|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe you sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro readers can explain this
"Common Man" wrote in message news.com... Note to the readers of sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro: Pearl is a regular in the alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian newsgroup and claims that the earth could be hollow. She goes on to claim that this could have been caused by a rapidly spinning early earth. I've tried to explain (without success) that such a rapidly spinning body would flatten out rather than become hollow. If any of you wish to take a crack at explaining this to her, feel free. For Pearl: Evidence that a rapidly spinning object would flatten out, not become hollow. See: http://www.govertschilling.nl/artike.../030612_sc.htm You have overlooked one important factor - the strength of the earths crust. Let us look at both scenarios and assume that the earth's inner core consists of molten lava or some other malleable substance. Take a tennis ball with a soft outer case, spin it up to say 5,000rpm and it would indeed tend to flatten and not be sphere Take a snooker ball and apply the same 5,000rpm and it would remain a perfect sphere. In either case the inner soft core would be driven by centrifugal force and compacted towards the outer shell. If we assume you are correct the earth would be not be circular, should Pearl be correct the earth would remain a sphere. The shape would be dependent upon the thickness and strength of the earth's crust at the time of acceleration. [BUT] In either case we are left with a central void, home to the inner earth beings. My argument is an extension of the above. The rotational speed was much faster (say some 20,000rpm) and the earth was flattened out until it resembled a disc i.e. a 'Flat Earth'. The 'beings' still exist, but they live on the bottom side. The 'beings are easily rerecognizable, they are about 4' tall, wear funny hats, have shocking personal hygiene and a strong propensity to stalk and verbally abuse woman. Their only contact with the real world is via a strange force known as 'EarthLink' They are best left alone. This also explains the extinction of the dinosaurs - the poor buggers were cast into outer space. It also serves to illustrate the serious side effects of almost 5 years posting to this newsgroup. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe you sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro readers can explainthis
Ray wrote:
snip My argument is an extension of the above. The rotational speed was much faster (say some 20,000rpm) and the earth was flattened out until it resembled a disc i.e. a 'Flat Earth'. The 'beings' still exist, but they live on the bottom side. The 'beings are easily rerecognizable, they are about 4' tall, wear funny hats, have shocking personal hygiene and a strong propensity to stalk and verbally abuse woman. Their only contact with the real world is via a strange force known as 'EarthLink' They are best left alone. Ray, This has been exhaustively studied by the great cosmologist/geologist/sociologist Terry Pratchett. He has documented his findings in a series of texts that many have misunderstood as fiction. They are not. One ignores the Truths (tm) He reveals at one's peril. snip It also serves to illustrate the serious side effects of almost 5 years posting to this newsgroup. Init the truth :-) Tom McDonald |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe you sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro readers can explainthis
Ray wrote:
snip My argument is an extension of the above. The rotational speed was much faster (say some 20,000rpm) and the earth was flattened out until it resembled a disc i.e. a 'Flat Earth'. The 'beings' still exist, but they live on the bottom side. The 'beings are easily rerecognizable, they are about 4' tall, wear funny hats, have shocking personal hygiene and a strong propensity to stalk and verbally abuse woman. Their only contact with the real world is via a strange force known as 'EarthLink' They are best left alone. Ray, This has been exhaustively studied by the great cosmologist/geologist/sociologist Terry Pratchett. He has documented his findings in a series of texts that many have misunderstood as fiction. They are not. One ignores the Truths (tm) He reveals at one's peril. snip It also serves to illustrate the serious side effects of almost 5 years posting to this newsgroup. Init the truth :-) Tom McDonald |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Maybe you sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro readers can explain this | Davoud | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | July 2nd 04 04:35 AM |
Maybe you sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro readers can explain this | Tom Hole | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | July 1st 04 12:00 AM |