|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Focal length of Sun's gravitational lens
I have been thinking this through quite hard, but I got nowhere
I know that stars and nebulae close to the solar disk in the sky get warped in their position because general relativity dictates that the Sun's gravitational field can perturb the path of the rays. But the question I have is can the Sun's gravitational field act as a magnifier to focus more of the light from stars onto the earth? Does the Sun's gravitational lens have a focal length of 1 astronomical unit? If so how many degrees does a star have to be within from the center of the solar disk in order for its magnified image to be focused upon the Earth? I'd really apprecite any advice to me. Cordially invited replies. Thank you! Thank you! ) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Focal length of Sun's gravitational lens
On Mar 6, 4:31*pm, wrote:
I have been thinking this through quite hard, but I got nowhere I know that stars and nebulae close to the solar disk in the sky get warped in their position because general relativity dictates that the Sun's gravitational field can perturb the path of the rays. But the question I have is can the Sun's gravitational field act as a magnifier to focus more of the light from stars onto the earth? Does the Sun's gravitational lens have a focal length of 1 astronomical unit? If so how many degrees does a star have to be within from the center of the solar disk in order for its magnified image to be focused upon the Earth? I'd really apprecite any advice to me. Cordially invited replies. Thank you! Thank you! ) There are two other people around here from the UK, I am not one of them. 92 percent opposed the Iraq war, and over time that number moved sharply toward 100 percent, currently at 99.9 percent and 0.1 percent are still playing secret government crab and CCTV Der Kommissar. Is it for the government? I poop in your society's big brother. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Focal length of Sun's gravitational lens
On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:31:18 -0800, deloitetouche wrote:
I have been thinking this through quite hard, but I got nowhere I know that stars and nebulae close to the solar disk in the sky get warped in their position because general relativity dictates that the Sun's gravitational field can perturb the path of the rays. But the question I have is can the Sun's gravitational field act as a magnifier to focus more of the light from stars onto the earth? Does the Sun's gravitational lens have a focal length of 1 astronomical unit? If so how many degrees does a star have to be within from the center of the solar disk in order for its magnified image to be focused upon the Earth? I'd really apprecite any advice to me. Cordially invited replies. Thank you! Thank you! ) (Comments to trolls included in parentheses.) You can figure this out from observational data and very simple math without ever invoking any of Einstein's reasoning. (This allows us to avoid yet another damn' 100-post long flamewar. Not that I think that will happen.) To begin with, its focal length will vary depending on how far the light passes from the center of the Sun, because a lightray passing near the Sun will be deflected more than one passing it farther away. That is to say, the focal length will be shorter for light passing the Sun's limb than for light passing it at a greater distance from its center. That is, a gravity well is pretty much a non-imaging lens. Next, the focal length of a lens is the harmonic mean of the distance from the object being imaged to the virtual image which the lens forms. For an object at a very great distance, the distance to the virtual image approaches the focal length. Finally, observations during Solar eclipses tell us the angle by which starlight passing the Sun's limb is deflected. (Again, guys, actual, repeated observations made by actual people with perfectly good telescopes, so let's not have a lot of horse**** about how gravity can't possibly deflect light.) So... Look up the aforementioned angle. You can find the number on myriad Web sites. Then do a little trigonometry: find the height of a right triangle whose base is the radius of the sun and whose other base angle is 90 degrees minus the starlight's deflection angle. If you don't know trig, many math Web sites will have a diagram of a similar situation captioned with the appropriate formula. The height of this triangle is the focal length of that part of the Sun's gravity well near its surface. If you dig around some you may even find deflection angles for greater distances from the Solar limb. They will be smaller, so the triangle will be taller, hence the focal length at that radius from the Sun's center will be longer. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Focal length of Sun's gravitational lens
Dear deloitetouche:
wrote in message ... .... I know that stars and nebulae close to the solar disk in the sky get warped in their position because general relativity dictates that the Sun's gravitational field can perturb the path of the rays. GR does not dictate that. GR describes what Nature does. But the question I have is can the Sun's gravitational field act as a magnifier to focus more of the light from stars onto the earth? No. The most that gravity can do for any mass, is create Einstein rings, and they are not specular images. .... I'd really apprecite any advice to me. Cordially invited replies. Thank you! Thank you! ) In the case of the Sun, you'd have to crush it down to below a neutron star's diameter so that the Einstein rings would be outside matter. Otherwise, all you get is a displaced image. David A. Smith |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Focal length of Sun's gravitational lens
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Focal length of Sun's gravitational lens
In article ,
wrote: I have been thinking this through quite hard, but I got nowhere I know that stars and nebulae close to the solar disk in the sky get warped in their position because general relativity dictates that the Sun's gravitational field can perturb the path of the rays. But the question I have is can the Sun's gravitational field act as a magnifier to focus more of the light from stars onto the earth? Does the Sun's gravitational lens have a focal length of 1 astronomical unit? :-) .... no! Any "focal length" would be more like a hundred thousand to a million astronomical units, i.e. several light years. Also, the "gravitational lens" of the Sun (or any other large mass) doesn't qork quite like an optical lens. On an optical lens the deflection is larger further away from the optical axis all the way out to the rim of the lens. It must be that way, or else parallell light would not be refracted into a single focal point. In the case of the Sun (or any other large mass), the deflection is larger the closer to the Sun's surface the light ray passes. And there is no well-defined "rim" of the "lens" - the deflection just drops off continuously the further away from the Sun the light ray passes. This also means that this "lens" has no well-defined focal length. If so how many degrees does a star have to be within from the center of the solar disk in order for its magnified image to be focused upon the Earth? I'd really apprecite any advice to me. Cordially invited replies. Thank you! Thank you! ) -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN e-mail: pausch at stjarnhimlen dot se WWW: http://stjarnhimlen.se/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Focal length of Sun's gravitational lens
