites and secondary impact shards, that reside upon our passive guano and portand cement like moon, offering such low contrast (0.45~0.65 albedo), and otherwise w/o hardly any raw mineral colors? Why is that highly reflective if not selectively retroreflective moon-dust that's affording such a nice amount of surface-tension, as offering such terrific physical support of such good clumping compression capacity and/or simply robust, and otherwise so unusually shallow, especially when much smaller moons are way more covered in deep layers of their fluffy moon-dust that isn't the least bit compacted. Since the GSO environment of what our Van Allen belt can be worth 2e3 Sv/year, as based upon being shielded by 5/16" worth of 5086 aluminum, and since our naked moon has always been measurably worse off; How the heck did they do it? I had asked; "Where do you suppose all of that sodium/salt is coming from?" KMM; eh? KMM, You've got to be absolutely kidding, as even our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) isn't that dumbfounded. The well documented and even photographed 900,000 km comet like trail of that solar wind extracted element of sodium away from our moon isn't hardly a secret. In spite of that NASA/Apollo koran you worship; that physically dark and double IR roasted to death nasty moon of ours is still as salty as all get out. Though "KMM" has provided those nice infomercial-science links of what we've all been informed of and thus knew about for decades, and otherwise more of those unfiltered Kodak moments of that guano moon that's so lightly dusted in such a thin layer of portland cement that's so bone-dry yet clumping and/or as having been selectively retroreflective under such nifty xenon lamp illumination to boot. Thanks ever so much. I'll ask again as to what's so complicated or otherwise taboo/nondisclosure about honest folks sharing the truth and nothing but the truth? What's so unusable or otherwise taboo about the regular laws of physics and of the sorts of hard-science that's fully replicated? What's so unlikely about various individuals of great wealth and power and/or of their puppet governments as having made mistakes or simply having been favorably dishonest, greedy and highly bigoted? What's your all-knowing expertise or best SWAG of an answer as to each of these pesky "blue-screen" frames? http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/ap...m/magazine/?73 http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/ap...?AS14-73-10182 http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/ap...m/magazine/?72 What's your all-knowing best answers to their having photographed a greater than half illuminated Earth along with their highly reflective moon as having been well past sunrise, and otherwise that of having recorded such an unusually slim crescent of Earth as photographed from the moon? http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...-134-20384.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...87-cropped.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...4/20149603.jpg http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/ap.../?AS14-66-9329 http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/ap.../?AS14-66-9331 Once again; WHERE's VENUS ? On at least three Apollo missions of A-11, A-14, A-16, and especially since you've all had access to the very best supercomputer and of the fully interactive 3D solar system simulator that'll fully render a very photographically realistic (AKA true to life) representation of nearly all there is as viewed from anywhere at any date and time: Where's Venus, as having been viewed from the moon? While you're at it, utilizing that absolutely nifty supercomputer of ours, and of using that fully interactive 3D capable rendering software of what that absolutely nifty solar system simulator of ours can accommodate; where's the likes of the super-bright and otherwise extreem bluish/violet Sirius star system throughout all of those APOLLO and of so many other robotic missions before and especially of those after having at least an extra 4 db or 16 fold better worth of dynamic range to offer (these days a few of the 16 db capable CCDs are available as also having been in orbit and otherwise 100+% bought and paid for by public dollars, as well as via tax-avoidance dollars (thereby same as public dollars)? I bet that you folks are not about to tell us village idiots what the unfiltered Kodak photographic recorded difference is between that of using a xenon lamp spectrum and that of having to deal with the raw solar illumination spectrum. In that case I and Kodak or that of other film manufactures will gladly share and share alike. Here's another trick question; With a view of Earth situated within the same frame as obtained from orbit; Why is that moon of ours of such a deeply rich composite of golden brown tinted or soot coated basalts and of various other dark element deposits as having been viewed from orbit, and otherwise entirely of such clean portland cement and of somewhat lighter contrasting substances that's absolutely colorless and even somewhat selectively retroreflective as having been viewed from the surface? BTW No.2; Ed Conrad (http://www.edconrad.com/) has been saying all along that man, or at least of something very human or perhaps ET like, is at the very least as old as coal, and that we haven't yet walked on that physically dark and nasty moon of ours. got it? If walking upon that physically nasty and unavoidably sooty dark mineral and complex meteorite rich moon of ours (representing our best available solar/cosmic morgue that has to include loads of dead spores), besides that environment being extremely electrostatic dusty as all get out (tens of meters in fluffy depth none the less), I want you folks to think Van Allen belt and TBI dosage nasty, as in GSO times ten = 2e4 Sv/year while having been shielded by 5/16" worth of 5086 aluminum (~2 g/cm2). Gee whiz, folks, that's only worth 228 rads/hr. On a truly bad solar day you can go with that dosage being another ten fold worse off, and if it's a rare but totally passive solar day there's no chance in hell of that daytime surface environment offering less than 23 rads/hr and perhaps at best 2.3 rads/hr by way of the gamma and unavoidable secondary/recoil in hard-X-rays of the cosmic nighttime/earthshine environment while shielded by that same 2 g/cm2. Either way, I'm thinking that you'd best have that personal cash of banked bone marrow standing by, and perhaps a few of those vital spare body parts just in case things get a little nastier than you'd planned on. I would also advise that you learn braille and get yourself a good dog, especially since you could soon become blind. - Brad Guth ---------------- Scott Hedrick wrote: Doesn't matter- the developer would be involved in the conspiracy. So, how hard is that to accomplish under their nondisclosure penalty of death? I don't believe any of that moon-film ever came back to Earth, not even the stuff from merely being in orbit. After all, onboard developing and scanning was entirely doable, especially by the time of Apollo-10, and would have been essential in order to keep from losing so much due to radiation. - Brad Guth ----------------- Sam Wormley, Good christ almighty on another stick. You sorry naysay son of a bitch. What a God damn F-ing liar, liar, pants on fire of an incest cloned Third Reich collaborating bigot. You are even worse than our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush), and he's worse off than Hitler. You have known all along, as in damn good and well that the vibrant crescent of Venus would have been absolutely unavoidable, as do all others of your kind know that we've been lied to by those having "the right stuff", except that your actions have been far worse than they have been. What part of raping humanity for all it's worth is accepted and promoted within your Jewish koran? - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification | [email protected] | Misc | 57 | July 14th 06 10:43 AM |
Meteorite Collision | Warhol | Misc | 71 | July 11th 06 04:55 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | CAPCOM | Astronomy Misc | 16 | February 21st 06 01:07 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | UK Astronomy | 8 | August 1st 04 09:08 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 29th 04 06:14 AM |