|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Younger galaxies have more "Wattage/power".
On Saturday, March 30, 2019 at 3:35:56 PM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
Ben Jacoby asked: 12.5 billion years ago, quasar J2157-3602 had the power of 695 trillion suns ( 2.66×10^41 Watts ). Today's Black Holes are much weaker. Why would you think that ? Because it's observed. Relf was there 12.5 billion years ago to observe it and has returned to keep us all informed. See why I say [I'm] STILL and idiot ? It took 12.5 billion years for the light to get here; we see it as it was then, 12.5 billion years ago. Younger galaxies have more "Wattage/power". As entropy increases, our universe is getting less "dense/hot/powerful". How long would it take light to get to us from the Sagittarius A black hole? Don't laugh. The European Southern Observatory thinks they have a picture! https://www.news.com.au/technology/s...ee5e3c4d34c873 Double-A |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rename Space Solar Power to " Wireless Power Transmission"! | John M | Policy | 8 | June 11th 10 05:32 PM |
just THREE YEARS AFTER my "CREWLESS Space Shuttle" article, theNSF """experts""" discover the idea of an unmanned Shuttle to fill the2010-2016 cargo-to-ISS (six+ years) GAP | gaetanomarano | Policy | 3 | September 15th 08 04:47 PM |
and now, Ladies and Gentlemen, the NSF "slow motion experts" have(finally) "invented" MY "Multipurpose Orbital Rescue Vehicle"... just 20 | gaetanomarano | Policy | 9 | August 30th 08 12:05 AM |