A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

50 Years Ago in Sky and Telescope



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 18th 13, 08:37 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Quadibloc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,018
Default 50 Years Ago in Sky and Telescope

In looking again at the February 2013 Sky and Telescope, on page 9,
Lawrence H. Aller is quoted as noting that many optical astronomers
were, in 1963, struggling with equipment that was a hundred years old.
(But ample funding was available for novel fields, such as radio
astronomy and space satellites.)

This somewhat puts in perspective the funding issues faced by the
astronomical community today.

John Savard
  #2  
Old January 19th 13, 04:40 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Paul Schlyter[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,344
Default 50 Years Ago in Sky and Telescope

In article 79512be1-cb35-4a31-832a-d4940ff357e9
@sb6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com, says...

In looking again at the February 2013 Sky and Telescope, on page 9,
Lawrence H. Aller is quoted as noting that many optical astronomers
were, in 1963, struggling with equipment that was a hundred years old.
(But ample funding was available for novel fields, such as radio
astronomy and space satellites.)

This somewhat puts in perspective the funding issues faced by the
astronomical community today.

John Savard


I'm currently reading the book "Giant Telescopes" by W Patrick McCray,
which describes optical astronomy from the 5-meter (200-inch) Palomar
telescope to today's giant telescopes.

The 5-meter Palomar telescope remained the world's largest optical
telescope for 28 years, from 1948 until the russian 6-meter telescope was
finished in 1976. Then it took another 17 years until the 10-meter Keck I
telescope was finished in 1993. During those years there were nine
telescopes 3 meters or larger built though.

Also, during these years, there were strong improvements in the detectors
used in the large telescopes, from traditional photographic plates to
photomultiplier tubes to today's modern CCD imaging devices. A 1-meter
telescope using a modern detector can easily outperform the 5-meter
Palomar telescope using traditional photographic plates.

  #3  
Old January 19th 13, 06:19 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
T.T.[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default 50 Years Ago in Sky and Telescope


"Paul Schlyter" wrote in message
...
In article 79512be1-cb35-4a31-832a-d4940ff357e9
@sb6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com, says...

In looking again at the February 2013 Sky and Telescope, on page 9,
Lawrence H. Aller is quoted as noting that many optical astronomers
were, in 1963, struggling with equipment that was a hundred years old.
(But ample funding was available for novel fields, such as radio
astronomy and space satellites.)

This somewhat puts in perspective the funding issues faced by the
astronomical community today.

John Savard


I'm currently reading the book "Giant Telescopes" by W Patrick McCray,
which describes optical astronomy from the 5-meter (200-inch) Palomar
telescope to today's giant telescopes.

The 5-meter Palomar telescope remained the world's largest optical
telescope for 28 years, from 1948 until the russian 6-meter telescope was
finished in 1976. Then it took another 17 years until the 10-meter Keck I
telescope was finished in 1993. During those years there were nine
telescopes 3 meters or larger built though.

Also, during these years, there were strong improvements in the detectors
used in the large telescopes, from traditional photographic plates to
photomultiplier tubes to today's modern CCD imaging devices. A 1-meter
telescope using a modern detector can easily outperform the 5-meter
Palomar telescope using traditional photographic plates.

I don't remember the year, but it was before the Palomar telescope began
operation,
an astronomer friend of the family wangled us a guided tour of the the dome.
It was awe-inspiring stuff, and the thing that impressed me the most was a
sort of clock-work drive that aimed the monster.
It was no bigger than a small refrigerator with gears and cogs no more
robust than a grandfather clock's.



  #4  
Old January 19th 13, 10:51 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
RichA[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 553
Default 50 Years Ago in Sky and Telescope

On Jan 19, 12:19*am, "T.T." wrote:
"Paul Schlyter" wrote in message

...







In article 79512be1-cb35-4a31-832a-d4940ff357e9
@sb6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com, says...


In looking again at the February 2013 Sky and Telescope, on page 9,
Lawrence H. Aller is quoted as noting that many optical astronomers
were, in 1963, struggling with equipment that was a hundred years old.
(But ample funding was available for novel fields, such as radio
astronomy and space satellites.)


This somewhat puts in perspective the funding issues faced by the
astronomical community today.


John Savard


I'm currently reading the book "Giant Telescopes" by W Patrick McCray,
which describes optical astronomy from the 5-meter (200-inch) Palomar
telescope to today's giant telescopes.


The 5-meter Palomar telescope remained the world's largest optical
telescope for 28 years, from 1948 until the russian 6-meter telescope was
finished in 1976. Then it took another 17 years until the 10-meter Keck I
telescope was finished in 1993. *During those years there were nine
telescopes 3 meters or larger built though.


Also, during these years, there were strong improvements in the detectors
used in the large telescopes, from traditional photographic plates to
photomultiplier tubes to today's modern CCD imaging devices. *A 1-meter
telescope using a modern detector can easily outperform the 5-meter
Palomar telescope using traditional photographic plates.