In article ,
jerry warner wrote: wrote: I have been thinking this through quite hard, but I got nowhere I know that stars and nebulae close to the solar disk in the sky get warped in their position because general relativity dictates that the Sun's gravitational field can perturb the path of the rays. But the question I have is can the Sun's gravitational field act as a magnifier to focus more of the light from stars onto the earth? Does the Sun's gravitational lens have a focal length of 1 astronomical unit? If so how many degrees does a star have to be within from the center of the solar disk in order for its magnified image to be focused upon the Earth? I'd really apprecite any advice to me. Cordially invited replies. Try a star with greater mass .... much greater mass. Much much much much greater mass. Concentrate on mass. The answer is in mass. No known stars have a large enough mass - you'd need a heavy black hole for that to happen. And if a large enough black hole would somehow replace the Sun, then the Earth would be in trouble.... Thank you! Thank you! ) -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN e-mail: pausch at stjarnhimlen dot se WWW: http://stjarnhimlen.se/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Focal length of Sun's gravitational lens
On Mar 6, 4:31*pm, wrote:
I have been thinking this through quite hard, but I got nowhere I know that stars and nebulae close to the solar disk in the sky get warped in their position because general relativity dictates that the Sun's gravitational field can perturb the path of the rays. But the question I have is can the Sun's gravitational field act as a magnifier to focus more of the light from stars onto the earth? Does the Sun's gravitational lens have a focal length of 1 astronomical unit? If so how many degrees does a star have to be within from the center of the solar disk in order for its magnified image to be focused upon the Earth? I'd really apprecite any advice to me. Cordially invited replies. Thank you! Thank you! ) There are two other people around here from the UK, I am not one of them. 92 percent opposed the Iraq war, and over time that number moved sharply toward 100 percent, currently at 99.9 percent and 0.1 percent are still playing secret government crab and CCTV Der Kommissar. Is it for the government? I poop in your society's big brother. Suck Ceausescu buttcrack. I am watching you English. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Focal length of Sun's gravitational lens
On Mar 6, 4:31*pm, wrote:
I have been thinking this through quite hard, but I got nowhere I know that stars and nebulae close to the solar disk in the sky get warped in their position because general relativity dictates that the Sun's gravitational field can perturb the path of the rays. But the question I have is can the Sun's gravitational field act as a magnifier to focus more of the light from stars onto the earth? Does the Sun's gravitational lens have a focal length of 1 astronomical unit? If so how many degrees does a star have to be within from the center of the solar disk in order for its magnified image to be focused upon the Earth? I'd really apprecite any advice to me. Cordially invited replies. Thank you! Thank you! ) There are two other people around here from the UK, I am not one of them. 92 percent opposed the Iraq war, and over time that number moved sharply toward 100 percent, currently at 99.9 percent and 0.1 percent are still playing secret government crab and CCTV Der Kommissar. Is it for the government? I poop in your society's big brother. Suck Ceausescu buttcrack. I am watching you English. This is not racist South Africa where people can be institutionally followed. CCTV cameras allow use of remote control to follow people on one's home television set through networked CCTV cameras. ****ing fascists. Anne's Clar Der Kommissar. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Focal length of Sun's gravitational lens
On Mar 6, 4:31*pm, wrote:
I have been thinking this through quite hard, but I got nowhere I know that stars and nebulae close to the solar disk in the sky get warped in their position because general relativity dictates that the Sun's gravitational field can perturb the path of the rays. But the question I have is can the Sun's gravitational field act as a magnifier to focus more of the light from stars onto the earth? Does the Sun's gravitational lens have a focal length of 1 astronomical unit? If so how many degrees does a star have to be within from the center of the solar disk in order for its magnified image to be focused upon the Earth? I'd really apprecite any advice to me. Cordially invited replies. Thank you! Thank you! ) There are two other people around here from the UK, I am not one of them. 92 percent opposed the Iraq war, and over time that number moved sharply toward 100 percent, currently at 99.9 percent and 0.1 percent are still playing secret government crab and CCTV Der Kommissar. Is it for the government? I poop in your society's big brother. Suck Ceausescu buttcrack. I am watching you English. This is not racist South Africa where people can be institutionally followed. CCTV cameras allow use of remote control to follow people on one's home television set through networked CCTV cameras. ****ing fascists. Anne's Clar Der Kommissar. Everybody in entire Europe who mention current politics and New Direction mention the UK based CCTV in their first sentence. Don't you hate your ****ing Nazi country? I told East Germans before the wall came down, I tell you. East Germans were silent. I told them. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Focal length of Sun's gravitational lens | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 20 | March 13th 09 06:38 PM |
Helping finding a converging lens with focal length of several feet | Dave[_11_] | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | April 30th 07 10:12 AM |
Recoated lens, focal length changed | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 11 | March 14th 06 06:17 PM |
Eyepiece Focal Length? | David Neal Minnick | Amateur Astronomy | 21 | December 31st 03 06:04 PM |
Scope focal length vs Eyepiece focal length | PS Surfer | Misc | 2 | September 23rd 03 12:57 AM |