Hear No Evil, See No Evil / Brad Guth

On Monday, June 3, 2013 12:02:16 PM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote:
It’s the job of a few to make these public Usenet/newsgroups as K-12

unfriendly and/or media undesirable as well as generally as raunchy X-

rated as possible. These individuals are actually one and the same

bully-naysayers and FUD-masters that systematically topic/author stalk

and trash upon anyone with an original idea or discovery of any

significance or potential of significance, because it seems they want

not an independent soul and/or private author or researcher to ever

get mainstream attention or otherwise noticed by others, much less

receiving any official public support.



Of course, for the past 12+ years I’ve been telling of this

interpretation of our public Usenet/newsgroup media being

systematically trashed because, it seems this public Usenet community

that’s merged along with Google Groups and Groups+ has simply become

too easily accessible by K12s and others, that nowadays via social

networking could possibly take notice of our topics and replies on

subjects of science, physics, politics, social networking and general

newsworthy issues, and it seems the oligarchs in charge of whatever we

get to read and interpret as truly independent of whatever these

oligarchs desire, is an obvious status quo damage-control situation

that can’t be let to evolve or flourish on its own, much less given

any direct benefits that would become K-12 and higher educated

attracting to those looking for the best available science and the

most independent interpretations of newsworthy topics, because these

oligarchs in charge of our government and the mainstream media

(including moderated reference material and public school textbooks)

are clearly so very much afraid of what we independent outsiders might

have to say.



Newsgroup "alt.astronomy" seems to be a Usenet Mecca of what the

mainstream status-quo of their oligarch holy grail matrix thinks is

utmost imperative to topic/author stalk and bash for all they can

muster.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a...y/topics?hl=en



For example, the mainstream of physics and science wants to exclude,

banish and/or obfuscate as to allowing any possibility of captured

moons, planetoids or planets, even though the merging of entire

galaxies is commonplace and otherwise perfectly obvious. Apparently

those laws of physics are conditional, and all public derived science

has to be mainstream moderated by the oligarchs before any of it

becomes viable, and the same status-quo gauntlet of applied

obfuscation(evidence excluding), nay-say and nondisclosure applies for

any potential exploitation of anything involving our moon or Venus.



Be my guest and apply your very own photographic enlargement software,

as to viewing this one small but rather interesting mountainous area

of Venus, using your independent deductive expertise as to enlarge or

magnify this extensively mountainous terrain of Venus that I’ve

focused upon, really shouldn’t be asking too much. Most of modern

PhotoZoom and numerous other photographic software variations tend to

accomplish this enlargement process automatically (including iPhone

and Safari image zooming), although some extra applied filtering and

thereby image enhancing for dynamic range compensations (aka contrast)

can further improve upon the end result (no direct pixel modifications

should ever be necessary, because it’s all a derivative from the

original Magellan radar imaging of 36 confirming radar scans/pixel,

that can always be 100% verified).



“GuthVenus” 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in

question:

https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...18595926178146



http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif



https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...8634/BradGuth#

http://translate.google.com/#

Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/”Guth

Venus”, GuthVenus

It's not just about Usenet/newsgroups and even G+ getting tormented and trashed by mainstream FUD-masters at every opportunity, but also about the exploitation of humanity and the ongoing path of systematically trashing the global biodiversity, as put at risk of getting us past the point of no return, which of course includes multiple GW+AGW issues.

Arctic and Antarctic ice melts from the bottom up.

I’ve been saying this exact same thing for years (going on a decade), as always based upon the accepted physics of geothermal upwelling heat plus tidal modulation (128 mw/m2) and using the best available science for deductively connecting the dots of GW and AGW issues. Never the less, the usual gauntlet of Usenet/newsgroup FUD-masters were always hell bent upon not having any of it.

http://news.yahoo.com/antarctic-ice-...180508023.html

“The study, published today (June 13) in the journal Science, found that on average, Antarctica's ice shelves are thinning by about 1.6 feet (50 centimeters) per year. But some of them are thinning much more quickly, by as much as 328 feet (100 meters) annually, said Eric Rignot, a study co-author and researcher at the University of California, Irvine. [Album: Stunning Photos of Antarctic Ice]”

"These changes are faster and larger than anything people anticipated,"

That average melt of 1.6 feet (.5 m) per year, especially considering the vast area of the Antarctic ice shelf represents a lot of volume: 1.5e12 m2 X .5 = .75e12 m3

In terms of the thermodynamics of solid water(ice) getting liquified is a substantial amount of stored energy transferred or released into our global surface environment which needs as much glacial ice as it can muster. Even as little as a one degree consideration of the annual volume of ice as having melted, when applied to the the vast underside area of ice is going to be an impressive issue, because the .75e12 m3/year contributed by the Antarctic ice shelf is literally just the tip of the global iceberg, that’s with few exceptions melting and/or calving and otherwise vaporizing or evaporating from most every direction, and it takes a great deal of applied energy in order to accomplish this ongoing activity.

With that sort of ongoing melt in addition to surface ice volume losses and a great deal of associated surface erosions continually going into the drink, it will not take long before increased calving and surface erosion run-offs place half of Florida underwater and most of Yew York City turning into a larger version of Venice.

Of course the combined Antarctic shelf, considerable Arctic sea ice thinning and Greenland shelf ice melting from the bottom up is not going to add any measurable volume to our oceans, however its loss of volume will further accelerate the calving of icebergs and surface ice loss that’ll unavoidably contribute to the sorts of nasty and lethal weather extremes which the oligarchs could naturally care less about.

At least the planet Venus is lucky, by having a terrifically protective atmosphere but not any ice to melt or to otherwise help stabilize or otherwise moderate its global environment. This doesn't preclude sufficiently smart individuals and their applied technology from taking advantage of what Venus has to offer, but in the case of Earth humans that still can't manage to get along without continual bloodshed and all sorts of consequences plus Karma revenge issues, there's probably not any chance in hell of us humans dealing with the likes of what Venus has to offer.