I don't remember the year, but it was before the Palomar telescope began
operation,
an astronomer friend of the family wangled us a guided tour of the the dome.
It was awe-inspiring stuff, and the thing that impressed me the most was a
sort of clock-work drive that aimed the monster.
It was no bigger than a small refrigerator with gears and cogs no more
robust than a grandfather clock's.


Massive telescopes now and to come, incredible detectors, image
stabilization. Professional telescopes seem to have weathered bad
economics well enough, which is good.


  #5  
Old January 19th 13, 11:00 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Thomas Womack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 206
Default 50 Years Ago in Sky and Telescope

In article ,
Paul Schlyter wrote:
In article 79512be1-cb35-4a31-832a-d4940ff357e9
, says...

In looking again at the February 2013 Sky and Telescope, on page 9,
Lawrence H. Aller is quoted as noting that many optical astronomers
were, in 1963, struggling with equipment that was a hundred years old.
(But ample funding was available for novel fields, such as radio
astronomy and space satellites.)

This somewhat puts in perspective the funding issues faced by the
astronomical community today.

John Savard


I'm currently reading the book "Giant Telescopes" by W Patrick McCray,
which describes optical astronomy from the 5-meter (200-inch) Palomar
telescope to today's giant telescopes.

The 5-meter Palomar telescope remained the world's largest optical
telescope for 28 years, from 1948 until the russian 6-meter telescope was
finished in 1976. Then it took another 17 years until the 10-meter Keck I
telescope was finished in 1993. During those years there were nine
telescopes 3 meters or larger built though.


And it's going to be the better part of another 28 years from first
light at Keck I to first light at the EELT, with nine eight-metre
scopes built in the interim; it looks as if that's just how astronomy
works.

GTC opened in 2007 but is only marginally bigger than Keck, and it
looks as if instrument development was very badly hit by Spain's
financial trouble; it's being used, but there aren't all that many
papers coming out

http://arxiv.org/find/all/1/all:+AND.../0/1/0/all/0/1

and it doesn't have the fancy adaptive optics required to compete in
high-resolution ground-based astronomy, or the incredibly stable
spectroscopes required to compete in exoplanet-hunting, or the
wide-field imagers required to compete in lensing-based cosmology.

I don't know if it's quite fair to compare GTC to Keck as if comparing
the Russian BTA with Palomar, but it seems tempting.

Tom
  #6  
Old January 22nd 13, 08:03 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Father Haskell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 118
Default 50 Years Ago in Sky and Telescope

On Jan 19, 12:19*am, "T.T." wrote:
"Paul Schlyter" wrote in message

...







In article 79512be1-cb35-4a31-832a-d4940ff357e9
@sb6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com, says...


In looking again at the February 2013 Sky and Telescope, on page 9,
Lawrence H. Aller is quoted as noting that many optical astronomers
were, in 1963, struggling with equipment that was a hundred years old.
(But ample funding was available for novel fields, such as radio
astronomy and space satellites.)


This somewhat puts in perspective the funding issues faced by the
astronomical community today.


John Savard


I'm currently reading the book "Giant Telescopes" by W Patrick McCray,
which describes optical astronomy from the 5-meter (200-inch) Palomar
telescope to today's giant telescopes.


The 5-meter Palomar telescope remained the world's largest optical
telescope for 28 years, from 1948 until the russian 6-meter telescope was
finished in 1976. Then it took another 17 years until the 10-meter Keck I
telescope was finished in 1993. *During those years there were nine
telescopes 3 meters or larger built though.


Also, during these years, there were strong improvements in the detectors
used in the large telescopes, from traditional photographic plates to
photomultiplier tubes to today's modern CCD imaging devices. *A 1-meter
telescope using a modern detector can easily outperform the 5-meter
Palomar telescope using traditional photographic plates.


I don't remember the year, but it was before the Palomar telescope began
operation,
an astronomer friend of the family wangled us a guided tour of the the dome.
It was awe-inspiring stuff, and the thing that impressed me the most was a
sort of clock-work drive that aimed the monster.
It was no bigger than a small refrigerator with gears and cogs no more
robust than a grandfather clock's.


Isn't it supposed to be so perfectly balanced that it can be moved
with finger pressure?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PBS: 400 Years of the Telescope Rick033050 Amateur Astronomy 20 April 27th 09 11:09 AM
Two years of amazing discoveries for Canada's "Humble Space Telescope" Jacques van Oene News 0 July 1st 05 09:20 AM
[AD} 35 years of Sky & Telescope Magazine for sale Morgoth Amateur Astronomy 12 August 17th 03 07:37 PM
[AD} 35 years of Sky & Telescope Magazine for sale Morgoth UK Astronomy 2 August 6th 03 06:18 AM
Light Years and telescope question YFC747 Misc 2 June 25th 03 08:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.