THREE FRAUDS THAT KILLED PHYSICS

"Androcles" wrote in message
k...

"Randy Poe" wrote in message
ups.com...
: On Aug 29, 7:19 am, "q-bit" wrote:
: "Jeckyl" wrote
:
:
:
: "Androcles" wrote
: "q-bit" wrote
: : "Jeckyl" wrote
: : "Androcles" wrote
: : "q-bit" wrote
: :
: : : It's all clearly and verifyably proven by Steven Bryant.
: : : IMO Steven Bryant should be awarded the Nobel Prize
: : : or another Grand Prize for helping rescuing physics
: : : from the hands of Einstein charlatans.
: :
: : Oh, do come on... Bryant missed the most obvious flaw there
is,
: : you don't any equations to see it. He'd have to share the
prize
: : with hundreds of others if that idea had any merit. The guy
that
: : actually proved Einstein wrong was Georges Sagnac in 1913.
: :
: : Nonsense .. sagnac is consistent with and explained by SR ..
: : it doesn't disprove it
: :
: : Why do you lie?
:
: Because he's an idiot. Killfile the moron.
:
: I think you're talking about yourself.
:
: So .. you two are both under the delusion the sagnac somehow refutes
SR are you?
:
: SR cannot be used if there is any gravitation or
accelleration/deceleration.
:
: Incorrect. SR may have errors, but it can still be used.
: Newton's laws may have errors, but they can still be used.


Incorrect. Newton's laws may have no errors,

They do have errors .. that has been known for a LONG time now .. haven't
you caught up with the 210th century yet (let alone the 21st)?

but you cannot use then correctly,
troll.

You calling someone else a troll .. what a laugh

On Aug 29, 4:19 am, "q-bit" wrote:
"Jeckyl" wrote



"Androcles" wrote
"q-bit" wrote
: "Jeckyl" wrote
: "Androcles" wrote
: "q-bit" wrote
:
: : It's all clearly and verifyably proven by Steven Bryant.
: : IMO Steven Bryant should be awarded the Nobel Prize
: : or another Grand Prize for helping rescuing physics
: : from the hands of Einstein charlatans.
:
: Oh, do come on... Bryant missed the most obvious flaw there is,
: you don't any equations to see it. He'd have to share the prize
: with hundreds of others if that idea had any merit. The guy that
: actually proved Einstein wrong was Georges Sagnac in 1913.
:
: Nonsense .. sagnac is consistent with and explained by SR ..
: it doesn't disprove it
:
: Why do you lie?

Because he's an idiot. Killfile the moron.

I think you're talking about yourself.

So .. you two are both under the delusion the sagnac somehow refutes SR are you?

SR cannot be used if there is any gravitation

Correct

or accelleration/deceleration.

Incorrect, ****bit. Try getting into college (good luck with that,
piece of ****), you will find out that there are classes that teach
you how to useSR in accelerated frames).


On Earth both gravitation and rotation is present.
And a rotating body of course means angular accelleration.

You're an idiot. The Earth rotates with a constant angular speed
meaning that there is no "angular acceleration", little ****.


Ergo: SR is useless on Earth.

q****,

you got the things wrong again. Now, go away.